mikros/rust
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
df0c13d2ea
rust/mk/tools.mk

143 lines
5.5 KiB
Makefile
Raw Normal View History

Reliciense makefiles and testsuite. Yup.
2012-12-10 19:32:48 -06:00
# Copyright 2012 The Rust Project Developers. See the COPYRIGHT
# file at the top-level directory of this distribution and at
# http://rust-lang.org/COPYRIGHT.
#
# Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 <LICENSE-APACHE or
# http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0> or the MIT license
# <LICENSE-MIT or http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT>, at your
# option. This file may not be copied, modified, or distributed
# except according to those terms.
Move compiletest to src/ and cleanup build rules
2011-10-02 19:28:59 -05:00
# Rules for non-core tools built with the compiler, both for target
# and host architectures
Rename cargo to rustpkg and start over fresh
2013-01-14 04:55:47 -06:00
# The test runner that runs the cfail/rfail/rpass and bxench tests
Rename all files with the 'rc' extension
2013-06-10 15:00:38 -05:00
COMPILETEST_CRATE := $(S)src/compiletest/compiletest.rs
COMPILETEST_INPUTS := $(wildcard $(S)src/compiletest/*.rs)
Move compiletest to src/ and cleanup build rules
2011-10-02 19:28:59 -05:00
Rename cargo to rustpkg and start over fresh
2013-01-14 04:55:47 -06:00
# Rustpkg, the package manager and build system
Rename files to match current recommendations. New standards have arisen in recent months, mostly for the use of rustpkg, but the main Rust codebase has not been altered to match these new specifications. This changeset rectifies most of these issues. - Renamed the crate source files `src/libX/X.rs` to `lib.rs`, for consistency with current styles; this affects extra, rustc, rustdoc, rustpkg, rustuv, std, syntax. - Renamed `X/X.rs` to `X/mod.rs,` as is now recommended style, for `std::num` and `std::terminfo`. - Shifted `src/libstd/str/ascii.rs` out of the otherwise unused `str` directory, to be consistent with its import path of `std::ascii`; libstd is flat at present so it's more appropriate thus. While this removes some `#[path = "..."]` directives, it does not remove all of them, and leaves certain other inconsistencies, such as `std::u8` et al. which are actually stored in `src/libstd/num/` (one subdirectory down). No quorum has been reached on this issue, so I felt it best to leave them all alone at present. #9208 deals with the possibility of making libstd more hierarchical (such as changing the crate to match the current filesystem structure, which would make the module path `std::num::u8`). There is one thing remaining in which this repository is not rustpkg-compliant: rustpkg would have `src/std/` et al. rather than `src/libstd/` et al. I have not endeavoured to change that at this point as it would guarantee prompt bitrot and confusion. A change of that magnitude needs to be discussed first.
2013-10-29 01:22:49 -05:00
RUSTPKG_LIB := $(S)src/librustpkg/lib.rs
Rename all files with the 'rc' extension
2013-06-10 15:00:38 -05:00
RUSTPKG_INPUTS := $(wildcard $(S)src/librustpkg/*.rs)
Build infra and minor build-enabling bugfixes for cargo.
2011-12-01 13:31:29 -06:00
Add rustdoc to build.
2011-12-20 20:27:27 -06:00
# Rustdoc, the documentation tool
Rename files to match current recommendations. New standards have arisen in recent months, mostly for the use of rustpkg, but the main Rust codebase has not been altered to match these new specifications. This changeset rectifies most of these issues. - Renamed the crate source files `src/libX/X.rs` to `lib.rs`, for consistency with current styles; this affects extra, rustc, rustdoc, rustpkg, rustuv, std, syntax. - Renamed `X/X.rs` to `X/mod.rs,` as is now recommended style, for `std::num` and `std::terminfo`. - Shifted `src/libstd/str/ascii.rs` out of the otherwise unused `str` directory, to be consistent with its import path of `std::ascii`; libstd is flat at present so it's more appropriate thus. While this removes some `#[path = "..."]` directives, it does not remove all of them, and leaves certain other inconsistencies, such as `std::u8` et al. which are actually stored in `src/libstd/num/` (one subdirectory down). No quorum has been reached on this issue, so I felt it best to leave them all alone at present. #9208 deals with the possibility of making libstd more hierarchical (such as changing the crate to match the current filesystem structure, which would make the module path `std::num::u8`). There is one thing remaining in which this repository is not rustpkg-compliant: rustpkg would have `src/std/` et al. rather than `src/libstd/` et al. I have not endeavoured to change that at this point as it would guarantee prompt bitrot and confusion. A change of that magnitude needs to be discussed first.
2013-10-29 01:22:49 -05:00
RUSTDOC_LIB := $(S)src/librustdoc/lib.rs
Place *all* rustdoc output in doc/{crate}
2013-09-22 22:09:42 -05:00
RUSTDOC_INPUTS := $(wildcard $(addprefix $(S)src/librustdoc/, \
*.rs */*.rs */*/*.rs))
Add rustdoc to build.
2011-12-20 20:27:27 -06:00
Move compiletest to src/ and cleanup build rules
2011-10-02 19:28:59 -05:00
# FIXME: These are only built for the host arch. Eventually we'll
# have tools that need to built for other targets.
Attempt to fix tools.mk under cross-compile
2012-11-07 21:47:24 -06:00
define TOOLS_STAGE_N_TARGET
Move compiletest to src/ and cleanup build rules
2011-10-02 19:28:59 -05:00
mk: cleanup - lib and executable suffix handling
2013-03-02 06:25:12 -06:00
$$(TBIN$(1)_T_$(4)_H_$(3))/compiletest$$(X_$(4)): \
Attempt to fix tools.mk under cross-compile
2012-11-07 21:47:24 -06:00
$$(COMPILETEST_CRATE) $$(COMPILETEST_INPUTS) \
Add dependence arc from running rustc to its libraries. This commit fixes some oversights in the Makefile where rustc could be invoked without some of its dependencies yet in place. (I encountered the problem in practice; its not just theoretical.) As written in Makefile.in, $(STAGE$(1)_T_$(2)_H_$(3)) is the way one writes an invocation of rustc where $(1) is the stage number $(2) is the target triple $(3) is the host triple. (Other uses of the macro may plug in actual values or different parameters in for those three formal parameters.) When you have invocations of $(STAGE...), you need to make sure that its dependences are satisfied; otherwise, if someone is using `make -jN` for certain (large-ish) `N`, one can encounter situations where GNU make attempts to invoke `rustc` before it has actually copied some of its libraries into place, such as libmorestack.a, which causes a link failure when the rustc invocation attempts to link in those libraries. In this case, the main prerequisite to add is TSREQ$(1)_T_$(2)_H_$(3), which is described in Makefile.in as "Prerequisites for using the stageN compiler to build target artifacts" ---- In addition to adding the extra dependences on TSREQ..., I also replaced occurrences of the pattern: TSREQ$(1)_T_$(2)_H_$(3) $$(TLIB$(1)_T_$(2)_H_$(3))/$(CFG_STDLIB_$(2)) $$(TLIB$(1)_T_$(2)_H_$(3))/$(CFG_EXTRALIB_$(2)) with: SREQ$(1)_T_$(2)_H_$(3) which is equivalent to the above, as defined in Makefile.in ---- Finally, for the cases where TSREQ was missing in tests.mk, I went ahead and put in a dependence on SREQ rather than just TSREQ, since it was not clear to me how one could expect to compile those cases without stdlib and extralib. (It could well be that I should have gone ahead and done the same in other cases where I saw TSREQ was missing, and put SREQ in those cases as well. But this seemed like a good measure for now, without needing to tax my understanding of the overall makefile infrastructure much further.)
