resolve the rustc_reservation_impl attribute in 1 place
This commit is contained in:
parent
9a94ecde04
commit
1ec7ae14fa
@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ rustc_queries! {
|
||||
query associated_item(_: DefId) -> ty::AssocItem {}
|
||||
|
||||
query impl_trait_ref(_: DefId) -> Option<ty::TraitRef<'tcx>> {}
|
||||
query impl_polarity(_: DefId) -> hir::ImplPolarity {}
|
||||
query impl_polarity(_: DefId) -> ty::ImplPolarity {}
|
||||
|
||||
query issue33140_self_ty(_: DefId) -> Option<ty::Ty<'tcx>> {}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ impl AutoTraitFinder<'tcx> {
|
||||
match vtable {
|
||||
Vtable::VtableImpl(VtableImplData { impl_def_id, .. }) => {
|
||||
// Blame tidy for the weird bracket placement
|
||||
if infcx.tcx.impl_polarity(*impl_def_id) == hir::ImplPolarity::Negative
|
||||
if infcx.tcx.impl_polarity(*impl_def_id) == ty::ImplPolarity::Negative
|
||||
{
|
||||
debug!("evaluate_nested_obligations: Found explicit negative impl\
|
||||
{:?}, bailing out", impl_def_id);
|
||||
|
@ -50,8 +50,6 @@ use std::iter;
|
||||
use std::rc::Rc;
|
||||
use crate::util::nodemap::{FxHashMap, FxHashSet};
|
||||
|
||||
use syntax::symbol::sym;
|
||||
|
||||
pub struct SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx> {
|
||||
infcx: &'cx InferCtxt<'cx, 'tcx>,
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1334,15 +1332,15 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx> {
|
||||
candidate: SelectionCandidate<'tcx>,
|
||||
) -> SelectionResult<'tcx, SelectionCandidate<'tcx>> {
|
||||
if let ImplCandidate(def_id) = candidate {
|
||||
if !self.allow_negative_impls
|
||||
&& self.tcx().impl_polarity(def_id) == hir::ImplPolarity::Negative
|
||||
{
|
||||
return Err(Unimplemented);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if self.tcx().has_attr(def_id, sym::rustc_reservation_impl) {
|
||||
return Ok(None);
|
||||
}
|
||||
match self.tcx().impl_polarity(def_id) {
|
||||
ty::ImplPolarity::Negative if !self.allow_negative_impls => {
|
||||
return Err(Unimplemented);
|
||||
}
|
||||
ty::ImplPolarity::Reservation => {
|
||||
return Ok(None);
|
||||
}
|
||||
_ => {}
|
||||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
Ok(Some(candidate))
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -3734,8 +3732,8 @@ impl<'cx, 'tcx> SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx> {
|
||||
return Err(());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if self.intercrate.is_none() &&
|
||||
self.tcx().has_attr(impl_def_id, sym::rustc_reservation_impl)
|
||||
if self.intercrate.is_none()
|
||||
&& self.tcx().impl_polarity(impl_def_id) == ty::ImplPolarity::Reservation
|
||||
{
|
||||
debug!("match_impl: reservation impls only apply in intercrate mode");
|
||||
return Err(());
|
||||
|
@ -167,6 +167,16 @@ pub struct ImplHeader<'tcx> {
|
||||
pub predicates: Vec<Predicate<'tcx>>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[derive(Copy, Clone, PartialEq, RustcEncodable, RustcDecodable, HashStable)]
|
||||
pub enum ImplPolarity {
|
||||
/// `impl Trait for Type`
|
||||
Positive,
|
||||
/// `impl !Trait for Type`
|
||||
Negative,
|
||||
/// `#[rustc_reservation_impl] impl Trait for Type`
|
||||
Reservation,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[derive(Copy, Clone, Debug, PartialEq, HashStable)]
|
||||
pub struct AssocItem {
|
||||
pub def_id: DefId,
|
||||
@ -2911,11 +2921,24 @@ impl<'tcx> TyCtxt<'tcx> {
|
||||
return Some(ImplOverlapKind::Permitted);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if self.impl_polarity(def_id1) != self.impl_polarity(def_id2) {
|
||||
debug!("impls_are_allowed_to_overlap({:?}, {:?}) - different polarities, None",
|
||||
def_id1, def_id2);
|
||||
return None;
|
||||
}
|
||||
match (self.impl_polarity(def_id1), self.impl_polarity(def_id2)) {
|
||||
(ImplPolarity::Reservation, _) |
|
||||
(_, ImplPolarity::Reservation) => {
|
||||
// `#[rustc_reservation_impl]` impls don't overlap with anything
|
||||
debug!("impls_are_allowed_to_overlap({:?}, {:?}) = Some(Permitted) (reservations)",
|
||||
def_id1, def_id2);
|
||||
return Some(ImplOverlapKind::Permitted);
|
||||
}
|
||||
(ImplPolarity::Positive, ImplPolarity::Negative) |
|
||||
(ImplPolarity::Negative, ImplPolarity::Positive) => {
|
||||
// FIXME: when can this happen?
