rust/src/librustc/metadata/creader.rs

465 lines
15 KiB
Rust
Raw Normal View History

// Copyright 2012 The Rust Project Developers. See the COPYRIGHT
// file at the top-level directory of this distribution and at
// http://rust-lang.org/COPYRIGHT.
//
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 <LICENSE-APACHE or
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0> or the MIT license
// <LICENSE-MIT or http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT>, at your
// option. This file may not be copied, modified, or distributed
// except according to those terms.
//! Validates all used crates and extern libraries and loads their metadata
2013-12-25 12:10:33 -06:00
use driver::{driver, session};
Add generation of static libraries to rustc This commit implements the support necessary for generating both intermediate and result static rust libraries. This is an implementation of my thoughts in https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/rust-dev/2013-November/006686.html. When compiling a library, we still retain the "lib" option, although now there are "rlib", "staticlib", and "dylib" as options for crate_type (and these are stackable). The idea of "lib" is to generate the "compiler default" instead of having too choose (although all are interchangeable). For now I have left the "complier default" to be a dynamic library for size reasons. Of the rust libraries, lib{std,extra,rustuv} will bootstrap with an rlib/dylib pair, but lib{rustc,syntax,rustdoc,rustpkg} will only be built as a dynamic object. I chose this for size reasons, but also because you're probably not going to be embedding the rustc compiler anywhere any time soon. Other than the options outlined above, there are a few defaults/preferences that are now opinionated in the compiler: * If both a .dylib and .rlib are found for a rust library, the compiler will prefer the .rlib variant. This is overridable via the -Z prefer-dynamic option * If generating a "lib", the compiler will generate a dynamic library. This is overridable by explicitly saying what flavor you'd like (rlib, staticlib, dylib). * If no options are passed to the command line, and no crate_type is found in the destination crate, then an executable is generated With this change, you can successfully build a rust program with 0 dynamic dependencies on rust libraries. There is still a dynamic dependency on librustrt, but I plan on removing that in a subsequent commit. This change includes no tests just yet. Our current testing infrastructure/harnesses aren't very amenable to doing flavorful things with linking, so I'm planning on adding a new mode of testing which I believe belongs as a separate commit. Closes #552
2013-11-15 16:03:29 -06:00
use driver::session::Session;
2013-12-25 12:10:33 -06:00
use metadata::csearch;
use metadata::cstore;
use metadata::decoder;
use metadata::loader;
2013-12-25 12:10:33 -06:00
use metadata::loader::Os;
2013-12-21 20:17:29 -06:00
use std::cell::RefCell;
use std::hashmap::HashMap;
use syntax::ast;
use syntax::abi;
2012-09-04 13:54:36 -05:00
use syntax::attr;
use syntax::attr::AttrMetaMethods;
use syntax::codemap::{Span};
use syntax::diagnostic::SpanHandler;
2013-12-25 12:10:33 -06:00
use syntax::ext::base::{CrateLoader, MacroCrate};
use syntax::parse::token::{IdentInterner, InternedString};
use syntax::parse::token;
2013-12-28 11:16:48 -06:00
use syntax::crateid::CrateId;
use syntax::visit;
// Traverses an AST, reading all the information about use'd crates and extern
2011-07-07 23:03:09 -05:00
// libraries necessary for later resolving, typechecking, linking, etc.
Add generation of static libraries to rustc This commit implements the support necessary for generating both intermediate and result static rust libraries. This is an implementation of my thoughts in https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/rust-dev/2013-November/006686.html. When compiling a library, we still retain the "lib" option, although now there are "rlib", "staticlib", and "dylib" as options for crate_type (and these are stackable). The idea of "lib" is to generate the "compiler default" instead of having too choose (although all are interchangeable). For now I have left the "complier default" to be a dynamic library for size reasons. Of the rust libraries, lib{std,extra,rustuv} will bootstrap with an rlib/dylib pair, but lib{rustc,syntax,rustdoc,rustpkg} will only be built as a dynamic object. I chose this for size reasons, but also because you're probably not going to be embedding the rustc compiler anywhere any time soon. Other than the options outlined above, there are a few defaults/preferences that are now opinionated in the compiler: * If both a .dylib and .rlib are found for a rust library, the compiler will prefer the .rlib variant. This is overridable via the -Z prefer-dynamic option * If generating a "lib", the compiler will generate a dynamic library. This is overridable by explicitly saying what flavor you'd like (rlib, staticlib, dylib). * If no options are passed to the command line, and no crate_type is found in the destination crate, then an executable is generated With this change, you can successfully build a rust program with 0 dynamic dependencies on rust libraries. There is still a dynamic dependency on librustrt, but I plan on removing that in a subsequent commit. This change includes no tests just yet. Our current testing infrastructure/harnesses aren't very amenable to doing flavorful things with linking, so I'm planning on adding a new mode of testing which I believe belongs as a separate commit. Closes #552
2013-11-15 16:03:29 -06:00
pub fn read_crates(sess: Session,
krate: &ast::Crate,
os: loader::Os,
intr: @IdentInterner) {
2013-12-21 18:46:55 -06:00
let mut e = Env {
Add generation of static libraries to rustc This commit implements the support necessary for generating both intermediate and result static rust libraries. This is an implementation of my thoughts in https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/rust-dev/2013-November/006686.html. When compiling a library, we still retain the "lib" option, although now there are "rlib", "staticlib", and "dylib" as options for crate_type (and these are stackable). The idea of "lib" is to generate the "compiler default" instead of having too choose (although all are interchangeable). For now I have left the "complier default" to be a dynamic library for size reasons. Of the rust libraries, lib{std,extra,rustuv} will bootstrap with an rlib/dylib pair, but lib{rustc,syntax,rustdoc,rustpkg} will only be built as a dynamic object. I chose this for size reasons, but also because you're probably not going to be embedding the rustc compiler anywhere any time soon. Other than the options outlined above, there are a few defaults/preferences that are now opinionated in the compiler: * If both a .dylib and .rlib are found for a rust library, the compiler will prefer the .rlib variant. This is overridable via the -Z prefer-dynamic option * If generating a "lib", the compiler will generate a dynamic library. This is overridable by explicitly saying what flavor you'd like (rlib, staticlib, dylib). * If no options are passed to the command line, and no crate_type is found in the destination crate, then an executable is generated With this change, you can successfully build a rust program with 0 dynamic dependencies on rust libraries. There is still a dynamic dependency on librustrt, but I plan on removing that in a subsequent commit. This change includes no tests just yet. Our current testing infrastructure/harnesses aren't very amenable to doing flavorful things with linking, so I'm planning on adding a new mode of testing which I believe belongs as a separate commit. Closes #552