2013-07-16 01:05:18 -05:00
$$(SREQ$(1)_T_$(4)_H_$(3)) \
Fix #3225: Check for old Rust libraries when building and installing. When building Rust libraries (e.g. librustc, libstd, etc), checks for and verbosely removes previous build products before invoking rustc. (Also, when Make variable VERBOSE is defined, it will list all of the libraries matching the object library's glob after the rustc invocation has completed.) When installing Rust libraries, checks for previous libraries in target install directory, but does not remove them. The thinking behind these two different modes of operation is that the installation target, unlike the build tree, is not under the control of this infrastructure and it is not up to this Makefile to decide if the previous libraries should be removed.
2013-07-04 09:51:45 -05:00
| $$(TBIN$(1)_T_$(4)_H_$(3))/
Attempt to fix tools.mk under cross-compile
2012-11-07 21:47:24 -06:00
@$$(call E, compile_and_link: $$@)
$$(STAGE$(1)_T_$(4)_H_$(3)) -o $$@ $$<
mk: cleanup - lib and executable suffix handling
2013-03-02 06:25:12 -06:00
$$(TLIB$(1)_T_$(4)_H_$(3))/$(CFG_LIBRUSTPKG_$(4)): \
Fix #3225: Incorporate feedback from Graydon. Namely, switched in many places to using GNU make provided functions for directory listing and text processing, rather than spawning a shell process to do that work. In the process of the revision, learned about Target-specific variables, which were very applicable to INSTALL_LIB (which, on a per-recipe basis, was always receiving the same actual arguments for its first two formal parameters in every invocation). http://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Target_002dspecific.html (We might be able to make use of those in future refactorings.) ---- Also adds a cleanup pass to get-snapshot.py as well, since the same problem arises when we unpack libraries from the snapshot archive into a build directory with a prior snapshot's artifacts. (I put this step into the python script rather than the makefile because I wanted to delay the cleanup pass until after we have at least successfully downloaded the tarball. That way, if the download fails, you should not destroy the previous unarchived snapshot libraries and build products.) ---- Also reverted whitespace changes to minimize diff. I plan to put them back in in a dedicated commit elsewhere.
2013-07-08 11:35:47 -05:00
$$(RUSTPKG_LIB) $$(RUSTPKG_INPUTS) \
Add dependence arc from running rustc to its libraries. This commit fixes some oversights in the Makefile where rustc could be invoked without some of its dependencies yet in place. (I encountered the problem in practice; its not just theoretical.) As written in Makefile.in, $(STAGE$(1)_T_$(2)_H_$(3)) is the way one writes an invocation of rustc where $(1) is the stage number $(2) is the target triple $(3) is the host triple. (Other uses of the macro may plug in actual values or different parameters in for those three formal parameters.) When you have invocations of $(STAGE...), you need to make sure that its dependences are satisfied; otherwise, if someone is using `make -jN` for certain (large-ish) `N`, one can encounter situations where GNU make attempts to invoke `rustc` before it has actually copied some of its libraries into place, such as libmorestack.a, which causes a link failure when the rustc invocation attempts to link in those libraries. In this case, the main prerequisite to add is TSREQ$(1)_T_$(2)_H_$(3), which is described in Makefile.in as "Prerequisites for using the stageN compiler to build target artifacts" ---- In addition to adding the extra dependences on TSREQ..., I also replaced occurrences of the pattern: TSREQ$(1)_T_$(2)_H_$(3) $$(TLIB$(1)_T_$(2)_H_$(3))/$(CFG_STDLIB_$(2)) $$(TLIB$(1)_T_$(2)_H_$(3))/$(CFG_EXTRALIB_$(2)) with: SREQ$(1)_T_$(2)_H_$(3) which is equivalent to the above, as defined in Makefile.in ---- Finally, for the cases where TSREQ was missing in tests.mk, I went ahead and put in a dependence on SREQ rather than just TSREQ, since it was not clear to me how one could expect to compile those cases without stdlib and extralib. (It could well be that I should have gone ahead and done the same in other cases where I saw TSREQ was missing, and put SREQ in those cases as well. But this seemed like a good measure for now, without needing to tax my understanding of the overall makefile infrastructure much further.)
2013-07-16 01:05:18 -05:00
$$(SREQ$(1)_T_$(4)_H_$(3)) \
Fix #3225: Incorporate feedback from Graydon. Namely, switched in many places to using GNU make provided functions for directory listing and text processing, rather than spawning a shell process to do that work. In the process of the revision, learned about Target-specific variables, which were very applicable to INSTALL_LIB (which, on a per-recipe basis, was always receiving the same actual arguments for its first two formal parameters in every invocation). http://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Target_002dspecific.html (We might be able to make use of those in future refactorings.) ---- Also adds a cleanup pass to get-snapshot.py as well, since the same problem arises when we unpack libraries from the snapshot archive into a build directory with a prior snapshot's artifacts. (I put this step into the python script rather than the makefile because I wanted to delay the cleanup pass until after we have at least successfully downloaded the tarball. That way, if the download fails, you should not destroy the previous unarchived snapshot libraries and build products.) ---- Also reverted whitespace changes to minimize diff. I plan to put them back in in a dedicated commit elsewhere.
