Rollup merge of #128912 - compiler-errors:do-not-recommend-impl, r=lcnr

Store `do_not_recommend`-ness in impl header

Alternative to #128674

It's less flexible, but also less invasive. Hopefully it's also performant. I'd recommend we think separately about the design for how to gate arbitrary diagnostic attributes moving forward.

compiler/rustc_hir_analysis/src/collect.rs

@@ -1700,6 +1700,8 @@ fn impl_trait_header(tcx: TyCtxt<'_>, def_id: LocalDefId) -> Option<ty::ImplTrai
             trait_ref: ty::EarlyBinder::bind(trait_ref),
             safety: impl_.safety,
             polarity: polarity_of_impl(tcx, def_id, impl_, item.span),
+            do_not_recommend: tcx.features().do_not_recommend
+                && tcx.has_attrs_with_path(def_id, &[sym::diagnostic, sym::do_not_recommend]),
         }
     })
 }

compiler/rustc_middle/src/ty/context.rs

@@ -3176,6 +3176,12 @@ pub fn impl_trait_ref(
     pub fn impl_polarity(self, def_id: impl IntoQueryParam<DefId>) -> ty::ImplPolarity {
         self.impl_trait_header(def_id).map_or(ty::ImplPolarity::Positive, |h| h.polarity)
     }
+
+    /// Whether this is a trait implementation that has `#[diagnostic::do_not_recommend]`
+    pub fn do_not_recommend_impl(self, def_id: DefId) -> bool {
+        matches!(self.def_kind(def_id), DefKind::Impl { of_trait: true })
+            && self.impl_trait_header(def_id).is_some_and(|header| header.do_not_recommend)
+    }
 }
 
 /// Parameter attributes that can only be determined by examining the body of a function instead

compiler/rustc_middle/src/ty/mod.rs

@@ -262,6 +262,7 @@ pub struct ImplTraitHeader<'tcx> {
     pub trait_ref: ty::EarlyBinder<'tcx, ty::TraitRef<'tcx>>,
     pub polarity: ImplPolarity,
     pub safety: hir::Safety,
+    pub do_not_recommend: bool,
 }
 
 #[derive(Copy, Clone, PartialEq, Eq, Debug, TypeFoldable, TypeVisitable)]

compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/error_reporting/traits/fulfillment_errors.rs

@@ -687,10 +687,7 @@ pub(super) fn apply_do_not_recommend(
         let mut applied_do_not_recommend = false;
         loop {
             if let ObligationCauseCode::ImplDerived(ref c) = base_cause {
-                if self.tcx.has_attrs_with_path(
-                    c.impl_or_alias_def_id,
-                    &[sym::diagnostic, sym::do_not_recommend],
-                ) {
+                if self.tcx.do_not_recommend_impl(c.impl_or_alias_def_id) {
                     let code = (*c.derived.parent_code).clone();
                     obligation.cause.map_code(|_| code);
                     obligation.predicate = c.derived.parent_trait_pred.upcast(self.tcx);
@@ -1629,11 +1626,7 @@ pub(super) fn report_similar_impl_candidates(
                 .tcx
                 .all_impls(def_id)
                 // ignore `do_not_recommend` items
-                .filter(|def_id| {
-                    !self
-                        .tcx
-                        .has_attrs_with_path(*def_id, &[sym::diagnostic, sym::do_not_recommend])
-                })
+                .filter(|def_id| !self.tcx.do_not_recommend_impl(*def_id))
                 // Ignore automatically derived impls and `!Trait` impls.
                 .filter_map(|def_id| self.tcx.impl_trait_header(def_id))
                 .filter_map(|header| {
@@ -1903,12 +1896,7 @@ pub(super) fn report_similar_impl_candidates(
         let impl_candidates = impl_candidates
             .into_iter()
             .cloned()
-            .filter(|cand| {
-                !self.tcx.has_attrs_with_path(
-                    cand.impl_def_id,
-                    &[sym::diagnostic, sym::do_not_recommend],
-                )
-            })
+            .filter(|cand| !self.tcx.do_not_recommend_impl(cand.impl_def_id))
             .collect::<Vec<_>>();
 
         let def_id = trait_ref.def_id();

compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/solve/fulfill.rs

@@ -13,7 +13,6 @@
 use rustc_middle::ty::error::{ExpectedFound, TypeError};
 use rustc_middle::ty::{self, TyCtxt};
 use rustc_next_trait_solver::solve::{GenerateProofTree, SolverDelegateEvalExt as _};
-use rustc_span::symbol::sym;
 
 use super::delegate::SolverDelegate;
 use super::inspect::{self, ProofTreeInferCtxtExt, ProofTreeVisitor};
@@ -440,10 +439,7 @@ fn visit_goal(&mut self, goal: &inspect::InspectGoal<'_, 'tcx>) -> Self::Result
             source: CandidateSource::Impl(impl_def_id),
             result: _,
         } = candidate.kind()
-            && goal
-                .infcx()
-                .tcx
-                .has_attrs_with_path(impl_def_id, &[sym::diagnostic, sym::do_not_recommend])
+            && goal.infcx().tcx.do_not_recommend_impl(impl_def_id)
         {
             return ControlFlow::Break(self.obligation.clone());
         }

tests/ui/diagnostic_namespace/do_not_recommend/do_not_apply_attribute_without_feature_flag.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+#![allow(unknown_or_malformed_diagnostic_attributes)]
+
+trait Foo {}
+
+#[diagnostic::do_not_recommend]
+impl<A> Foo for (A,) {}
+
+#[diagnostic::do_not_recommend]
+impl<A, B> Foo for (A, B) {}
+
+#[diagnostic::do_not_recommend]
+impl<A, B, C> Foo for (A, B, C) {}
+
+impl Foo for i32 {}
+
+fn check(a: impl Foo) {}
+
+fn main() {
+    check(());
+    //~^ ERROR the trait bound `(): Foo` is not satisfied
+}

tests/ui/diagnostic_namespace/do_not_recommend/do_not_apply_attribute_without_feature_flag.stderr

@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+error[E0277]: the trait bound `(): Foo` is not satisfied
+  --> $DIR/do_not_apply_attribute_without_feature_flag.rs:19:11
+   |
+LL |     check(());
+   |     ----- ^^ the trait `Foo` is not implemented for `()`
+   |     |
+   |     required by a bound introduced by this call
+   |
+   = help: the following other types implement trait `Foo`:
+             (A, B)
+             (A, B, C)
+             (A,)
+note: required by a bound in `check`
+  --> $DIR/do_not_apply_attribute_without_feature_flag.rs:16:18
+   |
+LL | fn check(a: impl Foo) {}
+   |                  ^^^ required by this bound in `check`
+
+error: aborting due to 1 previous error
+
+For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0277`.