mikros/rust
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
fd8aa5ec7d
rust/tests/ui/span/gated-features-attr-spans.stderr

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

13 lines
433 B
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

Tweak unstable diagnostic output
2019-04-10 18:40:12 -05:00
error[E0658]: SIMD types are experimental and possibly buggy
Remove licenses
2018-12-25 09:56:47 -06:00
--> $DIR/gated-features-attr-spans.rs:1:1
feature error span on attr. for fn_must_use, SIMD/align, macro reëxport There were several feature-gated attributes for which the feature-not-available error spans would point to the item annotated with the gated attribute, when it would make more sense for the span to point to the attribute itself: if the attribute is removed, the function/struct/&c. likely still makes sense and the program will compile. (Note that we decline to make the analogous change for the `main`, `start`, and `plugin_registrar` features, for in those cases it makes sense for the span to implicate the entire function, of which there is little hope of using without the gated attribute.)
2017-08-26 20:00:33 -05:00
|
Update tests
2019-03-09 06:03:44 -06:00
LL | #[repr(simd)]
feature error span on attr. for fn_must_use, SIMD/align, macro reëxport There were several feature-gated attributes for which the feature-not-available error spans would point to the item annotated with the gated attribute, when it would make more sense for the span to point to the attribute itself: if the attribute is removed, the function/struct/&c. likely still makes sense and the program will compile. (Note that we decline to make the analogous change for the `main`, `start`, and `plugin_registrar` features, for in those cases it makes sense for the span to implicate the entire function, of which there is little hope of using without the gated attribute.)
2017-08-26 20:00:33 -05:00
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
--bless --compare-mode=nll
2020-02-07 06:07:02 -06:00
= note: see issue #27731 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/27731> for more information
normalize use of backticks in compiler messages for libsyntax/feature_gate https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/60532
2019-07-09 04:32:08 -05:00
= help: add `#![feature(repr_simd)]` to the crate attributes to enable
feature error span on attr. for fn_must_use, SIMD/align, macro reëxport There were several feature-gated attributes for which the feature-not-available error spans would point to the item annotated with the gated attribute, when it would make more sense for the span to point to the attribute itself: if the attribute is removed, the function/struct/&c. likely still makes sense and the program will compile. (Note that we decline to make the analogous change for the `main`, `start`, and `plugin_registrar` features, for in those cases it makes sense for the span to implicate the entire function, of which there is little hope of using without the gated attribute.)
2017-08-26 20:00:33 -05:00
Stabilized `#[repr(align(x))]` attribute (RFC 1358)
2017-12-25 17:24:23 -06:00
error: aborting due to previous error
feature error span on attr. for fn_must_use, SIMD/align, macro reëxport There were several feature-gated attributes for which the feature-not-available error spans would point to the item annotated with the gated attribute, when it would make more sense for the span to point to the attribute itself: if the attribute is removed, the function/struct/&c. likely still makes sense and the program will compile. (Note that we decline to make the analogous change for the `main`, `start`, and `plugin_registrar` features, for in those cases it makes sense for the span to implicate the entire function, of which there is little hope of using without the gated attribute.)
2017-08-26 20:00:33 -05:00
update tests
2018-03-03 08:59:40 -06:00
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0658`.
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink