Auto merge of #120942 - compiler-errors:deep-assoc-hang, r=lcnr
Ignore own item bounds in parent alias types in `for_each_item_bound` Fixes #120912 I want to get a vibe check on this approach, which is very obviously a hack, but I believe something that is forwards-compatible with a more thorough solution and "good enough for now". The problem here is that for a really deep rigid associated type, we are now repeatedly considering unrelated item bounds from the parent alias types, meaning we're doing a *lot* of extra work in the MIR inliner for deeply substituted rigid projections. This feels intimately related to #107614. In that PR, we split *supertrait* bounds (bound which share the same `Self` type as the predicate which is being elaborated) and *implied* bounds (anything that is implied by elaborating the predicate). The problem here is related to the fact that we don't maintain the split between these two for `item_bounds`. If we did, then when recursing into a parent alias type, we'd want to consider only the bounds that are given by [`PredicateFilter::All`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_hir_analysis/astconv/enum.PredicateFilter.html#variant.SelfOnly) **except** those given by [`PredicateFilter::SelfOnly`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_hir_analysis/astconv/enum.PredicateFilter.html#variant.SelfOnly).
This commit is contained in:
commit
37b65339c8
@ -1605,6 +1605,8 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx> {
|
|||||||
on_ambiguity: impl FnOnce(),
|
on_ambiguity: impl FnOnce(),
|
||||||
) -> ControlFlow<T, ()> {
|
) -> ControlFlow<T, ()> {
|
||||||
let mut idx = 0;
|
let mut idx = 0;
|
||||||
|
let mut in_parent_alias_type = false;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
loop {
|
loop {
|
||||||
let (kind, alias_ty) = match *self_ty.kind() {
|
let (kind, alias_ty) = match *self_ty.kind() {
|
||||||
ty::Alias(kind @ (ty::Projection | ty::Opaque), alias_ty) => (kind, alias_ty),
|
ty::Alias(kind @ (ty::Projection | ty::Opaque), alias_ty) => (kind, alias_ty),
|
||||||
@ -1618,6 +1620,18 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx> {
|
|||||||
for bound in
|
for bound in
|
||||||
self.tcx().item_bounds(alias_ty.def_id).instantiate(self.tcx(), alias_ty.args)
|
self.tcx().item_bounds(alias_ty.def_id).instantiate(self.tcx(), alias_ty.args)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
|
// HACK: On subsequent recursions, we only care about bounds that don't
|
||||||
|
// share the same type as `self_ty`. This is because for truly rigid
|
||||||
|
// projections, we will never be able to equate, e.g. `<T as Tr>::A`
|
||||||
|
// with `<<T as Tr>::A as Tr>::A`.
|
||||||
|
if in_parent_alias_type {
|
||||||
|
match bound.kind().skip_binder() {
|
||||||
|
ty::ClauseKind::Trait(tr) if tr.self_ty() == self_ty => continue,
|
||||||
|
ty::ClauseKind::Projection(p) if p.self_ty() == self_ty => continue,
|
||||||
|
_ => {}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
for_each(self, bound, idx)?;
|
for_each(self, bound, idx)?;
|
||||||
idx += 1;
|
idx += 1;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
@ -1627,6 +1641,8 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx> {
|
|||||||
} else {
|
} else {
|
||||||
return ControlFlow::Continue(());
|
return ControlFlow::Continue(());
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
in_parent_alias_type = true;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user