2013-11-15 16:03:29 -06:00
sess: sess,
os: os,
crate_cache: @RefCell::new(~[]),
next_crate_num: 1,
intr: intr
};
visit_crate(&e, krate);
2013-12-21 18:46:55 -06:00
{
let mut v = ReadCrateVisitor {
e: &mut e
};
visit::walk_crate(&mut v, krate, ());
2013-12-21 18:46:55 -06:00
}
let crate_cache = e.crate_cache.borrow();
dump_crates(*crate_cache.get());
warn_if_multiple_versions(&mut e, sess.diagnostic(), *crate_cache.get());
2013-12-21 18:46:55 -06:00
}
struct ReadCrateVisitor<'a> {
e: &'a mut Env,
}
2013-12-21 18:46:55 -06:00
impl<'a> visit::Visitor<()> for ReadCrateVisitor<'a> {
fn visit_view_item(&mut self, a: &ast::ViewItem, _: ()) {
visit_view_item(self.e, a);
visit::walk_view_item(self, a, ());
}
fn visit_item(&mut self, a: &ast::Item, _: ()) {
visit_item(self.e, a);
visit::walk_item(self, a, ());
}
}
#[deriving(Clone)]
struct cache_entry {
cnum: ast::CrateNum,
span: Span,
hash: ~str,
2013-12-28 11:16:48 -06:00
crateid: CrateId,
}
fn dump_crates(crate_cache: &[cache_entry]) {
debug!("resolved crates:");
for entry in crate_cache.iter() {
debug!("cnum: {:?}", entry.cnum);
debug!("span: {:?}", entry.span);
debug!("hash: {:?}", entry.hash);
2012-04-09 17:06:38 -05:00
}
}
2013-12-21 18:46:55 -06:00
fn warn_if_multiple_versions(e: &mut Env,
2013-12-27 15:48:00 -06:00
diag: @SpanHandler,
crate_cache: &[cache_entry]) {
2012-06-04 10:03:14 -05:00
if crate_cache.len() != 0u {
2013-12-28 11:16:48 -06:00
let name = crate_cache[crate_cache.len() - 1].crateid.name.clone();
let (matches, non_matches) = crate_cache.partitioned(|entry|
2013-12-28 11:16:48 -06:00
name == entry.crateid.name);
2013-03-28 20:39:09 -05:00
assert!(!matches.is_empty());
if matches.len() != 1u {
diag.handler().warn(
2013-09-28 00:38:08 -05:00
format!("using multiple versions of crate `{}`", name));
for match_ in matches.iter() {
diag.span_note(match_.span, "used here");
2013-12-28 11:16:48 -06:00
loader::note_crateid_attr(diag, &match_.crateid);
}
}
warn_if_multiple_versions(e, diag, non_matches);
}
2011-07-07 23:03:09 -05:00
}
struct Env {
Add generation of static libraries to rustc This commit implements the support necessary for generating both intermediate and result static rust libraries. This is an implementation of my thoughts in https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/rust-dev/2013-November/006686.html. When compiling a library, we still retain the "lib" option, although now there are "rlib", "staticlib", and "dylib" as options for crate_type (and these are stackable). The idea of "lib" is to generate the "compiler default" instead of having too choose (although all are interchangeable). For now I have left the "complier default" to be a dynamic library for size reasons. Of the rust libraries, lib{std,extra,rustuv} will bootstrap with an rlib/dylib pair, but lib{rustc,syntax,rustdoc,rustpkg} will only be built as a dynamic object. I chose this for size reasons, but also because you're probably not going to be embedding the rustc compiler anywhere any time soon. Other than the options outlined above, there are a few defaults/preferences that are now opinionated in the compiler: * If both a .dylib and .rlib are found for a rust library, the compiler will prefer the .rlib variant. This is overridable via the -Z prefer-dynamic option * If generating a "lib", the compiler will generate a dynamic library. This is overridable by explicitly saying what flavor you'd like (rlib, staticlib, dylib). * If no options are passed to the command line, and no crate_type is found in the destination crate, then an executable is generated With this change, you can successfully build a rust program with 0 dynamic dependencies on rust libraries. There is still a dynamic dependency on librustrt, but I plan on removing that in a subsequent commit. This change includes no tests just yet. Our current testing infrastructure/harnesses aren't very amenable to doing flavorful things with linking, so I'm planning on adding a new mode of testing which I believe belongs as a separate commit. Closes #552
2013-11-15 16:03:29 -06:00
sess: Session,
os: loader::Os,
crate_cache: @RefCell<~[cache_entry]>,
next_crate_num: ast::CrateNum,
intr: @IdentInterner
}
2011-07-07 23:37:56 -05:00
fn visit_crate(e: &Env, c: &ast::Crate) {
Add generation of static libraries to rustc This commit implements the support necessary for generating both intermediate and result static rust libraries. This is an implementation of my thoughts in https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/rust-dev/2013-November/006686.html. When compiling a library, we still retain the "lib" option, although now there are "rlib", "staticlib", and "dylib" as options for crate_type (and these are stackable). The idea of "lib" is to generate the "compiler default" instead of having too choose (although all are interchangeable). For now I have left the "complier default" to be a dynamic library for size reasons. Of the rust libraries, lib{std,extra,rustuv} will bootstrap with an rlib/dylib pair, but lib{rustc,syntax,rustdoc,rustpkg} will only be built as a dynamic object. I chose this for size reasons, but also because you're probably not going to be embedding the rustc compiler anywhere any time soon. Other than the options outlined above, there are a few defaults/preferences that are now opinionated in the compiler: * If both a .dylib and .rlib are found for a rust library, the compiler will prefer the .rlib variant. This is overridable via the -Z prefer-dynamic option * If generating a "lib", the compiler will generate a dynamic library. This is overridable by explicitly saying what flavor you'd like (rlib, staticlib, dylib). * If no options are passed to the command line, and no crate_type is found in the destination crate, then an executable is generated With this change, you can successfully build a rust program with 0 dynamic dependencies on rust libraries. There is still a dynamic dependency on librustrt, but I plan on removing that in a subsequent commit. This change includes no tests just yet. Our current testing infrastructure/harnesses aren't very amenable to doing flavorful things with linking, so I'm planning on adding a new mode of testing which I believe belongs as a separate commit. Closes #552
2013-11-15 16:03:29 -06:00
let cstore = e.sess.cstore;
for a in c.attrs.iter().filter(|m| m.name().equiv(&("link_args"))) {
match a.value_str() {
Some(ref linkarg) => cstore.add_used_link_args(linkarg.get()),
None => { /* fallthrough */ }
}
}
}
fn visit_view_item(e: &mut Env, i: &ast::ViewItem) {
2013-12-25 12:10:33 -06:00
let should_load = i.attrs.iter().all(|attr| {
2014-01-21 12:08:10 -06:00
attr.name().get() != "phase" ||
2013-12-25 12:10:33 -06:00
attr.meta_item_list().map_or(false, |phases| {
attr::contains_name(phases, "link")
})
});
if !should_load {
return;
}
match extract_crate_info(i) {
Some(info) => {
let cnum = resolve_crate(e,
None,