|
||||
debug!("impls_are_allowed_to_overlap({:?}, {:?}) - None (differing polarities)",
|
||||
def_id1, def_id2);
|
||||
return None;
|
||||
}
|
||||
(ImplPolarity::Positive, ImplPolarity::Positive) |
|
||||
(ImplPolarity::Negative, ImplPolarity::Negative) => {}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
let is_marker_overlap = if self.features().overlapping_marker_traits {
|
||||
let trait1_is_empty = self.impl_trait_ref(def_id1)
|
||||
@ -2935,15 +2958,10 @@ impl<'tcx> TyCtxt<'tcx> {
|
||||
is_marker_impl(def_id1) && is_marker_impl(def_id2)
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
// `#[rustc_reservation_impl]` impls don't overlap with anything
|
||||
let is_reserve_overlap = {
|
||||
self.has_attr(def_id1, sym::rustc_reservation_impl) ||
|
||||
self.has_attr(def_id2, sym::rustc_reservation_impl)
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
if is_marker_overlap || is_reserve_overlap {
|
||||
debug!("impls_are_allowed_to_overlap({:?}, {:?}) = Some(Permitted) ({:?}/{:?})",
|
||||
def_id1, def_id2, is_marker_overlap, is_reserve_overlap);
|
||||
if is_marker_overlap {
|
||||
debug!("impls_are_allowed_to_overlap({:?}, {:?}) = Some(Permitted) (marker overlap)",
|
||||
def_id1, def_id2);
|
||||
Some(ImplOverlapKind::Permitted)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
if let Some(self_ty1) = self.issue33140_self_ty(def_id1) {
|
||||
@ -3325,7 +3343,7 @@ fn issue33140_self_ty(tcx: TyCtxt<'_>, def_id: DefId) -> Option<Ty<'_>> {
|
||||
debug!("issue33140_self_ty({:?}), trait-ref={:?}", def_id, trait_ref);
|
||||
|
||||
let is_marker_like =
|
||||
tcx.impl_polarity(def_id) == hir::ImplPolarity::Positive &&
|
||||
tcx.impl_polarity(def_id) == ty::ImplPolarity::Positive &&
|
||||
tcx.associated_item_def_ids(trait_ref.def_id).is_empty();
|
||||
|
||||
// Check whether these impls would be ok for a marker trait.
|
||||
|
@ -722,7 +722,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> CrateMetadata {
|
||||
self.get_impl_data(id).parent_impl
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn get_impl_polarity(&self, id: DefIndex) -> hir::ImplPolarity {
|
||||
pub fn get_impl_polarity(&self, id: DefIndex) -> ty::ImplPolarity {
|
||||
self.get_impl_data(id).polarity
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1172,8 +1172,9 @@ impl EncodeContext<'tcx> {
|
||||
ctor_sig: None,
|
||||
}), repr_options)
|
||||
}
|
||||
hir::ItemKind::Impl(_, polarity, defaultness, ..) => {
|
||||
hir::ItemKind::Impl(_, _, defaultness, ..) => {
|
||||
let trait_ref = tcx.impl_trait_ref(def_id);
|
||||
let polarity = tcx.impl_polarity(def_id);
|
||||
let parent = if let Some(trait_ref) = trait_ref {
|
||||
let trait_def = tcx.trait_def(trait_ref.def_id);
|
||||
trait_def.ancestors(tcx, def_id).nth(1).and_then(|node| {
|
||||
|
@ -327,7 +327,7 @@ pub struct TraitAliasData<'tcx> {
|
||||
|
||||
#[derive(RustcEncodable, RustcDecodable)]
|
||||
pub struct ImplData<'tcx> {
|
||||
pub polarity: hir::ImplPolarity,
|
||||
pub polarity: ty::ImplPolarity,
|
||||
pub defaultness: hir::Defaultness,
|
||||
pub parent_impl: Option<DefId>,
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ use rustc::hir::def::DefKind;
|
||||
use rustc::hir::def_id::DefId;
|
||||
use rustc::hir::intravisit::{self, NestedVisitorMap, Visitor};
|
||||
use rustc::hir::map::definitions::DefPathData;
|
||||
use rustc::hir::{self, ImplPolarity};
|
||||
use rustc::hir;
|
||||
use rustc::traits::{
|
||||
Clause,
|
||||
Clauses,
|
||||
@ -295,7 +295,8 @@ fn program_clauses_for_trait(tcx: TyCtxt<'_>, def_id: DefId) -> Clauses<'_> {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn program_clauses_for_impl(tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>, def_id: DefId) -> Clauses<'tcx> {
|
||||
if let ImplPolarity::Negative = tcx.impl_polarity(def_id) {
|
||||
// FIXME: implement reservation impls.
