2016-08-10 22:16:28 -05:00
|
|
|
use rustc::hir::def_id::DefId;
|
2016-12-06 04:32:21 -06:00
|
|
|
use rustc::hir::intravisit::{Visitor, walk_expr, NestedVisitorMap};
|
2016-08-10 22:16:28 -05:00
|
|
|
use rustc::hir::*;
|
2016-09-06 08:15:36 -05:00
|
|
|
use rustc::ty;
|
2016-08-10 22:16:28 -05:00
|
|
|
use rustc::lint::*;
|
2016-09-06 08:15:36 -05:00
|
|
|
use utils::{get_parent_expr, span_note_and_lint, span_lint};
|
2016-08-10 22:16:28 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/// **What it does:** Checks for a read and a write to the same variable where
|
|
|
|
/// whether the read occurs before or after the write depends on the evaluation
|
|
|
|
/// order of sub-expressions.
|
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// **Why is this bad?** It is often confusing to read. In addition, the
|
|
|
|
/// sub-expression evaluation order for Rust is not well documented.
|
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// **Known problems:** Code which intentionally depends on the evaluation
|
|
|
|
/// order, or which is correct for any evaluation order.
|
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// **Example:**
|
|
|
|
/// ```rust
|
|
|
|
/// let mut x = 0;
|
|
|
|
/// let a = {x = 1; 1} + x;
|
|
|
|
/// // Unclear whether a is 1 or 2.
|
|
|
|
/// ```
|
|
|
|
declare_lint! {
|
|
|
|
pub EVAL_ORDER_DEPENDENCE,
|
|
|
|
Warn,
|
|
|
|
"whether a variable read occurs before a write depends on sub-expression evaluation order"
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-09-06 08:15:36 -05:00
|
|
|
/// **What it does:** Checks for diverging calls that are not match arms or statements.
|
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// **Why is this bad?** It is often confusing to read. In addition, the
|
|
|
|
/// sub-expression evaluation order for Rust is not well documented.
|
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// **Known problems:** Someone might want to use `some_bool || panic!()` as a shorthand.
|
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// **Example:**
|
|
|
|
/// ```rust
|
|
|
|
/// let a = b() || panic!() || c();
|
|
|
|
/// // `c()` is dead, `panic!()` is only called if `b()` returns `false`
|
|
|
|
/// let x = (a, b, c, panic!());
|
|
|
|
/// // can simply be replaced by `panic!()`
|
|
|
|
/// ```
|
|
|
|
declare_lint! {
|
|
|
|
pub DIVERGING_SUB_EXPRESSION,
|
|
|
|
Warn,
|
|
|
|
"whether an expression contains a diverging sub expression"
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-08-10 22:16:28 -05:00
|
|
|
#[derive(Copy,Clone)]
|
|
|
|
pub struct EvalOrderDependence;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
impl LintPass for EvalOrderDependence {
|
|
|
|
fn get_lints(&self) -> LintArray {
|
2016-09-06 08:15:36 -05:00
|
|
|
lint_array!(EVAL_ORDER_DEPENDENCE, DIVERGING_SUB_EXPRESSION)
|
2016-08-10 22:16:28 -05:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-12-07 06:13:40 -06:00
|
|
|
impl<'a, 'tcx> LateLintPass<'a, 'tcx> for EvalOrderDependence {
|
|
|
|
fn check_expr(&mut self, cx: &LateContext<'a, 'tcx>, expr: &'tcx Expr) {
|
2016-08-10 22:16:28 -05:00
|
|
|
// Find a write to a local variable.