info.ident.clone(),
info.name.clone(),
info.version.clone(),
~"",
i.span);
2013-12-25 12:10:33 -06:00
e.sess.cstore.add_extern_mod_stmt_cnum(info.id, cnum);
}
None => ()
}
}
struct CrateInfo {
ident: ~str,
name: ~str,
version: ~str,
2013-12-25 12:10:33 -06:00
id: ast::NodeId,
}
fn extract_crate_info(i: &ast::ViewItem) -> Option<CrateInfo> {
match i.node {
ast::ViewItemExternMod(ident, ref path_opt, id) => {
let ident = token::get_ident(ident);
debug!("resolving extern crate stmt. ident: {:?} path_opt: {:?}",
ident, path_opt);
2014-01-21 12:08:10 -06:00
let (name, version) = match *path_opt {
Some((ref path_str, _)) => {
let crateid: Option<CrateId> = from_str(path_str.get());
2013-12-25 12:10:33 -06:00
match crateid {
None => (~"", ~""),
2013-12-25 12:10:33 -06:00
Some(crateid) => {
let version = match crateid.version {
None => ~"",
Some(ref ver) => ver.to_str(),
2013-12-25 12:10:33 -06:00
};
(crateid.name.to_str(), version)
2013-12-25 12:10:33 -06:00
}
}
}
None => (ident.get().to_str(), ~""),
2013-12-25 12:10:33 -06:00
};
Some(CrateInfo {
ident: ident.get().to_str(),
2013-12-25 12:10:33 -06:00
name: name,
version: version,
id: id,
})
}
_ => None
}
2011-07-07 23:37:56 -05:00
}
fn visit_item(e: &Env, i: &ast::Item) {
match i.node {
ast::ItemForeignMod(ref fm) => {
Add generation of static libraries to rustc This commit implements the support necessary for generating both intermediate and result static rust libraries. This is an implementation of my thoughts in https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/rust-dev/2013-November/006686.html. When compiling a library, we still retain the "lib" option, although now there are "rlib", "staticlib", and "dylib" as options for crate_type (and these are stackable). The idea of "lib" is to generate the "compiler default" instead of having too choose (although all are interchangeable). For now I have left the "complier default" to be a dynamic library for size reasons. Of the rust libraries, lib{std,extra,rustuv} will bootstrap with an rlib/dylib pair, but lib{rustc,syntax,rustdoc,rustpkg} will only be built as a dynamic object. I chose this for size reasons, but also because you're probably not going to be embedding the rustc compiler anywhere any time soon. Other than the options outlined above, there are a few defaults/preferences that are now opinionated in the compiler: * If both a .dylib and .rlib are found for a rust library, the compiler will prefer the .rlib variant. This is overridable via the -Z prefer-dynamic option * If generating a "lib", the compiler will generate a dynamic library. This is overridable by explicitly saying what flavor you'd like (rlib, staticlib, dylib). * If no options are passed to the command line, and no crate_type is found in the destination crate, then an executable is generated With this change, you can successfully build a rust program with 0 dynamic dependencies on rust libraries. There is still a dynamic dependency on librustrt, but I plan on removing that in a subsequent commit. This change includes no tests just yet. Our current testing infrastructure/harnesses aren't very amenable to doing flavorful things with linking, so I'm planning on adding a new mode of testing which I believe belongs as a separate commit. Closes #552
2013-11-15 16:03:29 -06:00
if fm.abis.is_rust() || fm.abis.is_intrinsic() {
return;
}
Add generation of static libraries to rustc This commit implements the support necessary for generating both intermediate and result static rust libraries. This is an implementation of my thoughts in https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/rust-dev/2013-November/006686.html. When compiling a library, we still retain the "lib" option, although now there are "rlib", "staticlib", and "dylib" as options for crate_type (and these are stackable). The idea of "lib" is to generate the "compiler default" instead of having too choose (although all are interchangeable). For now I have left the "complier default" to be a dynamic library for size reasons. Of the rust libraries, lib{std,extra,rustuv} will bootstrap with an rlib/dylib pair, but lib{rustc,syntax,rustdoc,rustpkg} will only be built as a dynamic object. I chose this for size reasons, but also because you're probably not going to be embedding the rustc compiler anywhere any time soon. Other than the options outlined above, there are a few defaults/preferences that are now opinionated in the compiler: * If both a .dylib and .rlib are found for a rust library, the compiler will prefer the .rlib variant. This is overridable via the -Z prefer-dynamic option * If generating a "lib", the compiler will generate a dynamic library. This is overridable by explicitly saying what flavor you'd like (rlib, staticlib, dylib). * If no options are passed to the command line, and no crate_type is found in the destination crate, then an executable is generated With this change, you can successfully build a rust program with 0 dynamic dependencies on rust libraries. There is still a dynamic dependency on librustrt, but I plan on removing that in a subsequent commit. This change includes no tests just yet. Our current testing infrastructure/harnesses aren't very amenable to doing flavorful things with linking, so I'm planning on adding a new mode of testing which I believe belongs as a separate commit. Closes #552
2013-11-15 16:03:29 -06:00
// First, add all of the custom link_args attributes
let cstore = e.sess.cstore;
let link_args = i.attrs.iter()
.filter_map(|at| if at.name().equiv(&("link_args")) {
Some(at)
} else {
None
})
Add generation of static libraries to rustc This commit implements the support necessary for generating both intermediate and result static rust libraries. This is an implementation of my thoughts in https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/rust-dev/2013-November/006686.html. When compiling a library, we still retain the "lib" option, although now there are "rlib", "staticlib", and "dylib" as options for crate_type (and these are stackable). The idea of "lib" is to generate the "compiler default" instead of having too choose (although all are interchangeable). For now I have left the "complier default" to be a dynamic library for size reasons. Of the rust libraries, lib{std,extra,rustuv} will bootstrap with an rlib/dylib pair, but lib{rustc,syntax,rustdoc,rustpkg} will only be built as a dynamic object. I chose this for size reasons, but also because you're probably not going to be embedding the rustc compiler anywhere any time soon. Other than the options outlined above, there are a few defaults/preferences that are now opinionated in the compiler: * If both a .dylib and .rlib are found for a rust library, the compiler will prefer the .rlib variant. This is overridable via the -Z prefer-dynamic option * If generating a "lib", the compiler will generate a dynamic library. This is overridable by explicitly saying what flavor you'd like (rlib, staticlib, dylib). * If no options are passed to the command line, and no crate_type is found in the destination crate, then an executable is generated With this change, you can successfully build a rust program with 0 dynamic dependencies on rust libraries. There is still a dynamic dependency on librustrt, but I plan on removing that in a subsequent commit. This change includes no tests just yet. Our current testing infrastructure/harnesses aren't very amenable to doing flavorful things with linking, so I'm planning on adding a new mode of testing which I believe belongs as a separate commit. Closes #552
