Rollup merge of #60185 - NieDzejkob:int-error-kind-reexport, r=rkruppe
Reexport IntErrorKind in std Currently `IntErrorKind` can only be found in `core`. @Centril confirmed on Discord that this is unintentional (should I r? him in this situation?). Should there be a test for this? As far as this *specific* situation goes, I don't think so, I'll risk it and say that there's no way this regresses. However, it might be a good idea to have some tool detect public items in `core` that are not reexported in `std`. Does this belong in tidy, or should that be a separate tool? Is there some rustc-specific *linter*? Unless that's entirely a dumb idea, this should probably get an issue. Note: My local build hasn't finished yet, but it's well past the point where I would expect problems.
This commit is contained in:
commit
3fffcd3314
@ -267,6 +267,7 @@
|
||||
#![feature(hash_raw_entry)]
|
||||
#![feature(hashmap_internals)]
|
||||
#![feature(int_error_internals)]
|
||||
#![feature(int_error_matching)]
|
||||
#![feature(integer_atomics)]
|
||||
#![feature(lang_items)]
|
||||
#![feature(libc)]
|
||||
|
@ -16,6 +16,12 @@
|
||||
#[stable(feature = "signed_nonzero", since = "1.34.0")]
|
||||
pub use core::num::{NonZeroI8, NonZeroI16, NonZeroI32, NonZeroI64, NonZeroI128, NonZeroIsize};
|
||||
|
||||
#[unstable(feature = "int_error_matching",
|
||||
reason = "it can be useful to match errors when making error messages \
|
||||
for integer parsing",
|
||||
issue = "22639")]
|
||||
pub use core::num::IntErrorKind;
|
||||
|
||||
#[cfg(test)] use crate::fmt;
|
||||
#[cfg(test)] use crate::ops::{Add, Sub, Mul, Div, Rem};
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user