use integer assoc consts instead of methods

This commit is contained in:
Ralf Jung 2020-03-04 13:12:04 +01:00
parent 7a3700c371
commit 6db7e34ab5
4 changed files with 13 additions and 13 deletions

View File

@ -818,9 +818,9 @@ pub fn set_range_inbounds(&mut self, start: Size, end: Size, new_state: bool) {
// First set all bits except the first `bita`,
// then unset the last `64 - bitb` bits.
let range = if bitb == 0 {
u64::max_value() << bita
u64::MAX << bita
} else {
(u64::max_value() << bita) & (u64::max_value() >> (64 - bitb))
(u64::MAX << bita) & (u64::MAX >> (64 - bitb))
};
if new_state {
self.blocks[blocka] |= range;
@ -832,21 +832,21 @@ pub fn set_range_inbounds(&mut self, start: Size, end: Size, new_state: bool) {
// across block boundaries
if new_state {
// Set `bita..64` to `1`.
self.blocks[blocka] |= u64::max_value() << bita;
self.blocks[blocka] |= u64::MAX << bita;
// Set `0..bitb` to `1`.
if bitb != 0 {
self.blocks[blockb] |= u64::max_value() >> (64 - bitb);
self.blocks[blockb] |= u64::MAX >> (64 - bitb);
}
// Fill in all the other blocks (much faster than one bit at a time).
for block in (blocka + 1)..blockb {
self.blocks[block] = u64::max_value();
self.blocks[block] = u64::MAX;
}
} else {
// Set `bita..64` to `0`.
self.blocks[blocka] &= !(u64::max_value() << bita);
self.blocks[blocka] &= !(u64::MAX << bita);
// Set `0..bitb` to `0`.
if bitb != 0 {
self.blocks[blockb] &= !(u64::max_value() >> (64 - bitb));
self.blocks[blockb] &= !(u64::MAX >> (64 - bitb));
}
// Fill in all the other blocks (much faster than one bit at a time).
for block in (blocka + 1)..blockb {

View File

@ -78,9 +78,9 @@ fn overflowing_offset(&self, val: u64, i: u64) -> (u64, bool) {
fn overflowing_signed_offset(&self, val: u64, i: i128) -> (u64, bool) {
// FIXME: is it possible to over/underflow here?
if i < 0 {
// Trickery to ensure that `i64::min_value()` works fine: compute `n = -i`.
// Trickery to ensure that `i64::MIN` works fine: compute `n = -i`.
// This formula only works for true negative values; it overflows for zero!
let n = u64::max_value() - (i as u64) + 1;
let n = u64::MAX - (i as u64) + 1;
let res = val.overflowing_sub(n);
self.truncate_to_ptr(res)
} else {

View File

@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ pub fn emulate_intrinsic(
if is_add {
// max unsigned
Scalar::from_uint(
u128::max_value() >> (128 - num_bits),
u128::MAX >> (128 - num_bits),
Size::from_bits(num_bits),
)
} else {
@ -381,11 +381,11 @@ pub fn exact_div(
dest: PlaceTy<'tcx, M::PointerTag>,
) -> InterpResult<'tcx> {
// Performs an exact division, resulting in undefined behavior where
// `x % y != 0` or `y == 0` or `x == T::min_value() && y == -1`.
// `x % y != 0` or `y == 0` or `x == T::MIN && y == -1`.
// First, check x % y != 0 (or if that computation overflows).
let (res, overflow, _ty) = self.overflowing_binary_op(BinOp::Rem, a, b)?;
if overflow || res.assert_bits(a.layout.size) != 0 {
// Then, check if `b` is -1, which is the "min_value / -1" case.
// Then, check if `b` is -1, which is the "MIN / -1" case.
let minus1 = Scalar::from_int(-1, dest.layout.size);
let b_scalar = b.to_scalar().unwrap();
if b_scalar == minus1 {

View File

@ -463,7 +463,7 @@ fn visit_scalar(
let (lo, hi) = valid_range.clone().into_inner();
// Determine the allowed range
// `max_hi` is as big as the size fits
let max_hi = u128::max_value() >> (128 - op.layout.size.bits());
let max_hi = u128::MAX >> (128 - op.layout.size.bits());
assert!(hi <= max_hi);
// We could also write `(hi + 1) % (max_hi + 1) == lo` but `max_hi + 1` overflows for `u128`
if (lo == 0 && hi == max_hi) || (hi + 1 == lo) {