mikros/rust
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Fix union handling in exhaustiveness

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Nadrieril 2024-03-31 23:57:53 +02:00
parent db9b4eac48
commit 27704c7f9e
5 changed files with 78 additions and 25 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

3
compiler/rustc_middle/src/thir.rs
View File

@ -1120,7 +1120,8 @@ fn fmt(&self, f: &mut fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> fmt::Result {
printed += 1;
}
if printed < variant.fields.len() {
let is_union = self.ty.ty_adt_def().is_some_and(|adt| adt.is_union());
if printed < variant.fields.len() && (!is_union || printed == 0) {
write!(f, "{}..", start_or_comma())?;
}

28
compiler/rustc_pattern_analysis/src/constructor.rs
View File

@ -140,6 +140,34 @@
//! [`ConstructorSet::split`]. The invariants of [`SplitConstructorSet`] are also of interest.
//!
//!
//! ## Unions
//!
//! Unions allow us to match a value via several overlapping representations at the same time. For
//! example, the following is exhaustive because when seeing the value as a boolean we handled all
//! possible cases (other cases such as `n == 3` would trigger UB).
//!
//! ```rust
//! # fn main() {
//! union U8AsBool {
//! n: u8,
//! b: bool,
//! }
//! let x = U8AsBool { n: 1 };
//! unsafe {
//! match x {
//! U8AsBool { n: 2 } => {}
//! U8AsBool { b: true } => {}
//! U8AsBool { b: false } => {}
//! }
//! }
//! # }
//! ```
//!
//! Pattern-matching has no knowledge that e.g. `false as u8 == 0`, so the values we consider in the
//! algorithm look like `U8AsBool { b: true, n: 2 }`. In other words, for the most part a union is
//! treated like a struct with the same fields. The difference lies in how we construct witnesses of
//! non-exhaustiveness.
//!
//!
//! ## Opaque patterns
//!

35
compiler/rustc_pattern_analysis/src/usefulness.rs
View File

@ -1384,12 +1384,35 @@ fn push_pattern(&mut self, pat: WitnessPat<Cx>) {
/// pats: [(false, "foo"), _, true]
/// result: [Enum::Variant { a: (false, "foo"), b: _ }, true]
/// ```
fn apply_constructor(&mut self, pcx: &PlaceCtxt<'_, Cx>, ctor: &Constructor<Cx>) {
fn apply_constructor(
mut self,
pcx: &PlaceCtxt<'_, Cx>,
ctor: &Constructor<Cx>,
) -> SmallVec<[Self; 1]> {
let len = self.0.len();
let arity = pcx.ctor_arity(ctor);
let fields = self.0.drain((len - arity)..).rev().collect();
let pat = WitnessPat::new(ctor.clone(), fields, pcx.ty.clone());
self.0.push(pat);
let fields: Vec<_> = self.0.drain((len - arity)..).rev().collect();
if matches!(ctor, Constructor::UnionField)
&& fields.iter().filter(|p| !matches!(p.ctor(), Constructor::Wildcard)).count() >= 2
{
// Convert a `Union { a: p, b: q }` witness into `Union { a: p }` and `Union { b: q }`.
// First add `Union { .. }` to `self`.
self.0.push(WitnessPat::wild_from_ctor(pcx.cx, ctor.clone(), pcx.ty.clone()));
fields
.into_iter()
.enumerate()
.filter(|(_, p)| !matches!(p.ctor(), Constructor::Wildcard))
.map(|(i, p)| {
let mut ret = self.clone();
// Fill the `i`th field of the union with `p`.
ret.0.last_mut().unwrap().fields[i] = p;
ret
})
.collect()
} else {
self.0.push(WitnessPat::new(ctor.clone(), fields, pcx.ty.clone()));
smallvec![self]
}
}
}
@ -1462,8 +1485,8 @@ fn apply_constructor(
*self = ret;
} else {
// Any other constructor we unspecialize as expected.
for witness in self.0.iter_mut() {
witness.apply_constructor(pcx, ctor)
for witness in std::mem::take(&mut self.0) {
self.0.extend(witness.apply_constructor(pcx, ctor));
}
}
}

5
tests/ui/pattern/usefulness/unions.rs
View File

@ -20,12 +20,13 @@ union U8AsBool {
U8AsBool { n: 1.. } => {}
}
match x {
//~^ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `U8AsBool { n: 0_u8, b: false }` not covered
//~^ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `U8AsBool { n: 0_u8 }` and `U8AsBool { b: false }` not covered
U8AsBool { b: true } => {}
U8AsBool { n: 1.. } => {}
}
// Our approach can report duplicate witnesses sometimes.
match (x, true) {
//~^ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `(U8AsBool { n: 0_u8, b: false }, false)` and `(U8AsBool { n: 0_u8, b: true }, false)` not covered
//~^ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `(U8AsBool { n: 0_u8 }, false)`, `(U8AsBool { b: false }, false)`, `(U8AsBool { n: 0_u8 }, false)` and 1 more not covered
(U8AsBool { b: true }, true) => {}
(U8AsBool { b: false }, true) => {}
(U8AsBool { n: 1.. }, true) => {}

32
tests/ui/pattern/usefulness/unions.stderr
View File

@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `U8AsBool { n: 0_u8, b: false }` not covered
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `U8AsBool { n: 0_u8 }` and `U8AsBool { b: false }` not covered
--> $DIR/unions.rs:22:15
|
LL | match x {
| ^ pattern `U8AsBool { n: 0_u8, b: false }` not covered
| ^ patterns `U8AsBool { n: 0_u8 }` and `U8AsBool { b: false }` not covered
|
note: `U8AsBool` defined here
--> $DIR/unions.rs:3:11
@ -10,23 +10,23 @@ note: `U8AsBool` defined here
LL | union U8AsBool {
| ^^^^^^^^
= note: the matched value is of type `U8AsBool`
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern or an explicit pattern as shown
|
LL ~ U8AsBool { n: 1.. } => {},
LL + U8AsBool { n: 0_u8, b: false } => todo!()
|
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `(U8AsBool { n: 0_u8, b: false }, false)` and `(U8AsBool { n: 0_u8, b: true }, false)` not covered
--> $DIR/unions.rs:27:15
|
LL | match (x, true) {
| ^^^^^^^^^ patterns `(U8AsBool { n: 0_u8, b: false }, false)` and `(U8AsBool { n: 0_u8, b: true }, false)` not covered
|
= note: the matched value is of type `(U8AsBool, bool)`
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern, a match arm with multiple or-patterns as shown, or multiple match arms
|
LL ~ U8AsBool { n: 1.. } => {},
LL + U8AsBool { n: 0_u8 } | U8AsBool { b: false } => todo!()
|
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `(U8AsBool { n: 0_u8 }, false)`, `(U8AsBool { b: false }, false)`, `(U8AsBool { n: 0_u8 }, false)` and 1 more not covered
--> $DIR/unions.rs:28:15
|
LL | match (x, true) {
| ^^^^^^^^^ patterns `(U8AsBool { n: 0_u8 }, false)`, `(U8AsBool { b: false }, false)`, `(U8AsBool { n: 0_u8 }, false)` and 1 more not covered
|
= note: the matched value is of type `(U8AsBool, bool)`
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern as shown, or multiple match arms
|
LL ~ (U8AsBool { n: 1.. }, true) => {},
LL + (U8AsBool { n: 0_u8, b: false }, false) | (U8AsBool { n: 0_u8, b: true }, false) => todo!()
LL + _ => todo!()
|
error: aborting due to 2 previous errors