|
|
|
|
match expr.node {
|
2016-12-20 11:21:30 -06:00
|
|
|
ExprAssign(ref lhs, _) |
|
|
|
|
ExprAssignOp(_, ref lhs, _) => {
|
2016-12-01 15:31:56 -06:00
|
|
|
if let ExprPath(ref qpath) = lhs.node {
|
|
|
|
if let QPath::Resolved(_, ref path) = *qpath {
|
|
|
|
if path.segments.len() == 1 {
|
|
|
|
let var = cx.tcx.tables().qpath_def(qpath, lhs.id).def_id();
|
|
|
|
let mut visitor = ReadVisitor {
|
|
|
|
cx: cx,
|
|
|
|
var: var,
|
|
|
|
write_expr: expr,
|
|
|
|
last_expr: expr,
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
check_for_unsequenced_reads(&mut visitor);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2016-08-10 22:16:28 -05:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2016-12-20 11:21:30 -06:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
_ => {},
|
2016-08-10 22:16:28 -05:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2016-12-07 06:13:40 -06:00
|
|
|
fn check_stmt(&mut self, cx: &LateContext<'a, 'tcx>, stmt: &'tcx Stmt) {
|
2016-09-06 08:15:36 -05:00
|
|
|
match stmt.node {
|
2016-12-20 11:21:30 -06:00
|
|
|
StmtExpr(ref e, _) |
|
|
|
|
StmtSemi(ref e, _) => DivergenceVisitor { cx: cx }.maybe_walk_expr(e),
|
2016-09-06 08:15:36 -05:00
|
|
|
StmtDecl(ref d, _) => {
|
|
|
|
if let DeclLocal(ref local) = d.node {
|
|
|
|
if let Local { init: Some(ref e), .. } = **local {
|
2016-12-06 04:32:21 -06:00
|
|
|
DivergenceVisitor { cx: cx }.visit_expr(e);
|
2016-09-06 08:15:36 -05:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-12-06 04:32:21 -06:00
|
|
|
struct DivergenceVisitor<'a, 'tcx: 'a> {
|
|
|
|
cx: &'a LateContext<'a, 'tcx>,
|
|
|
|
}
|
2016-09-06 08:15:36 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
impl<'a, 'tcx> DivergenceVisitor<'a, 'tcx> {
|
2016-12-06 04:32:21 -06:00
|
|
|
fn maybe_walk_expr(&mut self, e: &'tcx Expr) {
|
2016-09-06 08:15:36 -05:00
|
|
|
match e.node {
|
|
|
|
ExprClosure(..) => {},
|
|
|
|
ExprMatch(ref e, ref arms, _) => {
|
|
|
|
self.visit_expr(e);
|
|
|
|
for arm in arms {
|
|
|
|
if let Some(ref guard) = arm.guard {
|
|
|
|
self.visit_expr(guard);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// make sure top level arm expressions aren't linted
|
2016-10-01 07:41:20 -05:00
|
|
|
self.maybe_walk_expr(&*arm.body);
|
2016-09-06 08:15:36 -05:00
|
|
|
}
|
2016-12-20 11:21:30 -06:00
|
|
|
},
|
2016-09-06 08:15:36 -05:00
|
|
|
_ => walk_expr(self, e),
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
fn report_diverging_sub_expr(&mut self, e: &Expr) {
|
2016-12-20 11:21:30 -06:00
|
|
|
span_lint(self.cx, DIVERGING_SUB_EXPRESSION, e.span, "sub-expression diverges");
|
2016-09-06 08:15:36 -05:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-12-06 04:32:21 -06:00
|
|
|
impl<'a, 'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for DivergenceVisitor<'a, 'tcx> {
|
|
|
|
fn visit_expr(&mut self, e: &'tcx Expr) {
|
2016-09-06 08:15:36 -05:00
|
|
|
match e.node {
|
2016-12-20 11:21:30 -06:00
|
|
|
ExprAgain(_) | ExprBreak(_, _) | ExprRet(_) => self.report_diverging_sub_expr(e),
|
|
|
|
ExprCall(ref func, _) => {
|
|
|
|
match self.cx.tcx.tables().expr_ty(func).sty {
|
|
|
|
ty::TyFnDef(_, _, fn_ty) |
|
|
|
|
ty::TyFnPtr(fn_ty) => {
|
|
|
|
if let ty::TyNever = self.cx.tcx.erase_late_bound_regions(&fn_ty.sig).output().sty {