2013-07-08 11:35:47 -05:00
$$(TLIB$(1)_T_$(4)_H_$(3))/$(CFG_LIBRUSTC_$(4)) \
Fix #3225: Check for old Rust libraries when building and installing. When building Rust libraries (e.g. librustc, libstd, etc), checks for and verbosely removes previous build products before invoking rustc. (Also, when Make variable VERBOSE is defined, it will list all of the libraries matching the object library's glob after the rustc invocation has completed.) When installing Rust libraries, checks for previous libraries in target install directory, but does not remove them. The thinking behind these two different modes of operation is that the installation target, unlike the build tree, is not under the control of this infrastructure and it is not up to this Makefile to decide if the previous libraries should be removed.
2013-07-04 09:51:45 -05:00
| $$(TLIB$(1)_T_$(4)_H_$(3))/
Attempt to fix tools.mk under cross-compile
2012-11-07 21:47:24 -06:00
@$$(call E, compile_and_link: $$@)
Fix #3225: Incorporate feedback from Graydon. Namely, switched in many places to using GNU make provided functions for directory listing and text processing, rather than spawning a shell process to do that work. In the process of the revision, learned about Target-specific variables, which were very applicable to INSTALL_LIB (which, on a per-recipe basis, was always receiving the same actual arguments for its first two formal parameters in every invocation). http://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Target_002dspecific.html (We might be able to make use of those in future refactorings.) ---- Also adds a cleanup pass to get-snapshot.py as well, since the same problem arises when we unpack libraries from the snapshot archive into a build directory with a prior snapshot's artifacts. (I put this step into the python script rather than the makefile because I wanted to delay the cleanup pass until after we have at least successfully downloaded the tarball. That way, if the download fails, you should not destroy the previous unarchived snapshot libraries and build products.) ---- Also reverted whitespace changes to minimize diff. I plan to put them back in in a dedicated commit elsewhere.
2013-07-08 11:35:47 -05:00
$$(call REMOVE_ALL_OLD_GLOB_MATCHES_EXCEPT,$$(dir $$@),$(LIBRUSTPKG_GLOB_$(4)),$$(notdir $$@))
Warn when using -o option on libraries. Closes #6554.
2013-07-30 17:40:19 -05:00
$$(STAGE$(1)_T_$(4)_H_$(3)) $$(WFLAGS_ST$(1)) --out-dir $$(@D) $$< && touch $$@
Fix #3225: Incorporate feedback from Graydon. Namely, switched in many places to using GNU make provided functions for directory listing and text processing, rather than spawning a shell process to do that work. In the process of the revision, learned about Target-specific variables, which were very applicable to INSTALL_LIB (which, on a per-recipe basis, was always receiving the same actual arguments for its first two formal parameters in every invocation). http://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Target_002dspecific.html (We might be able to make use of those in future refactorings.) ---- Also adds a cleanup pass to get-snapshot.py as well, since the same problem arises when we unpack libraries from the snapshot archive into a build directory with a prior snapshot's artifacts. (I put this step into the python script rather than the makefile because I wanted to delay the cleanup pass until after we have at least successfully downloaded the tarball. That way, if the download fails, you should not destroy the previous unarchived snapshot libraries and build products.) ---- Also reverted whitespace changes to minimize diff. I plan to put them back in in a dedicated commit elsewhere.
2013-07-08 11:35:47 -05:00
$$(call LIST_ALL_OLD_GLOB_MATCHES_EXCEPT,$$(dir $$@),$(LIBRUSTPKG_GLOB_$(4)),$$(notdir $$@))
Attempt to fix tools.mk under cross-compile
2012-11-07 21:47:24 -06:00
mk: cleanup - lib and executable suffix handling
2013-03-02 06:25:12 -06:00
$$(TBIN$(1)_T_$(4)_H_$(3))/rustpkg$$(X_$(4)): \
Fix #3225: Incorporate feedback from Graydon. Namely, switched in many places to using GNU make provided functions for directory listing and text processing, rather than spawning a shell process to do that work. In the process of the revision, learned about Target-specific variables, which were very applicable to INSTALL_LIB (which, on a per-recipe basis, was always receiving the same actual arguments for its first two formal parameters in every invocation). http://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Target_002dspecific.html (We might be able to make use of those in future refactorings.) ---- Also adds a cleanup pass to get-snapshot.py as well, since the same problem arises when we unpack libraries from the snapshot archive into a build directory with a prior snapshot's artifacts. (I put this step into the python script rather than the makefile because I wanted to delay the cleanup pass until after we have at least successfully downloaded the tarball. That way, if the download fails, you should not destroy the previous unarchived snapshot libraries and build products.) ---- Also reverted whitespace changes to minimize diff. I plan to put them back in in a dedicated commit elsewhere.
2013-07-08 11:35:47 -05:00
$$(DRIVER_CRATE) \
Add dependence arc from running rustc to its libraries. This commit fixes some oversights in the Makefile where rustc could be invoked without some of its dependencies yet in place. (I encountered the problem in practice; its not just theoretical.) As written in Makefile.in, $(STAGE$(1)_T_$(2)_H_$(3)) is the way one writes an invocation of rustc where $(1) is the stage number $(2) is the target triple $(3) is the host triple. (Other uses of the macro may plug in actual values or different parameters in for those three formal parameters.) When you have invocations of $(STAGE...), you need to make sure that its dependences are satisfied; otherwise, if someone is using `make -jN` for certain (large-ish) `N`, one can encounter situations where GNU make attempts to invoke `rustc` before it has actually copied some of its libraries into place, such as libmorestack.a, which causes a link failure when the rustc invocation attempts to link in those libraries. In this case, the main prerequisite to add is TSREQ$(1)_T_$(2)_H_$(3), which is described in Makefile.in as "Prerequisites for using the stageN compiler to build target artifacts" ---- In addition to adding the extra dependences on TSREQ..., I also replaced occurrences of the pattern: TSREQ$(1)_T_$(2)_H_$(3) $$(TLIB$(1)_T_$(2)_H_$(3))/$(CFG_STDLIB_$(2)) $$(TLIB$(1)_T_$(2)_H_$(3))/$(CFG_EXTRALIB_$(2)) with: SREQ$(1)_T_$(2)_H_$(3) which is equivalent to the above, as defined in Makefile.in ---- Finally, for the cases where TSREQ was missing in tests.mk, I went ahead and put in a dependence on SREQ rather than just TSREQ, since it was not clear to me how one could expect to compile those cases without stdlib and extralib. (It could well be that I should have gone ahead and done the same in other cases where I saw TSREQ was missing, and put SREQ in those cases as well. But this seemed like a good measure for now, without needing to tax my understanding of the overall makefile infrastructure much further.)
