Remove some last remants of {push,pop}_unsafe!
These macros have already been removed, but there was still some code handling these macros. That code is now removed.
This commit is contained in:
parent
289ada5ed4
commit
45c55540a8
@ -1205,8 +1205,6 @@ pub struct ExprField<'hir> {
|
||||
pub enum BlockCheckMode {
|
||||
DefaultBlock,
|
||||
UnsafeBlock(UnsafeSource),
|
||||
PushUnsafeBlock(UnsafeSource),
|
||||
PopUnsafeBlock(UnsafeSource),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[derive(Copy, Clone, PartialEq, Encodable, Debug, HashStable_Generic)]
|
||||
|
@ -1070,8 +1070,6 @@ impl<'a> State<'a> {
|
||||
) {
|
||||
match blk.rules {
|
||||
hir::BlockCheckMode::UnsafeBlock(..) => self.word_space("unsafe"),
|
||||
hir::BlockCheckMode::PushUnsafeBlock(..) => self.word_space("push_unsafe"),
|
||||
hir::BlockCheckMode::PopUnsafeBlock(..) => self.word_space("pop_unsafe"),
|
||||
hir::BlockCheckMode::DefaultBlock => (),
|
||||
}
|
||||
self.maybe_print_comment(blk.span.lo());
|
||||
|
@ -494,8 +494,6 @@ impl<'tcx> Body<'tcx> {
|
||||
#[derive(Copy, Clone, PartialEq, Eq, Debug, TyEncodable, TyDecodable, HashStable)]
|
||||
pub enum Safety {
|
||||
Safe,
|
||||
/// Unsafe because of a PushUnsafeBlock
|
||||
BuiltinUnsafe,
|
||||
/// Unsafe because of an unsafe fn
|
||||
FnUnsafe,
|
||||
/// Unsafe because of an `unsafe` block
|
||||
|
@ -101,8 +101,6 @@ pub struct Block {
|
||||
pub enum BlockSafety {
|
||||
Safe,
|
||||
ExplicitUnsafe(hir::HirId),
|
||||
PushUnsafe,
|
||||
PopUnsafe,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[derive(Debug, HashStable)]
|
||||
|
@ -321,7 +321,6 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> UnsafetyChecker<'a, 'tcx> {
|
||||
}
|
||||
false
|
||||
}
|
||||
Safety::BuiltinUnsafe => true,
|
||||
Safety::ExplicitUnsafe(hir_id) => {
|
||||
// mark unsafe block as used if there are any unsafe operations inside
|
||||
if !violations.is_empty() {
|
||||
|
@ -74,8 +74,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Builder<'a, 'tcx> {
|
||||
// First we build all the statements in the block.
|
||||
let mut let_scope_stack = Vec::with_capacity(8);
|
||||
let outer_source_scope = this.source_scope;
|
||||
let outer_push_unsafe_count = this.push_unsafe_count;
|
||||
let outer_unpushed_unsafe = this.unpushed_unsafe;
|
||||
let outer_in_scope_unsafe = this.in_scope_unsafe;
|
||||
this.update_source_scope_for_safety_mode(span, safety_mode);
|
||||
|
||||
let source_info = this.source_info(span);
|
||||
@ -206,8 +205,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Builder<'a, 'tcx> {
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Restore the original source scope.
|
||||
this.source_scope = outer_source_scope;
|
||||
this.push_unsafe_count = outer_push_unsafe_count;
|
||||
this.unpushed_unsafe = outer_unpushed_unsafe;
|
||||
this.in_scope_unsafe = outer_in_scope_unsafe;
|
||||
block.unit()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -217,8 +215,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Builder<'a, 'tcx> {
|
||||
let new_unsafety = match safety_mode {
|
||||
BlockSafety::Safe => None,
|
||||
BlockSafety::ExplicitUnsafe(hir_id) => {
|
||||
assert_eq!(self.push_unsafe_count, 0);
|
||||
match self.unpushed_unsafe {
|
||||
match self.in_scope_unsafe {
|
||||
Safety::Safe => {}
|
||||
// no longer treat `unsafe fn`s as `unsafe` contexts (see RFC #2585)
|
||||
Safety::FnUnsafe
|
||||
@ -226,20 +223,9 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Builder<'a, 'tcx> {
|
||||
!= Level::Allow => {}
|
||||
_ => return,
|
||||
}
|
||||
self.unpushed_unsafe = Safety::ExplicitUnsafe(hir_id);
|
||||
self.in_scope_unsafe = Safety::ExplicitUnsafe(hir_id);
|
||||
Some(Safety::ExplicitUnsafe(hir_id))
|
||||
}
|
||||
BlockSafety::PushUnsafe => {
|
||||
self.push_unsafe_count += 1;
|
||||
Some(Safety::BuiltinUnsafe)
|
||||
}
|
||||
BlockSafety::PopUnsafe => {
|
||||
self.push_unsafe_count = self
|
||||
.push_unsafe_count
|
||||
.checked_sub(1)
|
||||
.unwrap_or_else(|| span_bug!(span, "unsafe count underflow"));
|
||||
if self.push_unsafe_count == 0 { Some(self.unpushed_unsafe) } else { None }
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
if let Some(unsafety) = new_unsafety {
|
||||
|
@ -367,12 +367,8 @@ struct Builder<'a, 'tcx> {
|
||||
/// `{ STMTS; EXPR1 } + EXPR2`.
