specialization_graph_of
's errored
field is used in the only call site, and used to immediately throw away the rest of the value. Let's use Result
to statically signal that this is happening
This commit is contained in:
parent
3a6bf351a3
commit
5461836281
@ -113,6 +113,7 @@ macro_rules! arena_types {
|
||||
[] stripped_cfg_items: rustc_ast::expand::StrippedCfgItem,
|
||||
[] mod_child: rustc_middle::metadata::ModChild,
|
||||
[] features: rustc_feature::Features,
|
||||
[decode] specialization_graph: rustc_middle::traits::specialization_graph::Graph,
|
||||
]);
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -1294,8 +1294,7 @@ rustc_queries! {
|
||||
desc { |tcx| "finding trait impls of `{}`", tcx.def_path_str(trait_id) }
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
query specialization_graph_of(trait_id: DefId) -> &'tcx specialization_graph::Graph {
|
||||
arena_cache
|
||||
query specialization_graph_of(trait_id: DefId) -> Result<&'tcx specialization_graph::Graph, ErrorGuaranteed> {
|
||||
desc { |tcx| "building specialization graph of trait `{}`", tcx.def_path_str(trait_id) }
|
||||
cache_on_disk_if { true }
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -786,6 +786,15 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Decodable<CacheDecoder<'a, 'tcx>> for &'tcx [rustc_ast::InlineAsm
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl<'a, 'tcx> Decodable<CacheDecoder<'a, 'tcx>>
|
||||
for &'tcx crate::traits::specialization_graph::Graph
|
||||
{
|
||||
#[inline]
|
||||
fn decode(d: &mut CacheDecoder<'a, 'tcx>) -> Self {
|
||||
RefDecodable::decode(d)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
macro_rules! impl_ref_decoder {
|
||||
(<$tcx:tt> $($ty:ty,)*) => {
|
||||
$(impl<'a, $tcx> Decodable<CacheDecoder<'a, $tcx>> for &$tcx [$ty] {
|
||||
|
@ -30,18 +30,16 @@ pub struct Graph {
|
||||
|
||||
/// The "root" impls are found by looking up the trait's def_id.
|
||||
pub children: DefIdMap<Children>,
|
||||
|
||||
/// Whether an error was emitted while constructing the graph.
|
||||
pub has_errored: Option<ErrorGuaranteed>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl Graph {
|
||||
pub fn new() -> Graph {
|
||||
Graph { parent: Default::default(), children: Default::default(), has_errored: None }
|
||||
Graph { parent: Default::default(), children: Default::default() }
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// The parent of a given impl, which is the `DefId` of the trait when the
|
||||
/// impl is a "specialization root".
|
||||
#[track_caller]
|
||||
pub fn parent(&self, child: DefId) -> DefId {
|
||||
*self.parent.get(&child).unwrap_or_else(|| panic!("Failed to get parent for {child:?}"))
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -255,13 +253,9 @@ pub fn ancestors(
|
||||
trait_def_id: DefId,
|
||||
start_from_impl: DefId,
|
||||
) -> Result<Ancestors<'_>, ErrorGuaranteed> {
|
||||
let specialization_graph = tcx.specialization_graph_of(trait_def_id);
|
||||
let specialization_graph = tcx.specialization_graph_of(trait_def_id)?;
|
||||
|
||||
if let Some(reported) = specialization_graph.has_errored {
|
||||
Err(reported)
|
||||
} else if let Err(reported) =
|
||||
tcx.type_of(start_from_impl).instantiate_identity().error_reported()
|
||||
{
|
||||
if let Err(reported) = tcx.type_of(start_from_impl).instantiate_identity().error_reported() {
|
||||
Err(reported)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
Ok(Ancestors {
|
||||
|
@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ use rustc_middle::ty::{self, ImplSubject, Ty, TyCtxt, TypeVisitableExt};
|
||||
use rustc_middle::ty::{GenericArgs, GenericArgsRef};
|
||||
use rustc_session::lint::builtin::COHERENCE_LEAK_CHECK;
|
||||
use rustc_session::lint::builtin::ORDER_DEPENDENT_TRAIT_OBJECTS;
|
||||
use rustc_span::{Span, DUMMY_SP};
|
||||
use rustc_span::{ErrorGuaranteed, Span, DUMMY_SP};
|
||||
|
||||
use super::util;
|
||||
use super::SelectionContext;
|
||||
@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ fn fulfill_implication<'tcx>(
|
||||
pub(super) fn specialization_graph_provider(
|
||||
tcx: TyCtxt<'_>,
|
||||
trait_id: DefId,
|
||||
) -> specialization_graph::Graph {
|
||||
) -> Result<&'_ specialization_graph::Graph, ErrorGuaranteed> {
|
||||
let mut sg = specialization_graph::Graph::new();
|
||||
let overlap_mode = specialization_graph::OverlapMode::get(tcx, trait_id);
|
||||
|
||||
@ -271,6 +271,8 @@ pub(super) fn specialization_graph_provider(
|
||||
trait_impls
|
||||
.sort_unstable_by_key(|def_id| (-(def_id.krate.as_u32() as i64), def_id.index.index()));
|
||||
|
||||
let mut errored = Ok(());
|
||||
|
||||
for impl_def_id in trait_impls {
|
||||
if let Some(impl_def_id) = impl_def_id.as_local() {
