Rollup merge of #112315 - lucascherzer:master, r=Nilstrieb
fix spelling error "rexport" is not valid spelling: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/re-export
This commit is contained in:
commit
7c363c22a2
@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
||||
// This crate is intentionally empty and a rexport of `rustc_driver_impl` to allow the code in
|
||||
// This crate is intentionally empty and a re-export of `rustc_driver_impl` to allow the code in
|
||||
// `rustc_driver_impl` to be compiled in parallel with other crates.
|
||||
|
||||
pub use rustc_driver_impl::*;
|
||||
|
@ -147,9 +147,9 @@ pub(crate) fn visit(mut self) -> Module<'tcx> {
|
||||
|
||||
// `#[macro_export] macro_rules!` items are reexported at the top level of the
|
||||
// crate, regardless of where they're defined. We want to document the
|
||||
// top level rexport of the macro, not its original definition, since
|
||||
// the rexport defines the path that a user will actually see. Accordingly,
|
||||
// we add the rexport as an item here, and then skip over the original
|
||||
// top level re-export of the macro, not its original definition, since
|
||||
// the re-export defines the path that a user will actually see. Accordingly,
|
||||
// we add the re-export as an item here, and then skip over the original
|
||||
// definition in `visit_item()` below.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// We also skip `#[macro_export] macro_rules!` that have already been inserted,
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user