63 lines
2.6 KiB
Plaintext
63 lines
2.6 KiB
Plaintext
|
error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
|
||
|
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:27:17
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
27 | let _ = boxed_slice.get(1).unwrap();
|
||
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&boxed_slice[1]`
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
= note: `-D get-unwrap` implied by `-D warnings`
|
||
|
|
||
|
error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
|
||
|
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:28:17
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
28 | let _ = some_slice.get(0).unwrap();
|
||
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_slice[0]`
|
||
|
|
||
|
error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a Vec. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
|
||
|
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:29:17
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
29 | let _ = some_vec.get(0).unwrap();
|
||
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_vec[0]`
|
||
|
|
||
|
error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a VecDeque. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
|
||
|
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:30:17
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
30 | let _ = some_vecdeque.get(0).unwrap();
|
||
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_vecdeque[0]`
|
||
|
|
||
|
error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a HashMap. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
|
||
|
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:31:17
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
31 | let _ = some_hashmap.get(&1).unwrap();
|
||
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_hashmap[&1]`
|
||
|
|
||
|
error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a BTreeMap. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
|
||
|
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:32:17
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
32 | let _ = some_btreemap.get(&1).unwrap();
|
||
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_btreemap[&1]`
|
||
|
|
||
|
error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
|
||
|
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:37:10
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
37 | *boxed_slice.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
|
||
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&mut boxed_slice[0]`
|
||
|
|
||
|
error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
|
||
|
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:38:10
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
38 | *some_slice.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
|
||
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&mut some_slice[0]`
|
||
|
|
||
|
error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a Vec. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
|
||
|
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:39:10
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
39 | *some_vec.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
|
||
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&mut some_vec[0]`
|
||
|
|
||
|
error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a VecDeque. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
|
||
|
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:40:10
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
40 | *some_vecdeque.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
|
||
|
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&mut some_vecdeque[0]`
|
||
|
|