|
|
|
|
self.report_diverging_sub_expr(e);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
_ => {},
|
|
|
|
}
|
2016-09-06 08:15:36 -05:00
|
|
|
},
|
2016-09-13 05:41:37 -05:00
|
|
|
ExprMethodCall(..) => {
|
|
|
|
let method_call = ty::MethodCall::expr(e.id);
|
2016-12-06 04:32:21 -06:00
|
|
|
let borrowed_table = self.cx.tcx.tables.borrow();
|
2016-09-13 05:41:37 -05:00
|
|
|
let method_type = borrowed_table.method_map.get(&method_call).expect("This should never happen.");
|
|
|
|
let result_ty = method_type.ty.fn_ret();
|
2016-12-06 04:32:21 -06:00
|
|
|
if let ty::TyNever = self.cx.tcx.erase_late_bound_regions(&result_ty).sty {
|
2016-09-13 05:41:37 -05:00
|
|
|
self.report_diverging_sub_expr(e);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-09-13 05:41:20 -05:00
|
|
|
_ => {
|
2016-12-21 03:25:14 -06:00
|
|
|
// do not lint expressions referencing objects of type `!`, as that required a diverging expression
|
|
|
|
// to begin with
|
2016-09-06 08:15:36 -05:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
self.maybe_walk_expr(e);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2016-12-06 04:32:21 -06:00
|
|
|
fn visit_block(&mut self, _: &'tcx Block) {
|
2016-09-06 08:15:36 -05:00
|
|
|
// don't continue over blocks, LateLintPass already does that
|
|
|
|
}
|
2016-12-06 04:32:21 -06:00
|
|
|
fn nested_visit_map<'this>(&'this mut self) -> NestedVisitorMap<'this, 'tcx> {
|
|
|
|
NestedVisitorMap::All(&self.cx.tcx.map)
|
|
|
|
}
|
2016-08-10 22:16:28 -05:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/// Walks up the AST from the the given write expression (`vis.write_expr`)
|
|
|
|
/// looking for reads to the same variable that are unsequenced relative to the
|
|
|
|
/// write.
|
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// This means reads for which there is a common ancestor between the read and
|
|
|
|
/// the write such that
|
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// * evaluating the ancestor necessarily evaluates both the read and the write
|
|
|
|
/// (for example, `&x` and `|| x = 1` don't necessarily evaluate `x`), and
|
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// * which one is evaluated first depends on the order of sub-expression
|
|
|
|
/// evaluation. Blocks, `if`s, loops, `match`es, and the short-circuiting
|
|
|
|
/// logical operators are considered to have a defined evaluation order.
|
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// When such a read is found, the lint is triggered.
|
|
|
|
fn check_for_unsequenced_reads(vis: &mut ReadVisitor) {
|
|
|
|
let map = &vis.cx.tcx.map;
|
|
|
|
let mut cur_id = vis.write_expr.id;
|
|
|
|
loop {
|
|
|
|
let parent_id = map.get_parent_node(cur_id);
|
|
|
|
if parent_id == cur_id {
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
let parent_node = match map.find(parent_id) {
|
|
|
|
Some(parent) => parent,
|
|
|
|
None => break,
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let stop_early = match parent_node {
|
|
|
|
map::Node::NodeExpr(expr) => check_expr(vis, expr),
|
|
|
|
map::Node::NodeStmt(stmt) => check_stmt(vis, stmt),
|
|
|
|
map::Node::NodeItem(_) => {
|
|
|
|
// We reached the top of the function, stop.
