new lint: implied_bounds_in_impl

This commit is contained in:
y21 2023-08-20 01:20:29 +02:00
parent 4932d05733
commit 42bd6d7af3
6 changed files with 161 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@ -4985,6 +4985,7 @@ Released 2018-09-13
[`implicit_return`]: https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#implicit_return
[`implicit_saturating_add`]: https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#implicit_saturating_add
[`implicit_saturating_sub`]: https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#implicit_saturating_sub
[`implied_bounds_in_impl`]: https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#implied_bounds_in_impl
[`impossible_comparisons`]: https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#impossible_comparisons
[`imprecise_flops`]: https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#imprecise_flops
[`inconsistent_digit_grouping`]: https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#inconsistent_digit_grouping

View File

@ -209,6 +209,7 @@
crate::implicit_return::IMPLICIT_RETURN_INFO,
crate::implicit_saturating_add::IMPLICIT_SATURATING_ADD_INFO,
crate::implicit_saturating_sub::IMPLICIT_SATURATING_SUB_INFO,
crate::implied_bounds_in_impl::IMPLIED_BOUNDS_IN_IMPL_INFO,
crate::inconsistent_struct_constructor::INCONSISTENT_STRUCT_CONSTRUCTOR_INFO,
crate::incorrect_impls::INCORRECT_CLONE_IMPL_ON_COPY_TYPE_INFO,
crate::incorrect_impls::INCORRECT_PARTIAL_ORD_IMPL_ON_ORD_TYPE_INFO,

View File

@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
use clippy_utils::diagnostics::span_lint;
use rustc_hir::def_id::LocalDefId;
use rustc_hir::intravisit::FnKind;
use rustc_hir::{Body, FnDecl, FnRetTy, GenericArgs, GenericBound, ItemKind, TraitBoundModifier, TyKind};
use rustc_lint::{LateContext, LateLintPass};
use rustc_middle::ty::ClauseKind;
use rustc_session::{declare_lint_pass, declare_tool_lint};
use rustc_span::Span;
declare_clippy_lint! {
/// ### What it does
/// Looks for bounds in `impl Trait` in return position that are implied by other bounds.
/// This is usually the case when a supertrait is explicitly specified, when it is already implied
/// by a subtrait (e.g. `DerefMut: Deref`, so specifying `Deref` is unnecessary when `DerefMut` is specified).
///
/// ### Why is this bad?
/// Unnecessary complexity.
///
/// ### Known problems
/// This lint currently does not work with generic traits (i.e. will not lint even if redundant).
///
/// ### Example
/// ```rust
/// fn f() -> impl Deref<Target = i32> + DerefMut<Target = i32> {
/// // ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ unnecessary bound, already implied by the `DerefMut` trait bound
/// Box::new(123)
/// }
/// ```
/// Use instead:
/// ```rust
/// fn f() -> impl DerefMut<Target = i32> {
/// Box::new(123)
/// }
/// ```
#[clippy::version = "1.73.0"]
pub IMPLIED_BOUNDS_IN_IMPL,
complexity,
"specifying bounds that are implied by other bounds in `impl Trait` type"
}
declare_lint_pass!(ImpliedBoundsInImpl => [IMPLIED_BOUNDS_IN_IMPL]);
impl LateLintPass<'_> for ImpliedBoundsInImpl {
fn check_fn(
&mut self,
cx: &LateContext<'_>,
_: FnKind<'_>,
decl: &FnDecl<'_>,
_: &Body<'_>,
_: Span,
_: LocalDefId,
) {
if let FnRetTy::Return(ty) = decl.output {
if let TyKind::OpaqueDef(item_id, ..) = ty.kind
&& let item = cx.tcx.hir().item(item_id)
&& let ItemKind::OpaqueTy(opaque_ty) = item.kind
{
// Get all `DefId`s of (implied) trait predicates in all the bounds.
// For `impl Deref + DerefMut` this will contain [`Deref`].
// The implied `Deref` comes from `DerefMut` because `trait DerefMut: Deref {}`.
// N.B. Generic args on trait bounds are currently ignored and (G)ATs are fine to disregard,
// because they must be the same for all of its supertraits. Example:
// `impl Deref<Target = i32> + DerefMut<Target = u32>` is not allowed.
// `DerefMut::Target` needs to match `Deref::Target`
let implied_bounds = opaque_ty.bounds.iter().flat_map(|bound| {
if let GenericBound::Trait(poly_trait, TraitBoundModifier::None) = bound
&& let [.., path] = poly_trait.trait_ref.path.segments
&& poly_trait.bound_generic_params.is_empty()
&& path.args.map_or(true, GenericArgs::is_empty)
&& let Some(trait_def_id) = path.res.opt_def_id()
{
cx.tcx.implied_predicates_of(trait_def_id).predicates
} else {
&[]
}
}).collect::<Vec<_>>();
// Lint all bounds in the `impl Trait` type that are also in the `implied_bounds` vec.
for bound in opaque_ty.bounds {
if let GenericBound::Trait(poly_trait, TraitBoundModifier::None) = bound
&& let Some(def_id) = poly_trait.trait_ref.path.res.opt_def_id()
&& implied_bounds.iter().any(|(clause, _)| {
if let ClauseKind::Trait(tr) = clause.kind().skip_binder() {
tr.def_id() == def_id
} else {
false
}
})
{
span_lint(cx, IMPLIED_BOUNDS_IN_IMPL, poly_trait.span, "this bound is implied by another bound and can be removed");
}
}
}
}
}
}

