Rollup merge of #127045 - compiler-errors:explicit, r=oli-obk
Rename `super_predicates_of` and similar queries to `explicit_*` to note that they're not elaborated Rename: * `super_predicates_of` -> `explicit_super_predicates_of` * `implied_predicates_of` -> `explicit_implied_predicates_of` * `supertraits_containing_assoc_item` -> `explicit_supertraits_containing_assoc_item` This makes it clearer that, unlike (for example) [`TyCtxt::super_traits_of`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_middle/ty/context/struct.TyCtxt.html#method.super_traits_of), we don't automatically elaborate this set of predicates. r? ``@lcnr`` or ``@oli-obk`` or someone from t-types idc
This commit is contained in:
commit
411655217c
@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ fn collect_supertrait_bounds<'tcx>(cx: &LateContext<'tcx>, bounds: GenericBounds
|
||||
&& let [.., path] = poly_trait.trait_ref.path.segments
|
||||
&& poly_trait.bound_generic_params.is_empty()
|
||||
&& let Some(trait_def_id) = path.res.opt_def_id()
|
||||
&& let predicates = cx.tcx.super_predicates_of(trait_def_id).predicates
|
||||
&& let predicates = cx.tcx.explicit_super_predicates_of(trait_def_id).predicates
|
||||
// If the trait has no supertrait, there is no need to collect anything from that bound
|
||||
&& !predicates.is_empty()
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ fn is_subtrait_of_any(cx: &LateContext<'_>, ty: Ty<'_>) -> bool {
|
||||
cx.tcx.is_diagnostic_item(sym::Any, tr.def_id)
|
||||
|| cx
|
||||
.tcx
|
||||
.super_predicates_of(tr.def_id)
|
||||
.explicit_super_predicates_of(tr.def_id)
|
||||
.predicates
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.any(|(clause, _)| {
|
||||
|
@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ fn search(cx: &LateContext<'_>, path: &mut Vec<DefId>) -> bool {
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for &(predicate, _) in cx.tcx.super_predicates_of(trait_def_id).predicates {
|
||||
for &(predicate, _) in cx.tcx.explicit_super_predicates_of(trait_def_id).predicates {
|
||||
if let ClauseKind::Trait(trait_predicate) = predicate.kind().skip_binder()
|
||||
&& trait_predicate.polarity == PredicatePolarity::Positive
|
||||
&& !path.contains(&trait_predicate.def_id())
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user