2013-07-16 01:05:18 -05:00
$$(TSREQ$(1)_T_$(4)_H_$(3)) \
$$(TLIB$(1)_T_$(4)_H_$(3))/$(CFG_LIBRUSTPKG_$(4)) \
Fix #3225: Check for old Rust libraries when building and installing. When building Rust libraries (e.g. librustc, libstd, etc), checks for and verbosely removes previous build products before invoking rustc. (Also, when Make variable VERBOSE is defined, it will list all of the libraries matching the object library's glob after the rustc invocation has completed.) When installing Rust libraries, checks for previous libraries in target install directory, but does not remove them. The thinking behind these two different modes of operation is that the installation target, unlike the build tree, is not under the control of this infrastructure and it is not up to this Makefile to decide if the previous libraries should be removed.
2013-07-04 09:51:45 -05:00
| $$(TBIN$(1)_T_$(4)_H_$(3))/
Attempt to fix tools.mk under cross-compile
2012-11-07 21:47:24 -06:00
@$$(call E, compile_and_link: $$@)
Rename cargo to rustpkg and start over fresh
2013-01-14 04:55:47 -06:00
$$(STAGE$(1)_T_$(4)_H_$(3)) --cfg rustpkg -o $$@ $$<
Attempt to fix tools.mk under cross-compile
2012-11-07 21:47:24 -06:00
mk: cleanup - lib and executable suffix handling
2013-03-02 06:25:12 -06:00
$$(TLIB$(1)_T_$(4)_H_$(3))/$(CFG_LIBRUSTDOC_$(4)): \
Fix #3225: Incorporate feedback from Graydon. Namely, switched in many places to using GNU make provided functions for directory listing and text processing, rather than spawning a shell process to do that work. In the process of the revision, learned about Target-specific variables, which were very applicable to INSTALL_LIB (which, on a per-recipe basis, was always receiving the same actual arguments for its first two formal parameters in every invocation). http://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Target_002dspecific.html (We might be able to make use of those in future refactorings.) ---- Also adds a cleanup pass to get-snapshot.py as well, since the same problem arises when we unpack libraries from the snapshot archive into a build directory with a prior snapshot's artifacts. (I put this step into the python script rather than the makefile because I wanted to delay the cleanup pass until after we have at least successfully downloaded the tarball. That way, if the download fails, you should not destroy the previous unarchived snapshot libraries and build products.) ---- Also reverted whitespace changes to minimize diff. I plan to put them back in in a dedicated commit elsewhere.
2013-07-08 11:35:47 -05:00
$$(RUSTDOC_LIB) $$(RUSTDOC_INPUTS) \
Add dependence arc from running rustc to its libraries. This commit fixes some oversights in the Makefile where rustc could be invoked without some of its dependencies yet in place. (I encountered the problem in practice; its not just theoretical.) As written in Makefile.in, $(STAGE$(1)_T_$(2)_H_$(3)) is the way one writes an invocation of rustc where $(1) is the stage number $(2) is the target triple $(3) is the host triple. (Other uses of the macro may plug in actual values or different parameters in for those three formal parameters.) When you have invocations of $(STAGE...), you need to make sure that its dependences are satisfied; otherwise, if someone is using `make -jN` for certain (large-ish) `N`, one can encounter situations where GNU make attempts to invoke `rustc` before it has actually copied some of its libraries into place, such as libmorestack.a, which causes a link failure when the rustc invocation attempts to link in those libraries. In this case, the main prerequisite to add is TSREQ$(1)_T_$(2)_H_$(3), which is described in Makefile.in as "Prerequisites for using the stageN compiler to build target artifacts" ---- In addition to adding the extra dependences on TSREQ..., I also replaced occurrences of the pattern: TSREQ$(1)_T_$(2)_H_$(3) $$(TLIB$(1)_T_$(2)_H_$(3))/$(CFG_STDLIB_$(2)) $$(TLIB$(1)_T_$(2)_H_$(3))/$(CFG_EXTRALIB_$(2)) with: SREQ$(1)_T_$(2)_H_$(3) which is equivalent to the above, as defined in Makefile.in ---- Finally, for the cases where TSREQ was missing in tests.mk, I went ahead and put in a dependence on SREQ rather than just TSREQ, since it was not clear to me how one could expect to compile those cases without stdlib and extralib. (It could well be that I should have gone ahead and done the same in other cases where I saw TSREQ was missing, and put SREQ in those cases as well. But this seemed like a good measure for now, without needing to tax my understanding of the overall makefile infrastructure much further.)
2013-07-16 01:05:18 -05:00
$$(SREQ$(1)_T_$(4)_H_$(3)) \
Fix #3225: Incorporate feedback from Graydon. Namely, switched in many places to using GNU make provided functions for directory listing and text processing, rather than spawning a shell process to do that work. In the process of the revision, learned about Target-specific variables, which were very applicable to INSTALL_LIB (which, on a per-recipe basis, was always receiving the same actual arguments for its first two formal parameters in every invocation). http://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Target_002dspecific.html (We might be able to make use of those in future refactorings.) ---- Also adds a cleanup pass to get-snapshot.py as well, since the same problem arises when we unpack libraries from the snapshot archive into a build directory with a prior snapshot's artifacts. (I put this step into the python script rather than the makefile because I wanted to delay the cleanup pass until after we have at least successfully downloaded the tarball. That way, if the download fails, you should not destroy the previous unarchived snapshot libraries and build products.) ---- Also reverted whitespace changes to minimize diff. I plan to put them back in in a dedicated commit elsewhere.
2013-07-08 11:35:47 -05:00
$$(TLIB$(1)_T_$(4)_H_$(3))/$(CFG_LIBRUSTC_$(4)) \
Statically link sundown to librustdoc Closes #10103
2013-10-31 01:22:04 -05:00
$$(SUNDOWN_LIB_$(4)) \
Fix #3225: Check for old Rust libraries when building and installing. When building Rust libraries (e.g. librustc, libstd, etc), checks for and verbosely removes previous build products before invoking rustc. (Also, when Make variable VERBOSE is defined, it will list all of the libraries matching the object library's glob after the rustc invocation has completed.) When installing Rust libraries, checks for previous libraries in target install directory, but does not remove them. The thinking behind these two different modes of operation is that the installation target, unlike the build tree, is not under the control of this infrastructure and it is not up to this Makefile to decide if the previous libraries should be removed.
