Rollup merge of #122608 - Urgau:check-cfg-move-diagnostic-logic, r=fmease

Move check-cfg diagnostic logic into a separate file

as well as adding some triagebot mentions (for me) for check-cfg related files.

``@rustbot`` label +F-check-cfg
This commit is contained in:
Matthias Krüger 2024-03-17 08:23:26 +01:00 committed by GitHub
commit 325678c979
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: B5690EEEBB952194
3 changed files with 291 additions and 274 deletions

View File

@ -5,49 +5,11 @@
use rustc_errors::{add_elided_lifetime_in_path_suggestion, Diag};
use rustc_errors::{Applicability, SuggestionStyle};
use rustc_middle::middle::stability;
use rustc_session::config::ExpectedValues;
use rustc_session::lint::BuiltinLintDiag;
use rustc_session::Session;
use rustc_span::edit_distance::find_best_match_for_name;
use rustc_span::symbol::{sym, Symbol};
use rustc_span::BytePos;
const MAX_CHECK_CFG_NAMES_OR_VALUES: usize = 35;
fn check_cfg_expected_note(
sess: &Session,
possibilities: &[Symbol],
type_: &str,
name: Option<Symbol>,
suffix: &str,
) -> String {
use std::fmt::Write;
let n_possibilities = if sess.opts.unstable_opts.check_cfg_all_expected {
possibilities.len()
} else {
std::cmp::min(possibilities.len(), MAX_CHECK_CFG_NAMES_OR_VALUES)
};
let mut possibilities = possibilities.iter().map(Symbol::as_str).collect::<Vec<_>>();
possibilities.sort();
let and_more = possibilities.len().saturating_sub(n_possibilities);
let possibilities = possibilities[..n_possibilities].join("`, `");
let mut note = String::with_capacity(50 + possibilities.len());
write!(&mut note, "expected {type_}").unwrap();
if let Some(name) = name {
write!(&mut note, " for `{name}`").unwrap();
}
write!(&mut note, " are: {suffix}`{possibilities}`").unwrap();
if and_more > 0 {
write!(&mut note, " and {and_more} more").unwrap();
}
note
}
mod check_cfg;
pub(super) fn builtin(sess: &Session, diagnostic: BuiltinLintDiag, diag: &mut Diag<'_, ()>) {
match diagnostic {
@ -219,242 +181,11 @@ pub(super) fn builtin(sess: &Session, diagnostic: BuiltinLintDiag, diag: &mut Di
diag.help(help);
diag.note("see the asm section of Rust By Example <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rust-by-example/unsafe/asm.html#labels> for more information");
}
BuiltinLintDiag::UnexpectedCfgName((name, name_span), value) => {
#[allow(rustc::potential_query_instability)]
let possibilities: Vec<Symbol> =
sess.psess.check_config.expecteds.keys().copied().collect();
let mut names_possibilities: Vec<_> = if value.is_none() {
// We later sort and display all the possibilities, so the order here does not matter.
#[allow(rustc::potential_query_instability)]
sess.psess
.check_config
.expecteds
.iter()
.filter_map(|(k, v)| match v {
ExpectedValues::Some(v) if v.contains(&Some(name)) => Some(k),
_ => None,
})
.collect()
} else {
Vec::new()
};
let is_from_cargo = rustc_session::utils::was_invoked_from_cargo();
let mut is_feature_cfg = name == sym::feature;
if is_feature_cfg && is_from_cargo {
diag.help("consider defining some features in `Cargo.toml`");
// Suggest the most probable if we found one
} else if let Some(best_match) = find_best_match_for_name(&possibilities, name, None) {
if let Some(ExpectedValues::Some(best_match_values)) =
sess.psess.check_config.expecteds.get(&best_match)
{
// We will soon sort, so the initial order does not matter.
#[allow(rustc::potential_query_instability)]
let mut possibilities =
best_match_values.iter().flatten().map(Symbol::as_str).collect::<Vec<_>>();
possibilities.sort();
let mut should_print_possibilities = true;
if let Some((value, value_span)) = value {
if best_match_values.contains(&Some(value)) {
diag.span_suggestion(
name_span,
"there is a config with a similar name and value",
best_match,
Applicability::MaybeIncorrect,
);
should_print_possibilities = false;
} else if best_match_values.contains(&None) {
diag.span_suggestion(
name_span.to(value_span),
"there is a config with a similar name and no value",
best_match,
Applicability::MaybeIncorrect,
);
should_print_possibilities = false;
} else if let Some(first_value) = possibilities.first() {
diag.span_suggestion(
name_span.to(value_span),
"there is a config with a similar name and different values",
format!("{best_match} = \"{first_value}\""),
Applicability::MaybeIncorrect,
);
} else {
diag.span_suggestion(
name_span.to(value_span),
"there is a config with a similar name and different values",
best_match,
Applicability::MaybeIncorrect,
);
};
} else {
diag.span_suggestion(
name_span,
"there is a config with a similar name",
best_match,
Applicability::MaybeIncorrect,
);
}
if !possibilities.is_empty() && should_print_possibilities {
let possibilities = possibilities.join("`, `");
diag.help(format!(
"expected values for `{best_match}` are: `{possibilities}`"
));
}
} else {
diag.span_suggestion(
name_span,
"there is a config with a similar name",
best_match,
Applicability::MaybeIncorrect,
);
