AmbiguityCause should not eagerly format strings
This commit is contained in:
parent
b06258cde4
commit
0750a5df4d
@ -29,7 +29,6 @@
|
||||
use rustc_middle::traits::specialization_graph::OverlapMode;
|
||||
use rustc_middle::traits::DefiningAnchor;
|
||||
use rustc_middle::ty::fast_reject::{DeepRejectCtxt, TreatParams};
|
||||
use rustc_middle::ty::print::with_no_trimmed_paths;
|
||||
use rustc_middle::ty::visit::{TypeVisitable, TypeVisitableExt};
|
||||
use rustc_middle::ty::{self, Ty, TyCtxt, TypeSuperVisitable, TypeVisitor};
|
||||
use rustc_session::lint::builtin::COINDUCTIVE_OVERLAP_IN_COHERENCE;
|
||||
@ -54,7 +53,7 @@ pub enum Conflict {
|
||||
|
||||
pub struct OverlapResult<'tcx> {
|
||||
pub impl_header: ty::ImplHeader<'tcx>,
|
||||
pub intercrate_ambiguity_causes: FxIndexSet<IntercrateAmbiguityCause>,
|
||||
pub intercrate_ambiguity_causes: FxIndexSet<IntercrateAmbiguityCause<'tcx>>,
|
||||
|
||||
/// `true` if the overlap might've been permitted before the shift
|
||||
/// to universes.
|
||||
@ -979,8 +978,8 @@ fn visit_const(&mut self, _c: ty::Const<'tcx>) -> ControlFlow<Self::BreakTy> {
|
||||
fn compute_intercrate_ambiguity_causes<'tcx>(
|
||||
infcx: &InferCtxt<'tcx>,
|
||||
obligations: &[PredicateObligation<'tcx>],
|
||||
) -> FxIndexSet<IntercrateAmbiguityCause> {
|
||||
let mut causes: FxIndexSet<IntercrateAmbiguityCause> = Default::default();
|
||||
) -> FxIndexSet<IntercrateAmbiguityCause<'tcx>> {
|
||||
let mut causes: FxIndexSet<IntercrateAmbiguityCause<'tcx>> = Default::default();
|
||||
|
||||
for obligation in obligations {
|
||||
search_ambiguity_causes(infcx, obligation.clone().into(), &mut causes);
|
||||
@ -989,11 +988,11 @@ fn compute_intercrate_ambiguity_causes<'tcx>(
|
||||
causes
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
struct AmbiguityCausesVisitor<'a> {
|
||||
causes: &'a mut FxIndexSet<IntercrateAmbiguityCause>,
|
||||
struct AmbiguityCausesVisitor<'a, 'tcx> {
|
||||
causes: &'a mut FxIndexSet<IntercrateAmbiguityCause<'tcx>>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl<'a, 'tcx> ProofTreeVisitor<'tcx> for AmbiguityCausesVisitor<'a> {
|
||||
impl<'a, 'tcx> ProofTreeVisitor<'tcx> for AmbiguityCausesVisitor<'a, 'tcx> {
|
||||
type BreakTy = !;
|
||||
fn visit_goal(&mut self, goal: &InspectGoal<'_, 'tcx>) -> ControlFlow<Self::BreakTy> {
|
||||
let infcx = goal.infcx();
|
||||
@ -1033,14 +1032,12 @@ fn visit_goal(&mut self, goal: &InspectGoal<'_, 'tcx>) -> ControlFlow<Self::Brea
|
||||
} = cand.kind()
|
||||
{
|
||||
if let ty::ImplPolarity::Reservation = infcx.tcx.impl_polarity(def_id) {
|
||||
let value = infcx
|
||||
let message = infcx
|
||||
.tcx
|
||||
.get_attr(def_id, sym::rustc_reservation_impl)
|
||||
.and_then(|a| a.value_str());
|
||||
if let Some(value) = value {
|
||||
self.causes.insert(IntercrateAmbiguityCause::ReservationImpl {
|
||||
message: value.to_string(),
|
||||
});
|
||||
if let Some(message) = message {
|
||||
self.causes.insert(IntercrateAmbiguityCause::ReservationImpl { message });
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -1078,24 +1075,18 @@ fn visit_goal(&mut self, goal: &InspectGoal<'_, 'tcx>) -> ControlFlow<Self::Brea
|
||||
Ok(Err(conflict)) => {
|
||||
if !trait_ref.references_error() {
|
||||
let self_ty = trait_ref.self_ty();
|
||||
let (trait_desc, self_desc) = with_no_trimmed_paths!({
|
||||
let trait_desc = trait_ref.print_only_trait_path().to_string();
|
||||
let self_desc = self_ty
|
||||
.has_concrete_skeleton()
|
||||
.then(|| self_ty.to_string());
|
||||
(trait_desc, self_desc)
|
||||
});
|
||||
let self_ty = self_ty.has_concrete_skeleton().then(|| self_ty);
|
||||
ambiguity_cause = Some(match conflict {
|
||||
Conflict::Upstream => {
|
||||
IntercrateAmbiguityCause::UpstreamCrateUpdate {
|
||||
trait_desc,
|
||||
self_desc,
|
||||
trait_ref,
|
||||
self_ty,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
Conflict::Downstream => {
|
||||
IntercrateAmbiguityCause::DownstreamCrate {
|
||||
trait_desc,
|
||||
self_desc,
|
||||
trait_ref,
|
||||
self_ty,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
