From 2eb074dff180743336b022144fae7e88ea849c4b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ralf Jung <post@ralfj.de>
Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2019 10:19:22 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] make example code typecheck at least

---
 src/libcore/pin.rs | 14 +++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/libcore/pin.rs b/src/libcore/pin.rs
index 302e40a954f..ffea5cbf331 100644
--- a/src/libcore/pin.rs
+++ b/src/libcore/pin.rs
@@ -168,7 +168,9 @@
 //! you must treat Drop as implicitly taking `Pin<&mut Self>`.
 //!
 //! For example, you could implement `Drop` as follows:
-//! ```rust,ignore
+//! ```rust,no_run
+//! # use std::pin::Pin;
+//! # struct Type { }
 //! impl Drop for Type {
 //!     fn drop(&mut self) {
 //!         // `new_unchecked` is okay because we know this value is never used
@@ -220,7 +222,10 @@
 //! all you have to ensure is that you never create a pinned reference to that field.
 //!
 //! Then you may add a projection method that turns `Pin<&mut Struct>` into `&mut Field`:
-//! ```rust,ignore
+//! ```rust,no_run
+//! # use std::pin::Pin;
+//! # type Field = i32;
+//! # struct Struct { field: Field }
 //! impl Struct {
 //!     fn pin_get_field<'a>(self: Pin<&'a mut Self>) -> &'a mut Field {
 //!         // This is okay because `field` is never considered pinned.
@@ -240,7 +245,10 @@
 //!
 //! This allows writing a projection that creates a `Pin<&mut Field>`, thus
 //! witnessing that the field is pinned:
-//! ```rust,ignore
+//! ```rust,no_run
+//! # use std::pin::Pin;
+//! # type Field = i32;
+//! # struct Struct { field: Field }
 //! impl Struct {
 //!     fn pin_get_field<'a>(self: Pin<&'a mut Self>) -> Pin<&'a mut Field> {
 //!         // This is okay because `field` is pinned when `self` is.