Assert that we don't capture escaping bound vars in Fn trait selection
This commit is contained in:
parent
5dfb4b0afa
commit
8927135274
@ -693,16 +693,19 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx> {
|
||||
|
||||
let gen_sig = substs.as_generator().poly_sig();
|
||||
|
||||
// (1) Feels icky to skip the binder here, but OTOH we know
|
||||
// that the self-type is an generator type and hence is
|
||||
// NOTE: The self-type is a generator type and hence is
|
||||
// in fact unparameterized (or at least does not reference any
|
||||
// regions bound in the obligation). Still probably some
|
||||
// refactoring could make this nicer.
|
||||
// regions bound in the obligation).
|
||||
let self_ty = obligation
|
||||
.predicate
|
||||
.self_ty()
|
||||
.no_bound_vars()
|
||||
.expect("unboxed closure type should not capture bound vars from the predicate");
|
||||
|
||||
let trait_ref = super::util::generator_trait_ref_and_outputs(
|
||||
self.tcx(),
|
||||
obligation.predicate.def_id(),
|
||||
obligation.predicate.skip_binder().self_ty(), // (1)
|
||||
self_ty,
|
||||
gen_sig,
|
||||
)
|
||||
.map_bound(|(trait_ref, ..)| trait_ref);
|
||||
|
@ -2271,15 +2271,19 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx> {
|
||||
|
||||
debug!(?closure_sig);
|
||||
|
||||
// (1) Feels icky to skip the binder here, but OTOH we know
|
||||
// that the self-type is an unboxed closure type and hence is
|
||||
// NOTE: The self-type is an unboxed closure type and hence is
|
||||
// in fact unparameterized (or at least does not reference any
|
||||
// regions bound in the obligation). Still probably some
|
||||
// refactoring could make this nicer.
|
||||
// regions bound in the obligation).
|
||||
let self_ty = obligation
|
||||
.predicate
|
||||
.self_ty()
|
||||
.no_bound_vars()
|
||||
.expect("unboxed closure type should not capture bound vars from the predicate");
|
||||
|
||||
closure_trait_ref_and_return_type(
|
||||
self.tcx(),
|
||||
obligation.predicate.def_id(),
|
||||
obligation.predicate.skip_binder().self_ty(), // (1)
|
||||
self_ty,
|
||||
closure_sig,
|
||||
util::TupleArgumentsFlag::No,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
@ -298,11 +298,11 @@ pub fn closure_trait_ref_and_return_type<'tcx>(
|
||||
sig: ty::PolyFnSig<'tcx>,
|
||||
tuple_arguments: TupleArgumentsFlag,
|
||||
) -> ty::Binder<'tcx, (ty::TraitRef<'tcx>, Ty<'tcx>)> {
|
||||
assert!(!self_ty.has_escaping_bound_vars());
|
||||
let arguments_tuple = match tuple_arguments {
|
||||
TupleArgumentsFlag::No => sig.skip_binder().inputs()[0],
|
||||
TupleArgumentsFlag::Yes => tcx.intern_tup(sig.skip_binder().inputs()),
|
||||
};
|
||||
debug_assert!(!self_ty.has_escaping_bound_vars());
|
||||
let trait_ref = tcx.mk_trait_ref(fn_trait_def_id, [self_ty, arguments_tuple]);
|
||||
sig.map_bound(|sig| (trait_ref, sig.output()))
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ pub fn generator_trait_ref_and_outputs<'tcx>(
|
||||
self_ty: Ty<'tcx>,
|
||||
sig: ty::PolyGenSig<'tcx>,
|
||||
) -> ty::Binder<'tcx, (ty::TraitRef<'tcx>, Ty<'tcx>, Ty<'tcx>)> {
|
||||
debug_assert!(!self_ty.has_escaping_bound_vars());
|
||||
assert!(!self_ty.has_escaping_bound_vars());
|
||||
let trait_ref = tcx.mk_trait_ref(fn_trait_def_id, [self_ty, sig.skip_binder().resume_ty]);
|
||||
sig.map_bound(|sig| (trait_ref, sig.yield_ty, sig.return_ty))
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ pub fn future_trait_ref_and_outputs<'tcx>(
|
||||
self_ty: Ty<'tcx>,
|
||||
sig: ty::PolyGenSig<'tcx>,
|
||||
) -> ty::Binder<'tcx, (ty::TraitRef<'tcx>, Ty<'tcx>)> {
|
||||
debug_assert!(!self_ty.has_escaping_bound_vars());
|
||||
assert!(!self_ty.has_escaping_bound_vars());
|
||||
let trait_ref = tcx.mk_trait_ref(fn_trait_def_id, [self_ty]);
|
||||
sig.map_bound(|sig| (trait_ref, sig.return_ty))
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user