Rollup merge of #64357 - rust-lang:adt-docs-fix, r=varkor
`AdtDef` is an algebraic data type, not abstract data type r? @varkor
This commit is contained in:
commit
88e501e768
@ -1938,9 +1938,15 @@ pub struct FieldDef {
|
||||
pub vis: Visibility,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// The definition of an abstract data type -- a struct or enum.
|
||||
/// The definition of a user-defined type, e.g., a `struct`, `enum`, or `union`.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// These are all interned (by `intern_adt_def`) into the `adt_defs` table.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// The initialism *"Adt"* stands for an [*algebraic data type (ADT)*][adt].
|
||||
/// This is slightly wrong because `union`s are not ADTs.
|
||||
/// Moreover, Rust only allows recursive data types through indirection.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// [adt]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algebraic_data_type
|
||||
pub struct AdtDef {
|
||||
/// `DefId` of the struct, enum or union item.
|
||||
pub did: DefId,
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user