}
is_feature_cfg |= best_match == sym::feature;
} else {
if !names_possibilities.is_empty() && names_possibilities.len() <= 3 {
names_possibilities.sort();
for cfg_name in names_possibilities.iter() {
diag.span_suggestion(
name_span,
"found config with similar value",
format!("{cfg_name} = \"{name}\""),
Applicability::MaybeIncorrect,
);
}
}
if !possibilities.is_empty() {
diag.help_once(check_cfg_expected_note(
sess,
&possibilities,
"names",
None,
"",
));
}
}
let inst = if let Some((value, _value_span)) = value {
let pre = if is_from_cargo { "\\" } else { "" };
format!("cfg({name}, values({pre}\"{value}{pre}\"))")
} else {
format!("cfg({name})")
};
if is_from_cargo {
if !is_feature_cfg {
diag.help(format!("consider using a Cargo feature instead or adding `println!(\"cargo:rustc-check-cfg={inst}\");` to the top of a `build.rs`"));
}
diag.note("see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/cargo/reference/unstable.html#check-cfg> for more information about checking conditional configuration");
} else {
diag.help(format!("to expect this configuration use `--check-cfg={inst}`"));
diag.note("see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/unstable-book/compiler-flags/check-cfg.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration");
}
BuiltinLintDiag::UnexpectedCfgName(name, value) => {
check_cfg::unexpected_cfg_name(sess, diag, name, value)
}
BuiltinLintDiag::UnexpectedCfgValue((name, name_span), value) => {
let Some(ExpectedValues::Some(values)) = &sess.psess.check_config.expecteds.get(&name)
else {
bug!(
"it shouldn't be possible to have a diagnostic on a value whose name is not in values"
);
};
let mut have_none_possibility = false;
// We later sort possibilities if it is not empty, so the
// order here does not matter.
#[allow(rustc::potential_query_instability)]
let possibilities: Vec<Symbol> = values
.iter()
.inspect(|a| have_none_possibility |= a.is_none())
.copied()
.flatten()
.collect();
let is_from_cargo = rustc_session::utils::was_invoked_from_cargo();
// Show the full list if all possible values for a given name, but don't do it
// for names as the possibilities could be very long
if !possibilities.is_empty() {
diag.note(check_cfg_expected_note(
sess,
&possibilities,
"values",
Some(name),
if have_none_possibility { "(none), " } else { "" },
));
if let Some((value, value_span)) = value {
// Suggest the most probable if we found one
if let Some(best_match) = find_best_match_for_name(&possibilities, value, None)
{
diag.span_suggestion(
value_span,
"there is a expected value with a similar name",
format!("\"{best_match}\""),
Applicability::MaybeIncorrect,
);
}
} else if let &[first_possibility] = &possibilities[..] {
diag.span_suggestion(
name_span.shrink_to_hi(),
"specify a config value",
format!(" = \"{first_possibility}\""),
Applicability::MaybeIncorrect,
);
}
} else if have_none_possibility {
diag.note(format!("no expected value for `{name}`"));
if let Some((_value, value_span)) = value {
diag.span_suggestion(
name_span.shrink_to_hi().to(value_span),
"remove the value",
"",
Applicability::MaybeIncorrect,
);
}
} else {
diag.note(format!("no expected values for `{name}`"));
let sp = if let Some((_value, value_span)) = value {
name_span.to(value_span)
} else {
name_span
};
diag.span_suggestion(sp, "remove the condition", "", Applicability::MaybeIncorrect);
}
// We don't want to suggest adding values to well known names
// since those are defined by rustc it-self. Users can still
// do it if they want, but should not encourage them.
let is_cfg_a_well_know_name = sess.psess.check_config.well_known_names.contains(&name);
let inst = if let Some((value, _value_span)) = value {
let pre = if is_from_cargo { "\\" } else { "" };
format!("cfg({name}, values({pre}\"{value}{pre}\"))")
} else {
format!("cfg({name})")
};
if is_from_cargo {
if name == sym::feature {
if let Some((value, _value_span)) = value {
diag.help(format!(
"consider adding `{value}` as a feature in `Cargo.toml`"
));
} else {
diag.help("consider defining some features in `Cargo.toml`");
}
} else if !is_cfg_a_well_know_name {
diag.help(format!("consider using a Cargo feature instead or adding `println!(\"cargo:rustc-check-cfg={inst}\");` to the top of a `build.rs`"));
}
diag.note("see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/cargo/reference/unstable.html#check-cfg> for more information about checking conditional configuration");
} else {
if !is_cfg_a_well_know_name {
diag.help(format!("to expect this configuration use `--check-cfg={inst}`"));
}
diag.note("see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/unstable-book/compiler-flags/check-cfg.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration");
}
BuiltinLintDiag::UnexpectedCfgValue(name, value) => {
check_cfg::unexpected_cfg_value(sess, diag, name, value)
}
BuiltinLintDiag::DeprecatedWhereclauseLocation(sugg) => {
let left_sp = diag.span.primary_span().unwrap();

