2017-12-05 12:15:23 -06:00
|
|
|
// Test cases where we constrain `<T as Anything<'b>>::AssocType` to
|
|
|
|
// outlive `'static`. In this case, we don't get any errors, and in fact
|
|
|
|
// we don't even propagate constraints from the closures to the callers.
|
|
|
|
|
2018-04-09 04:28:00 -05:00
|
|
|
// compile-flags:-Zborrowck=mir -Zverbose
|
2019-07-02 16:30:28 -05:00
|
|
|
// build-pass (FIXME(62277): could be check-pass?)
|
2017-12-05 12:15:23 -06:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#![allow(warnings)]
|
|
|
|
#![feature(rustc_attrs)]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
use std::cell::Cell;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
trait Anything<'a> {
|
|
|
|
type AssocType: 'static;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fn with_signature<'a, T, F>(cell: Cell<&'a ()>, t: T, op: F)
|
|
|
|
where
|
|
|
|
F: FnOnce(Cell<&'a ()>, T),
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
op(cell, t)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fn require<'a, 'b, T>(_cell: Cell<&'a ()>, _t: T)
|
|
|
|
where
|
|
|
|
T: Anything<'b>,
|
|
|
|
T::AssocType: 'a,
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[rustc_regions]
|
|
|
|
fn no_relationships_late<'a, 'b, T>(cell: Cell<&'a ()>, t: T)
|
|
|
|
where
|
|
|
|
T: Anything<'b>,
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
with_signature(cell, t, |cell, t| require(cell, t));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[rustc_regions]
|
|
|
|
fn no_relationships_early<'a, 'b, T>(cell: Cell<&'a ()>, t: T)
|
|
|
|
where
|
|
|
|
T: Anything<'b>,
|
|
|
|
'a: 'a,
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
with_signature(cell, t, |cell, t| require(cell, t));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[rustc_regions]
|
|
|
|
fn projection_outlives<'a, 'b, T>(cell: Cell<&'a ()>, t: T)
|
|
|
|
where
|
|
|
|
T: Anything<'b>,
|
|
|
|
T::AssocType: 'a,
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
// This error is unfortunate. This code ought to type-check: we
|
|
|
|
// are projecting `<T as Anything<'b>>::AssocType`, and we know
|
|
|
|
// that this outlives `'a` because of the where-clause. However,
|
|
|
|
// the way the region checker works, we don't register this
|
|
|
|
// outlives obligation, and hence we get an error: this is because
|
|
|
|
// what we see is a projection like `<T as
|
|
|
|
// Anything<'?0>>::AssocType`, and we don't yet know if `?0` will
|
|
|
|
// equal `'b` or not, so we ignore the where-clause. Obviously we
|
|
|
|
// can do better here with a more involved verification step.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
with_signature(cell, t, |cell, t| require(cell, t));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[rustc_regions]
|
|
|
|
fn elements_outlive<'a, 'b, T>(cell: Cell<&'a ()>, t: T)
|
|
|
|
where
|
|
|
|
T: Anything<'b>,
|
|
|
|
'b: 'a,
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
with_signature(cell, t, |cell, t| require(cell, t));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[rustc_regions]
|
|
|
|
fn one_region<'a, T>(cell: Cell<&'a ()>, t: T)
|
|
|
|
where
|
|
|
|
T: Anything<'a>,
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
// Note that in this case the closure still propagates an external
|
|
|
|
// requirement between two variables in its signature, but the
|
|
|
|
// creator maps both those two region variables to `'a` on its
|
|
|
|
// side.
|
|
|
|
with_signature(cell, t, |cell, t| require(cell, t));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fn main() {}
|