Rollup merge of #116704 - compiler-errors:afit-lint-plus, r=tmandry

Fix AFIT lint message to mention pitfall

Addresses https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/116184#issuecomment-1745194387 by adding a short note. Not sure exactly of the wording -- I don't think this should be a blocker for the stabilization PR since we can iterate on this lint's messaging in the next few weeks in the worst case.

r? `@tmandry` cc `@traviscross` `@jonhoo`
This commit is contained in:
Matthias Krüger 2023-10-14 13:36:29 +02:00 committed by GitHub
commit 24116aebe0
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
2 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ lint_array_into_iter =
lint_async_fn_in_trait = use of `async fn` in public traits is discouraged as auto trait bounds cannot be specified
.note = you can suppress this lint if you plan to use the trait only in your own code, or do not care about auto traits like `Send` on the `Future`
.suggestion = you can alternatively desugar to a normal `fn` that returns `impl Future` and add any desired bounds such as `Send`
.suggestion = you can alternatively desugar to a normal `fn` that returns `impl Future` and add any desired bounds such as `Send`, but these cannot be relaxed without a breaking API change
lint_atomic_ordering_fence = memory fences cannot have `Relaxed` ordering
.help = consider using ordering modes `Acquire`, `Release`, `AcqRel` or `SeqCst`

View File

@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ note: the lint level is defined here
|
LL | #![deny(async_fn_in_trait)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
help: you can alternatively desugar to a normal `fn` that returns `impl Future` and add any desired bounds such as `Send`
help: you can alternatively desugar to a normal `fn` that returns `impl Future` and add any desired bounds such as `Send`, but these cannot be relaxed without a breaking API change
|
LL - async fn not_send();
LL + fn not_send() -> impl std::future::Future<Output = ()> + Send;