coverage: Remove next_id methods from counter/expression IDs

When these methods were originally written, I wasn't aware that
`newtype_index!` already supports addition with ordinary numbers, without
needing to unwrap and re-wrap.
This commit is contained in:
Zalathar 2023-09-06 17:53:04 +10:00
parent b1cf0c8f1b
commit 053c4f94a0
2 changed files with 2 additions and 12 deletions

View File

@ -18,11 +18,6 @@ rustc_index::newtype_index! {
impl CounterId { impl CounterId {
pub const START: Self = Self::from_u32(0); pub const START: Self = Self::from_u32(0);
#[inline(always)]
pub fn next_id(self) -> Self {
Self::from_u32(self.as_u32() + 1)
}
} }
rustc_index::newtype_index! { rustc_index::newtype_index! {
@ -38,11 +33,6 @@ rustc_index::newtype_index! {
impl ExpressionId { impl ExpressionId {
pub const START: Self = Self::from_u32(0); pub const START: Self = Self::from_u32(0);
#[inline(always)]
pub fn next_id(self) -> Self {
Self::from_u32(self.as_u32() + 1)
}
} }
/// Operand of a coverage-counter expression. /// Operand of a coverage-counter expression.

View File

@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ impl CoverageCounters {
/// Counter IDs start from one and go up. /// Counter IDs start from one and go up.
fn next_counter(&mut self) -> CounterId { fn next_counter(&mut self) -> CounterId {
let next = self.next_counter_id; let next = self.next_counter_id;
self.next_counter_id = next.next_id(); self.next_counter_id = self.next_counter_id + 1;
next next
} }
@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ impl CoverageCounters {
/// (Counter IDs and Expression IDs are distinguished by the `Operand` enum.) /// (Counter IDs and Expression IDs are distinguished by the `Operand` enum.)
fn next_expression(&mut self) -> ExpressionId { fn next_expression(&mut self) -> ExpressionId {
let next = self.next_expression_id; let next = self.next_expression_id;
self.next_expression_id = next.next_id(); self.next_expression_id = self.next_expression_id + 1;
next next
} }