Provide suggestion when using field access instead of path

When trying to access an associated constant as if it were a field of
an instance, provide a suggestion for the correct syntax.

src/librustc_resolve/error_reporting.rs

@@ -379,6 +379,14 @@ fn smart_resolve_context_dependent_help(
                                         Applicability::MaybeIncorrect
                                     );
                                 },
+                                ExprKind::Field(ref _expr, ident) => {
+                                    err.span_suggestion(
+                                        sm.start_point(parent.span).to(ident.span),
+                                        "use `::` to access an associated item",
+                                        format!("{}::{}", path_str, ident),
+                                        Applicability::MaybeIncorrect
+                                    );
+                                }
                                 _ => {
                                     err.span_label(
                                         span,

src/test/ui/suggestions/assoc-const-as-field.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+pub mod Mod {
+    pub struct Foo {}
+    impl Foo {
+        pub const BAR: usize = 42;
+    }
+}
+
+fn foo(_: usize) {}
+
+fn main() {
+    foo(Mod::Foo.Bar);
+    //~^ ERROR expected value, found
+}

src/test/ui/suggestions/assoc-const-as-field.stderr

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+error[E0423]: expected value, found struct `Mod::Foo`
+  --> $DIR/assoc-const-as-field.rs:11:9
+   |
+LL |     foo(Mod::Foo.Bar);
+   |         ^^^^^^^^----
+   |         |
+   |         help: use `::` to access an associated item: `Mod::Foo::Bar`
+
+error: aborting due to previous error
+
+For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0423`.