document ABI compatibility
This commit is contained in:
parent
2db26d3d55
commit
281d8cc4ae
@ -119,7 +119,7 @@
|
||||
//! # Representation
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! Rust guarantees to optimize the following types `T` such that
|
||||
//! [`Option<T>`] has the same size and alignment as `T`. In some
|
||||
//! [`Option<T>`] has the same size, alignment, and [function call ABI] as `T`. In some
|
||||
//! of these cases, Rust further guarantees that
|
||||
//! `transmute::<_, Option<T>>([0u8; size_of::<T>()])` is sound and
|
||||
//! produces `Option::<T>::None`. These cases are identified by the
|
||||
@ -127,7 +127,7 @@
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! | `T` | `transmute::<_, Option<T>>([0u8; size_of::<T>()])` sound? |
|
||||
//! |---------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|
||||
//! | [`Box<U>`] | when `U: Sized` |
|
||||
//! | [`Box<U>`] (specifically, only `Box<U, Global>`) | when `U: Sized` |
|
||||
//! | `&U` | when `U: Sized` |
|
||||
//! | `&mut U` | when `U: Sized` |
|
||||
//! | `fn`, `extern "C" fn`[^extern_fn] | always |
|
||||
@ -135,11 +135,12 @@
|
||||
//! | [`ptr::NonNull<U>`] | when `U: Sized` |
|
||||
//! | `#[repr(transparent)]` struct around one of the types in this list. | when it holds for the inner type |
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! [^extern_fn]: this remains true for any other ABI: `extern "abi" fn` (_e.g._, `extern "system" fn`)
|
||||
//! [^extern_fn]: this remains true for any argument/return types and any other ABI: `extern "abi" fn` (_e.g._, `extern "system" fn`)
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! [`Box<U>`]: ../../std/boxed/struct.Box.html
|
||||
//! [`num::NonZero*`]: crate::num
|
||||
//! [`ptr::NonNull<U>`]: crate::ptr::NonNull
|
||||
//! [function call ABI]: ../primitive.fn.html#abi-compatibility
|
||||
//!
|
||||
//! This is called the "null pointer optimization" or NPO.
|
||||
//!
|
||||
|
@ -1480,7 +1480,7 @@ mod prim_ref {}
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// ### Casting to and from integers
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// You cast function pointers directly to integers:
|
||||
/// You can cast function pointers directly to integers:
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// ```rust
|
||||
/// let fnptr: fn(i32) -> i32 = |x| x+2;
|
||||
@ -1506,6 +1506,110 @@ mod prim_ref {}
|
||||
/// Note that all of this is not portable to platforms where function pointers and data pointers
|
||||
/// have different sizes.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// ### ABI compatibility
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Generally, when a function is declared with one signature and called via a function pointer with
|
||||
/// a different signature, the two signatures must be *ABI-compatible* or else calling the function
|
||||
/// via that function pointer is Undefined Behavior. ABI compatibility is a lot stricter than merely
|
||||
/// having the same memory layout; for example, even if `i32` and `f32` have the same size and
|
||||
/// alignment, they might be passed in different registers and hence not be ABI-compatible.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// ABI compatibility as a concern only arises in code that alters the type of function pointers,
|
||||
/// and in code that combines `#[target_feature]` with `extern fn`. Altering the type of
|
||||
/// function pointers is wildly unsafe (as in, a lot more unsafe than even
|
||||
/// [`transmute_copy`][mem::transmute_copy]), and should only occur in the most exceptional
|
||||
/// circumstances. `#[target_feature]` is also used rarely. But assuming such circumstances, what
|
||||
/// are the rules?
