Rollup merge of #98313 - m-ou-se:fix-comments, r=joshtriplett
Remove lies in comments.
> does not have a const constructor
> pub const fn new() -> Self
🤔
This commit is contained in:
commit
18b01d5ea0
@ -46,13 +46,12 @@ impl Drop for StaticMutexGuard {
|
||||
|
||||
/// An OS-based mutual exclusion lock.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// This mutex does *not* have a const constructor, cleans up its resources in
|
||||
/// its `Drop` implementation, may safely be moved (when not borrowed), and
|
||||
/// does not cause UB when used reentrantly.
|
||||
/// This mutex cleans up its resources in its `Drop` implementation, may safely
|
||||
/// be moved (when not borrowed), and does not cause UB when used reentrantly.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// This mutex does not implement poisoning.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// This is either a wrapper around `Box<imp::Mutex>` or `imp::Mutex`,
|
||||
/// This is either a wrapper around `LazyBox<imp::Mutex>` or `imp::Mutex`,
|
||||
/// depending on the platform. It is boxed on platforms where `imp::Mutex` may
|
||||
/// not be moved.
|
||||
pub struct MovableMutex(imp::MovableMutex);
|
||||
|
@ -62,12 +62,12 @@ impl Drop for StaticRwLockWriteGuard {
|
||||
|
||||
/// An OS-based reader-writer lock.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// This rwlock does *not* have a const constructor, cleans up its resources in
|
||||
/// its `Drop` implementation and may safely be moved (when not borrowed).
|
||||
/// This rwlock cleans up its resources in its `Drop` implementation and may
|
||||
/// safely be moved (when not borrowed).
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// This rwlock does not implement poisoning.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// This is either a wrapper around `Box<imp::RwLock>` or `imp::RwLock`,
|
||||
/// This is either a wrapper around `LazyBox<imp::RwLock>` or `imp::RwLock`,
|
||||
/// depending on the platform. It is boxed on platforms where `imp::RwLock` may
|
||||
/// not be moved.
|
||||
pub struct MovableRwLock(imp::MovableRwLock);
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user