Rollup merge of #41377 - nikomatsakis:issue-41298-ICE-inference, r=eddyb
Fix ICE building gluon_vm The problem was due to various places we were failing to propagate obligations. I think I got them mostly correct, but I didn't get around to writing test cases for each case. r? @eddyb or @arielb1
This commit is contained in:
commit
348d66c73f
@ -1597,9 +1597,13 @@ impl<'a, 'gcx, 'tcx> InferCtxt<'a, 'gcx, 'tcx> {
|
||||
// generic so we don't have to do anything quite this
|
||||
// terrible.
|
||||
let trace = TypeTrace::dummy(self.tcx);
|
||||
self.equate(true, trace, a, b).map(|InferOk { obligations, .. }| {
|
||||
// FIXME(#32730) propagate obligations
|
||||
assert!(obligations.is_empty());
|
||||
self.equate(true, trace, a, b).map(|InferOk { obligations: _, .. }| {
|
||||
// We can intentionally ignore obligations here, since
|
||||
// this is part of a simple test for general
|
||||
// "equatability". However, it's not entirely clear
|
||||
// that we *ought* to be, perhaps a better thing would
|
||||
// be to use a mini-fulfillment context or something
|
||||
// like that.
|
||||
})
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -55,16 +55,15 @@ fn overlap<'cx, 'gcx, 'tcx>(selcx: &mut SelectionContext<'cx, 'gcx, 'tcx>,
|
||||
debug!("overlap: b_impl_header={:?}", b_impl_header);
|
||||
|
||||
// Do `a` and `b` unify? If not, no overlap.
|
||||
match selcx.infcx().eq_impl_headers(true,
|
||||
let obligations = match selcx.infcx().eq_impl_headers(true,
|
||||
&ObligationCause::dummy(),
|
||||
&a_impl_header,
|
||||
&b_impl_header) {
|
||||
Ok(InferOk { obligations, .. }) => {
|
||||
// FIXME(#32730) propagate obligations
|
||||
assert!(obligations.is_empty());
|
||||
obligations
|
||||
}
|
||||
Err(_) => return None
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
debug!("overlap: unification check succeeded");
|
||||
|
||||
@ -78,6 +77,7 @@ fn overlap<'cx, 'gcx, 'tcx>(selcx: &mut SelectionContext<'cx, 'gcx, 'tcx>,
|
||||
.map(|p| Obligation { cause: ObligationCause::dummy(),
|
||||
recursion_depth: 0,
|
||||
predicate: p })
|
||||
.chain(obligations)
|
||||
.find(|o| !selcx.evaluate_obligation(o));
|
||||
|
||||
if let Some(failing_obligation) = opt_failing_obligation {
|
||||
|
@ -184,6 +184,16 @@ impl<'a, 'gcx, 'tcx> FulfillmentContext<'tcx> {
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn register_predicate_obligations(&mut self,
|
||||
infcx: &InferCtxt<'a, 'gcx, 'tcx>,
|
||||
obligations: Vec<PredicateObligation<'tcx>>)
|
||||
{
|
||||
for obligation in obligations {
|
||||
self.register_predicate_obligation(infcx, obligation);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn region_obligations(&self,
|
||||
body_id: ast::NodeId)
|
||||
-> &[RegionObligation<'tcx>]
|
||||
|
@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ fn fulfill_implication<'a, 'gcx, 'tcx>(infcx: &InferCtxt<'a, 'gcx, 'tcx>,
|
||||
-> Result<&'tcx Substs<'tcx>, ()> {
|
||||
let selcx = &mut SelectionContext::new(&infcx);
|
||||
let target_substs = infcx.fresh_substs_for_item(DUMMY_SP, target_impl);
|
||||
let (target_trait_ref, obligations) = impl_trait_ref_and_oblig(selcx,
|
||||
let (target_trait_ref, mut obligations) = impl_trait_ref_and_oblig(selcx,
|
||||
target_impl,
|
||||
target_substs);
|
||||
|
||||
@ -227,9 +227,8 @@ fn fulfill_implication<'a, 'gcx, 'tcx>(infcx: &InferCtxt<'a, 'gcx, 'tcx>,
|
||||
&ObligationCause::dummy(),
|
||||
source_trait_ref,
|
||||
target_trait_ref) {
|
||||
Ok(InferOk { obligations, .. }) => {
|
||||
// FIXME(#32730) propagate obligations
|
||||
assert!(obligations.is_empty())
|
||||
Ok(InferOk { obligations: o, .. }) => {
|
||||
obligations.extend(o);
|
||||
}
|
||||
Err(_) => {
|
||||
debug!("fulfill_implication: {:?} does not unify with {:?}",
|
||||
|
@ -376,7 +376,7 @@ impl<'a, 'gcx, 'tcx> Env<'a, 'gcx, 'tcx> {
|
||||
pub fn check_sub(&self, t1: Ty<'tcx>, t2: Ty<'tcx>) {
|
||||
match self.sub(t1, t2) {
|
||||
Ok(InferOk { obligations, .. }) => {
|
||||
// FIXME(#32730) once obligations are being propagated, assert the right thing.
|
||||
// None of these tests should require nested obligations:
|
||||
assert!(obligations.is_empty());
|
||||
}
|
||||
Err(ref e) => {
|
||||
@ -400,7 +400,7 @@ impl<'a, 'gcx, 'tcx> Env<'a, 'gcx, 'tcx> {
|
||||
pub fn check_lub(&self, t1: Ty<'tcx>, t2: Ty<'tcx>, t_lub: Ty<'tcx>) {
|
||||
match self.lub(t1, t2) {
|
||||
Ok(InferOk { obligations, value: t }) => {
|
||||
// FIXME(#32730) once obligations are being propagated, assert the right thing.