|
||||
if let ty::ImplPolarity::Negative = tcx.impl_polarity(def_id) {
|
||||
return List::empty();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -94,20 +94,27 @@ pub fn check_item_well_formed(tcx: TyCtxt<'_>, def_id: DefId) {
|
||||
//
|
||||
// won't be allowed unless there's an *explicit* implementation of `Send`
|
||||
// for `T`
|
||||
hir::ItemKind::Impl(_, polarity, defaultness, _, ref trait_ref, ref self_ty, _) => {
|
||||
hir::ItemKind::Impl(_, _, defaultness, _, ref trait_ref, ref self_ty, _) => {
|
||||
let is_auto = tcx.impl_trait_ref(tcx.hir().local_def_id(item.hir_id))
|
||||
.map_or(false, |trait_ref| tcx.trait_is_auto(trait_ref.def_id));
|
||||
.map_or(false, |trait_ref| tcx.trait_is_auto(trait_ref.def_id));
|
||||
let polarity = tcx.impl_polarity(def_id);
|
||||
if let (hir::Defaultness::Default { .. }, true) = (defaultness, is_auto) {
|
||||
tcx.sess.span_err(item.span, "impls of auto traits cannot be default");
|
||||
}
|
||||
if polarity == hir::ImplPolarity::Positive {
|
||||
check_impl(tcx, item, self_ty, trait_ref);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// FIXME(#27579): what amount of WF checking do we need for neg impls?
|
||||
if trait_ref.is_some() && !is_auto {
|
||||
span_err!(tcx.sess, item.span, E0192,
|
||||
"negative impls are only allowed for \
|
||||
auto traits (e.g., `Send` and `Sync`)")
|
||||
match polarity {
|
||||
ty::ImplPolarity::Positive => {
|
||||
check_impl(tcx, item, self_ty, trait_ref);
|
||||
}
|
||||
ty::ImplPolarity::Negative => {
|
||||
// FIXME(#27579): what amount of WF checking do we need for neg impls?
|
||||
if trait_ref.is_some() && !is_auto {
|
||||
span_err!(tcx.sess, item.span, E0192,
|
||||
"negative impls are only allowed for \
|
||||
auto traits (e.g., `Send` and `Sync`)")
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
ty::ImplPolarity::Reservation => {
|
||||
// FIXME: what amount of WF checking do we need for reservation impls?
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -401,20 +408,18 @@ fn check_impl<'tcx>(
|
||||
// `#[rustc_reservation_impl]` impls are not real impls and
|
||||
// therefore don't need to be WF (the trait's `Self: Trait` predicate
|
||||
// won't hold).