View File

@ -0,0 +1,277 @@
use rustc_errors::{Applicability, Diag};
use rustc_session::{config::ExpectedValues, Session};
use rustc_span::edit_distance::find_best_match_for_name;
use rustc_span::{sym, Span, Symbol};
const MAX_CHECK_CFG_NAMES_OR_VALUES: usize = 35;
fn check_cfg_expected_note(
sess: &Session,
possibilities: &[Symbol],
type_: &str,
name: Option<Symbol>,
suffix: &str,
) -> String {
use std::fmt::Write;
let n_possibilities = if sess.opts.unstable_opts.check_cfg_all_expected {
possibilities.len()
} else {
std::cmp::min(possibilities.len(), MAX_CHECK_CFG_NAMES_OR_VALUES)
};
let mut possibilities = possibilities.iter().map(Symbol::as_str).collect::<Vec<_>>();
possibilities.sort();
let and_more = possibilities.len().saturating_sub(n_possibilities);
let possibilities = possibilities[..n_possibilities].join("`, `");
let mut note = String::with_capacity(50 + possibilities.len());
write!(&mut note, "expected {type_}").unwrap();
if let Some(name) = name {
write!(&mut note, " for `{name}`").unwrap();
}
write!(&mut note, " are: {suffix}`{possibilities}`").unwrap();
if and_more > 0 {
write!(&mut note, " and {and_more} more").unwrap();
}
note
}
pub(super) fn unexpected_cfg_name(
sess: &Session,
diag: &mut Diag<'_, ()>,
(name, name_span): (Symbol, Span),
value: Option<(Symbol, Span)>,
) {
#[allow(rustc::potential_query_instability)]
let possibilities: Vec<Symbol> = sess.psess.check_config.expecteds.keys().copied().collect();
let mut names_possibilities: Vec<_> = if value.is_none() {
// We later sort and display all the possibilities, so the order here does not matter.
#[allow(rustc::potential_query_instability)]
sess.psess
.check_config
.expecteds
.iter()
.filter_map(|(k, v)| match v {
ExpectedValues::Some(v) if v.contains(&Some(name)) => Some(k),
_ => None,
})
.collect()
} else {
Vec::new()
};
let is_from_cargo = rustc_session::utils::was_invoked_from_cargo();
let mut is_feature_cfg = name == sym::feature;
if is_feature_cfg && is_from_cargo {
diag.help("consider defining some features in `Cargo.toml`");
// Suggest the most probable if we found one
} else if let Some(best_match) = find_best_match_for_name(&possibilities, name, None) {
if let Some(ExpectedValues::Some(best_match_values)) =
sess.psess.check_config.expecteds.get(&best_match)
{
// We will soon sort, so the initial order does not matter.
#[allow(rustc::potential_query_instability)]
let mut possibilities =
best_match_values.iter().flatten().map(Symbol::as_str).collect::<Vec<_>>();
possibilities.sort();
let mut should_print_possibilities = true;
if let Some((value, value_span)) = value {
if best_match_values.contains(&Some(value)) {
diag.span_suggestion(
name_span,
"there is a config with a similar name and value",
best_match,
Applicability::MaybeIncorrect,
);
should_print_possibilities = false;
} else if best_match_values.contains(&None) {
diag.span_suggestion(
name_span.to(value_span),
"there is a config with a similar name and no value",
best_match,
Applicability::MaybeIncorrect,
);
should_print_possibilities = false;
} else if let Some(first_value) = possibilities.first() {
diag.span_suggestion(
name_span.to(value_span),
"there is a config with a similar name and different values",
format!("{best_match} = \"{first_value}\""),
Applicability::MaybeIncorrect,
);
} else {
diag.span_suggestion(
name_span.to(value_span),
"there is a config with a similar name and different values",
best_match,
Applicability::MaybeIncorrect,
);
};
} else {
diag.span_suggestion(
name_span,
"there is a config with a similar name",
best_match,
Applicability::MaybeIncorrect,
);
}
if !possibilities.is_empty() && should_print_possibilities {
let possibilities = possibilities.join("`, `");
diag.help(format!("expected values for `{best_match}` are: `{possibilities}`"));
}
} else {
diag.span_suggestion(
name_span,
"there is a config with a similar name",
best_match,
Applicability::MaybeIncorrect,
);
}
is_feature_cfg |= best_match == sym::feature;
} else {
if !names_possibilities.is_empty() && names_possibilities.len() <= 3 {
names_possibilities.sort();
for cfg_name in names_possibilities.iter() {
diag.span_suggestion(
name_span,
"found config with similar value",
format!("{cfg_name} = \"{name}\""),
Applicability::MaybeIncorrect,
);
}
}
if !possibilities.is_empty() {