2013-07-04 09:51:45 -05:00
| $$(TLIB$(1)_T_$(4)_H_$(3))/
Attempt to fix tools.mk under cross-compile
2012-11-07 21:47:24 -06:00
@$$(call E, compile_and_link: $$@)
Fix #3225: Incorporate feedback from Graydon. Namely, switched in many places to using GNU make provided functions for directory listing and text processing, rather than spawning a shell process to do that work. In the process of the revision, learned about Target-specific variables, which were very applicable to INSTALL_LIB (which, on a per-recipe basis, was always receiving the same actual arguments for its first two formal parameters in every invocation). http://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Target_002dspecific.html (We might be able to make use of those in future refactorings.) ---- Also adds a cleanup pass to get-snapshot.py as well, since the same problem arises when we unpack libraries from the snapshot archive into a build directory with a prior snapshot's artifacts. (I put this step into the python script rather than the makefile because I wanted to delay the cleanup pass until after we have at least successfully downloaded the tarball. That way, if the download fails, you should not destroy the previous unarchived snapshot libraries and build products.) ---- Also reverted whitespace changes to minimize diff. I plan to put them back in in a dedicated commit elsewhere.
2013-07-08 11:35:47 -05:00
$$(call REMOVE_ALL_OLD_GLOB_MATCHES_EXCEPT,$$(dir $$@),$(LIBRUSTDOC_GLOB_$(4)),$$(notdir $$@))
Statically link sundown to librustdoc Closes #10103
2013-10-31 01:22:04 -05:00
$$(STAGE$(1)_T_$(4)_H_$(3)) $$(WFLAGS_ST$(1)) \
-L $$(SUNDOWN_DIR_$(4)) --out-dir $$(@D) $$< && touch $$@
Fix #3225: Incorporate feedback from Graydon. Namely, switched in many places to using GNU make provided functions for directory listing and text processing, rather than spawning a shell process to do that work. In the process of the revision, learned about Target-specific variables, which were very applicable to INSTALL_LIB (which, on a per-recipe basis, was always receiving the same actual arguments for its first two formal parameters in every invocation). http://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Target_002dspecific.html (We might be able to make use of those in future refactorings.) ---- Also adds a cleanup pass to get-snapshot.py as well, since the same problem arises when we unpack libraries from the snapshot archive into a build directory with a prior snapshot's artifacts. (I put this step into the python script rather than the makefile because I wanted to delay the cleanup pass until after we have at least successfully downloaded the tarball. That way, if the download fails, you should not destroy the previous unarchived snapshot libraries and build products.) ---- Also reverted whitespace changes to minimize diff. I plan to put them back in in a dedicated commit elsewhere.
2013-07-08 11:35:47 -05:00
$$(call LIST_ALL_OLD_GLOB_MATCHES_EXCEPT,$$(dir $$@),$(LIBRUSTDOC_GLOB_$(4)),$$(notdir $$@))
Attempt to fix tools.mk under cross-compile
2012-11-07 21:47:24 -06:00
Fix #3225: Incorporate feedback from Graydon. Namely, switched in many places to using GNU make provided functions for directory listing and text processing, rather than spawning a shell process to do that work. In the process of the revision, learned about Target-specific variables, which were very applicable to INSTALL_LIB (which, on a per-recipe basis, was always receiving the same actual arguments for its first two formal parameters in every invocation). http://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Target_002dspecific.html (We might be able to make use of those in future refactorings.) ---- Also adds a cleanup pass to get-snapshot.py as well, since the same problem arises when we unpack libraries from the snapshot archive into a build directory with a prior snapshot's artifacts. (I put this step into the python script rather than the makefile because I wanted to delay the cleanup pass until after we have at least successfully downloaded the tarball. That way, if the download fails, you should not destroy the previous unarchived snapshot libraries and build products.) ---- Also reverted whitespace changes to minimize diff. I plan to put them back in in a dedicated commit elsewhere.
2013-07-08 11:35:47 -05:00
$$(TBIN$(1)_T_$(4)_H_$(3))/rustdoc$$(X_$(4)): \
$$(DRIVER_CRATE) \
Add dependence arc from running rustc to its libraries. This commit fixes some oversights in the Makefile where rustc could be invoked without some of its dependencies yet in place. (I encountered the problem in practice; its not just theoretical.) As written in Makefile.in, $(STAGE$(1)_T_$(2)_H_$(3)) is the way one writes an invocation of rustc where $(1) is the stage number $(2) is the target triple $(3) is the host triple. (Other uses of the macro may plug in actual values or different parameters in for those three formal parameters.) When you have invocations of $(STAGE...), you need to make sure that its dependences are satisfied; otherwise, if someone is using `make -jN` for certain (large-ish) `N`, one can encounter situations where GNU make attempts to invoke `rustc` before it has actually copied some of its libraries into place, such as libmorestack.a, which causes a link failure when the rustc invocation attempts to link in those libraries. In this case, the main prerequisite to add is TSREQ$(1)_T_$(2)_H_$(3), which is described in Makefile.in as "Prerequisites for using the stageN compiler to build target artifacts" ---- In addition to adding the extra dependences on TSREQ..., I also replaced occurrences of the pattern: TSREQ$(1)_T_$(2)_H_$(3) $$(TLIB$(1)_T_$(2)_H_$(3))/$(CFG_STDLIB_$(2)) $$(TLIB$(1)_T_$(2)_H_$(3))/$(CFG_EXTRALIB_$(2)) with: SREQ$(1)_T_$(2)_H_$(3) which is equivalent to the above, as defined in Makefile.in ---- Finally, for the cases where TSREQ was missing in tests.mk, I went ahead and put in a dependence on SREQ rather than just TSREQ, since it was not clear to me how one could expect to compile those cases without stdlib and extralib. (It could well be that I should have gone ahead and done the same in other cases where I saw TSREQ was missing, and put SREQ in those cases as well. But this seemed like a good measure for now, without needing to tax my understanding of the overall makefile infrastructure much further.)
2013-07-16 01:05:18 -05:00
$$(TSREQ$(1)_T_$(4)_H_$(3)) \
Fix #3225: Incorporate feedback from Graydon. Namely, switched in many places to using GNU make provided functions for directory listing and text processing, rather than spawning a shell process to do that work. In the process of the revision, learned about Target-specific variables, which were very applicable to INSTALL_LIB (which, on a per-recipe basis, was always receiving the same actual arguments for its first two formal parameters in every invocation). http://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Target_002dspecific.html (We might be able to make use of those in future refactorings.) ---- Also adds a cleanup pass to get-snapshot.py as well, since the same problem arises when we unpack libraries from the snapshot archive into a build directory with a prior snapshot's artifacts. (I put this step into the python script rather than the makefile because I wanted to delay the cleanup pass until after we have at least successfully downloaded the tarball. That way, if the download fails, you should not destroy the previous unarchived snapshot libraries and build products.) ---- Also reverted whitespace changes to minimize diff. I plan to put them back in in a dedicated commit elsewhere.
