Update #[deriving] documentation.

Syntax and a few fixed bugs etc.
This commit is contained in:
Huon Wilson 2015-01-13 00:00:19 +11:00
parent 486f60df87
commit 933303413e

View File

@ -21,13 +21,7 @@
//! (e.g. `Option<T>`), the parameters are automatically given the
//! current trait as a bound. (This includes separate type parameters
//! and lifetimes for methods.)
//! - Additional bounds on the type parameters, e.g. the `Ord` instance
//! requires an explicit `PartialEq` bound at the
//! moment. (`TraitDef.additional_bounds`)
//!
//! Unsupported: FIXME #6257: calling methods on reference fields,
//! e.g. derive Eq/Ord/Clone don't work on `struct A(&int)`,
//! because of how the auto-dereferencing happens.
//! - Additional bounds on the type parameters (`TraitDef.additional_bounds`)
//!
//! The most important thing for implementers is the `Substructure` and
//! `SubstructureFields` objects. The latter groups 5 possibilities of the
@ -79,6 +73,15 @@
//! enums (one for each variant). For empty struct and empty enum
//! variants, it is represented as a count of 0.
//!
//! # "`cs`" functions
//!
//! The `cs_...` functions ("combine substructure) are designed to
//! make life easier by providing some pre-made recipes for common
//! tasks; mostly calling the function being derived on all the
//! arguments and then combining them back together in some way (or
//! letting the user chose that). They are not meant to be the only
//! way to handle the structures that this code creates.
//!
//! # Examples
//!
//! The following simplified `PartialEq` is used for in-code examples:
@ -102,22 +105,22 @@
//! When generating the `expr` for the `A` impl, the `SubstructureFields` is
//!
//! ```{.text}
//! Struct(~[FieldInfo {
//! Struct(vec![FieldInfo {
//! span: <span of x>
//! name: Some(<ident of x>),
//! self_: <expr for &self.x>,
//! other: ~[<expr for &other.x]
//! other: vec![<expr for &other.x]
//! }])
//! ```
//!
//! For the `B` impl, called with `B(a)` and `B(b)`,
//!
//! ```{.text}
//! Struct(~[FieldInfo {
//! Struct(vec![FieldInfo {
//! span: <span of `int`>,
//! name: None,
//! <expr for &a>
//! ~[<expr for &b>]
//! self_: <expr for &a>
//! other: vec![<expr for &b>]
//! }])
//! ```
//!
@ -128,11 +131,11 @@
//!
//! ```{.text}
//! EnumMatching(0, <ast::Variant for C0>,
//! ~[FieldInfo {
//! vec![FieldInfo {
//! span: <span of int>
//! name: None,
//! self_: <expr for &a>,
//! other: ~[<expr for &b>]
//! other: vec![<expr for &b>]
//! }])
//! ```
//!
@ -140,11 +143,11 @@
//!
//! ```{.text}
//! EnumMatching(1, <ast::Variant for C1>,
//! ~[FieldInfo {
//! vec![FieldInfo {
//! span: <span of x>
//! name: Some(<ident of x>),
//! self_: <expr for &self.x>,
//! other: ~[<expr for &other.x>]
//! other: vec![<expr for &other.x>]
//! }])
//! ```
//!
@ -152,7 +155,7 @@
//!
//! ```{.text}
//! EnumNonMatchingCollapsed(
//! ~[<ident of self>, <ident of __arg_1>],
//! vec![<ident of self>, <ident of __arg_1>],
//! &[<ast::Variant for C0>, <ast::Variant for C1>],
//! &[<ident for self index value>, <ident of __arg_1 index value>])
//! ```
@ -168,16 +171,16 @@
//!
//! ## Static
//!
//! A static method on the above would result in,
//! A static method on the types above would result in,
//!
//! ```{.text}
//! StaticStruct(<ast::StructDef of A>, Named(~[(<ident of x>, <span of x>)]))
//! StaticStruct(<ast::StructDef of A>, Named(vec![(<ident of x>, <span of x>)]))
//!
//! StaticStruct(<ast::StructDef of B>, Unnamed(~[<span of x>]))
//! StaticStruct(<ast::StructDef of B>, Unnamed(vec![<span of x>]))
//!
//! StaticEnum(<ast::EnumDef of C>, ~[(<ident of C0>, <span of C0>, Unnamed(~[<span of int>])),
//! (<ident of C1>, <span of C1>,
//! Named(~[(<ident of x>, <span of x>)]))])
//! StaticEnum(<ast::EnumDef of C>,
//! vec![(<ident of C0>, <span of C0>, Unnamed(vec![<span of int>])),
//! (<ident of C1>, <span of C1>, Named(vec![(<ident of x>, <span of x>)]))])
//! ```
pub use self::StaticFields::*;
@ -1378,7 +1381,7 @@ pub fn cs_fold<F>(use_foldl: bool,
/// process the collected results. i.e.
///
/// ```
/// f(cx, span, ~[self_1.method(__arg_1_1, __arg_2_1),
/// f(cx, span, vec![self_1.method(__arg_1_1, __arg_2_1),
/// self_2.method(__arg_1_2, __arg_2_2)])
/// ```
#[inline]