@ -1132,7 +1123,7 @@ fn visit_goal(&mut self, goal: &InspectGoal<'_, 'tcx>) -> ControlFlow<Self::Brea
|
||||
fn search_ambiguity_causes<'tcx>(
|
||||
infcx: &InferCtxt<'tcx>,
|
||||
goal: Goal<'tcx, ty::Predicate<'tcx>>,
|
||||
causes: &mut FxIndexSet<IntercrateAmbiguityCause>,
|
||||
causes: &mut FxIndexSet<IntercrateAmbiguityCause<'tcx>>,
|
||||
) {
|
||||
infcx.visit_proof_tree(goal, &mut AmbiguityCausesVisitor { causes });
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -46,6 +46,7 @@
|
||||
use rustc_middle::ty::{self, EarlyBinder, PolyProjectionPredicate, ToPolyTraitRef, ToPredicate};
|
||||
use rustc_middle::ty::{Ty, TyCtxt, TypeFoldable, TypeVisitableExt};
|
||||
use rustc_span::symbol::sym;
|
||||
use rustc_span::Symbol;
|
||||
|
||||
use std::cell::{Cell, RefCell};
|
||||
use std::cmp;
|
||||
@ -59,13 +60,13 @@
|
||||
mod confirmation;
|
||||
|
||||
#[derive(Clone, Debug, Eq, PartialEq, Hash)]
|
||||
pub enum IntercrateAmbiguityCause {
|
||||
DownstreamCrate { trait_desc: String, self_desc: Option<String> },
|
||||
UpstreamCrateUpdate { trait_desc: String, self_desc: Option<String> },
|
||||
ReservationImpl { message: String },
|
||||
pub enum IntercrateAmbiguityCause<'tcx> {
|
||||
DownstreamCrate { trait_ref: ty::TraitRef<'tcx>, self_ty: Option<Ty<'tcx>> },
|
||||
UpstreamCrateUpdate { trait_ref: ty::TraitRef<'tcx>, self_ty: Option<Ty<'tcx>> },
|
||||
ReservationImpl { message: Symbol },
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl IntercrateAmbiguityCause {
|
||||
impl<'tcx> IntercrateAmbiguityCause<'tcx> {
|
||||
/// Emits notes when the overlap is caused by complex intercrate ambiguities.
|
||||
/// See #23980 for details.
|
||||
pub fn add_intercrate_ambiguity_hint(&self, err: &mut Diagnostic) {
|
||||
@ -73,28 +74,32 @@ pub fn add_intercrate_ambiguity_hint(&self, err: &mut Diagnostic) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn intercrate_ambiguity_hint(&self) -> String {
|
||||
match self {
|
||||
IntercrateAmbiguityCause::DownstreamCrate { trait_desc, self_desc } => {
|
||||
let self_desc = if let Some(ty) = self_desc {
|
||||
format!(" for type `{ty}`")
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
String::new()
|
||||
};
|
||||
format!("downstream crates may implement trait `{trait_desc}`{self_desc}")
|
||||
}
|
||||
IntercrateAmbiguityCause::UpstreamCrateUpdate { trait_desc, self_desc } => {
|
||||
let self_desc = if let Some(ty) = self_desc {
|
||||
format!(" for type `{ty}`")
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
String::new()
|
||||
};
|
||||
with_no_trimmed_paths!(match self {
|
||||
IntercrateAmbiguityCause::DownstreamCrate { trait_ref, self_ty } => {
|
||||
format!(
|
||||
"upstream crates may add a new impl of trait `{trait_desc}`{self_desc} \
|
||||
in future versions"
|
||||
"downstream crates may implement trait `{trait_desc}`{self_desc}",
|
||||
trait_desc = trait_ref.print_only_trait_path(),
|
||||
self_desc = if let Some(self_ty) = self_ty {
|
||||
format!(" for type `{self_ty}`")
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
String::new()
|
||||
}
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
IntercrateAmbiguityCause::ReservationImpl { message } => message.clone(),
|
||||
}
|
||||
IntercrateAmbiguityCause::UpstreamCrateUpdate { trait_ref, self_ty } => {
|
||||
format!(
|
||||
"upstream crates may add a new impl of trait `{trait_desc}`{self_desc} \
|
||||
in future versions",
|
||||
trait_desc = trait_ref.print_only_trait_path(),
|
||||
self_desc = if let Some(self_ty) = self_ty {
|
||||
format!(" for type `{self_ty}`")
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
String::new()
|
||||
}
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
IntercrateAmbiguityCause::ReservationImpl { message } => message.to_string(),
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -114,7 +119,7 @@ pub struct SelectionContext<'cx, 'tcx> {
|
||||
/// We don't do his until we detect a coherence error because it can
|
||||
/// lead to false overflow results (#47139) and because always
|
||||
/// computing it may negatively impact performance.