diag.help_once(check_cfg_expected_note(sess, &possibilities, "names", None, ""));
}
}
let inst = if let Some((value, _value_span)) = value {
let pre = if is_from_cargo { "\\" } else { "" };
format!("cfg({name}, values({pre}\"{value}{pre}\"))")
} else {
format!("cfg({name})")
};
if is_from_cargo {
if !is_feature_cfg {
diag.help(format!("consider using a Cargo feature instead or adding `println!(\"cargo:rustc-check-cfg={inst}\");` to the top of a `build.rs`"));
}
diag.note("see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/cargo/reference/unstable.html#check-cfg> for more information about checking conditional configuration");
} else {
diag.help(format!("to expect this configuration use `--check-cfg={inst}`"));
diag.note("see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/unstable-book/compiler-flags/check-cfg.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration");
}
}
pub(super) fn unexpected_cfg_value(
sess: &Session,
diag: &mut Diag<'_, ()>,
(name, name_span): (Symbol, Span),
value: Option<(Symbol, Span)>,
) {
let Some(ExpectedValues::Some(values)) = &sess.psess.check_config.expecteds.get(&name) else {
bug!(
"it shouldn't be possible to have a diagnostic on a value whose name is not in values"
);
};
let mut have_none_possibility = false;
// We later sort possibilities if it is not empty, so the
// order here does not matter.
#[allow(rustc::potential_query_instability)]
let possibilities: Vec<Symbol> = values
.iter()
.inspect(|a| have_none_possibility |= a.is_none())
.copied()
.flatten()
.collect();
let is_from_cargo = rustc_session::utils::was_invoked_from_cargo();
// Show the full list if all possible values for a given name, but don't do it
// for names as the possibilities could be very long
if !possibilities.is_empty() {
diag.note(check_cfg_expected_note(
sess,
&possibilities,
"values",
Some(name),
if have_none_possibility { "(none), " } else { "" },
));
if let Some((value, value_span)) = value {
// Suggest the most probable if we found one
if let Some(best_match) = find_best_match_for_name(&possibilities, value, None) {
diag.span_suggestion(
value_span,
"there is a expected value with a similar name",
format!("\"{best_match}\""),
Applicability::MaybeIncorrect,
);
}
} else if let &[first_possibility] = &possibilities[..] {
diag.span_suggestion(
name_span.shrink_to_hi(),
"specify a config value",
format!(" = \"{first_possibility}\""),
Applicability::MaybeIncorrect,
);
}
} else if have_none_possibility {
diag.note(format!("no expected value for `{name}`"));
if let Some((_value, value_span)) = value {
diag.span_suggestion(
name_span.shrink_to_hi().to(value_span),
"remove the value",
"",
Applicability::MaybeIncorrect,
);
}
} else {
diag.note(format!("no expected values for `{name}`"));
let sp = if let Some((_value, value_span)) = value {
name_span.to(value_span)
} else {
name_span
};
diag.span_suggestion(sp, "remove the condition", "", Applicability::MaybeIncorrect);
}
// We don't want to suggest adding values to well known names
// since those are defined by rustc it-self. Users can still
// do it if they want, but should not encourage them.
let is_cfg_a_well_know_name = sess.psess.check_config.well_known_names.contains(&name);
let inst = if let Some((value, _value_span)) = value {
let pre = if is_from_cargo { "\\" } else { "" };
format!("cfg({name}, values({pre}\"{value}{pre}\"))")
} else {
format!("cfg({name})")
};
if is_from_cargo {
if name == sym::feature {
if let Some((value, _value_span)) = value {
diag.help(format!("consider adding `{value}` as a feature in `Cargo.toml`"));
} else {
diag.help("consider defining some features in `Cargo.toml`");
}
} else if !is_cfg_a_well_know_name {
diag.help(format!("consider using a Cargo feature instead or adding `println!(\"cargo:rustc-check-cfg={inst}\");` to the top of a `build.rs`"));
}
diag.note("see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/cargo/reference/unstable.html#check-cfg> for more information about checking conditional configuration");
} else {
if !is_cfg_a_well_know_name {
diag.help(format!("to expect this configuration use `--check-cfg={inst}`"));
}
diag.note("see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/unstable-book/compiler-flags/check-cfg.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration");
}
}

