Rollup merge of #77449 - ssomers:btree_drain_filter_size_hint, r=Mark-Simulacrum
BTreeMap: comment why drain_filter's size_hint is somewhat pessimistic The `size_hint` of the `DrainFilter` iterator doesn't adjust as you iterate. This hardly seems important to me, but there has been a comparable PR #64383 in the past. I guess a scenario is that you first iterate half the map manually and keep most of the key/value pairs in the map, and then tell the predicate to drain most of the key/value pairs and `.collect` the iterator over the remaining half of the map. I am totally ambivalent whether this is better or not. r? @Mark-Simulacrum
This commit is contained in:
commit
738a41b363
@ -1783,6 +1783,10 @@ impl<'a, K: 'a, V: 'a> DrainFilterInner<'a, K, V> {
|
||||
|
||||
/// Implementation of a typical `DrainFilter::size_hint` method.
|
||||
pub(super) fn size_hint(&self) -> (usize, Option<usize>) {
|
||||
// In most of the btree iterators, `self.length` is the number of elements
|
||||
// yet to be visited. Here, it includes elements that were visited and that
|
||||
// the predicate decided not to drain. Making this upper bound more accurate
|
||||
// requires maintaining an extra field and is not worth while.
|
||||
(0, Some(*self.length))
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user