Auto merge of #93343 - lqd:attrs, r=spastorino
Only traverse attrs once while checking for coherence override attributes In coherence, while checking for negative impls override attributes: only traverse the `DefId`s' attributes once. This PR is an easy way to get back some of the small perf loss in #93175
This commit is contained in:
commit
312a7995e7
@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
|
||||
self, FulfillmentContext, Normalized, Obligation, ObligationCause, PredicateObligation,
|
||||
PredicateObligations, SelectionContext,
|
||||
};
|
||||
use rustc_ast::Attribute;
|
||||
use rustc_hir::def_id::{DefId, LOCAL_CRATE};
|
||||
use rustc_middle::ty::fast_reject::{self, SimplifyParams, StripReferences};
|
||||
use rustc_middle::ty::fold::TypeFoldable;
|
||||
@ -160,24 +161,30 @@ fn use_implicit_negative(&self) -> bool {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn overlap_mode<'tcx>(tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>, impl1_def_id: DefId, impl2_def_id: DefId) -> OverlapMode {
|
||||
if tcx.has_attr(impl1_def_id, sym::rustc_strict_coherence)
|
||||
!= tcx.has_attr(impl2_def_id, sym::rustc_strict_coherence)
|
||||
{
|
||||
bug!("Use strict coherence on both impls",);
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Find the possible coherence mode override opt-in attributes for each `DefId`
|
||||
let find_coherence_attr = |attr: &Attribute| {
|
||||
let name = attr.name_or_empty();
|
||||
match name {
|
||||
sym::rustc_with_negative_coherence | sym::rustc_strict_coherence => Some(name),
|
||||
_ => None,
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
let impl1_coherence_mode = tcx.get_attrs(impl1_def_id).iter().find_map(find_coherence_attr);
|
||||
let impl2_coherence_mode = tcx.get_attrs(impl2_def_id).iter().find_map(find_coherence_attr);
|
||||
|
||||
if tcx.has_attr(impl1_def_id, sym::rustc_with_negative_coherence)
|
||||
!= tcx.has_attr(impl2_def_id, sym::rustc_with_negative_coherence)
|
||||
{
|
||||
bug!("Use with negative coherence on both impls",);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if tcx.has_attr(impl1_def_id, sym::rustc_strict_coherence) {
|
||||
OverlapMode::Strict
|
||||
} else if tcx.has_attr(impl1_def_id, sym::rustc_with_negative_coherence) {
|
||||
OverlapMode::WithNegative
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
OverlapMode::Stable
|
||||
// If there are any (that currently happens in tests), they need to match. Otherwise, the
|
||||
// default 1.0 rules are used.
|
||||
match (impl1_coherence_mode, impl2_coherence_mode) {
|
||||
(None, None) => OverlapMode::Stable,
|
||||
(Some(sym::rustc_with_negative_coherence), Some(sym::rustc_with_negative_coherence)) => {
|
||||
OverlapMode::WithNegative
|
||||
}
|
||||
(Some(sym::rustc_strict_coherence), Some(sym::rustc_strict_coherence)) => {
|
||||
OverlapMode::Strict
|
||||
}
|
||||
(Some(mode), _) | (_, Some(mode)) => {
|
||||
bug!("Use the same coherence mode on both impls: {}", mode)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user