2013-07-08 11:35:47 -05:00
$$(TLIB$(1)_T_$(4)_H_$(3))/$(CFG_LIBRUSTDOC_$(4)) \
Fix #3225: Check for old Rust libraries when building and installing. When building Rust libraries (e.g. librustc, libstd, etc), checks for and verbosely removes previous build products before invoking rustc. (Also, when Make variable VERBOSE is defined, it will list all of the libraries matching the object library's glob after the rustc invocation has completed.) When installing Rust libraries, checks for previous libraries in target install directory, but does not remove them. The thinking behind these two different modes of operation is that the installation target, unlike the build tree, is not under the control of this infrastructure and it is not up to this Makefile to decide if the previous libraries should be removed.
2013-07-04 09:51:45 -05:00
| $$(TBIN$(1)_T_$(4)_H_$(3))/
Attempt to fix tools.mk under cross-compile
2012-11-07 21:47:24 -06:00
@$$(call E, compile_and_link: $$@)
$$(STAGE$(1)_T_$(4)_H_$(3)) --cfg rustdoc -o $$@ $$<
endef
define TOOLS_STAGE_N_HOST
mk: cleanup - lib and executable suffix handling
2013-03-02 06:25:12 -06:00
$$(HBIN$(2)_H_$(4))/compiletest$$(X_$(4)): \
$$(TBIN$(1)_T_$(4)_H_$(3))/compiletest$$(X_$(4)) \
Fix #3225: Incorporate feedback from Graydon. Namely, switched in many places to using GNU make provided functions for directory listing and text processing, rather than spawning a shell process to do that work. In the process of the revision, learned about Target-specific variables, which were very applicable to INSTALL_LIB (which, on a per-recipe basis, was always receiving the same actual arguments for its first two formal parameters in every invocation). http://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Target_002dspecific.html (We might be able to make use of those in future refactorings.) ---- Also adds a cleanup pass to get-snapshot.py as well, since the same problem arises when we unpack libraries from the snapshot archive into a build directory with a prior snapshot's artifacts. (I put this step into the python script rather than the makefile because I wanted to delay the cleanup pass until after we have at least successfully downloaded the tarball. That way, if the download fails, you should not destroy the previous unarchived snapshot libraries and build products.) ---- Also reverted whitespace changes to minimize diff. I plan to put them back in in a dedicated commit elsewhere.
2013-07-08 11:35:47 -05:00
$$(HSREQ$(2)_H_$(4)) \
Fix #3225: Check for old Rust libraries when building and installing. When building Rust libraries (e.g. librustc, libstd, etc), checks for and verbosely removes previous build products before invoking rustc. (Also, when Make variable VERBOSE is defined, it will list all of the libraries matching the object library's glob after the rustc invocation has completed.) When installing Rust libraries, checks for previous libraries in target install directory, but does not remove them. The thinking behind these two different modes of operation is that the installation target, unlike the build tree, is not under the control of this infrastructure and it is not up to this Makefile to decide if the previous libraries should be removed.
2013-07-04 09:51:45 -05:00
| $$(HBIN$(2)_H_$(4))/
Move compiletest to src/ and cleanup build rules
2011-10-02 19:28:59 -05:00
@$$(call E, cp: $$@)
$$(Q)cp $$< $$@
library-ifying of tools - turning cargo, rustdoc, fuzzer, into libraries, as per #3543
2012-10-03 19:32:30 -05:00
mk: cleanup - lib and executable suffix handling
2013-03-02 06:25:12 -06:00
$$(HLIB$(2)_H_$(4))/$(CFG_LIBRUSTPKG_$(4)): \
$$(TLIB$(1)_T_$(4)_H_$(3))/$(CFG_LIBRUSTPKG_$(4)) \
$$(HLIB$(2)_H_$(4))/$(CFG_LIBRUSTC_$(4)) \
Fix #3225: Check for old Rust libraries when building and installing. When building Rust libraries (e.g. librustc, libstd, etc), checks for and verbosely removes previous build products before invoking rustc. (Also, when Make variable VERBOSE is defined, it will list all of the libraries matching the object library's glob after the rustc invocation has completed.) When installing Rust libraries, checks for previous libraries in target install directory, but does not remove them. The thinking behind these two different modes of operation is that the installation target, unlike the build tree, is not under the control of this infrastructure and it is not up to this Makefile to decide if the previous libraries should be removed.
2013-07-04 09:51:45 -05:00
$$(HSREQ$(2)_H_$(4)) \
| $$(HLIB$(2)_H_$(4))/
library-ifying of tools - turning cargo, rustdoc, fuzzer, into libraries, as per #3543
2012-10-03 19:32:30 -05:00
@$$(call E, cp: $$@)
Fix #3225: Incorporate feedback from Graydon. Namely, switched in many places to using GNU make provided functions for directory listing and text processing, rather than spawning a shell process to do that work. In the process of the revision, learned about Target-specific variables, which were very applicable to INSTALL_LIB (which, on a per-recipe basis, was always receiving the same actual arguments for its first two formal parameters in every invocation). http://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Target_002dspecific.html (We might be able to make use of those in future refactorings.) ---- Also adds a cleanup pass to get-snapshot.py as well, since the same problem arises when we unpack libraries from the snapshot archive into a build directory with a prior snapshot's artifacts. (I put this step into the python script rather than the makefile because I wanted to delay the cleanup pass until after we have at least successfully downloaded the tarball. That way, if the download fails, you should not destroy the previous unarchived snapshot libraries and build products.) ---- Also reverted whitespace changes to minimize diff. I plan to put them back in in a dedicated commit elsewhere.