2013-11-15 16:03:29 -06:00
.to_owned_vec();
for m in link_args.iter() {
match m.value_str() {
Some(linkarg) => cstore.add_used_link_args(linkarg.get()),
Add generation of static libraries to rustc This commit implements the support necessary for generating both intermediate and result static rust libraries. This is an implementation of my thoughts in https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/rust-dev/2013-November/006686.html. When compiling a library, we still retain the "lib" option, although now there are "rlib", "staticlib", and "dylib" as options for crate_type (and these are stackable). The idea of "lib" is to generate the "compiler default" instead of having too choose (although all are interchangeable). For now I have left the "complier default" to be a dynamic library for size reasons. Of the rust libraries, lib{std,extra,rustuv} will bootstrap with an rlib/dylib pair, but lib{rustc,syntax,rustdoc,rustpkg} will only be built as a dynamic object. I chose this for size reasons, but also because you're probably not going to be embedding the rustc compiler anywhere any time soon. Other than the options outlined above, there are a few defaults/preferences that are now opinionated in the compiler: * If both a .dylib and .rlib are found for a rust library, the compiler will prefer the .rlib variant. This is overridable via the -Z prefer-dynamic option * If generating a "lib", the compiler will generate a dynamic library. This is overridable by explicitly saying what flavor you'd like (rlib, staticlib, dylib). * If no options are passed to the command line, and no crate_type is found in the destination crate, then an executable is generated With this change, you can successfully build a rust program with 0 dynamic dependencies on rust libraries. There is still a dynamic dependency on librustrt, but I plan on removing that in a subsequent commit. This change includes no tests just yet. Our current testing infrastructure/harnesses aren't very amenable to doing flavorful things with linking, so I'm planning on adding a new mode of testing which I believe belongs as a separate commit. Closes #552
2013-11-15 16:03:29 -06:00
None => { /* fallthrough */ }
}
}
Add generation of static libraries to rustc This commit implements the support necessary for generating both intermediate and result static rust libraries. This is an implementation of my thoughts in https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/rust-dev/2013-November/006686.html. When compiling a library, we still retain the "lib" option, although now there are "rlib", "staticlib", and "dylib" as options for crate_type (and these are stackable). The idea of "lib" is to generate the "compiler default" instead of having too choose (although all are interchangeable). For now I have left the "complier default" to be a dynamic library for size reasons. Of the rust libraries, lib{std,extra,rustuv} will bootstrap with an rlib/dylib pair, but lib{rustc,syntax,rustdoc,rustpkg} will only be built as a dynamic object. I chose this for size reasons, but also because you're probably not going to be embedding the rustc compiler anywhere any time soon. Other than the options outlined above, there are a few defaults/preferences that are now opinionated in the compiler: * If both a .dylib and .rlib are found for a rust library, the compiler will prefer the .rlib variant. This is overridable via the -Z prefer-dynamic option * If generating a "lib", the compiler will generate a dynamic library. This is overridable by explicitly saying what flavor you'd like (rlib, staticlib, dylib). * If no options are passed to the command line, and no crate_type is found in the destination crate, then an executable is generated With this change, you can successfully build a rust program with 0 dynamic dependencies on rust libraries. There is still a dynamic dependency on librustrt, but I plan on removing that in a subsequent commit. This change includes no tests just yet. Our current testing infrastructure/harnesses aren't very amenable to doing flavorful things with linking, so I'm planning on adding a new mode of testing which I believe belongs as a separate commit. Closes #552
2013-11-15 16:03:29 -06:00
// Next, process all of the #[link(..)]-style arguments
let cstore = e.sess.cstore;
let link_args = i.attrs.iter()
.filter_map(|at| if at.name().equiv(&("link")) {
Some(at)
} else {
None
})
Add generation of static libraries to rustc This commit implements the support necessary for generating both intermediate and result static rust libraries. This is an implementation of my thoughts in https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/rust-dev/2013-November/006686.html. When compiling a library, we still retain the "lib" option, although now there are "rlib", "staticlib", and "dylib" as options for crate_type (and these are stackable). The idea of "lib" is to generate the "compiler default" instead of having too choose (although all are interchangeable). For now I have left the "complier default" to be a dynamic library for size reasons. Of the rust libraries, lib{std,extra,rustuv} will bootstrap with an rlib/dylib pair, but lib{rustc,syntax,rustdoc,rustpkg} will only be built as a dynamic object. I chose this for size reasons, but also because you're probably not going to be embedding the rustc compiler anywhere any time soon. Other than the options outlined above, there are a few defaults/preferences that are now opinionated in the compiler: * If both a .dylib and .rlib are found for a rust library, the compiler will prefer the .rlib variant. This is overridable via the -Z prefer-dynamic option * If generating a "lib", the compiler will generate a dynamic library. This is overridable by explicitly saying what flavor you'd like (rlib, staticlib, dylib). * If no options are passed to the command line, and no crate_type is found in the destination crate, then an executable is generated With this change, you can successfully build a rust program with 0 dynamic dependencies on rust libraries. There is still a dynamic dependency on librustrt, but I plan on removing that in a subsequent commit. This change includes no tests just yet. Our current testing infrastructure/harnesses aren't very amenable to doing flavorful things with linking, so I'm planning on adding a new mode of testing which I believe belongs as a separate commit. Closes #552
2013-11-15 16:03:29 -06:00
.to_owned_vec();
for m in link_args.iter() {
match m.meta_item_list() {
Some(items) => {
2013-11-28 20:03:38 -06:00
let kind = items.iter().find(|k| {
k.name().equiv(&("kind"))
2013-11-28 20:03:38 -06:00
}).and_then(|a| a.value_str());
