Support generic type
This commit is contained in:
parent
16e53c9868
commit
8cb2ec804d
@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> LateLintPass<'a, 'tcx> for AssignOps {
|
||||
let hir::Item_::ItemImpl(_, _, _, Some(ref trait_ref), _, _) = item.node,
|
||||
trait_ref.path.def.def_id() == trait_id
|
||||
], { return; }}
|
||||
implements_trait($cx, $ty, trait_id, vec![$rty])
|
||||
implements_trait($cx, $ty, trait_id, &[$rty], None)
|
||||
},)*
|
||||
_ => false,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -724,7 +724,7 @@ fn lint_or_fun_call(cx: &LateContext, expr: &hir::Expr, name: &str, args: &[hir:
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
if implements_trait(cx, arg_ty, default_trait_id, Vec::new()) {
|
||||
if implements_trait(cx, arg_ty, default_trait_id, &[], None) {
|
||||
span_lint_and_then(cx,
|
||||
OR_FUN_CALL,
|
||||
span,
|
||||
@ -1268,7 +1268,7 @@ fn get_error_type<'a>(cx: &LateContext, ty: ty::Ty<'a>) -> Option<ty::Ty<'a>> {
|
||||
/// This checks whether a given type is known to implement Debug.
|
||||
fn has_debug_impl<'a, 'b>(ty: ty::Ty<'a>, cx: &LateContext<'b, 'a>) -> bool {
|
||||
match cx.tcx.lang_items.debug_trait() {
|
||||
Some(debug) => implements_trait(cx, ty, debug, Vec::new()),
|
||||
Some(debug) => implements_trait(cx, ty, debug, &[], None),
|
||||
None => false,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -420,7 +420,7 @@ fn check_to_owned(cx: &LateContext, expr: &Expr, other: &Expr, left: bool, op: S
|
||||
None => return,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
if !implements_trait(cx, arg_ty, partial_eq_trait_id, vec![other_ty]) {
|
||||
if !implements_trait(cx, arg_ty, partial_eq_trait_id, &[other_ty], None) {
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> LateLintPass<'a, 'tcx> for NewWithoutDefault {
|
||||
self_ty.walk_shallow().next().is_none(), // implements_trait does not work with generics
|
||||
same_tys(cx, self_ty, return_ty(cx, id), id),
|
||||
let Some(default_trait_id) = get_trait_def_id(cx, &paths::DEFAULT_TRAIT),
|
||||
!implements_trait(cx, self_ty, default_trait_id, Vec::new())
|
||||
!implements_trait(cx, self_ty, default_trait_id, &[], None)
|
||||
], {
|
||||
if let Some(sp) = can_derive_default(self_ty, cx, default_trait_id) {
|
||||
span_lint_and_then(cx,
|
||||
@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ fn can_derive_default<'t, 'c>(ty: ty::Ty<'t>, cx: &LateContext<'c, 't>, default_
|
||||
ty::TyAdt(adt_def, substs) if adt_def.is_struct() => {
|
||||
for field in adt_def.all_fields() {
|
||||
let f_ty = field.ty(cx.tcx, substs);
|
||||
if !implements_trait(cx, f_ty, default_trait_id, Vec::new()) {
|
||||
if !implements_trait(cx, f_ty, default_trait_id, &[], None) {
|
||||
return None;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
|
||||
use rustc::lint::*;
|
||||
use rustc::hir::*;
|
||||
use utils::{paths, is_direct_expn_of, get_trait_def_id, implements_trait, span_lint};
|
||||
use utils::{is_direct_expn_of, implements_trait, span_lint};
|
||||
|
||||
/// **What it does:** Checks for `assert!(x == y)` which can be written better
|
||||
/// as `assert_eq!(x, y)` if `x` and `y` implement `Debug` trait.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// **Why is this bad?** `assert_eq` provides better assertion failure reporting.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// **Known problems:** None.