|
||||
if !fcx.tcx.has_attr(item_def_id, sym::rustc_reservation_impl) {
|
||||
let trait_ref = fcx.tcx.impl_trait_ref(item_def_id).unwrap();
|
||||
let trait_ref =
|
||||
fcx.normalize_associated_types_in(
|
||||
ast_trait_ref.path.span, &trait_ref);
|
||||
let obligations =
|
||||
ty::wf::trait_obligations(fcx,
|
||||
fcx.param_env,
|
||||
fcx.body_id,
|
||||
&trait_ref,
|
||||
ast_trait_ref.path.span);
|
||||
for obligation in obligations {
|
||||
fcx.register_predicate(obligation);
|
||||
}
|
||||
let trait_ref = fcx.tcx.impl_trait_ref(item_def_id).unwrap();
|
||||
let trait_ref =
|
||||
fcx.normalize_associated_types_in(
|
||||
ast_trait_ref.path.span, &trait_ref);
|
||||
let obligations =
|
||||
ty::wf::trait_obligations(fcx,
|
||||
fcx.param_env,
|
||||
fcx.body_id,
|
||||
&trait_ref,
|
||||
ast_trait_ref.path.span);
|
||||
for obligation in obligations {
|
||||
fcx.register_predicate(obligation);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
None => {
|
||||
|
@ -1866,10 +1866,30 @@ fn impl_trait_ref(tcx: TyCtxt<'_>, def_id: DefId) -> Option<ty::TraitRef<'_>> {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn impl_polarity(tcx: TyCtxt<'_>, def_id: DefId) -> hir::ImplPolarity {
|
||||
fn impl_polarity(tcx: TyCtxt<'_>, def_id: DefId) -> ty::ImplPolarity {
|
||||
let hir_id = tcx.hir().as_local_hir_id(def_id).unwrap();
|
||||
match tcx.hir().expect_item(hir_id).node {
|
||||
hir::ItemKind::Impl(_, polarity, ..) => polarity,
|
||||
let is_rustc_reservation = tcx.has_attr(def_id, sym::rustc_reservation_impl);
|
||||
let item = tcx.hir().expect_item(hir_id);
|
||||
match &item.node {
|
||||
hir::ItemKind::Impl(_, hir::ImplPolarity::Negative, ..) => {
|
||||
if is_rustc_reservation {
|
||||
tcx.sess.span_err(item.span, "reservation impls can't be negative");
|
||||
}
|
||||
ty::ImplPolarity::Negative
|
||||
}
|
||||
hir::ItemKind::Impl(_, hir::ImplPolarity::Positive, _, _, None, _, _) => {
|
||||
if is_rustc_reservation {
|
||||
tcx.sess.span_err(item.span, "reservation impls can't be inherent");
|
||||
}
|
||||
ty::ImplPolarity::Positive
|
||||
}
|
||||
hir::ItemKind::Impl(_, hir::ImplPolarity::Positive, _, _, Some(_tr), _, _) => {
|
||||
if is_rustc_reservation {
|
||||
ty::ImplPolarity::Reservation
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
ty::ImplPolarity::Positive
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
ref item => bug!("impl_polarity: {:?} not an impl", item),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -3864,11 +3864,13 @@ pub enum ImplPolarity {
|
||||
Negative,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl Clean<ImplPolarity> for hir::ImplPolarity {
|
||||
impl Clean<ImplPolarity> for ty::ImplPolarity {
|
||||
fn clean(&self, _: &DocContext<'_>) -> ImplPolarity {
|
||||
match self {
|
||||
&hir::ImplPolarity::Positive => ImplPolarity::Positive,
|
||||
&hir::ImplPolarity::Negative => ImplPolarity::Negative,
|
||||
&ty::ImplPolarity::Positive |
|
||||
// FIXME: do we want to do something else here?
|
||||
&ty::ImplPolarity::Reservation => ImplPolarity::Positive,
|
||||
&ty::ImplPolarity::Negative => ImplPolarity::Negative,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -3900,6 +3902,7 @@ impl Clean<Vec<Item>> for doctree::Impl<'_> {
|
||||
let mut ret = Vec::new();
|
||||
let trait_ = self.trait_.clean(cx);
|
||||
let items = self.items.iter().map(|ii| ii.clean(cx)).collect::<Vec<_>>();
|
||||
let def_id = cx.tcx.hir().local_def_id(self.id);
|
||||
|
||||
// If this impl block is an implementation of the Deref trait, then we
|
||||
// need to try inlining the target's inherent impl blocks as well.
|
||||
@ -3918,7 +3921,7 @@ impl Clean<Vec<Item>> for doctree::Impl<'_> {
|
||||
name: None,
|
||||
attrs: self.attrs.clean(cx),
|
||||
source: self.whence.clean(cx),
|
||||
def_id: cx.tcx.hir().local_def_id(self.id),
|
||||
def_id,
|
||||
visibility: self.vis.clean(cx),
|
||||
stability: cx.stability(self.id).clean(cx),
|
||||
deprecation: cx.deprecation(self.id).clean(cx),
|
||||
@ -3929,7 +3932,7 @@ impl Clean<Vec<Item>> for doctree::Impl<'_> {
|
||||
trait_,
|
||||
for_: self.for_.clean(cx),
|
||||
items,
|
||||
polarity: Some(self.polarity.clean(cx)),
|
||||
polarity: Some(cx.tcx.impl_polarity(def_id).clean(cx)),
|
||||
synthetic: false,
|
||||
blanket_impl: None,
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user