Add generation of static libraries to rustc This commit implements the support necessary for generating both intermediate and result static rust libraries. This is an implementation of my thoughts in https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/rust-dev/2013-November/006686.html. When compiling a library, we still retain the "lib" option, although now there are "rlib", "staticlib", and "dylib" as options for crate_type (and these are stackable). The idea of "lib" is to generate the "compiler default" instead of having too choose (although all are interchangeable). For now I have left the "complier default" to be a dynamic library for size reasons. Of the rust libraries, lib{std,extra,rustuv} will bootstrap with an rlib/dylib pair, but lib{rustc,syntax,rustdoc,rustpkg} will only be built as a dynamic object. I chose this for size reasons, but also because you're probably not going to be embedding the rustc compiler anywhere any time soon. Other than the options outlined above, there are a few defaults/preferences that are now opinionated in the compiler: * If both a .dylib and .rlib are found for a rust library, the compiler will prefer the .rlib variant. This is overridable via the -Z prefer-dynamic option * If generating a "lib", the compiler will generate a dynamic library. This is overridable by explicitly saying what flavor you'd like (rlib, staticlib, dylib). * If no options are passed to the command line, and no crate_type is found in the destination crate, then an executable is generated With this change, you can successfully build a rust program with 0 dynamic dependencies on rust libraries. There is still a dynamic dependency on librustrt, but I plan on removing that in a subsequent commit. This change includes no tests just yet. Our current testing infrastructure/harnesses aren't very amenable to doing flavorful things with linking, so I'm planning on adding a new mode of testing which I believe belongs as a separate commit. Closes #552
2013-11-15 16:03:29 -06:00
let kind = match kind {
Some(k) => {
if k.equiv(&("static")) {
cstore::NativeStatic
} else if e.sess.targ_cfg.os == abi::OsMacos &&
k.equiv(&("framework")) {
cstore::NativeFramework
} else if k.equiv(&("framework")) {
e.sess.span_err(m.span,
"native frameworks are only available \
on OSX targets");
cstore::NativeUnknown
} else {
e.sess.span_err(m.span,
format!("unknown kind: `{}`", k));
cstore::NativeUnknown
}
Add generation of static libraries to rustc This commit implements the support necessary for generating both intermediate and result static rust libraries. This is an implementation of my thoughts in https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/rust-dev/2013-November/006686.html. When compiling a library, we still retain the "lib" option, although now there are "rlib", "staticlib", and "dylib" as options for crate_type (and these are stackable). The idea of "lib" is to generate the "compiler default" instead of having too choose (although all are interchangeable). For now I have left the "complier default" to be a dynamic library for size reasons. Of the rust libraries, lib{std,extra,rustuv} will bootstrap with an rlib/dylib pair, but lib{rustc,syntax,rustdoc,rustpkg} will only be built as a dynamic object. I chose this for size reasons, but also because you're probably not going to be embedding the rustc compiler anywhere any time soon. Other than the options outlined above, there are a few defaults/preferences that are now opinionated in the compiler: * If both a .dylib and .rlib are found for a rust library, the compiler will prefer the .rlib variant. This is overridable via the -Z prefer-dynamic option * If generating a "lib", the compiler will generate a dynamic library. This is overridable by explicitly saying what flavor you'd like (rlib, staticlib, dylib). * If no options are passed to the command line, and no crate_type is found in the destination crate, then an executable is generated With this change, you can successfully build a rust program with 0 dynamic dependencies on rust libraries. There is still a dynamic dependency on librustrt, but I plan on removing that in a subsequent commit. This change includes no tests just yet. Our current testing infrastructure/harnesses aren't very amenable to doing flavorful things with linking, so I'm planning on adding a new mode of testing which I believe belongs as a separate commit. Closes #552
2013-11-15 16:03:29 -06:00
}
None => cstore::NativeUnknown
};
2013-11-28 20:03:38 -06:00
let n = items.iter().find(|n| {
n.name().equiv(&("name"))
2013-11-28 20:03:38 -06:00
}).and_then(|a| a.value_str());
Add generation of static libraries to rustc This commit implements the support necessary for generating both intermediate and result static rust libraries. This is an implementation of my thoughts in https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/rust-dev/2013-November/006686.html. When compiling a library, we still retain the "lib" option, although now there are "rlib", "staticlib", and "dylib" as options for crate_type (and these are stackable). The idea of "lib" is to generate the "compiler default" instead of having too choose (although all are interchangeable). For now I have left the "complier default" to be a dynamic library for size reasons. Of the rust libraries, lib{std,extra,rustuv} will bootstrap with an rlib/dylib pair, but lib{rustc,syntax,rustdoc,rustpkg} will only be built as a dynamic object. I chose this for size reasons, but also because you're probably not going to be embedding the rustc compiler anywhere any time soon. Other than the options outlined above, there are a few defaults/preferences that are now opinionated in the compiler: * If both a .dylib and .rlib are found for a rust library, the compiler will prefer the .rlib variant. This is overridable via the -Z prefer-dynamic option * If generating a "lib", the compiler will generate a dynamic library. This is overridable by explicitly saying what flavor you'd like (rlib, staticlib, dylib). * If no options are passed to the command line, and no crate_type is found in the destination crate, then an executable is generated With this change, you can successfully build a rust program with 0 dynamic dependencies on rust libraries. There is still a dynamic dependency on librustrt, but I plan on removing that in a subsequent commit. This change includes no tests just yet. Our current testing infrastructure/harnesses aren't very amenable to doing flavorful things with linking, so I'm planning on adding a new mode of testing which I believe belongs as a separate commit. Closes #552
2013-11-15 16:03:29 -06:00
let n = match n {
Some(n) => n,
None => {
e.sess.span_err(m.span,
Add generation of static libraries to rustc This commit implements the support necessary for generating both intermediate and result static rust libraries. This is an implementation of my thoughts in https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/rust-dev/2013-November/006686.html. When compiling a library, we still retain the "lib" option, although now there are "rlib", "staticlib", and "dylib" as options for crate_type (and these are stackable). The idea of "lib" is to generate the "compiler default" instead of having too choose (although all are interchangeable). For now I have left the "complier default" to be a dynamic library for size reasons. Of the rust libraries, lib{std,extra,rustuv} will bootstrap with an rlib/dylib pair, but lib{rustc,syntax,rustdoc,rustpkg} will only be built as a dynamic object. I chose this for size reasons, but also because you're probably not going to be embedding the rustc compiler anywhere any time soon. Other than the options outlined above, there are a few defaults/preferences that are now opinionated in the compiler: * If both a .dylib and .rlib are found for a rust library, the compiler will prefer the .rlib variant. This is overridable via the -Z prefer-dynamic option * If generating a "lib", the compiler will generate a dynamic library. This is overridable by explicitly saying what flavor you'd like (rlib, staticlib, dylib). * If no options are passed to the command line, and no crate_type is found in the destination crate, then an executable is generated With this change, you can successfully build a rust program with 0 dynamic dependencies on rust libraries. There is still a dynamic dependency on librustrt, but I plan on removing that in a subsequent commit. This change includes no tests just yet. Our current testing infrastructure/harnesses aren't very amenable to doing flavorful things with linking, so I'm planning on adding a new mode of testing which I believe belongs as a separate commit. Closes #552