|
||||
intercrate_ambiguity_causes: Option<FxIndexSet<IntercrateAmbiguityCause>>,
|
||||
intercrate_ambiguity_causes: Option<FxIndexSet<IntercrateAmbiguityCause<'tcx>>>,
|
||||
|
||||
/// The mode that trait queries run in, which informs our error handling
|
||||
/// policy. In essence, canonicalized queries need their errors propagated
|
||||
@ -270,7 +275,9 @@ pub fn enable_tracking_intercrate_ambiguity_causes(&mut self) {
|
||||
/// Gets the intercrate ambiguity causes collected since tracking
|
||||
/// was enabled and disables tracking at the same time. If
|
||||
/// tracking is not enabled, just returns an empty vector.
|
||||
pub fn take_intercrate_ambiguity_causes(&mut self) -> FxIndexSet<IntercrateAmbiguityCause> {
|
||||
pub fn take_intercrate_ambiguity_causes(
|
||||
&mut self,
|
||||
) -> FxIndexSet<IntercrateAmbiguityCause<'tcx>> {
|
||||
assert!(self.is_intercrate());
|
||||
self.intercrate_ambiguity_causes.take().unwrap_or_default()
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -428,19 +435,11 @@ fn candidate_from_obligation_no_cache<'o>(
|
||||
);
|
||||
if !trait_ref.references_error() {
|
||||
let self_ty = trait_ref.self_ty();
|
||||
let (trait_desc, self_desc) = with_no_trimmed_paths!({
|
||||
let trait_desc = trait_ref.print_only_trait_path().to_string();
|
||||
let self_desc =
|
||||
self_ty.has_concrete_skeleton().then(|| self_ty.to_string());
|
||||
(trait_desc, self_desc)
|
||||
});
|
||||
let self_ty = self_ty.has_concrete_skeleton().then(|| self_ty);
|
||||
let cause = if let Conflict::Upstream = conflict {
|
||||
IntercrateAmbiguityCause::UpstreamCrateUpdate {
|
||||
trait_desc,
|
||||
self_desc,
|
||||
}
|
||||
IntercrateAmbiguityCause::UpstreamCrateUpdate { trait_ref, self_ty }
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
IntercrateAmbiguityCause::DownstreamCrate { trait_desc, self_desc }
|
||||
IntercrateAmbiguityCause::DownstreamCrate { trait_ref, self_ty }
|
||||
};
|
||||
debug!(?cause, "evaluate_stack: pushing cause");
|
||||
self.intercrate_ambiguity_causes.as_mut().unwrap().insert(cause);
|
||||
@ -1451,20 +1450,17 @@ fn filter_reservation_impls(
|
||||
if let ImplCandidate(def_id) = candidate {
|
||||
if let ty::ImplPolarity::Reservation = tcx.impl_polarity(def_id) {
|
||||
if let Some(intercrate_ambiguity_clauses) = &mut self.intercrate_ambiguity_causes {
|
||||
let value = tcx
|
||||
let message = tcx
|
||||
.get_attr(def_id, sym::rustc_reservation_impl)
|
||||
.and_then(|a| a.value_str());
|
||||
if let Some(value) = value {
|
||||
if let Some(message) = message {
|
||||
debug!(
|
||||
"filter_reservation_impls: \
|
||||
reservation impl ambiguity on {:?}",
|
||||
def_id
|
||||
);
|
||||
intercrate_ambiguity_clauses.insert(
|
||||
IntercrateAmbiguityCause::ReservationImpl {
|
||||
message: value.to_string(),
|
||||
},
|
||||
);
|
||||
intercrate_ambiguity_clauses
|
||||
.insert(IntercrateAmbiguityCause::ReservationImpl { message });
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
return Ok(None);
|
||||
|
@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ pub struct OverlapError<'tcx> {
|
||||
pub with_impl: DefId,
|
||||
pub trait_ref: ty::TraitRef<'tcx>,
|
||||
pub self_ty: Option<Ty<'tcx>>,
|
||||
pub intercrate_ambiguity_causes: FxIndexSet<IntercrateAmbiguityCause>,
|
||||
pub intercrate_ambiguity_causes: FxIndexSet<IntercrateAmbiguityCause<'tcx>>,
|
||||
pub involves_placeholder: bool,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user