|
||||
/// **Known problems:** Hopefully none.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// **Example:**
|
||||
/// ```rust
|
||||
@ -45,13 +45,19 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> LateLintPass<'a, 'tcx> for ShouldAssertEq {
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
let debug_trait = get_trait_def_id(cx, &paths::DEBUG_TRAIT)
|
||||
.expect("cannot find Debug trait");
|
||||
let debug_trait = if let Some(t) = cx.tcx.lang_items.debug_trait() {
|
||||
t
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
return;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
let ty1 = cx.tables.expr_ty(expr1);
|
||||
let ty2 = cx.tables.expr_ty(expr2);
|
||||
if implements_trait(cx, ty1, debug_trait, vec![]) &&
|
||||
implements_trait(cx, ty2, debug_trait, vec![]) {
|
||||
|
||||
let parent = cx.tcx.hir.get_parent(e.id);
|
||||
|
||||
if implements_trait(cx, ty1, debug_trait, &[], Some(parent)) &&
|
||||
implements_trait(cx, ty2, debug_trait, &[], Some(parent)) {
|
||||
span_lint(cx, SHOULD_ASSERT_EQ, e.span, "use `assert_eq` for better reporting");
|
||||
}
|
||||
}}
|
||||
|
@ -317,13 +317,19 @@ pub fn implements_trait<'a, 'tcx>(
|
||||
cx: &LateContext<'a, 'tcx>,
|
||||
ty: ty::Ty<'tcx>,
|
||||
trait_id: DefId,
|
||||
ty_params: Vec<ty::Ty<'tcx>>
|
||||
ty_params: &[ty::Ty<'tcx>],
|
||||
parent_node_id: Option<NodeId>
|
||||
) -> bool {
|
||||
cx.tcx.populate_implementations_for_trait_if_necessary(trait_id);
|
||||
|
||||
let ty = cx.tcx.erase_regions(&ty);
|
||||
cx.tcx.infer_ctxt((), Reveal::All).enter(|infcx| {
|
||||
let obligation = cx.tcx.predicate_for_trait_def(traits::ObligationCause::dummy(), trait_id, 0, ty, &ty_params);
|
||||
let mut b = if let Some(id) = parent_node_id {
|
||||
cx.tcx.infer_ctxt(BodyId { node_id: id }, Reveal::All)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
cx.tcx.infer_ctxt((), Reveal::All)
|
||||
};
|
||||
b.enter(|infcx| {
|
||||
let obligation = cx.tcx.predicate_for_trait_def(traits::ObligationCause::dummy(), trait_id, 0, ty, ty_params);
|
||||
|
||||
traits::SelectionContext::new(&infcx).evaluate_obligation_conservatively(&obligation)
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
@ -15,7 +15,6 @@ pub const CMP_MIN: [&'static str; 3] = ["core", "cmp", "min"];
|
||||
pub const COW: [&'static str; 3] = ["collections", "borrow", "Cow"];
|
||||
pub const CSTRING_NEW: [&'static str; 5] = ["std", "ffi", "c_str", "CString", "new"];
|
||||
pub const DEBUG_FMT_METHOD: [&'static str; 4] = ["core", "fmt", "Debug", "fmt"];
|
||||
pub const DEBUG_TRAIT: [&'static str; 3] = ["core", "fmt", "Debug"];
|
||||
pub const DEFAULT_TRAIT: [&'static str; 3] = ["core", "default", "Default"];
|
||||
pub const DISPLAY_FMT_METHOD: [&'static str; 4] = ["core", "fmt", "Display", "fmt"];
|
||||
pub const DROP: [&'static str; 3] = ["core", "mem", "drop"];
|
||||
|
@ -13,4 +13,11 @@ fn main() {
|
||||
assert!(1 == 2);
|
||||
assert!(Debug(1) == Debug(2));
|
||||
assert!(NonDebug(1) == NonDebug(1)); // ok
|
||||
|
||||
test_generic(1, 2, 3, 4);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn test_generic<T: std::fmt::Debug + Eq, U: Eq>(x: T, y: T, z: U, w: U) {
|
||||
assert!(x == y);
|
||||
assert!(z == w); // ok
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -19,5 +19,13 @@ error: use `assert_eq` for better reporting
|
||||
|
|
||||
= note: this error originates in a macro outside of the current crate
|
||||
|
||||
error: aborting due to 2 previous errors
|
||||
error: use `assert_eq` for better reporting
|
||||
--> $DIR/should_assert_eq.rs:21:5
|
||||
|
|
||||
21 | assert!(x == y);
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
|
|
||||
= note: this error originates in a macro outside of the current crate
|
||||
|
||||
error: aborting due to 3 previous errors
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user