2013-11-15 16:03:29 -06:00
"#[link(...)] specified without \
`name = \"foo\"`");
InternedString::new("foo")
Add generation of static libraries to rustc This commit implements the support necessary for generating both intermediate and result static rust libraries. This is an implementation of my thoughts in https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/rust-dev/2013-November/006686.html. When compiling a library, we still retain the "lib" option, although now there are "rlib", "staticlib", and "dylib" as options for crate_type (and these are stackable). The idea of "lib" is to generate the "compiler default" instead of having too choose (although all are interchangeable). For now I have left the "complier default" to be a dynamic library for size reasons. Of the rust libraries, lib{std,extra,rustuv} will bootstrap with an rlib/dylib pair, but lib{rustc,syntax,rustdoc,rustpkg} will only be built as a dynamic object. I chose this for size reasons, but also because you're probably not going to be embedding the rustc compiler anywhere any time soon. Other than the options outlined above, there are a few defaults/preferences that are now opinionated in the compiler: * If both a .dylib and .rlib are found for a rust library, the compiler will prefer the .rlib variant. This is overridable via the -Z prefer-dynamic option * If generating a "lib", the compiler will generate a dynamic library. This is overridable by explicitly saying what flavor you'd like (rlib, staticlib, dylib). * If no options are passed to the command line, and no crate_type is found in the destination crate, then an executable is generated With this change, you can successfully build a rust program with 0 dynamic dependencies on rust libraries. There is still a dynamic dependency on librustrt, but I plan on removing that in a subsequent commit. This change includes no tests just yet. Our current testing infrastructure/harnesses aren't very amenable to doing flavorful things with linking, so I'm planning on adding a new mode of testing which I believe belongs as a separate commit. Closes #552
2013-11-15 16:03:29 -06:00
}
};
if n.get().is_empty() {
e.sess.span_err(m.span, "#[link(name = \"\")] given with empty name");
} else {
cstore.add_used_library(n.get().to_owned(), kind);
}
Add generation of static libraries to rustc This commit implements the support necessary for generating both intermediate and result static rust libraries. This is an implementation of my thoughts in https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/rust-dev/2013-November/006686.html. When compiling a library, we still retain the "lib" option, although now there are "rlib", "staticlib", and "dylib" as options for crate_type (and these are stackable). The idea of "lib" is to generate the "compiler default" instead of having too choose (although all are interchangeable). For now I have left the "complier default" to be a dynamic library for size reasons. Of the rust libraries, lib{std,extra,rustuv} will bootstrap with an rlib/dylib pair, but lib{rustc,syntax,rustdoc,rustpkg} will only be built as a dynamic object. I chose this for size reasons, but also because you're probably not going to be embedding the rustc compiler anywhere any time soon. Other than the options outlined above, there are a few defaults/preferences that are now opinionated in the compiler: * If both a .dylib and .rlib are found for a rust library, the compiler will prefer the .rlib variant. This is overridable via the -Z prefer-dynamic option * If generating a "lib", the compiler will generate a dynamic library. This is overridable by explicitly saying what flavor you'd like (rlib, staticlib, dylib). * If no options are passed to the command line, and no crate_type is found in the destination crate, then an executable is generated With this change, you can successfully build a rust program with 0 dynamic dependencies on rust libraries. There is still a dynamic dependency on librustrt, but I plan on removing that in a subsequent commit. This change includes no tests just yet. Our current testing infrastructure/harnesses aren't very amenable to doing flavorful things with linking, so I'm planning on adding a new mode of testing which I believe belongs as a separate commit. Closes #552
2013-11-15 16:03:29 -06:00
}
None => {}
2013-02-16 11:48:28 -06:00
}
2011-07-27 07:19:39 -05:00
}
2011-07-07 23:37:56 -05:00
}
Add generation of static libraries to rustc This commit implements the support necessary for generating both intermediate and result static rust libraries. This is an implementation of my thoughts in https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/rust-dev/2013-November/006686.html. When compiling a library, we still retain the "lib" option, although now there are "rlib", "staticlib", and "dylib" as options for crate_type (and these are stackable). The idea of "lib" is to generate the "compiler default" instead of having too choose (although all are interchangeable). For now I have left the "complier default" to be a dynamic library for size reasons. Of the rust libraries, lib{std,extra,rustuv} will bootstrap with an rlib/dylib pair, but lib{rustc,syntax,rustdoc,rustpkg} will only be built as a dynamic object. I chose this for size reasons, but also because you're probably not going to be embedding the rustc compiler anywhere any time soon. Other than the options outlined above, there are a few defaults/preferences that are now opinionated in the compiler: * If both a .dylib and .rlib are found for a rust library, the compiler will prefer the .rlib variant. This is overridable via the -Z prefer-dynamic option * If generating a "lib", the compiler will generate a dynamic library. This is overridable by explicitly saying what flavor you'd like (rlib, staticlib, dylib). * If no options are passed to the command line, and no crate_type is found in the destination crate, then an executable is generated With this change, you can successfully build a rust program with 0 dynamic dependencies on rust libraries. There is still a dynamic dependency on librustrt, but I plan on removing that in a subsequent commit. This change includes no tests just yet. Our current testing infrastructure/harnesses aren't very amenable to doing flavorful things with linking, so I'm planning on adding a new mode of testing which I believe belongs as a separate commit. Closes #552
