Verify that only NeedsNonConstDrop expects promoteds
This commit is contained in:
parent
7581bae996
commit
74c6636d27
@ -46,6 +46,9 @@ pub trait Qualif {
|
||||
/// Whether this `Qualif` is cleared when a local is moved from.
|
||||
const IS_CLEARED_ON_MOVE: bool = false;
|
||||
|
||||
/// Whether this `Qualif` might be evaluated after the promotion and can encounter a promoted.
|
||||
const ALLOW_PROMOTED: bool = false;
|
||||
|
||||
/// Extracts the field of `ConstQualifs` that corresponds to this `Qualif`.
|
||||
fn in_qualifs(qualifs: &ConstQualifs) -> bool;
|
||||
|
||||
@ -129,6 +132,7 @@ pub struct NeedsNonConstDrop;
|
||||
impl Qualif for NeedsNonConstDrop {
|
||||
const ANALYSIS_NAME: &'static str = "flow_needs_nonconst_drop";
|
||||
const IS_CLEARED_ON_MOVE: bool = true;
|
||||
const ALLOW_PROMOTED: bool = true;
|
||||
|
||||
fn in_qualifs(qualifs: &ConstQualifs) -> bool {
|
||||
qualifs.needs_non_const_drop
|
||||
@ -309,11 +313,13 @@ where
|
||||
|
||||
// Check the qualifs of the value of `const` items.
|
||||
if let Some(ct) = constant.literal.const_for_ty() {
|
||||
if let ty::ConstKind::Unevaluated(ty::Unevaluated { def, substs_: _, promoted: None }) =
|
||||
ct.val
|
||||
{
|
||||
if let ty::ConstKind::Unevaluated(ty::Unevaluated { def, substs_: _, promoted }) = ct.val {
|
||||
// Use qualifs of the type for the promoted. Promoteds in MIR body should be possible
|
||||
// only for `NeedsNonConstDrop` with precise drop checking. This is the only const
|
||||
// check performed after the promotion. Verify that with an assertion.
|
||||
assert!(promoted.is_none() || Q::ALLOW_PROMOTED);
|
||||
// Don't peek inside trait associated constants.
|
||||
if cx.tcx.trait_of_item(def.did).is_none() {
|
||||
if promoted.is_none() && cx.tcx.trait_of_item(def.did).is_none() {
|
||||
let qualifs = if let Some((did, param_did)) = def.as_const_arg() {
|
||||
cx.tcx.at(constant.span).mir_const_qualif_const_arg((did, param_did))
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user