rewrite sanitizer-staticlib-link to rmake

This commit is contained in:
Oneirical 2024-07-22 16:34:32 -04:00
parent d22425606e
commit 62fb491028
4 changed files with 39 additions and 24 deletions

View File

@ -70,7 +70,6 @@ run-make/reproducible-build-2/Makefile
run-make/reproducible-build/Makefile
run-make/rlib-format-packed-bundled-libs-2/Makefile
run-make/rlib-format-packed-bundled-libs/Makefile
run-make/sanitizer-staticlib-link/Makefile
run-make/share-generics-dylib/Makefile
run-make/simd-ffi/Makefile
run-make/split-debuginfo/Makefile

View File

@ -1,20 +0,0 @@
# needs-sanitizer-support
# needs-sanitizer-address
include ../tools.mk
# This test first builds a staticlib with AddressSanitizer and checks that
# linking it to an executable fails due to the missing sanitizer runtime.
# It then builds an executable linking to the staticlib and checks that
# the fault in the staticlib is detected correctly.
# Note that checking for the link failure actually checks two things at once:
# 1) That the library has the sanitizer intrumentation
# 2) and that library does not have the sanitizer runtime
all:
$(RUSTC) -g -Z sanitizer=address --crate-type staticlib --target $(TARGET) library.rs
! $(CC) program.c $(call STATICLIB,library) $(call OUT_EXE,program) $(EXTRACFLAGS) $(EXTRACXXFLAGS)
$(RUSTC) -g -Z sanitizer=address --crate-type bin --target $(TARGET) -L . program.rs
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$(TMPDIR) $(TMPDIR)/program 2>&1 | $(CGREP) stack-buffer-overflow

View File

@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
// This test first builds a staticlib with AddressSanitizer and checks that
// linking it to an executable fails due to the missing sanitizer runtime.
// It then builds an executable linking to the staticlib and checks that
// the fault in the staticlib is detected correctly.
// Note that checking for the link failure actually checks two things at once:
// 1) That the library has the sanitizer intrumentation
// 2) and that library does not have the sanitizer runtime
// See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/38699
//@ needs-sanitizer-support
//@ needs-sanitizer-address
use run_make_support::{cc, extra_c_flags, extra_cxx_flags, run_fail, rustc, static_lib_name};
fn main() {
rustc().arg("-g").arg("-Zsanitizer=address").crate_type("staticlib").input("library.rs").run();
cc().input("program.c")
.arg(static_lib_name("library"))
.out_exe("program")
.args(extra_c_flags())
.args(extra_cxx_flags())
.run_fail();
rustc().arg("-g").arg("-Zsanitizer=address").crate_type("bin").input("program.rs").run();
run_fail("program").assert_stderr_contains("stack-buffer-overflow");
}

View File

@ -7,19 +7,29 @@
//@ ignore-cross-compile
// Reason: the compiled binary is executed
//FIXME(Oneirical): try on msvc, not because of an ignore but because i did wonky things
use run_make_support::{
cc, cwd, dynamic_lib_name, extra_c_flags, has_extension, rfs, run, rustc, shallow_find_files,
cc, cwd, dynamic_lib_name, extra_c_flags, has_extension, is_msvc, rfs, run, rustc,
shallow_find_files,
};
fn main() {
rustc().input("foo.rs").run();
rustc().input("bar.rs").run();
cc().input("main.c").out_exe("main").arg(dynamic_lib_name("bar")).args(extra_c_flags()).run();
// On msvc, dynamic libraries are compiled by rustc to:
// bar.dll // dylib
// bar.dll.lib // import library for the dylib
// bar.dll.exp // export library for the dylib
// msvc's underlying link.exe requires the import library for the dynamic library as input.
// That is why the library is bar.dll.lib, not bar.dll.
let library = if is_msvc() { "bar.dll.lib" } else { &dynamic_lib_name("bar") };
cc().input("main.c").out_exe("main").arg(library).args(extra_c_flags()).run();
for rlib in shallow_find_files(cwd(), |path| has_extension(path, "rlib")) {
rfs::remove_file(rlib);
}
rfs::remove_file(dynamic_lib_name("foo"));
if is_msvc() {
rfs::remove_file("foo.dll.lib");
}
run("main");
}