Rollup merge of #31351 - steveklabnik:gh31318, r=alexcrichton

This is a behavior that some find confusing, so it deserves its own example.

Fixes #31318

I think this wording might be a bit strange, but I couldn't come up with anything better. Feedback very welcome.
This commit is contained in:
Manish Goregaokar 2016-02-03 02:54:25 +05:30
commit 5540605cd6

View File

@ -1050,6 +1050,30 @@ pub trait Iterator {
/// // got a false, take_while() isn't used any more
/// assert_eq!(iter.next(), None);
/// ```
///
/// Because `take_while()` needs to look at the value in order to see if it
/// should be included or not, consuming iterators will see that it is
/// removed:
///
/// ```
/// let a = [1, 2, 3, 4];
/// let mut iter = a.into_iter();
///
/// let result: Vec<i32> = iter.by_ref()
/// .take_while(|n| **n != 3)
/// .cloned()
/// .collect();
///
/// assert_eq!(result, &[1, 2]);
///
/// let result: Vec<i32> = iter.cloned().collect();
///
/// assert_eq!(result, &[4]);
/// ```
///
/// The `3` is no longer there, because it was consumed in order to see if
/// the iteration should stop, but wasn't placed back into the iterator or
/// some similar thing.
#[inline]
#[stable(feature = "rust1", since = "1.0.0")]
fn take_while<P>(self, predicate: P) -> TakeWhile<Self, P> where