Fixed naive doc formatting for #[must_use]
lints
This commit is contained in:
parent
e1871ba0da
commit
25ff7ce128
@ -91,11 +91,9 @@
|
||||
|
||||
declare_clippy_lint! {
|
||||
/// ### What it does
|
||||
/// Checks for a [`#[must_use]`] attribute on
|
||||
/// Checks for a `#[must_use]` attribute on
|
||||
/// unit-returning functions and methods.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// [`#[must_use]`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/attributes/diagnostics.html#the-must_use-attribute
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// ### Why is this bad?
|
||||
/// Unit values are useless. The attribute is likely
|
||||
/// a remnant of a refactoring that removed the return type.
|
||||
@ -112,12 +110,10 @@
|
||||
|
||||
declare_clippy_lint! {
|
||||
/// ### What it does
|
||||
/// Checks for a [`#[must_use]`] attribute without
|
||||
/// Checks for a `#[must_use]` attribute without
|
||||
/// further information on functions and methods that return a type already
|
||||
/// marked as `#[must_use]`.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// [`#[must_use]`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/attributes/diagnostics.html#the-must_use-attribute
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// ### Why is this bad?
|
||||
/// The attribute isn't needed. Not using the result
|
||||
/// will already be reported. Alternatively, one can add some text to the
|
||||
@ -138,11 +134,9 @@
|
||||
declare_clippy_lint! {
|
||||
/// ### What it does
|
||||
/// Checks for public functions that have no
|
||||
/// [`#[must_use]`] attribute, but return something not already marked
|
||||
/// `#[must_use]` attribute, but return something not already marked
|
||||
/// must-use, have no mutable arg and mutate no statics.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// [`#[must_use]`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/attributes/diagnostics.html#the-must_use-attribute
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// ### Why is this bad?
|
||||
/// Not bad at all, this lint just shows places where
|
||||
/// you could add the attribute.
|
||||
|
@ -10,12 +10,11 @@
|
||||
|
||||
declare_clippy_lint! {
|
||||
/// ### What it does
|
||||
/// Checks for `let _ = <expr>`
|
||||
/// where expr is #[must_use]
|
||||
/// Checks for `let _ = <expr>` where expr is `#[must_use]`
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// ### Why is this bad?
|
||||
/// It's better to explicitly
|
||||
/// handle the value of a #[must_use] expr
|
||||
/// It's better to explicitly handle the value of a `#[must_use]`
|
||||
/// expr
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// ### Example
|
||||
/// ```rust
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user