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
},
|
2016-12-20 11:21:30 -06:00
|
|
|
_ => StopEarly::KeepGoing,
|
2016-08-10 22:16:28 -05:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
match stop_early {
|
|
|
|
StopEarly::Stop => break,
|
|
|
|
StopEarly::KeepGoing => {},
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cur_id = parent_id;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/// Whether to stop early for the loop in `check_for_unsequenced_reads`. (If
|
|
|
|
/// `check_expr` weren't an independent function, this would be unnecessary and
|
|
|
|
/// we could just use `break`).
|
|
|
|
enum StopEarly {
|
|
|
|
KeepGoing,
|
|
|
|
Stop,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-12-20 11:21:30 -06:00
|
|
|
fn check_expr<'a, 'tcx>(vis: &mut ReadVisitor<'a, 'tcx>, expr: &'tcx Expr) -> StopEarly {
|
2016-08-10 22:16:28 -05:00
|
|
|
if expr.id == vis.last_expr.id {
|
|
|
|
return StopEarly::KeepGoing;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
match expr.node {
|
2016-09-30 08:35:24 -05:00
|
|
|
ExprArray(_) |
|
2016-08-10 22:16:28 -05:00
|
|
|
ExprTup(_) |
|
|
|
|
ExprMethodCall(_, _, _) |
|
|
|
|
ExprCall(_, _) |
|
|
|
|
ExprAssign(_, _) |
|
|
|
|
ExprIndex(_, _) |
|
|
|
|
ExprRepeat(_, _) |
|
|
|
|
ExprStruct(_, _, _) => {
|
|
|
|
walk_expr(vis, expr);
|
2016-12-20 11:21:30 -06:00
|
|
|
},
|
2016-08-10 22:16:28 -05:00
|
|
|
ExprBinary(op, _, _) |
|
|
|
|
ExprAssignOp(op, _, _) => {
|
|
|
|
if op.node == BiAnd || op.node == BiOr {
|
|
|
|
// x && y and x || y always evaluate x first, so these are
|
|
|
|
// strictly sequenced.
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
walk_expr(vis, expr);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2016-12-20 11:21:30 -06:00
|
|
|
},
|
2016-08-10 22:16:28 -05:00
|
|
|
ExprClosure(_, _, _, _) => {
|
|
|
|
// Either
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// * `var` is defined in the closure body, in which case we've
|
|
|
|
// reached the top of the enclosing function and can stop, or
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// * `var` is captured by the closure, in which case, because
|
|
|
|
// evaluating a closure does not evaluate its body, we don't
|
|
|
|
// necessarily have a write, so we need to stop to avoid
|
|
|
|
// generating false positives.
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// This is also the only place we need to stop early (grrr).
|
|
|
|
return StopEarly::Stop;
|
2016-12-20 11:21:30 -06:00
|
|
|
},
|
2016-08-10 22:16:28 -05:00
|
|
|
// All other expressions either have only one child or strictly
|
|
|
|
// sequence the evaluation order of their sub-expressions.
|
2016-12-20 11:21:30 -06:00
|
|
|
_ => {},
|
2016-08-10 22:16:28 -05:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
vis.last_expr = expr;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
StopEarly::KeepGoing
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-12-07 06:13:40 -06:00
|
|
|
fn check_stmt<'a, 'tcx>(vis: &mut ReadVisitor<'a, 'tcx>, stmt: &'tcx Stmt) -> StopEarly {
|
2016-08-10 22:16:28 -05:00
|
|
|
match stmt.node {
|
|
|
|
StmtExpr(ref expr, _) |
|
|
|
|
StmtSemi(ref expr, _) => check_expr(vis, expr),
|
|
|
|
StmtDecl(ref decl, _) => {
|
|
|
|
// If the declaration is of a local variable, check its initializer
|
|
|
|
// expression if it has one. Otherwise, keep going.
