Merge pull request #2251 from LaurentMazare/master
Add a couple small tests to the match-same-arm lint + fix a small issue in search_same.
This commit is contained in:
commit
1c95a7cf35
@ -74,9 +74,8 @@ fn eq(&self, other: &Self) -> bool {
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
(&Constant::Bool(l), &Constant::Bool(r)) => l == r,
|
||||
(&Constant::Vec(ref l), &Constant::Vec(ref r)) => l == r,
|
||||
(&Constant::Vec(ref l), &Constant::Vec(ref r)) | (&Constant::Tuple(ref l), &Constant::Tuple(ref r)) => l == r,
|
||||
(&Constant::Repeat(ref lv, ref ls), &Constant::Repeat(ref rv, ref rs)) => ls == rs && lv == rv,
|
||||
(&Constant::Tuple(ref l), &Constant::Tuple(ref r)) => l == r,
|
||||
_ => false, // TODO: Are there inter-type equalities?
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -203,14 +203,10 @@ fn lint_match_arms(cx: &LateContext, expr: &Expr) {
|
||||
db.span_note(i.body.span, "same as this");
|
||||
|
||||
// Note: this does not use `span_suggestion` on purpose: there is no clean way
|
||||
// to
|
||||
// remove the other arm. Building a span and suggest to replace it to "" makes
|
||||
// an
|
||||
// even more confusing error message. Also in order not to make up a span for
|
||||
// the
|
||||
// whole pattern, the suggestion is only shown when there is only one pattern.
|
||||
// The
|
||||
// user should know about `|` if they are already using it…
|
||||
// to remove the other arm. Building a span and suggest to replace it to ""
|
||||
// makes an even more confusing error message. Also in order not to make up a
|
||||
// span for the whole pattern, the suggestion is only shown when there is only
|
||||
// one pattern. The user should know about `|` if they are already using it…
|
||||
|
||||
if i.pats.len() == 1 && j.pats.len() == 1 {
|
||||
let lhs = snippet(cx, i.pats[0].span, "<pat1>");
|
||||
@ -329,10 +325,13 @@ fn search_same<T, Hash, Eq>(exprs: &[T], hash: Hash, eq: Eq) -> Option<(&T, &T)>
|
||||
|
||||
for expr in exprs {
|
||||
match map.entry(hash(expr)) {
|
||||
Entry::Occupied(o) => for o in o.get() {
|
||||
if eq(o, expr) {
|
||||
return Some((o, expr));
|
||||
Entry::Occupied(mut o) => {
|
||||
for o in o.get() {
|
||||
if eq(o, expr) {
|
||||
return Some((o, expr));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
o.get_mut().push(expr);
|
||||
},
|
||||
Entry::Vacant(v) => {
|
||||
v.insert(vec![expr]);
|
||||
|
@ -206,8 +206,7 @@ fn check_doc<'a, Events: Iterator<Item = (usize, pulldown_cmark::Event<'a>)>>(
|
||||
End(Link(_, _)) => in_link = None,
|
||||
Start(_tag) | End(_tag) => (), // We don't care about other tags
|
||||
Html(_html) | InlineHtml(_html) => (), // HTML is weird, just ignore it
|
||||
SoftBreak => (),
|
||||
HardBreak => (),
|
||||
SoftBreak | HardBreak => (),
|
||||
FootnoteReference(text) | Text(text) => {
|
||||
if Some(&text) == in_link.as_ref() {
|
||||
// Probably a link of the form `<http://example.com>`
|
||||
|
@ -277,6 +277,42 @@ fn match_wild_err_arm() {
|
||||
Ok(_) => println!("ok"),
|
||||
Err(_) => {unreachable!();}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// no warning because of the guard
|
||||
match x {
|
||||
Ok(x) if x*x == 64 => println!("ok"),
|
||||
Ok(_) => println!("ok"),
|
||||
Err(_) => println!("err")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// this is a current false positive, see #1996
|
||||
match x {
|
||||
Ok(3) => println!("ok"),
|
||||
Ok(x) if x*x == 64 => println!("ok 64"),
|
||||
Ok(_) => println!("ok"),
|
||||
Err(_) => println!("err")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
match (x, Some(1i32)) {
|
||||
(Ok(x), Some(_)) => println!("ok {}", x),
|
||||
(Ok(_), Some(x)) => println!("ok {}", x),
|
||||
_ => println!("err")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// no warning because of the different types for x
|
||||
match (x, Some(1.0f64)) {
|
||||
(Ok(x), Some(_)) => println!("ok {}", x),
|
||||
(Ok(_), Some(x)) => println!("ok {}", x),
|
||||
_ => println!("err")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// because of a bug, no warning was generated for this case before #2251
|
||||
match x {
|
||||
Ok(_tmp) => println!("ok"),
|
||||
Ok(3) => println!("ok"),
|
||||
Ok(_) => println!("ok"),
|
||||
Err(_) => {unreachable!();}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn main() {
|
||||
|
@ -390,3 +390,57 @@ note: consider refactoring into `Ok(3) | Ok(_)`
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
= note: this error originates in a macro outside of the current crate (in Nightly builds, run with -Z external-macro-backtrace for more info)
|
||||
|
||||
error: this `match` has identical arm bodies
|
||||
--> $DIR/matches.rs:292:18
|
||||
|
|
||||
292 | Ok(_) => println!("ok"),
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
|
|
||||
note: same as this
|
||||
--> $DIR/matches.rs:290:18
|
||||
|
|
||||
290 | Ok(3) => println!("ok"),
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
note: consider refactoring into `Ok(3) | Ok(_)`
|
||||
--> $DIR/matches.rs:290:18
|
||||
|
|
||||
290 | Ok(3) => println!("ok"),
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
= note: this error originates in a macro outside of the current crate (in Nightly builds, run with -Z external-macro-backtrace for more info)
|
||||
|
||||
error: this `match` has identical arm bodies
|
||||
--> $DIR/matches.rs:298:29
|
||||
|
|
||||
298 | (Ok(_), Some(x)) => println!("ok {}", x),
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
|
|
||||
note: same as this
|
||||
--> $DIR/matches.rs:297:29
|
||||
|
|
||||
297 | (Ok(x), Some(_)) => println!("ok {}", x),
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
note: consider refactoring into `(Ok(x), Some(_)) | (Ok(_), Some(x))`
|
||||
--> $DIR/matches.rs:297:29
|
||||
|
|
||||
297 | (Ok(x), Some(_)) => println!("ok {}", x),
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
= note: this error originates in a macro outside of the current crate (in Nightly builds, run with -Z external-macro-backtrace for more info)
|
||||
|
||||
error: this `match` has identical arm bodies
|
||||
--> $DIR/matches.rs:313:18
|
||||
|
|
||||
313 | Ok(_) => println!("ok"),
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
|
|
||||
note: same as this
|
||||
--> $DIR/matches.rs:312:18
|
||||
|
|
||||
312 | Ok(3) => println!("ok"),
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
note: consider refactoring into `Ok(3) | Ok(_)`
|
||||
--> $DIR/matches.rs:312:18
|
||||
|
|
||||
312 | Ok(3) => println!("ok"),
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
= note: this error originates in a macro outside of the current crate (in Nightly builds, run with -Z external-macro-backtrace for more info)
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user