rust/src/test/run-pass/newlambdas-ret-infer2.rs

#![allow(dead_code)]
// Test that the lambda kind is inferred correctly as a return
// expression

// pretty-expanded FIXME #23616

fn unique() -> Box<FnMut()+'static> { Box::new(|| ()) }

pub fn main() {
}
Allow various lints as part of ui-ifying `src/test/run-pass` suite. 2018-09-14 05:20:28 -05:00			`#![allow(dead_code)]`
Add two tests, one xfailed, for inferring lambda kinds in return position 2012-07-01 20:08:53 -05:00			`// Test that the lambda kind is inferred correctly as a return`
			`// expression`

rustdoc: Replace no-pretty-expanded with pretty-expanded Now that features must be declared expanded source often does not compile. This adds 'pretty-expanded' to a bunch of test cases that still work. 2015-03-22 15:13:15 -05:00			`// pretty-expanded FIXME #23616`

Switched to Box::new in many places. Many of the modifications putting in `Box::new` calls also include a pointer to Issue 22405, which tracks going back to `box <expr>` if possible in the future. (Still tried to use `Box<_>` where it sufficed; thus some tests still have `box_syntax` enabled, as they use a mix of `box` and `Box::new`.) Precursor for overloaded-`box` and placement-`in`; see Issue 22181. 2015-02-15 02:52:21 -06:00			`fn unique() -> Box<FnMut()+'static> { Box::new(\|\| ()) }`
Add two tests, one xfailed, for inferring lambda kinds in return position 2012-07-01 20:08:53 -05:00
check-fast fallout from removing export, r=burningtree 2013-02-01 21:43:17 -06:00			`pub fn main() {`
Add two tests, one xfailed, for inferring lambda kinds in return position 2012-07-01 20:08:53 -05:00			`}`