View File

@ -515,6 +515,9 @@ cc = ["@Nadrieril"]
message = "Some changes occurred in exhaustiveness checking"
cc = ["@Nadrieril"]
[mentions."compiler/rustc_lint/src/context/diagnostics/check_cfg.rs"]
cc = ["@Urgau"]
[mentions."library/core/src/intrinsics/simd.rs"]
message = """
Some changes occurred to the platform-builtins intrinsics. Make sure the
@ -699,6 +702,9 @@ cc = ["@rust-lang/project-exploit-mitigations", "@rcvalle"]
[mentions."src/doc/unstable-book/src/language-features/no-sanitize.md"]
cc = ["@rust-lang/project-exploit-mitigations", "@rcvalle"]
[mentions."src/doc/unstable-book/src/compiler-flags/check-cfg.md"]
cc = ["@Urgau"]
[mentions."tests/codegen/sanitizer"]
cc = ["@rust-lang/project-exploit-mitigations", "@rcvalle"]
@ -717,6 +723,9 @@ cc = ["@rust-lang/project-exploit-mitigations", "@rcvalle"]
[mentions."tests/ui/stack-protector"]
cc = ["@rust-lang/project-exploit-mitigations", "@rcvalle"]
[mentions."tests/ui/check-cfg"]
cc = ["@Urgau"]
[assign]
warn_non_default_branch = true
contributing_url = "https://rustc-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/getting-started.html"