mikros/rust
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Rename strict_check to negative_impl_exists

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Santiago Pastorino 2022-01-22 21:25:56 -03:00
parent 7847ca8c61
commit 269383226f
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 8131A24E0C79EFAF
1 changed files with 8 additions and 4 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

12
compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/coherence.rs
View File

@ -313,7 +313,9 @@ fn implicit_negative<'cx, 'tcx>(
predicate: p,
})
.chain(obligations)
.find(|o| loose_check(selcx, o) || tcx.features().negative_impls && strict_check(selcx, o));
.find(|o| {
loose_check(selcx, o) || tcx.features().negative_impls && negative_impl_exists(selcx, o)
});
// FIXME: the call to `selcx.predicate_may_hold_fatal` above should be ported
// to the canonical trait query form, `infcx.predicate_may_hold`, once
// the new system supports intercrate mode (which coherence needs).
@ -377,8 +379,10 @@ fn negative_impl<'cx, 'tcx>(
}
};
let opt_failing_obligation =
obligations.into_iter().chain(more_obligations).find(|o| strict_check(selcx, o));
let opt_failing_obligation = obligations
.into_iter()
.chain(more_obligations)
.find(|o| negative_impl_exists(selcx, o));
if let Some(failing_obligation) = opt_failing_obligation {
debug!("overlap: obligation unsatisfiable {:?}", failing_obligation);
@ -396,7 +400,7 @@ fn loose_check<'cx, 'tcx>(
!selcx.predicate_may_hold_fatal(o)
}
fn strict_check<'cx, 'tcx>(
fn negative_impl_exists<'cx, 'tcx>(
selcx: &SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx>,
o: &PredicateObligation<'tcx>,
) -> bool {