2013-11-15 16:03:29 -06:00
_ => { }
2011-07-07 23:37:56 -05:00
}
}
fn existing_match(e: &Env, name: &str, version: &str, hash: &str) -> Option<ast::CrateNum> {
let crate_cache = e.crate_cache.borrow();
for c in crate_cache.get().iter() {
2013-12-28 11:16:48 -06:00
let crateid_version = match c.crateid.version {
None => ~"0.0",
Some(ref ver) => ver.to_str(),
};
if (name.is_empty() || name == c.crateid.name) &&
(version.is_empty() || version == crateid_version) &&
(hash.is_empty() || hash == c.hash) {
2012-08-20 14:23:37 -05:00
return Some(c.cnum);
2012-06-04 10:03:14 -05:00
}
}
None
}
2013-12-21 18:46:55 -06:00
fn resolve_crate(e: &mut Env,
root_ident: Option<~str>,
ident: ~str,
name: ~str,
version: ~str,
hash: ~str,
span: Span)
-> ast::CrateNum {
match existing_match(e, name, version, hash) {
2012-08-20 14:23:37 -05:00
None => {
let load_ctxt = loader::Context {
Add generation of static libraries to rustc This commit implements the support necessary for generating both intermediate and result static rust libraries. This is an implementation of my thoughts in https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/rust-dev/2013-November/006686.html. When compiling a library, we still retain the "lib" option, although now there are "rlib", "staticlib", and "dylib" as options for crate_type (and these are stackable). The idea of "lib" is to generate the "compiler default" instead of having too choose (although all are interchangeable). For now I have left the "complier default" to be a dynamic library for size reasons. Of the rust libraries, lib{std,extra,rustuv} will bootstrap with an rlib/dylib pair, but lib{rustc,syntax,rustdoc,rustpkg} will only be built as a dynamic object. I chose this for size reasons, but also because you're probably not going to be embedding the rustc compiler anywhere any time soon. Other than the options outlined above, there are a few defaults/preferences that are now opinionated in the compiler: * If both a .dylib and .rlib are found for a rust library, the compiler will prefer the .rlib variant. This is overridable via the -Z prefer-dynamic option * If generating a "lib", the compiler will generate a dynamic library. This is overridable by explicitly saying what flavor you'd like (rlib, staticlib, dylib). * If no options are passed to the command line, and no crate_type is found in the destination crate, then an executable is generated With this change, you can successfully build a rust program with 0 dynamic dependencies on rust libraries. There is still a dynamic dependency on librustrt, but I plan on removing that in a subsequent commit. This change includes no tests just yet. Our current testing infrastructure/harnesses aren't very amenable to doing flavorful things with linking, so I'm planning on adding a new mode of testing which I believe belongs as a separate commit. Closes #552
2013-11-15 16:03:29 -06:00
sess: e.sess,
span: span,
ident: ident,
name: name,
version: version,
hash: hash,
os: e.os,
2012-07-18 18:18:02 -05:00
intr: e.intr
};
Add generation of static libraries to rustc This commit implements the support necessary for generating both intermediate and result static rust libraries. This is an implementation of my thoughts in https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/rust-dev/2013-November/006686.html. When compiling a library, we still retain the "lib" option, although now there are "rlib", "staticlib", and "dylib" as options for crate_type (and these are stackable). The idea of "lib" is to generate the "compiler default" instead of having too choose (although all are interchangeable). For now I have left the "complier default" to be a dynamic library for size reasons. Of the rust libraries, lib{std,extra,rustuv} will bootstrap with an rlib/dylib pair, but lib{rustc,syntax,rustdoc,rustpkg} will only be built as a dynamic object. I chose this for size reasons, but also because you're probably not going to be embedding the rustc compiler anywhere any time soon. Other than the options outlined above, there are a few defaults/preferences that are now opinionated in the compiler: * If both a .dylib and .rlib are found for a rust library, the compiler will prefer the .rlib variant. This is overridable via the -Z prefer-dynamic option * If generating a "lib", the compiler will generate a dynamic library. This is overridable by explicitly saying what flavor you'd like (rlib, staticlib, dylib). * If no options are passed to the command line, and no crate_type is found in the destination crate, then an executable is generated With this change, you can successfully build a rust program with 0 dynamic dependencies on rust libraries. There is still a dynamic dependency on librustrt, but I plan on removing that in a subsequent commit. This change includes no tests just yet. Our current testing infrastructure/harnesses aren't very amenable to doing flavorful things with linking, so I'm planning on adding a new mode of testing which I believe belongs as a separate commit. Closes #552
2013-11-15 16:03:29 -06:00
let loader::Library {
dylib, rlib, metadata
} = load_ctxt.load_library_crate(root_ident.clone());
let attrs = decoder::get_crate_attributes(metadata.as_slice());
2013-12-27 18:14:01 -06:00
let crateid = attr::find_crateid(attrs).unwrap();
let hash = decoder::get_crate_hash(metadata.as_slice());
// Claim this crate number and cache it
2011-07-27 07:19:39 -05:00
let cnum = e.next_crate_num;
{
let mut crate_cache = e.crate_cache.borrow_mut();
crate_cache.get().push(cache_entry {
cnum: cnum,
span: span,
hash: hash,
2013-12-28 11:16:48 -06:00
crateid: crateid,
});
}
e.next_crate_num += 1;
// Maintain a reference to the top most crate.
let root_crate = match root_ident {
Some(c) => c,
None => load_ctxt.ident.clone()
};
// Now resolve the crates referenced by this crate
let cnum_map = resolve_crate_deps(e,
Some(root_crate),
metadata.as_slice(),
span);
let cmeta = @cstore::crate_metadata {
name: load_ctxt.name,
Add generation of static libraries to rustc This commit implements the support necessary for generating both intermediate and result static rust libraries. This is an implementation of my thoughts in https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/rust-dev/2013-November/006686.html. When compiling a library, we still retain the "lib" option, although now there are "rlib", "staticlib", and "dylib" as options for crate_type (and these are stackable). The idea of "lib" is to generate the "compiler default" instead of having too choose (although all are interchangeable). For now I have left the "complier default" to be a dynamic library for size reasons. Of the rust libraries, lib{std,extra,rustuv} will bootstrap with an rlib/dylib pair, but lib{rustc,syntax,rustdoc,rustpkg} will only be built as a dynamic object. I chose this for size reasons, but also because you're probably not going to be embedding the rustc compiler anywhere any time soon. Other than the options outlined above, there are a few defaults/preferences that are now opinionated in the compiler: * If both a .dylib and .rlib are found for a rust library, the compiler will prefer the .rlib variant. This is overridable via the -Z prefer-dynamic option * If generating a "lib", the compiler will generate a dynamic library. This is overridable by explicitly saying what flavor you'd like (rlib, staticlib, dylib). * If no options are passed to the command line, and no crate_type is found in the destination crate, then an executable is generated With this change, you can successfully build a rust program with 0 dynamic dependencies on rust libraries. There is still a dynamic dependency on librustrt, but I plan on removing that in a subsequent commit. This change includes no tests just yet. Our current testing infrastructure/harnesses aren't very amenable to doing flavorful things with linking, so I'm planning on adding a new mode of testing which I believe belongs as a separate commit. Closes #552
