Remove incorrect statement about raw pointers.

Fixes #21709
This commit is contained in:
Steve Klabnik 2015-03-19 18:06:54 -04:00
parent 08dd30d9eb
commit 109803f6d5

View File

@ -93,10 +93,6 @@ offered by the Rust language and libraries. For example, they
- are plain-old-data, that is, they don't move ownership, again unlike
`Box`, hence the Rust compiler cannot protect against bugs like
use-after-free;
- are considered sendable (if their contents is considered sendable),
so the compiler offers no assistance with ensuring their use is
thread-safe; for example, one can concurrently access a `*mut i32`
from two threads without synchronization.
- lack any form of lifetimes, unlike `&`, and so the compiler cannot
reason about dangling pointers; and
- have no guarantees about aliasing or mutability other than mutation