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// For two signatures to be considered *ABI-compatible*, they must use a compatible ABI string,
|
||||
/// must take the same number of arguments, the individual argument types and the return types must
|
||||
/// be ABI-compatible, and the target feature requirements must be met (see the subsection below for
|
||||
/// the last point). The ABI string is declared via `extern "ABI" fn(...) -> ...`; note that
|
||||
/// `fn name(...) -> ...` implicitly uses the `"Rust"` ABI string and `extern fn name(...) -> ...`
|
||||
/// implicitly uses the `"C"` ABI string.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// The ABI strings are guaranteed to be compatible if they are the same, or if the caller ABI
|
||||
/// string is `$X-unwind` and the callee ABI string is `$X`, where `$X` is one of the following:
|
||||
/// "C", "aapcs", "fastcall", "stdcall", "system", "sysv64", "thiscall", "vectorcall", "win64".
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// The following types are guaranteed to be ABI-compatible:
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// - `*const T`, `*mut T`, `&T`, `&mut T`, `Box<T>` (specifically, only `Box<T, Global>`),
|
||||
/// `NonNull<T>` are all ABI-compatible with each other for all `T`. Two of these pointer types
|
||||
/// with different `T` are ABI-compatible if they have the same metadata type (`<T as
|
||||
/// Pointee>::Metadata`).
|
||||
/// - `usize` is ABI-compatible with the `uN` integer type of the same size, and likewise `isize` is
|
||||
/// ABI-compatible with the `iN` integer type of the same size.
|
||||
/// - Any two `fn` types are ABI-compatible with each other if they have the same ABI string or the
|
||||
/// ABI string only differs in a trailing `-unwind`, independent of the rest of their signature.
|
||||
/// (Note that this is about the case of passing a function pointer as an argument to a function.
|
||||
/// The two pointers being ABI-compatible here means that the call successfully passes the
|
||||
/// pointer. When actually calling the pointer, of course the rest of the signature becomes
|
||||
/// relevant as well, according to the rules in this section.)
|
||||
/// - Any two types with size 0 and alignment 1 are ABI-compatible.
|
||||
/// - A `repr(transparent)` type `T` is ABI-compatible with its unique non-trivial field, i.e., the
|
||||
/// unique field that doesn't have size 0 and alignment 1 (if there is such a field).
|
||||
/// - `i32` is ABI-compatible with `NonZeroI32`, and similar for all other integer types with their
|
||||
/// matching `NonZero*` type.
|
||||
/// - If `T` is guaranteed to be subject to the [null pointer
|
||||
/// optimization](option/index.html#representation), then `T` and `Option<T>` are ABI-compatible.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Furthermore, ABI compatibility satisfies the following general properties:
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// - Every type is ABI-compatible with itself.
|
||||
/// - If `T1` and `T2` are ABI-compatible, then two `repr(C)` types that only differ because one
|
||||
/// field type was changed from `T1` to `T2` are ABI-compatible.
|
||||
/// - If `T1` and `T2` are ABI-compatible and `T2` and `T3` are ABI-compatible, then so are `T1` and
|
||||
/// `T3` (i.e., ABI-compatibility is transitive).
|
||||
/// - If `T1` and `T2` are ABI-compatible, then so are `T2` and `T1` (i.e., ABI-compatibility is
|
||||
/// symmetric).
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// More signatures can be ABI-compatible on specific targets, but that should not be relied upon
|
||||
/// since it is not portable and not a stable guarantee.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Noteworthy cases of types *not* being ABI-compatible in general are:
|
||||
/// * `bool` vs `u8`, and `i32` vs `u32`: on some targets, the calling conventions for these types
|
||||
/// differ in terms of what they guarantee for the remaining bits in the register that are not
|
||||
/// used by the value.
|
||||
/// * `i32` vs `f32` are not compatible either, as has already been mentioned above.
