Use ConstCx
for validate_candidates
This commit is contained in:
parent
0bc743ed12
commit
22a53790ed
@ -1997,7 +1997,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> TypeChecker<'a, 'tcx> {
|
||||
// be mentioned, need to check if the rvalue is promotable.
|
||||
let should_suggest =
|
||||
should_suggest_const_in_array_repeat_expressions_attribute(
|
||||
ccx, operand,
|
||||
&ccx, operand,
|
||||
);
|
||||
debug!("check_rvalue: should_suggest={:?}", should_suggest);
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ impl<'tcx> MirPass<'tcx> for PromoteTemps<'tcx> {
|
||||
let ccx = ConstCx::new(tcx, def_id, body);
|
||||
let (temps, all_candidates) = collect_temps_and_candidates(&ccx, &mut rpo);
|
||||
|
||||
let promotable_candidates = validate_candidates(tcx, body, def_id, &temps, &all_candidates);
|
||||
let promotable_candidates = validate_candidates(&ccx, &temps, &all_candidates);
|
||||
|
||||
let promoted = promote_candidates(def_id, body, tcx, temps, promotable_candidates);
|
||||
self.promoted_fragments.set(promoted);
|
||||
@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ pub fn collect_temps_and_candidates(
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// This wraps an `Item`, and has access to all fields of that `Item` via `Deref` coercion.
|
||||
struct Validator<'a, 'tcx> {
|
||||
ccx: ConstCx<'a, 'tcx>,
|
||||
ccx: &'a ConstCx<'a, 'tcx>,
|
||||
temps: &'a IndexVec<Local, TempState>,
|
||||
|
||||
/// Explicit promotion happens e.g. for constant arguments declared via
|
||||
@ -715,13 +715,11 @@ impl<'tcx> Validator<'_, 'tcx> {
|
||||
|
||||
// FIXME(eddyb) remove the differences for promotability in `static`, `const`, `const fn`.
|
||||
pub fn validate_candidates(
|
||||
tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
|
||||
body: &Body<'tcx>,
|
||||
def_id: DefId,
|
||||
ccx: &ConstCx<'_, '_>,
|
||||
temps: &IndexVec<Local, TempState>,
|
||||
candidates: &[Candidate],
|
||||
) -> Vec<Candidate> {
|
||||
let mut validator = Validator { ccx: ConstCx::new(tcx, def_id, body), temps, explicit: false };
|
||||
let mut validator = Validator { ccx, temps, explicit: false };
|
||||
|
||||
candidates
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
@ -735,9 +733,9 @@ pub fn validate_candidates(
|
||||
let is_promotable = validator.validate_candidate(candidate).is_ok();
|
||||
match candidate {
|
||||
Candidate::Argument { bb, index } if !is_promotable => {
|
||||
let span = body[bb].terminator().source_info.span;
|
||||
let span = ccx.body[bb].terminator().source_info.span;
|
||||
let msg = format!("argument {} is required to be a constant", index + 1);
|
||||
tcx.sess.span_err(span, &msg);
|
||||
ccx.tcx.sess.span_err(span, &msg);
|
||||
}
|
||||
_ => (),
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -1145,7 +1143,7 @@ pub fn promote_candidates<'tcx>(
|
||||
/// Feature attribute should be suggested if `operand` can be promoted and the feature is not
|
||||
/// enabled.
|
||||
crate fn should_suggest_const_in_array_repeat_expressions_attribute<'tcx>(
|
||||
ccx: ConstCx<'_, 'tcx>,
|
||||
ccx: &ConstCx<'_, 'tcx>,
|
||||
operand: &Operand<'tcx>,
|
||||
) -> bool {
|
||||
let mut rpo = traversal::reverse_postorder(&ccx.body);
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user