Auto merge of #2377 - rust-lang:only-on-host, r=oli-obk
Add test flag for running a test only on the host
This commit is contained in:
commit
006bb3cd26
7
miri
7
miri
@ -133,10 +133,9 @@ find_sysroot() {
|
||||
# Run command.
|
||||
case "$COMMAND" in
|
||||
install)
|
||||
# "--locked" to respect the Cargo.lock file if it exists,
|
||||
# "--offline" to avoid querying the registry (for yanked packages).
|
||||
$CARGO install $CARGO_EXTRA_FLAGS --path "$MIRIDIR" --force --locked --offline "$@"
|
||||
$CARGO install $CARGO_EXTRA_FLAGS --path "$MIRIDIR"/cargo-miri --force --locked --offline "$@"
|
||||
# "--locked" to respect the Cargo.lock file if it exists.
|
||||
$CARGO install $CARGO_EXTRA_FLAGS --path "$MIRIDIR" --force --locked "$@"
|
||||
$CARGO install $CARGO_EXTRA_FLAGS --path "$MIRIDIR"/cargo-miri --force --locked "$@"
|
||||
;;
|
||||
check)
|
||||
# Check, and let caller control flags.
|
||||
|
@ -25,8 +25,10 @@ their command specifies, or the test will fail without even being run.
|
||||
|
||||
* `//@ignore-XXX` avoids running the test on targets whose triple contains `XXX`
|
||||
* `XXX` can also be one of `64bit`, `32bit` or `16bit`
|
||||
* `XXX` can also be `on-host`, which will only run the test during cross compilation testing.
|
||||
* `//@only-XXX` avoids running the test on targets whose triple **does not** contain `XXX`
|
||||
* `XXX` can also be one of `64bit`, `32bit` or `16bit`
|
||||
* `XXX` can also be `on-host`, which will not run the test during cross compilation testing
|
||||
* `//@stderr-per-bitwidth` produces one stderr file per bitwidth, as they may differ significantly sometimes
|
||||
* `//@error-pattern: XXX` make sure the stderr output contains `XXX`
|
||||
* `//@revisions: XXX YYY` runs the test once for each space separated name in the list
|
||||
|
@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ pub fn run_tests(config: Config) -> Result<()> {
|
||||
}
|
||||
let comments = Comments::parse_file(&path)?;
|
||||
// Ignore file if only/ignore rules do (not) apply
|
||||
if !test_file_conditions(&comments, &target) {
|
||||
if !test_file_conditions(&comments, &target, &config) {
|
||||
ignored.fetch_add(1, Ordering::Relaxed);
|
||||
eprintln!(
|
||||
"{} ... {}",
|
||||
@ -499,19 +499,20 @@ fn output_path(path: &Path, comments: &Comments, kind: String, target: &str) ->
|
||||
path.with_extension(kind)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn test_condition(condition: &Condition, target: &str) -> bool {
|
||||
fn test_condition(condition: &Condition, target: &str, config: &Config) -> bool {
|
||||
match condition {
|
||||
Condition::Bitwidth(bits) => get_pointer_width(target) == *bits,
|
||||
Condition::Target(t) => target.contains(t),
|
||||
Condition::OnHost => config.target.is_none(),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Returns whether according to the in-file conditions, this file should be run.
|
||||
fn test_file_conditions(comments: &Comments, target: &str) -> bool {
|
||||
if comments.ignore.iter().any(|c| test_condition(c, target)) {
|
||||
fn test_file_conditions(comments: &Comments, target: &str, config: &Config) -> bool {
|
||||
if comments.ignore.iter().any(|c| test_condition(c, target, config)) {
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
comments.only.iter().all(|c| test_condition(c, target))
|
||||
comments.only.iter().all(|c| test_condition(c, target, config))
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Taken 1:1 from compiletest-rs
|
||||
|
@ -43,6 +43,8 @@ pub(crate) enum Condition {
|
||||
Target(String),
|
||||
/// Tests that the bitwidth is the given one.
|
||||
Bitwidth(u8),
|
||||
/// Tests that the target is the host.
|
||||
OnHost,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[derive(Debug, Clone)]
|
||||
@ -64,7 +66,9 @@ pub(crate) struct ErrorMatch {
|
||||
|
||||
impl Condition {
|
||||
fn parse(c: &str) -> Self {
|
||||
if let Some(bits) = c.strip_suffix("bit") {
|
||||
if c == "on-host" {
|
||||
Condition::OnHost
|
||||
} else if let Some(bits) = c.strip_suffix("bit") {
|
||||
let bits: u8 = bits.parse().expect(
|
||||
"ignore/only filter ending in 'bit' must be of the form 'Nbit' for some integer N",
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user