2013-07-08 11:35:47 -05:00
$$(call REMOVE_ALL_OLD_GLOB_MATCHES_EXCEPT,$$(dir $$@),$(LIBRUSTPKG_GLOB_$(4)),$$(notdir $$@))
library-ifying of tools - turning cargo, rustdoc, fuzzer, into libraries, as per #3543
2012-10-03 19:32:30 -05:00
$$(Q)cp $$< $$@
Fix #3225: Incorporate feedback from Graydon. Namely, switched in many places to using GNU make provided functions for directory listing and text processing, rather than spawning a shell process to do that work. In the process of the revision, learned about Target-specific variables, which were very applicable to INSTALL_LIB (which, on a per-recipe basis, was always receiving the same actual arguments for its first two formal parameters in every invocation). http://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Target_002dspecific.html (We might be able to make use of those in future refactorings.) ---- Also adds a cleanup pass to get-snapshot.py as well, since the same problem arises when we unpack libraries from the snapshot archive into a build directory with a prior snapshot's artifacts. (I put this step into the python script rather than the makefile because I wanted to delay the cleanup pass until after we have at least successfully downloaded the tarball. That way, if the download fails, you should not destroy the previous unarchived snapshot libraries and build products.) ---- Also reverted whitespace changes to minimize diff. I plan to put them back in in a dedicated commit elsewhere.
2013-07-08 11:35:47 -05:00
$$(call LIST_ALL_OLD_GLOB_MATCHES_EXCEPT,$$(dir $$@),$(LIBRUSTPKG_GLOB_$(4)),$$(notdir $$@))
mk: cleanup - lib and executable suffix handling
2013-03-02 06:25:12 -06:00
$$(Q)cp -R $$(TLIB$(1)_T_$(4)_H_$(3))/$(LIBRUSTPKG_GLOB_$(4)) \
$$(wildcard $$(TLIB$(1)_T_$(4)_H_$(3))/$(LIBRUSTPKG_DSYM_GLOB_$(4))) \
Fix install target for new libraries
2012-11-07 02:45:42 -06:00
$$(HLIB$(2)_H_$(4))
Build infra and minor build-enabling bugfixes for cargo.
2011-12-01 13:31:29 -06:00
mk: cleanup - lib and executable suffix handling
2013-03-02 06:25:12 -06:00
$$(HBIN$(2)_H_$(4))/rustpkg$$(X_$(4)): \
$$(TBIN$(1)_T_$(4)_H_$(3))/rustpkg$$(X_$(4)) \
$$(HLIB$(2)_H_$(4))/$(CFG_LIBRUSTPKG_$(4)) \
Fix #3225: Check for old Rust libraries when building and installing. When building Rust libraries (e.g. librustc, libstd, etc), checks for and verbosely removes previous build products before invoking rustc. (Also, when Make variable VERBOSE is defined, it will list all of the libraries matching the object library's glob after the rustc invocation has completed.) When installing Rust libraries, checks for previous libraries in target install directory, but does not remove them. The thinking behind these two different modes of operation is that the installation target, unlike the build tree, is not under the control of this infrastructure and it is not up to this Makefile to decide if the previous libraries should be removed.
2013-07-04 09:51:45 -05:00
$$(HSREQ$(2)_H_$(4)) \
Fix #3225: Incorporate feedback from Graydon. Namely, switched in many places to using GNU make provided functions for directory listing and text processing, rather than spawning a shell process to do that work. In the process of the revision, learned about Target-specific variables, which were very applicable to INSTALL_LIB (which, on a per-recipe basis, was always receiving the same actual arguments for its first two formal parameters in every invocation). http://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Target_002dspecific.html (We might be able to make use of those in future refactorings.) ---- Also adds a cleanup pass to get-snapshot.py as well, since the same problem arises when we unpack libraries from the snapshot archive into a build directory with a prior snapshot's artifacts. (I put this step into the python script rather than the makefile because I wanted to delay the cleanup pass until after we have at least successfully downloaded the tarball. That way, if the download fails, you should not destroy the previous unarchived snapshot libraries and build products.) ---- Also reverted whitespace changes to minimize diff. I plan to put them back in in a dedicated commit elsewhere.
2013-07-08 11:35:47 -05:00
| $$(HBIN$(2)_H_$(4))/
Build infra and minor build-enabling bugfixes for cargo.
2011-12-01 13:31:29 -06:00
@$$(call E, cp: $$@)
$$(Q)cp $$< $$@
Fix #3225: Incorporate feedback from Graydon. Namely, switched in many places to using GNU make provided functions for directory listing and text processing, rather than spawning a shell process to do that work. In the process of the revision, learned about Target-specific variables, which were very applicable to INSTALL_LIB (which, on a per-recipe basis, was always receiving the same actual arguments for its first two formal parameters in every invocation). http://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Target_002dspecific.html (We might be able to make use of those in future refactorings.) ---- Also adds a cleanup pass to get-snapshot.py as well, since the same problem arises when we unpack libraries from the snapshot archive into a build directory with a prior snapshot's artifacts. (I put this step into the python script rather than the makefile because I wanted to delay the cleanup pass until after we have at least successfully downloaded the tarball. That way, if the download fails, you should not destroy the previous unarchived snapshot libraries and build products.) ---- Also reverted whitespace changes to minimize diff. I plan to put them back in in a dedicated commit elsewhere.
2013-07-08 11:35:47 -05:00
$$(HLIB$(2)_H_$(4))/$(CFG_LIBRUSTDOC_$(4)): \
mk: cleanup - lib and executable suffix handling
2013-03-02 06:25:12 -06:00
$$(TLIB$(1)_T_$(4)_H_$(3))/$(CFG_LIBRUSTDOC_$(4)) \
Fix #3225: Incorporate feedback from Graydon. Namely, switched in many places to using GNU make provided functions for directory listing and text processing, rather than spawning a shell process to do that work. In the process of the revision, learned about Target-specific variables, which were very applicable to INSTALL_LIB (which, on a per-recipe basis, was always receiving the same actual arguments for its first two formal parameters in every invocation). http://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Target_002dspecific.html (We might be able to make use of those in future refactorings.) ---- Also adds a cleanup pass to get-snapshot.py as well, since the same problem arises when we unpack libraries from the snapshot archive into a build directory with a prior snapshot's artifacts. (I put this step into the python script rather than the makefile because I wanted to delay the cleanup pass until after we have at least successfully downloaded the tarball. That way, if the download fails, you should not destroy the previous unarchived snapshot libraries and build products.) ---- Also reverted whitespace changes to minimize diff. I plan to put them back in in a dedicated commit elsewhere.