|
||||
/// * `struct Foo(u32)` and `u32` are not compatible (without `repr(transparent)`) since structs are
|
||||
/// aggregate types and often passed in a different way than primitives like `i32`.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Note that these rules describe when two completely known types are ABI-compatible. When
|
||||
/// considering ABI compatibility of a type declared in another crate (including the standard
|
||||
/// library), consider that any type that has a private field or the `#[non_exhaustive]` attribute
|
||||
/// may change its layout as a non-breaking update unless documented otherwise -- so for instance,
|
||||
/// even if such a type is a 1-ZST or `repr(transparent)` right now, this might change with any
|
||||
/// library version bump.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// If the declared signature and the signature of the function pointer are ABI-compatible, then the
|
||||
/// function call behaves as if every argument was [`transmute`d][mem::transmute] from the
|
||||
/// type in the function pointer to the type at the function declaration, and the return value is
|
||||
/// [`transmute`d][mem::transmute] from the type in the declaration to the type in the
|
||||
/// pointer. All the usual caveats and concerns around transmutation apply; for instance, if the
|
||||
/// function expects a `NonNullI32` and the function pointer uses the ABI-compatible type
|
||||
/// `Option<NonNullI32>`, and the value used for the argument is `None`, then this call is Undefined
|
||||
/// Behavior since transmuting `None::<NonNullI32>` to `NonNullI32` violates the non-null
|
||||
/// requirement.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// #### Requirements concerning target features
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Under some conditions, the signature used by the caller and the callee can be ABI-incompatible
|
||||
/// even if the exact same ABI string and types are being used. As an example, the
|
||||
/// `std::arch::x86_64::__m256` type has a different `extern "C"` ABI when the `avx` feature is
|
||||
/// enabled vs when it is not enabled.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Therefore, to ensure ABI compatibility when code using different target features is combined
|
||||
/// (such as via `#[target_feature]`), we further require that one of the following conditions is
|
||||
/// met:
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// - The function uses the `"Rust"` ABI string (which is the default without `extern`).
|
||||
/// - Caller and callee are using the exact same set of target features. For the callee we consider
|
||||
/// the features enabled (via `#[target_feature]` and `-C target-feature`/`-C target-cpu`) at the
|
||||
/// declaration site; for the caller we consider the features enabled at the call site.
|
||||
/// - Neither any argument nor the return value involves a SIMD type (`#[repr(simd)]`) that is not
|
||||
/// behind a pointer indirection (i.e., `*mut __m256` is fine, but `(i32, __m256)` is not).
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// ### Trait implementations
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// In this documentation the shorthand `fn (T₁, T₂, …, Tₙ)` is used to represent non-variadic
|
||||
|
@ -231,8 +231,7 @@ mod $name {
|
||||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Compatibility of pointers is probably de-facto guaranteed,
|
||||
// but that does not seem to be documented.
|
||||
// Compatibility of pointers.
|
||||
test_abi_compatible!(ptr_mut, *const i32, *mut i32);
|
||||
test_abi_compatible!(ptr_pointee, *const i32, *const Vec<i32>);
|
||||
test_abi_compatible!(ref_mut, &i32, &mut i32);
|
||||
@ -241,14 +240,15 @@ mod $name {
|
||||
test_abi_compatible!(nonnull_ptr, NonNull<i32>, *const i32);
|
||||
test_abi_compatible!(fn_fn, fn(), fn(i32) -> i32);
|
||||
|
||||
// Some further guarantees we will likely (have to) make.
|
||||
// Compatibility of 1-ZST.
|
||||
test_abi_compatible!(zst_unit, Zst, ());
|
||||
#[cfg(not(any(target_arch = "sparc64")))]
|
||||
test_abi_compatible!(zst_array, Zst, [u8; 0]);
|
||||
test_abi_compatible!(nonzero_int, NonZeroI32, i32);
|
||||
|
||||
// `DispatchFromDyn` relies on ABI compatibility.
|
||||
// This is interesting since these types are not `repr(transparent)`.
|
||||
// This is interesting since these types are not `repr(transparent)`. So this is not part of our
|
||||
// public ABI guarantees, but is relied on by the compiler.
|
||||
test_abi_compatible!(rc, Rc<i32>, *mut i32);
|
||||
test_abi_compatible!(arc, Arc<i32>, *mut i32);
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user