|
||||
// None of these tests should require nested obligations:
|
||||
assert!(obligations.is_empty());
|
||||
|
||||
self.assert_eq(t, t_lub);
|
||||
@ -415,7 +415,7 @@ impl<'a, 'gcx, 'tcx> Env<'a, 'gcx, 'tcx> {
|
||||
match self.glb(t1, t2) {
|
||||
Err(e) => panic!("unexpected error computing LUB: {:?}", e),
|
||||
Ok(InferOk { obligations, value: t }) => {
|
||||
// FIXME(#32730) once obligations are being propagated, assert the right thing.
|
||||
// None of these tests should require nested obligations:
|
||||
assert!(obligations.is_empty());
|
||||
|
||||
self.assert_eq(t, t_glb);
|
||||
|
@ -294,10 +294,9 @@ fn compare_predicate_entailment<'a, 'tcx>(tcx: TyCtxt<'a, 'tcx, 'tcx>,
|
||||
debug!("compare_impl_method: trait_fty={:?}", trait_fty);
|
||||
|
||||
let sub_result = infcx.sub_types(false, &cause, impl_fty, trait_fty)
|
||||
.map(|InferOk { obligations, .. }| {
|
||||
// FIXME(#32730) propagate obligations
|
||||
assert!(obligations.is_empty());
|
||||
});
|
||||
.map(|InferOk { obligations, .. }| {
|
||||
inh.register_predicates(obligations);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
if let Err(terr) = sub_result {
|
||||
debug!("sub_types failed: impl ty {:?}, trait ty {:?}",
|
||||
|
@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ fn ensure_drop_params_and_item_params_correspond<'a, 'tcx>(
|
||||
// check that the impl type can be made to match the trait type.
|
||||
|
||||
let impl_param_env = ty::ParameterEnvironment::for_item(tcx, self_type_node_id);
|
||||
tcx.infer_ctxt(impl_param_env, Reveal::UserFacing).enter(|infcx| {
|
||||
tcx.infer_ctxt(impl_param_env, Reveal::UserFacing).enter(|ref infcx| {
|
||||
let tcx = infcx.tcx;
|
||||
let mut fulfillment_cx = traits::FulfillmentContext::new();
|
||||
|
||||
@ -97,8 +97,7 @@ fn ensure_drop_params_and_item_params_correspond<'a, 'tcx>(
|
||||
let cause = &ObligationCause::misc(drop_impl_span, drop_impl_node_id);
|
||||
match infcx.eq_types(true, cause, named_type, fresh_impl_self_ty) {
|
||||
Ok(InferOk { obligations, .. }) => {
|
||||
// FIXME(#32730) propagate obligations
|
||||
assert!(obligations.is_empty());
|
||||
fulfillment_cx.register_predicate_obligations(infcx, obligations);
|
||||
}
|
||||
Err(_) => {
|
||||
let item_span = tcx.hir.span(self_type_node_id);
|
||||
|
@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ use rustc::infer::InferOk;
|
||||
use rustc::ty::subst::Substs;
|
||||
use rustc::ty::{self, Ty, TyCtxt};
|
||||
use rustc::ty::maps::Providers;
|
||||
use rustc::traits::{ObligationCause, ObligationCauseCode, Reveal};
|
||||
use rustc::traits::{FulfillmentContext, ObligationCause, ObligationCauseCode, Reveal};
|
||||
use session::config;
|
||||
use util::common::time;
|
||||
|
||||
@ -153,15 +153,22 @@ fn require_same_types<'a, 'tcx>(tcx: TyCtxt<'a, 'tcx, 'tcx>,
|
||||
expected: Ty<'tcx>,
|
||||
actual: Ty<'tcx>)
|
||||
-> bool {
|
||||
tcx.infer_ctxt((), Reveal::UserFacing).enter(|infcx| {
|
||||
tcx.infer_ctxt((), Reveal::UserFacing).enter(|ref infcx| {
|
||||
let mut fulfill_cx = FulfillmentContext::new();
|
||||
match infcx.eq_types(false, &cause, expected, actual) {
|
||||
Ok(InferOk { obligations, .. }) => {
|
||||
// FIXME(#32730) propagate obligations
|
||||
assert!(obligations.is_empty());
|
||||
true
|
||||
fulfill_cx.register_predicate_obligations(infcx, obligations);
|
||||
}
|
||||
Err(err) => {
|
||||
infcx.report_mismatched_types(cause, expected, actual, err).emit();
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
match fulfill_cx.select_all_or_error(infcx) {
|
||||
Ok(()) => true,
|
||||
Err(errors) => {
|
||||
infcx.report_fulfillment_errors(&errors);
|
||||
false
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
16
src/test/run-pass/issue-41298.rs
Normal file
16
src/test/run-pass/issue-41298.rs
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
|
||||
// Copyright 2016 The Rust Project Developers. See the COPYRIGHT
|
||||
// file at the top-level directory of this distribution and at
|
||||
// http://rust-lang.org/COPYRIGHT.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 <LICENSE-APACHE or
|
||||
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0> or the MIT license
|
||||
// <LICENSE-MIT or http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT>, at your
|
||||
// option. This file may not be copied, modified, or distributed
|
||||
// except according to those terms.
|
||||
|
||||
struct Function<T, F> { t: T, f: F }
|
||||
|
||||
impl<T, R> Function<T, fn() -> R> { fn foo() { } }
|
||||
impl<T, R> Function<T, fn() -> R> { fn bar() { } }
|
||||
|
||||
fn main() { }
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user