2013-07-08 11:35:47 -05:00
$$(HLIB$(2)_H_$(4))/$(CFG_LIBRUSTC_$(4)) \
$$(HSREQ$(2)_H_$(4)) \
Fix #3225: Check for old Rust libraries when building and installing. When building Rust libraries (e.g. librustc, libstd, etc), checks for and verbosely removes previous build products before invoking rustc. (Also, when Make variable VERBOSE is defined, it will list all of the libraries matching the object library's glob after the rustc invocation has completed.) When installing Rust libraries, checks for previous libraries in target install directory, but does not remove them. The thinking behind these two different modes of operation is that the installation target, unlike the build tree, is not under the control of this infrastructure and it is not up to this Makefile to decide if the previous libraries should be removed.
2013-07-04 09:51:45 -05:00
| $$(HLIB$(2)_H_$(4))/
library-ifying of tools - turning cargo, rustdoc, fuzzer, into libraries, as per #3543
2012-10-03 19:32:30 -05:00
@$$(call E, cp: $$@)
Fix #3225: Incorporate feedback from Graydon. Namely, switched in many places to using GNU make provided functions for directory listing and text processing, rather than spawning a shell process to do that work. In the process of the revision, learned about Target-specific variables, which were very applicable to INSTALL_LIB (which, on a per-recipe basis, was always receiving the same actual arguments for its first two formal parameters in every invocation). http://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Target_002dspecific.html (We might be able to make use of those in future refactorings.) ---- Also adds a cleanup pass to get-snapshot.py as well, since the same problem arises when we unpack libraries from the snapshot archive into a build directory with a prior snapshot's artifacts. (I put this step into the python script rather than the makefile because I wanted to delay the cleanup pass until after we have at least successfully downloaded the tarball. That way, if the download fails, you should not destroy the previous unarchived snapshot libraries and build products.) ---- Also reverted whitespace changes to minimize diff. I plan to put them back in in a dedicated commit elsewhere.
2013-07-08 11:35:47 -05:00
$$(call REMOVE_ALL_OLD_GLOB_MATCHES_EXCEPT,$$(dir $$@),$(LIBRUSTDOC_GLOB_$(4)),$$(notdir $$@))
library-ifying of tools - turning cargo, rustdoc, fuzzer, into libraries, as per #3543
2012-10-03 19:32:30 -05:00
$$(Q)cp $$< $$@
Fix #3225: Incorporate feedback from Graydon. Namely, switched in many places to using GNU make provided functions for directory listing and text processing, rather than spawning a shell process to do that work. In the process of the revision, learned about Target-specific variables, which were very applicable to INSTALL_LIB (which, on a per-recipe basis, was always receiving the same actual arguments for its first two formal parameters in every invocation). http://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Target_002dspecific.html (We might be able to make use of those in future refactorings.) ---- Also adds a cleanup pass to get-snapshot.py as well, since the same problem arises when we unpack libraries from the snapshot archive into a build directory with a prior snapshot's artifacts. (I put this step into the python script rather than the makefile because I wanted to delay the cleanup pass until after we have at least successfully downloaded the tarball. That way, if the download fails, you should not destroy the previous unarchived snapshot libraries and build products.) ---- Also reverted whitespace changes to minimize diff. I plan to put them back in in a dedicated commit elsewhere.
2013-07-08 11:35:47 -05:00
$$(call LIST_ALL_OLD_GLOB_MATCHES_EXCEPT,$$(dir $$@),$(LIBRUSTDOC_GLOB_$(4)),$$(notdir $$@))
mk: cleanup - lib and executable suffix handling
2013-03-02 06:25:12 -06:00
$$(Q)cp -R $$(TLIB$(1)_T_$(4)_H_$(3))/$(LIBRUSTDOC_GLOB_$(4)) \
$$(wildcard $$(TLIB$(1)_T_$(4)_H_$(3))/$(LIBRUSTDOC_DSYM_GLOB_$(4))) \
Fix install target for new libraries
2012-11-07 02:45:42 -06:00
$$(HLIB$(2)_H_$(4))
Add rustdoc to build.
2011-12-20 20:27:27 -06:00
mk: cleanup - lib and executable suffix handling
2013-03-02 06:25:12 -06:00
$$(HBIN$(2)_H_$(4))/rustdoc$$(X_$(4)): \
$$(TBIN$(1)_T_$(4)_H_$(3))/rustdoc$$(X_$(4)) \
$$(HLIB$(2)_H_$(4))/$(CFG_LIBRUSTDOC_$(4)) \
Fix #3225: Check for old Rust libraries when building and installing. When building Rust libraries (e.g. librustc, libstd, etc), checks for and verbosely removes previous build products before invoking rustc. (Also, when Make variable VERBOSE is defined, it will list all of the libraries matching the object library's glob after the rustc invocation has completed.) When installing Rust libraries, checks for previous libraries in target install directory, but does not remove them. The thinking behind these two different modes of operation is that the installation target, unlike the build tree, is not under the control of this infrastructure and it is not up to this Makefile to decide if the previous libraries should be removed.
2013-07-04 09:51:45 -05:00
$$(HSREQ$(2)_H_$(4)) \
| $$(HBIN$(2)_H_$(4))/
Add rustdoc to build.
2011-12-20 20:27:27 -06:00
@$$(call E, cp: $$@)
$$(Q)cp $$< $$@
Move compiletest to src/ and cleanup build rules
2011-10-02 19:28:59 -05:00
endef
support for GNU configure syntax
2013-10-21 04:18:21 -05:00
$(foreach host,$(CFG_HOST), \
$(foreach target,$(CFG_TARGET), \
mk: Split target triples into bulid triple + host triples + target triples For cross compiling to targets that don't want to build a compiler
2013-02-21 18:15:01 -06:00
$(eval $(call TOOLS_STAGE_N_TARGET,0,1,$(host),$(target))) \
$(eval $(call TOOLS_STAGE_N_TARGET,1,2,$(host),$(target))) \
mk: Include all bins in the windows install
2013-06-27 20:57:38 -05:00
$(eval $(call TOOLS_STAGE_N_TARGET,2,3,$(host),$(target))) \
$(eval $(call TOOLS_STAGE_N_TARGET,3,bogus,$(host),$(target)))))
Attempt to fix tools.mk under cross-compile
2012-11-07 21:47:24 -06:00
support for GNU configure syntax
2013-10-21 04:18:21 -05:00
$(foreach host,$(CFG_HOST), \
Attempt to fix tools.mk under cross-compile
2012-11-07 21:47:24 -06:00
$(eval $(call TOOLS_STAGE_N_HOST,0,1,$(host),$(host))) \
$(eval $(call TOOLS_STAGE_N_HOST,1,2,$(host),$(host))) \
$(eval $(call TOOLS_STAGE_N_HOST,2,3,$(host),$(host))))
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink