mikros/rust
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

compiler: use is_none_or where it is clearly better

Browse Source 
heuristic was: if it easily allows removing bangs entirely? worth it.
if it requires more effort or just moves the bang? not.
This commit is contained in:
Jubilee Young 2024-10-16 23:32:21 -07:00
parent dd5127615a
commit 47cfaa6d87
2 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
compiler/rustc_resolve/src/check_unused.rs
View File

@ -184,11 +184,11 @@ fn report_unused_extern_crate_items(
// If the extern crate isn't in the extern prelude,
// there is no way it can be written as a `use`.
if !self
if self
.r
.extern_prelude
.get(&extern_crate.ident)
.is_some_and(|entry| !entry.introduced_by_item)
.is_none_or(|entry| entry.introduced_by_item)
{
continue;
}

2
compiler/rustc_type_ir/src/search_graph/mod.rs
View File

@ -714,7 +714,7 @@ fn lookup_provisional_cache(&mut self, cx: X, input: X::Input) -> Option<X::Resu
// current goal is already part of the same cycle. This check could be
// improved but seems to be good enough for now.
let last = self.stack.raw.last().unwrap();
if !last.heads.opt_lowest_cycle_head().is_some_and(|lowest| lowest <= head) {
if last.heads.opt_lowest_cycle_head().is_none_or(|lowest| lowest > head) {
continue;
}
}