|
|
|
|
let local = match decl.node {
|
|
|
|
DeclLocal(ref local) => Some(local),
|
|
|
|
_ => None,
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
local.and_then(|local| local.init.as_ref())
|
|
|
|
.map_or(StopEarly::KeepGoing, |expr| check_expr(vis, expr))
|
2016-12-20 11:21:30 -06:00
|
|
|
},
|
2016-08-10 22:16:28 -05:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/// A visitor that looks for reads from a variable.
|
2016-12-06 04:32:21 -06:00
|
|
|
struct ReadVisitor<'a, 'tcx: 'a> {
|
|
|
|
cx: &'a LateContext<'a, 'tcx>,
|
2016-08-10 22:16:28 -05:00
|
|
|
/// The id of the variable we're looking for.
|
|
|
|
var: DefId,
|
|
|
|
/// The expressions where the write to the variable occurred (for reporting
|
|
|
|
/// in the lint).
|
2016-12-06 04:32:21 -06:00
|
|
|
write_expr: &'tcx Expr,
|
2016-08-10 22:16:28 -05:00
|
|
|
/// The last (highest in the AST) expression we've checked, so we know not
|
|
|
|
/// to recheck it.
|
2016-12-06 04:32:21 -06:00
|
|
|
last_expr: &'tcx Expr,
|
2016-08-10 22:16:28 -05:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-12-06 04:32:21 -06:00
|
|
|
impl<'a, 'tcx> Visitor<'tcx> for ReadVisitor<'a, 'tcx> {
|
|
|
|
fn visit_expr(&mut self, expr: &'tcx Expr) {
|
2016-08-10 22:16:28 -05:00
|
|
|
if expr.id == self.last_expr.id {
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
match expr.node {
|
2016-12-01 15:31:56 -06:00
|
|
|
ExprPath(ref qpath) => {
|
|
|
|
if let QPath::Resolved(None, ref path) = *qpath {
|
|
|
|
if path.segments.len() == 1 && self.cx.tcx.tables().qpath_def(qpath, expr.id).def_id() == self.var {
|
|
|
|
if is_in_assignment_position(self.cx, expr) {
|
|
|
|
// This is a write, not a read.
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
span_note_and_lint(
|
|
|
|
self.cx,
|
|
|
|
EVAL_ORDER_DEPENDENCE,
|
|
|
|
expr.span,
|
|
|
|
"unsequenced read of a variable",
|
|
|
|
self.write_expr.span,
|
|
|
|
"whether read occurs before this write depends on evaluation order"
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2016-08-10 22:16:28 -05:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// We're about to descend a closure. Since we don't know when (or
|
|
|
|
// if) the closure will be evaluated, any reads in it might not
|
|
|
|
// occur here (or ever). Like above, bail to avoid false positives.
|
|
|
|
ExprClosure(_, _, _, _) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// We want to avoid a false positive when a variable name occurs
|
|
|
|
// only to have its address taken, so we stop here. Technically,
|
|
|
|
// this misses some weird cases, eg.
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// ```rust
|
|
|
|
// let mut x = 0;
|
|
|
|
// let a = foo(&{x = 1; x}, x);
|
|
|
|
// ```
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// TODO: fix this
|
|
|
|
ExprAddrOf(_, _) => {
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
_ => {}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
walk_expr(self, expr);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2016-12-06 04:32:21 -06:00
|
|
|
fn nested_visit_map<'this>(&'this mut self) -> NestedVisitorMap<'this, 'tcx> {
|
|
|
|
NestedVisitorMap::All(&self.cx.tcx.map)
|
|
|
|
}
|
2016-08-10 22:16:28 -05:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/// Returns true if `expr` is the LHS of an assignment, like `expr = ...`.
|
|
|
|
fn is_in_assignment_position(cx: &LateContext, expr: &Expr) -> bool {
|
|
|
|
if let Some(parent) = get_parent_expr(cx, expr) {
|
|
|
|
if let ExprAssign(ref lhs, _) = parent.node {
|
|
|
|
return lhs.id == expr.id;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
false
|
|
|
|
}
|