|
||||
// This is where impl overlap checking happens:
|
||||
@ -283,15 +285,21 @@ pub(super) fn specialization_graph_provider(
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
if let Some(overlap) = overlap {
|
||||
report_overlap_conflict(tcx, overlap, impl_def_id, used_to_be_allowed, &mut sg);
|
||||
errored = errored.and(report_overlap_conflict(
|
||||
tcx,
|
||||
overlap,
|
||||
impl_def_id,
|
||||
used_to_be_allowed,
|
||||
));
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
let parent = tcx.impl_parent(impl_def_id).unwrap_or(trait_id);
|
||||
sg.record_impl_from_cstore(tcx, parent, impl_def_id)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
errored?;
|
||||
|
||||
sg
|
||||
Ok(tcx.arena.alloc(sg))
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// This function is only used when
|
||||
@ -304,36 +312,31 @@ fn report_overlap_conflict<'tcx>(
|
||||
overlap: OverlapError<'tcx>,
|
||||
impl_def_id: LocalDefId,
|
||||
used_to_be_allowed: Option<FutureCompatOverlapErrorKind>,
|
||||
sg: &mut specialization_graph::Graph,
|
||||
) {
|
||||
) -> Result<(), ErrorGuaranteed> {
|
||||
let impl_polarity = tcx.impl_polarity(impl_def_id.to_def_id());
|
||||
let other_polarity = tcx.impl_polarity(overlap.with_impl);
|
||||
match (impl_polarity, other_polarity) {
|
||||
(ty::ImplPolarity::Negative, ty::ImplPolarity::Positive) => {
|
||||
report_negative_positive_conflict(
|
||||
Err(report_negative_positive_conflict(
|
||||
tcx,
|
||||
&overlap,
|
||||
impl_def_id,
|
||||
impl_def_id.to_def_id(),
|
||||
overlap.with_impl,
|
||||
sg,
|
||||
);
|
||||
))
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
(ty::ImplPolarity::Positive, ty::ImplPolarity::Negative) => {
|
||||
report_negative_positive_conflict(
|
||||
Err(report_negative_positive_conflict(
|
||||
tcx,
|
||||
&overlap,
|
||||
impl_def_id,
|
||||
overlap.with_impl,
|
||||
impl_def_id.to_def_id(),
|
||||
sg,
|
||||
);
|
||||
))
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
_ => {
|
||||
report_conflicting_impls(tcx, overlap, impl_def_id, used_to_be_allowed, sg);
|
||||
}
|
||||
_ => report_conflicting_impls(tcx, overlap, impl_def_id, used_to_be_allowed),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -343,16 +346,16 @@ fn report_negative_positive_conflict<'tcx>(
|
||||
local_impl_def_id: LocalDefId,
|
||||
negative_impl_def_id: DefId,
|
||||
positive_impl_def_id: DefId,
|
||||
sg: &mut specialization_graph::Graph,
|
||||
) {
|
||||
let err = tcx.dcx().create_err(NegativePositiveConflict {
|
||||
impl_span: tcx.def_span(local_impl_def_id),
|
||||
trait_desc: overlap.trait_ref,
|
||||
self_ty: overlap.self_ty,
|
||||
negative_impl_span: tcx.span_of_impl(negative_impl_def_id),
|
||||
positive_impl_span: tcx.span_of_impl(positive_impl_def_id),
|
||||
});
|
||||
sg.has_errored = Some(err.emit());
|
||||
) -> ErrorGuaranteed {
|
||||
tcx.dcx()
|
||||
.create_err(NegativePositiveConflict {
|
||||
impl_span: tcx.def_span(local_impl_def_id),
|
||||
trait_desc: overlap.trait_ref,
|
||||
self_ty: overlap.self_ty,
|
||||
negative_impl_span: tcx.span_of_impl(negative_impl_def_id),
|
||||
positive_impl_span: tcx.span_of_impl(positive_impl_def_id),
|
||||
})
|
||||
.emit()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn report_conflicting_impls<'tcx>(
|
||||
@ -360,8 +363,7 @@ fn report_conflicting_impls<'tcx>(
|
||||
overlap: OverlapError<'tcx>,
|
||||
impl_def_id: LocalDefId,
|
||||
used_to_be_allowed: Option<FutureCompatOverlapErrorKind>,
|
||||
sg: &mut specialization_graph::Graph,
|
||||
) {
|
||||
) -> Result<(), ErrorGuaranteed> {
|
||||
let impl_span = tcx.def_span(impl_def_id);
|
||||
|
||||
// Work to be done after we've built the DiagnosticBuilder. We have to define it
|
||||
@ -429,14 +431,11 @@ fn report_conflicting_impls<'tcx>(
|
||||
let mut err = tcx.dcx().struct_span_err(impl_span, msg);
|
||||
err.code(error_code!(E0119));
|
||||
decorate(tcx, &overlap, impl_span, &mut err);
|
||||
Some(err.emit())
|
||||
err.emit()
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
Some(
|
||||
tcx.dcx()
|
||||
.span_delayed_bug(impl_span, "impl should have failed the orphan check"),
|
||||
)
|
||||
tcx.dcx().span_delayed_bug(impl_span, "impl should have failed the orphan check")
|
||||
};
|
||||
sg.has_errored = reported;
|
||||
Err(reported)
|
||||
}
|
||||
Some(kind) => {
|
||||
let lint = match kind {
|
||||
@ -452,8 +451,9 @@ fn report_conflicting_impls<'tcx>(
|
||||
decorate(tcx, &overlap, impl_span, err);
|
||||
},
|
||||
);
|
||||
Ok(())
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Recovers the "impl X for Y" signature from `impl_def_id` and returns it as a
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user