2013-11-15 16:03:29 -06:00
data: metadata,
cnum_map: cnum_map,
cnum: cnum
};
Add generation of static libraries to rustc This commit implements the support necessary for generating both intermediate and result static rust libraries. This is an implementation of my thoughts in https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/rust-dev/2013-November/006686.html. When compiling a library, we still retain the "lib" option, although now there are "rlib", "staticlib", and "dylib" as options for crate_type (and these are stackable). The idea of "lib" is to generate the "compiler default" instead of having too choose (although all are interchangeable). For now I have left the "complier default" to be a dynamic library for size reasons. Of the rust libraries, lib{std,extra,rustuv} will bootstrap with an rlib/dylib pair, but lib{rustc,syntax,rustdoc,rustpkg} will only be built as a dynamic object. I chose this for size reasons, but also because you're probably not going to be embedding the rustc compiler anywhere any time soon. Other than the options outlined above, there are a few defaults/preferences that are now opinionated in the compiler: * If both a .dylib and .rlib are found for a rust library, the compiler will prefer the .rlib variant. This is overridable via the -Z prefer-dynamic option * If generating a "lib", the compiler will generate a dynamic library. This is overridable by explicitly saying what flavor you'd like (rlib, staticlib, dylib). * If no options are passed to the command line, and no crate_type is found in the destination crate, then an executable is generated With this change, you can successfully build a rust program with 0 dynamic dependencies on rust libraries. There is still a dynamic dependency on librustrt, but I plan on removing that in a subsequent commit. This change includes no tests just yet. Our current testing infrastructure/harnesses aren't very amenable to doing flavorful things with linking, so I'm planning on adding a new mode of testing which I believe belongs as a separate commit. Closes #552
2013-11-15 16:03:29 -06:00
let cstore = e.sess.cstore;
2013-12-25 14:08:04 -06:00
cstore.set_crate_data(cnum, cmeta);
cstore.add_used_crate_source(cstore::CrateSource {
Add generation of static libraries to rustc This commit implements the support necessary for generating both intermediate and result static rust libraries. This is an implementation of my thoughts in https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/rust-dev/2013-November/006686.html. When compiling a library, we still retain the "lib" option, although now there are "rlib", "staticlib", and "dylib" as options for crate_type (and these are stackable). The idea of "lib" is to generate the "compiler default" instead of having too choose (although all are interchangeable). For now I have left the "complier default" to be a dynamic library for size reasons. Of the rust libraries, lib{std,extra,rustuv} will bootstrap with an rlib/dylib pair, but lib{rustc,syntax,rustdoc,rustpkg} will only be built as a dynamic object. I chose this for size reasons, but also because you're probably not going to be embedding the rustc compiler anywhere any time soon. Other than the options outlined above, there are a few defaults/preferences that are now opinionated in the compiler: * If both a .dylib and .rlib are found for a rust library, the compiler will prefer the .rlib variant. This is overridable via the -Z prefer-dynamic option * If generating a "lib", the compiler will generate a dynamic library. This is overridable by explicitly saying what flavor you'd like (rlib, staticlib, dylib). * If no options are passed to the command line, and no crate_type is found in the destination crate, then an executable is generated With this change, you can successfully build a rust program with 0 dynamic dependencies on rust libraries. There is still a dynamic dependency on librustrt, but I plan on removing that in a subsequent commit. This change includes no tests just yet. Our current testing infrastructure/harnesses aren't very amenable to doing flavorful things with linking, so I'm planning on adding a new mode of testing which I believe belongs as a separate commit. Closes #552
2013-11-15 16:03:29 -06:00
dylib: dylib,
rlib: rlib,
cnum: cnum,
});
2012-08-01 19:30:05 -05:00
return cnum;
}
2012-08-20 14:23:37 -05:00
Some(cnum) => {
2012-08-01 19:30:05 -05:00
return cnum;
}
}
}
// Go through the crate metadata and load any crates that it references
fn resolve_crate_deps(e: &mut Env,
root_ident: Option<~str>,
cdata: &[u8], span : Span)
-> cstore::cnum_map {
debug!("resolving deps of external crate");
// The map from crate numbers in the crate we're resolving to local crate
// numbers
let mut cnum_map = HashMap::new();
let r = decoder::get_crate_deps(cdata);
for dep in r.iter() {
2011-07-27 07:19:39 -05:00
let extrn_cnum = dep.cnum;
let cname_str = token::get_ident(dep.name);
debug!("resolving dep crate {} ver: {} hash: {}",
cname_str, dep.vers, dep.hash);
match existing_match(e,
cname_str.get(),
dep.vers,
dep.hash) {
2012-08-20 14:23:37 -05:00
Some(local_cnum) => {
debug!("already have it");
// We've already seen this crate
cnum_map.insert(extrn_cnum, local_cnum);
}
2012-08-20 14:23:37 -05:00
None => {
debug!("need to load it");
// This is a new one so we've got to load it
let local_cnum = resolve_crate(e,
root_ident.clone(),
cname_str.get().to_str(),
cname_str.get().to_str(),
dep.vers.clone(),
dep.hash.clone(),
span);
cnum_map.insert(extrn_cnum, local_cnum);
}
}
}
2013-12-21 20:17:29 -06:00
return @RefCell::new(cnum_map);
}
2013-12-25 12:10:33 -06:00
pub struct Loader {
priv env: Env,
}
impl Loader {
pub fn new(sess: Session) -> Loader {
let os = driver::get_os(driver::host_triple()).unwrap();
let os = session::sess_os_to_meta_os(os);
Loader {
env: Env {
sess: sess,
os: os,
crate_cache: @RefCell::new(~[]),
next_crate_num: 1,
intr: token::get_ident_interner(),
}
}
}
}
impl CrateLoader for Loader {
fn load_crate(&mut self, krate: &ast::ViewItem) -> MacroCrate {
let info = extract_crate_info(krate).unwrap();
let cnum = resolve_crate(&mut self.env,
None,
info.ident.clone(),
info.name.clone(),
info.version.clone(),
~"",
krate.span);
2013-12-25 12:10:33 -06:00
let library = self.env.sess.cstore.get_used_crate_source(cnum).unwrap();
MacroCrate {
lib: library.dylib,
cnum: cnum
}
}
fn get_exported_macros(&mut self, cnum: ast::CrateNum) -> ~[~str] {
2013-12-25 12:10:33 -06:00
csearch::get_exported_macros(self.env.sess.cstore, cnum)
}
fn get_registrar_symbol(&mut self, cnum: ast::CrateNum) -> Option<~str> {
let cstore = self.env.sess.cstore;
csearch::get_macro_registrar_fn(cstore, cnum)
.map(|did| csearch::get_symbol(cstore, did))
}
}