mikros/rust
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Rollup merge of #115972 - RalfJung:const-consistency, r=oli-obk

Browse Source 
rename mir::Constant -> mir::ConstOperand, mir::ConstKind -> mir::Const

Also, be more consistent with the `to/eval_bits` methods... we had some that take a type and some that take a size, and then sometimes the one that takes a type is called `bits_for_ty`.

Turns out that `ty::Const`/`mir::ConstKind` carry their type with them, so we don't need to even pass the type to those `eval_bits` functions at all.

However this is not properly consistent yet: in `ty` we have most of the methods on `ty::Const`, but in `mir` we have them on `mir::ConstKind`. And indeed those two types are the ones that correspond to each other. So `mir::ConstantKind` should actually be renamed to `mir::Const`. But what to do with `mir::Constant`? It carries around a span, that's really more like a constant operand that appears as a MIR operand... it's more suited for `syntax.rs` than `consts.rs`, but the bigger question is, which name should it get if we want to align the `mir` and `ty` types? `ConstOperand`? `ConstOp`? `Literal`? It's not a literal but it has a field called `literal` so it would at least be consistently wrong-ish...

``@oli-obk`` any ideas?
This commit is contained in:
Guillaume Gomez 2023-09-21 13:25:39 +02:00 committed by GitHub
commit 1351de36ee
2 changed files with 5 additions and 5 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
src/constant.rs
View File

@ -64,9 +64,9 @@ pub(crate) fn codegen_tls_ref<'tcx>(
pub(crate) fn eval_mir_constant<'tcx>(
fx: &FunctionCx<'_, '_, 'tcx>,
constant: &Constant<'tcx>,
constant: &ConstOperand<'tcx>,
) -> (ConstValue<'tcx>, Ty<'tcx>) {
let cv = fx.monomorphize(constant.literal);
let cv = fx.monomorphize(constant.const_);
// This cannot fail because we checked all required_consts in advance.
let val = cv
.eval(fx.tcx, ty::ParamEnv::reveal_all(), Some(constant.span))
@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ pub(crate) fn eval_mir_constant<'tcx>(
pub(crate) fn codegen_constant_operand<'tcx>(
fx: &mut FunctionCx<'_, '_, 'tcx>,
constant: &Constant<'tcx>,
constant: &ConstOperand<'tcx>,
) -> CValue<'tcx> {
let (const_val, ty) = eval_mir_constant(fx, constant);
codegen_const_value(fx, const_val, ty)

4
src/inline_asm.rs
View File

@ -252,8 +252,8 @@ pub(crate) fn codegen_inline_asm<'tcx>(
CInlineAsmOperand::Const { value }
}
InlineAsmOperand::SymFn { ref value } => {
let literal = fx.monomorphize(value.literal);
if let ty::FnDef(def_id, args) = *literal.ty().kind() {
let const_ = fx.monomorphize(value.const_);
if let ty::FnDef(def_id, args) = *const_.ty().kind() {
let instance = ty::Instance::resolve_for_fn_ptr(
fx.tcx,
ty::ParamEnv::reveal_all(),