|
||||
block_context: BlockContext,
|
||||
|
||||
/// The current unsafe block in scope, even if it is hidden by
|
||||
/// a `PushUnsafeBlock`.
|
||||
unpushed_unsafe: Safety,
|
||||
|
||||
/// The number of `push_unsafe_block` levels in scope.
|
||||
push_unsafe_count: usize,
|
||||
/// The current unsafe block in scope
|
||||
in_scope_unsafe: Safety,
|
||||
|
||||
/// The vector of all scopes that we have created thus far;
|
||||
/// we track this for debuginfo later.
|
||||
@ -877,8 +873,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Builder<'a, 'tcx> {
|
||||
source_scopes: IndexVec::new(),
|
||||
source_scope: OUTERMOST_SOURCE_SCOPE,
|
||||
guard_context: vec![],
|
||||
push_unsafe_count: 0,
|
||||
unpushed_unsafe: safety,
|
||||
in_scope_unsafe: safety,
|
||||
local_decls: IndexVec::from_elem_n(LocalDecl::new(return_ty, return_span), 1),
|
||||
canonical_user_type_annotations: IndexVec::new(),
|
||||
upvar_mutbls: vec![],
|
||||
|
@ -27,8 +27,6 @@ impl<'tcx> Cx<'tcx> {
|
||||
safety_mode: match block.rules {
|
||||
hir::BlockCheckMode::DefaultBlock => BlockSafety::Safe,
|
||||
hir::BlockCheckMode::UnsafeBlock(..) => BlockSafety::ExplicitUnsafe(block.hir_id),
|
||||
hir::BlockCheckMode::PushUnsafeBlock(..) => BlockSafety::PushUnsafe,
|
||||
hir::BlockCheckMode::PopUnsafeBlock(..) => BlockSafety::PopUnsafe,
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -174,13 +174,12 @@ impl Needs {
|
||||
pub struct UnsafetyState {
|
||||
pub def: hir::HirId,
|
||||
pub unsafety: hir::Unsafety,
|
||||
pub unsafe_push_count: u32,
|
||||
from_fn: bool,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl UnsafetyState {
|
||||
pub fn function(unsafety: hir::Unsafety, def: hir::HirId) -> UnsafetyState {
|
||||
UnsafetyState { def, unsafety, unsafe_push_count: 0, from_fn: true }
|
||||
UnsafetyState { def, unsafety, from_fn: true }
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn recurse(self, blk: &hir::Block<'_>) -> UnsafetyState {
|
||||
@ -193,19 +192,11 @@ impl UnsafetyState {
|
||||
hir::Unsafety::Unsafe if self.from_fn => self,
|
||||
|
||||
unsafety => {
|
||||
let (unsafety, def, count) = match blk.rules {
|
||||
BlockCheckMode::PushUnsafeBlock(..) => {
|
||||
(unsafety, blk.hir_id, self.unsafe_push_count.checked_add(1).unwrap())
|
||||
}
|
||||
BlockCheckMode::PopUnsafeBlock(..) => {
|
||||
(unsafety, blk.hir_id, self.unsafe_push_count.checked_sub(1).unwrap())
|
||||
}
|
||||
BlockCheckMode::UnsafeBlock(..) => {
|
||||
(hir::Unsafety::Unsafe, blk.hir_id, self.unsafe_push_count)
|
||||
}
|
||||
BlockCheckMode::DefaultBlock => (unsafety, self.def, self.unsafe_push_count),
|
||||
let (unsafety, def) = match blk.rules {
|
||||
BlockCheckMode::UnsafeBlock(..) => (hir::Unsafety::Unsafe, blk.hir_id),
|
||||
BlockCheckMode::DefaultBlock => (unsafety, self.def),
|
||||
};
|
||||
UnsafetyState { def, unsafety, unsafe_push_count: count, from_fn: false }
|
||||
UnsafetyState { def, unsafety, from_fn: false }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -411,9 +411,7 @@ impl<'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for UnsafeVisitor<'_, 'tcx> {
|
||||
|
||||
if let ExprKind::Block(block, _) = expr.kind {
|
||||
match block.rules {
|
||||
BlockCheckMode::UnsafeBlock(UnsafeSource::UserProvided)
|
||||
| BlockCheckMode::PushUnsafeBlock(UnsafeSource::UserProvided)
|
||||
| BlockCheckMode::PopUnsafeBlock(UnsafeSource::UserProvided) => {
|
||||
BlockCheckMode::UnsafeBlock(UnsafeSource::UserProvided) => {
|
||||
self.has_unsafe = true;
|
||||
},
|
||||
_ => {},
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user