35 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown
35 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown
|
# Frequently asked questions
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Why is it called salsa?
|
||
|
|
||
|
I like salsa! Don't you?! Well, ok, there's a bit more to it. The
|
||
|
underlying algorithm for figuring out which bits of code need to be
|
||
|
re-executed after any given change is based on the algorithm used in
|
||
|
rustc. Michael Woerister and I first described the rustc algorithm in
|
||
|
terms of two colors, red and green, and hence we called it the
|
||
|
"red-green algorithm". This made me think of the New Mexico State
|
||
|
Question --- ["Red or green?"][nm] --- which refers to chile
|
||
|
(salsa). Although this version no longer uses colors (we borrowed
|
||
|
revision counters from Glimmer, instead), I still like the name.
|
||
|
|
||
|
[nm]: https://www.sos.state.nm.us/about-new-mexico/state-question/
|
||
|
|
||
|
## What is the relationship between salsa and an Entity-Component System (ECS)?
|
||
|
|
||
|
You may have noticed that Salsa "feels" a lot like an ECS in some
|
||
|
ways. That's true -- Salsa's queries are a bit like *components* (and
|
||
|
the keys to the queries are a bit like *entities*). But there is one
|
||
|
big difference: **ECS is -- at its heart -- a mutable system**. You
|
||
|
can get or set a component of some entity whenever you like. In
|
||
|
contrast, salsa's queries **define "derived values" via pure
|
||
|
computations**.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Partly as a consequence, ECS doesn't handle incremental updates for
|
||
|
you. When you update some component of some entity, you have to ensure
|
||
|
that other entities' components are updated appropriately.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Finally, ECS offers interesting metadata and "aspect-like" facilities,
|
||
|
such as iterating over all entities that share certain components.
|
||
|
Salsa has no analogue to that.
|
||
|
|