Rollup merge of #101828 - aDotInTheVoid:test-101743, r=jsha

Add test for #101743

The issue was closes as we stopped rendering `const`s like this, but if we move back to doing that, make sure we don't accidently generate tags
This commit is contained in:
Matthias Krüger 2022-09-15 08:00:18 +02:00 committed by GitHub
commit 384fee9703
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23

View File

@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
// Regression test for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/101743
#![crate_name="foo"]
pub type Word = usize;
pub struct Repr<const B: usize>([i32; B]);
pub struct IBig(usize);
pub const fn base_as_ibig<const B: Word>() -> IBig {
IBig(B)
}
impl<const B: Word> Repr<B> {
// If we change back to rendering the value of consts, check this doesn't add
// a <b> tag, but escapes correctly
// @has foo/struct.Repr.html '//section[@id="associatedconstant.BASE"]/h4' '= _'
pub const BASE: IBig = base_as_ibig::<B>();
}