Fixed diagnostics for coroutines with () as input.
This commit is contained in:
parent
7042c269c1
commit
986e20d5bb
@ -2635,49 +2635,47 @@ fn report_signature_mismatch_error(
|
||||
// This shouldn't be common unless manually implementing one of the
|
||||
// traits manually, but don't make it more confusing when it does
|
||||
// happen.
|
||||
Ok(
|
||||
if Some(expected_trait_ref.def_id) != self.tcx.lang_items().coroutine_trait()
|
||||
&& not_tupled
|
||||
{
|
||||
self.report_and_explain_type_error(
|
||||
TypeTrace::trait_refs(
|
||||
&obligation.cause,
|
||||
true,
|
||||
expected_trait_ref,
|
||||
found_trait_ref,
|
||||
),
|
||||
ty::error::TypeError::Mismatch,
|
||||
)
|
||||
} else if found.len() == expected.len() {
|
||||
self.report_closure_arg_mismatch(
|
||||
span,
|
||||
found_span,
|
||||
found_trait_ref,
|
||||
expected_trait_ref,
|
||||
obligation.cause.code(),
|
||||
found_node,
|
||||
obligation.param_env,
|
||||
)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
let (closure_span, closure_arg_span, found) = found_did
|
||||
.and_then(|did| {
|
||||
let node = self.tcx.hir().get_if_local(did)?;
|
||||
let (found_span, closure_arg_span, found) =
|
||||
self.get_fn_like_arguments(node)?;
|
||||
Some((Some(found_span), closure_arg_span, found))
|
||||
})
|
||||
.unwrap_or((found_span, None, found));
|
||||
if Some(expected_trait_ref.def_id) != self.tcx.lang_items().coroutine_trait() && not_tupled
|
||||
{
|
||||
return Ok(self.report_and_explain_type_error(
|
||||
TypeTrace::trait_refs(&obligation.cause, true, expected_trait_ref, found_trait_ref),
|
||||
ty::error::TypeError::Mismatch,
|
||||
));
|
||||
}
|
||||
if found.len() != expected.len() {
|
||||
let (closure_span, closure_arg_span, found) = found_did
|
||||
.and_then(|did| {
|
||||
let node = self.tcx.hir().get_if_local(did)?;
|
||||
let (found_span, closure_arg_span, found) = self.get_fn_like_arguments(node)?;
|
||||
Some((Some(found_span), closure_arg_span, found))
|
||||
})
|
||||
.unwrap_or((found_span, None, found));
|
||||
|
||||
self.report_arg_count_mismatch(
|
||||
// If the coroutine take a single () as its argument,
|
||||
// the trait argument would found the coroutine take 0 arguments,
|
||||
// but get_fn_like_arguments would give 1 argument.
|
||||
// This would result in "Expected to take 1 argument, but it takes 1 argument".
|
||||
// Check again to avoid this.
|
||||
if found.len() != expected.len() {
|
||||
return Ok(self.report_arg_count_mismatch(
|
||||
span,
|
||||
closure_span,
|
||||
expected,
|
||||
found,
|
||||
found_trait_ty.is_closure(),
|
||||
closure_arg_span,
|
||||
)
|
||||
},
|
||||
)
|
||||
));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
Ok(self.report_closure_arg_mismatch(
|
||||
span,
|
||||
found_span,
|
||||
found_trait_ref,
|
||||
expected_trait_ref,
|
||||
obligation.cause.code(),
|
||||
found_node,
|
||||
obligation.param_env,
|
||||
))
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Given some node representing a fn-like thing in the HIR map,
|
||||
|
11
tests/ui/coroutine/arg-count-mismatch-on-unit-input.rs
Normal file
11
tests/ui/coroutine/arg-count-mismatch-on-unit-input.rs
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
|
||||
#![feature(coroutines, coroutine_trait, stmt_expr_attributes)]
|
||||
|
||||
use std::ops::Coroutine;
|
||||
|
||||
fn foo() -> impl Coroutine<u8> {
|
||||
//~^ ERROR type mismatch in coroutine arguments
|
||||
#[coroutine]
|
||||
|_: ()| {}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn main() { }
|
15
tests/ui/coroutine/arg-count-mismatch-on-unit-input.stderr
Normal file
15
tests/ui/coroutine/arg-count-mismatch-on-unit-input.stderr
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
|
||||
error[E0631]: type mismatch in coroutine arguments
|
||||
--> $DIR/arg-count-mismatch-on-unit-input.rs:5:13
|
||||
|
|
||||
LL | fn foo() -> impl Coroutine<u8> {
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ expected due to this
|
||||
...
|
||||
LL | |_: ()| {}
|
||||
| ------- found signature defined here
|
||||
|
|
||||
= note: expected coroutine signature `fn(u8) -> _`
|
||||
found coroutine signature `fn(()) -> _`
|
||||
|
||||
error: aborting due to 1 previous error
|
||||
|
||||
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0631`.
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user