Fix closures again (#937)

* Fix closures again

Closes #934

Oh god, the rules for parsing closures are even more messed up than I thought - whether or not there is an inner block or depends not only on if there are braces, but also if there is a return type for the closure (!) and if there are statements in the block.

* Fix overflow
This commit is contained in:
Nick Cameron 2016-04-15 20:52:08 +12:00 committed by Marcus Klaas de Vries
parent e1d33df302
commit 7a758ea20a
3 changed files with 69 additions and 14 deletions

View File

@ -313,6 +313,9 @@ pub fn rewrite_array<'a, I>(expr_iter: I,
// * the body of a closure is represented by an ast::Block, but that does not
// imply there are `{}` (unless the block is empty) (see rust issue #27872),
// * if there is a return type, then there must be braces,
// * given a closure with braces, whether that is parsed to give an inner block
// or not depends on if there is a return type and if there are statements
// in that block,
// * if the first expression in the body ends with a block (i.e., is a
// statement without needing a semi-colon), then adding or removing braces
// can change whether it is treated as an expression or statement.
@ -379,11 +382,7 @@ fn rewrite_closure(capture: ast::CaptureBy,
prefix.push_str(&ret_str);
}
assert!(body.stmts.is_empty(),
"unexpected statements in closure: `{}`",
context.snippet(span));
if body.expr.is_none() {
if body.expr.is_none() && body.stmts.is_empty() {
return Some(format!("{} {{}}", prefix));
}
@ -392,15 +391,17 @@ fn rewrite_closure(capture: ast::CaptureBy,
let budget = try_opt!(width.checked_sub(extra_offset));
// This is where we figure out whether to use braces or not.
let mut had_braces = false;
let mut had_braces = true;
let mut inner_block = body;
// If there is an inner block and we can ignore it, do so.
if body.stmts.is_empty() {
if let ast::ExprKind::Block(ref inner) = inner_block.expr.as_ref().unwrap().node {
had_braces = true;
inner_block = inner;
};
assert!(!force_block || !had_braces,
"Closure requires braces, but they weren't present. How did this parse? `{}`",
context.snippet(span));
} else if !force_block {
had_braces = false;
}
}
let try_single_line = is_simple_block(inner_block, context.codemap) &&
inner_block.rules == ast::BlockCheckMode::Default;
@ -439,7 +440,9 @@ fn rewrite_closure(capture: ast::CaptureBy,
if try_single_line && !prefix.contains('\n') {
let inner_expr = inner_block.expr.as_ref().unwrap();
// 4 = braces and spaces.
let mut rewrite = inner_expr.rewrite(context, budget - 4, offset + extra_offset);
let mut rewrite = inner_expr.rewrite(context,
try_opt!(budget.checked_sub(4)),
offset + extra_offset);
// Checks if rewrite succeeded and fits on a single line.
rewrite = and_one_line(rewrite);

View File

@ -57,3 +57,28 @@ fn issue863() {
_ => false,
} == true;
}
fn issue934() {
let hash: &Fn(&&Block) -> u64 = &|block| -> u64 {
let mut h = SpanlessHash::new(cx);
h.hash_block(block);
h.finish()
};
let hash: &Fn(&&Block) -> u64 = &|block| -> u64 {
let mut h = SpanlessHash::new(cx);
h.hash_block(block);
h.finish();
};
}
impl<'a, 'tcx: 'a> SpanlessEq<'a, 'tcx> {
pub fn eq_expr(&self, left: &Expr, right: &Expr) -> bool {
match (&left.node, &right.node) {
(&ExprBinary(l_op, ref ll, ref lr), &ExprBinary(r_op, ref rl, ref rr)) => {
l_op.node == r_op.node && self.eq_expr(ll, rl) && self.eq_expr(lr, rr) ||
swap_binop(l_op.node, ll, lr).map_or(false, |(l_op, ll, lr)| l_op == r_op.node && self.eq_expr(ll, rl) && self.eq_expr(lr, rr))
}
}
}
}

View File

@ -82,3 +82,30 @@ fn issue863() {
_ => false,
} == true;
}
fn issue934() {
let hash: &Fn(&&Block) -> u64 = &|block| -> u64 {
let mut h = SpanlessHash::new(cx);
h.hash_block(block);
h.finish()
};
let hash: &Fn(&&Block) -> u64 = &|block| -> u64 {
let mut h = SpanlessHash::new(cx);
h.hash_block(block);
h.finish();
};
}
impl<'a, 'tcx: 'a> SpanlessEq<'a, 'tcx> {
pub fn eq_expr(&self, left: &Expr, right: &Expr) -> bool {
match (&left.node, &right.node) {
(&ExprBinary(l_op, ref ll, ref lr), &ExprBinary(r_op, ref rl, ref rr)) => {
l_op.node == r_op.node && self.eq_expr(ll, rl) && self.eq_expr(lr, rr) ||
swap_binop(l_op.node, ll, lr).map_or(false, |(l_op, ll, lr)| {
l_op == r_op.node && self.eq_expr(ll, rl) && self.eq_expr(lr, rr)
})
}
}
}
}