View File

@ -152,6 +152,7 @@
mod implicit_return;
mod implicit_saturating_add;
mod implicit_saturating_sub;
mod implied_bounds_in_impl;
mod inconsistent_struct_constructor;
mod incorrect_impls;
mod index_refutable_slice;
@ -1097,6 +1098,7 @@ pub fn register_plugins(store: &mut rustc_lint::LintStore, sess: &Session, conf:
store.register_late_pass(|_| Box::new(redundant_locals::RedundantLocals));
store.register_late_pass(|_| Box::new(ignored_unit_patterns::IgnoredUnitPatterns));
store.register_late_pass(|_| Box::<reserve_after_initialization::ReserveAfterInitialization>::default());
store.register_late_pass(|_| Box::new(implied_bounds_in_impl::ImpliedBoundsInImpl));
// add lints here, do not remove this comment, it's used in `new_lint`
}

View File

@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
#![warn(clippy::implied_bounds_in_impl)]
#![allow(dead_code)]
use std::ops::{Deref, DerefMut};
trait Trait1<T> {}
// T is intentionally at a different position in Trait2 than in Trait1,
// since that also needs to be taken into account when making this lint work with generics
trait Trait2<U, T>: Trait1<T> {}
impl Trait1<i32> for () {}
impl Trait1<String> for () {}
impl Trait2<u32, i32> for () {}
impl Trait2<u32, String> for () {}
// Deref implied by DerefMut
fn deref_derefmut<T>(x: T) -> impl Deref<Target = T> + DerefMut<Target = T> {
Box::new(x)
}
// Note: no test for different associated types needed since that isn't allowed in the first place.
// E.g. `-> impl Deref<Target = T> + DerefMut<Target = U>` is a compile error.
// DefIds of the traits match, but the generics do not, so it's *not* redundant.
// `Trait2: Trait` holds, but not `Trait2<_, String>: Trait1<i32>`.
// (Generic traits are currently not linted anyway but once/if ever implemented this should not
// warn.)
fn different_generics() -> impl Trait1<i32> + Trait2<u32, String> {
/* () */
}
trait NonGenericTrait1 {}
trait NonGenericTrait2: NonGenericTrait1 {}
impl NonGenericTrait1 for i32 {}
impl NonGenericTrait2 for i32 {}
// Only one bound. Nothing to lint.
fn normal1() -> impl NonGenericTrait1 {
1
}
fn normal2() -> impl NonGenericTrait1 + NonGenericTrait2 {
1
}
fn main() {}

View File

@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
error: this bound is implied by another bound and can be removed
--> $DIR/implied_bounds_in_impl.rs:16:36
|
LL | fn deref_derefmut<T>(x: T) -> impl Deref<Target = T> + DerefMut<Target = T> {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: `-D clippy::implied-bounds-in-impl` implied by `-D warnings`
error: this bound is implied by another bound and can be removed
--> $DIR/implied_bounds_in_impl.rs:41:22
|
LL | fn normal2() -> impl NonGenericTrait1 + NonGenericTrait2 {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
error: aborting due to 2 previous errors