Rollup merge of #89041 - sticnarf:sticnarf/fat-lto-dwarf, r=nagisa
Work around invalid DWARF bugs for fat LTO This PR applies the same workaround in #46772 to fat LTO. It seems to fix the bug reported in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/66118#issuecomment-917434036.
This commit is contained in:
commit
1deef1f75d
@ -325,6 +325,20 @@ fn fat_lto(
|
||||
drop(linker);
|
||||
save_temp_bitcode(&cgcx, &module, "lto.input");
|
||||
|
||||
// Fat LTO also suffers from the invalid DWARF issue similar to Thin LTO.
|
||||
// Here we rewrite all `DICompileUnit` pointers if there is only one `DICompileUnit`.
|
||||
// This only works around the problem when codegen-units = 1.
|
||||
// Refer to the comments in the `optimize_thin_module` function for more details.
|
||||
let mut cu1 = ptr::null_mut();
|
||||
let mut cu2 = ptr::null_mut();
|
||||
unsafe { llvm::LLVMRustLTOGetDICompileUnit(llmod, &mut cu1, &mut cu2) };
|
||||
if !cu2.is_null() {
|
||||
let _timer =
|
||||
cgcx.prof.generic_activity_with_arg("LLVM_fat_lto_patch_debuginfo", &*module.name);
|
||||
unsafe { llvm::LLVMRustLTOPatchDICompileUnit(llmod, cu1) };
|
||||
save_temp_bitcode(cgcx, &module, "fat-lto-after-patch");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Internalize everything below threshold to help strip out more modules and such.
|
||||
unsafe {
|
||||
let ptr = symbols_below_threshold.as_ptr();
|
||||
@ -748,7 +762,7 @@ pub unsafe fn optimize_thin_module(
|
||||
// an error.
|
||||
let mut cu1 = ptr::null_mut();
|
||||
let mut cu2 = ptr::null_mut();
|
||||
llvm::LLVMRustThinLTOGetDICompileUnit(llmod, &mut cu1, &mut cu2);
|
||||
llvm::LLVMRustLTOGetDICompileUnit(llmod, &mut cu1, &mut cu2);
|
||||
if !cu2.is_null() {
|
||||
let msg = "multiple source DICompileUnits found";
|
||||
return Err(write::llvm_err(&diag_handler, msg));
|
||||
@ -847,7 +861,7 @@ pub unsafe fn optimize_thin_module(
|
||||
let _timer = cgcx
|
||||
.prof
|
||||
.generic_activity_with_arg("LLVM_thin_lto_patch_debuginfo", thin_module.name());
|
||||
llvm::LLVMRustThinLTOPatchDICompileUnit(llmod, cu1);
|
||||
llvm::LLVMRustLTOPatchDICompileUnit(llmod, cu1);
|
||||
save_temp_bitcode(cgcx, &module, "thin-lto-after-patch");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -2377,12 +2377,8 @@ pub fn LLVMRustGetBitcodeSliceFromObjectData(
|
||||
len: usize,
|
||||
out_len: &mut usize,
|
||||
) -> *const u8;
|
||||
pub fn LLVMRustThinLTOGetDICompileUnit(
|
||||
M: &Module,
|
||||
CU1: &mut *mut c_void,
|
||||
CU2: &mut *mut c_void,
|
||||
);
|
||||
pub fn LLVMRustThinLTOPatchDICompileUnit(M: &Module, CU: *mut c_void);
|
||||
pub fn LLVMRustLTOGetDICompileUnit(M: &Module, CU1: &mut *mut c_void, CU2: &mut *mut c_void);
|
||||
pub fn LLVMRustLTOPatchDICompileUnit(M: &Module, CU: *mut c_void);
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn LLVMRustLinkerNew(M: &'a Module) -> &'a mut Linker<'a>;
|
||||
pub fn LLVMRustLinkerAdd(
|
||||
|
@ -1747,7 +1747,7 @@ LLVMRustGetBitcodeSliceFromObjectData(const char *data,
|
||||
// Rewrite all `DICompileUnit` pointers to the `DICompileUnit` specified. See
|
||||
// the comment in `back/lto.rs` for why this exists.
|
||||
extern "C" void
|
||||
LLVMRustThinLTOGetDICompileUnit(LLVMModuleRef Mod,
|
||||
LLVMRustLTOGetDICompileUnit(LLVMModuleRef Mod,
|
||||
DICompileUnit **A,
|
||||
DICompileUnit **B) {
|
||||
Module *M = unwrap(Mod);
|
||||
@ -1765,7 +1765,7 @@ LLVMRustThinLTOGetDICompileUnit(LLVMModuleRef Mod,
|
||||
// Rewrite all `DICompileUnit` pointers to the `DICompileUnit` specified. See
|
||||
// the comment in `back/lto.rs` for why this exists.
|
||||
extern "C" void
|
||||
LLVMRustThinLTOPatchDICompileUnit(LLVMModuleRef Mod, DICompileUnit *Unit) {
|
||||
LLVMRustLTOPatchDICompileUnit(LLVMModuleRef Mod, DICompileUnit *Unit) {
|
||||
Module *M = unwrap(Mod);
|
||||
|
||||
// If the original source module didn't have a `DICompileUnit` then try to
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user