rust/doc/tutorial.md

2640 lines
84 KiB
Markdown
Raw Normal View History

2012-10-07 00:47:26 -05:00
% The Rust Language Tutorial
# Introduction
Rust is a programming language with a focus on type safety, memory
safety, concurrency and performance. It is intended for writing
2012-10-10 21:05:13 -05:00
large-scale, high-performance software that is free from several
classes of common errors. Rust has a sophisticated memory model that
encourages efficient data structures and safe concurrency patterns,
forbidding invalid memory accesses that would otherwise cause
segmentation faults. It is statically typed and compiled ahead of
time.
As a multi-paradigm language, Rust supports writing code in
procedural, functional and object-oriented styles. Some of its
pleasant high-level features include:
2012-10-06 22:23:38 -05:00
* **Type inference.** Type annotations on local variable declarations
are optional.
* **Safe task-based concurrency.** Rust's lightweight tasks do not share
2012-10-10 21:05:13 -05:00
memory, instead communicating through messages.
2012-10-06 22:23:38 -05:00
* **Higher-order functions.** Efficient and flexible closures provide
iteration and other control structures
* **Pattern matching and algebraic data types.** Pattern matching on
2012-10-10 21:05:13 -05:00
Rust's enumeration types (a more powerful version of C's enums,
similar to algebraic data types in functional languages) is a
compact and expressive way to encode program logic.
* **Polymorphism.** Rust has type-parametric functions and
2012-10-06 22:23:38 -05:00
types, type classes and OO-style interfaces.
## Scope
This is an introductory tutorial for the Rust programming language. It
covers the fundamentals of the language, including the syntax, the
type system and memory model, generics, and modules. [Additional
tutorials](#what-next) cover specific language features in greater
depth.
This tutorial assumes that the reader is already familiar with one or
2012-12-20 15:16:27 -06:00
more languages in the C family. Understanding of pointers and general
memory management techniques will help.
## Conventions
2012-10-10 21:05:13 -05:00
Throughout the tutorial, language keywords and identifiers defined in
example code are displayed in `code font`.
Code snippets are indented, and also shown in a monospaced font. Not
all snippets constitute whole programs. For brevity, we'll often show
fragments of programs that don't compile on their own. To try them
out, you might have to wrap them in `fn main() { ... }`, and make sure
2012-10-10 21:05:13 -05:00
they don't contain references to names that aren't actually defined.
2012-10-10 21:05:13 -05:00
> ***Warning:*** Rust is a language under ongoing development. Notes
> about potential changes to the language, implementation
> deficiencies, and other caveats appear offset in blockquotes.
# Getting started
2012-09-22 20:59:34 -05:00
The Rust compiler currently must be built from a [tarball], unless you
are on Windows, in which case using the [installer][win-exe] is
recommended.
2012-09-22 20:59:34 -05:00
Since the Rust compiler is written in Rust, it must be built by
a precompiled "snapshot" version of itself (made in an earlier state
of development). As such, source builds require a connection to
the Internet, to fetch snapshots, and an OS that can execute the
available snapshot binaries.
2012-09-22 20:59:34 -05:00
Snapshot binaries are currently built and tested on several platforms:
2012-09-22 20:59:34 -05:00
* Windows (7, Server 2008 R2), x86 only
* Linux (various distributions), x86 and x86-64
2012-10-10 19:56:23 -05:00
* OSX 10.6 ("Snow Leopard") or greater, x86 and x86-64
2012-09-22 20:59:34 -05:00
You may find that other platforms work, but these are our "tier 1"
supported build environments that are most likely to work.
> ***Note:*** Windows users should read the detailed
2012-10-10 21:05:13 -05:00
> "[getting started][wiki-start]" notes on the wiki. Even when using
> the binary installer, the Windows build requires a MinGW installation,
> the precise details of which are not discussed here. Finally, `rustc` may
> need to be [referred to as `rustc.exe`][bug-3319]. It's a bummer, we
2012-10-10 21:05:13 -05:00
> know.
[bug-3319]: https://github.com/mozilla/rust/issues/3319
[wiki-start]: https://github.com/mozilla/rust/wiki/Note-getting-started-developing-Rust
To build from source you will also need the following prerequisite
packages:
2012-09-22 20:59:34 -05:00
* g++ 4.4 or clang++ 3.x
* python 2.6 or later (but not 3.x)
* perl 5.0 or later
* gnu make 3.81 or later
* curl
2012-10-10 21:05:13 -05:00
If you've fulfilled those prerequisites, something along these lines
should work.
~~~~ {.notrust}
$ curl -O http://static.rust-lang.org/dist/rust-0.6.tar.gz
$ tar -xzf rust-0.6.tar.gz
$ cd rust-0.6
$ ./configure
$ make && make install
~~~~
You may need to use `sudo make install` if you do not normally have
2012-07-03 21:08:13 -05:00
permission to modify the destination directory. The install locations
can be adjusted by passing a `--prefix` argument to
2012-10-10 21:05:13 -05:00
`configure`. Various other options are also supported: pass `--help`
2012-07-03 21:08:13 -05:00
for more information on them.
2012-09-26 21:34:48 -05:00
When complete, `make install` will place several programs into
`/usr/local/bin`: `rustc`, the Rust compiler; `rustdoc`, the
2013-02-19 11:10:31 -06:00
API-documentation tool; `rustpkg`, the Rust package manager;
`rusti`, the Rust REPL; and `rust`, a tool which acts both as a unified
interface for them, and for a few common command line scenarios.
2012-09-22 20:59:34 -05:00
[wiki-start]: https://github.com/mozilla/rust/wiki/Note-getting-started-developing-Rust
[tarball]: http://static.rust-lang.org/dist/rust-0.6.tar.gz
[win-exe]: http://static.rust-lang.org/dist/rust-0.6-install.exe
## Compiling your first program
Rust program files are, by convention, given the extension `.rs`. Say
we have a file `hello.rs` containing this program:
~~~~
2012-08-31 18:57:37 -05:00
fn main() {
println("hello?");
}
~~~~
If the Rust compiler was installed successfully, running `rustc
2012-09-22 20:59:34 -05:00
hello.rs` will produce an executable called `hello` (or `hello.exe` on
2012-10-07 00:57:40 -05:00
Windows) which, upon running, will likely do exactly what you expect.
2012-09-22 20:59:34 -05:00
2012-10-10 21:05:13 -05:00
The Rust compiler tries to provide useful information when it encounters an
error. If you introduce an error into the program (for example, by changing
`println` to some nonexistent function), and then compile it, you'll see
2012-10-10 21:05:13 -05:00
an error message like this:
~~~~ {.notrust}
hello.rs:2:4: 2:16 error: unresolved name: print_with_unicorns
hello.rs:2 print_with_unicorns("hello?");
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~
2012-09-22 20:59:34 -05:00
In its simplest form, a Rust program is a `.rs` file with some types
and functions defined in it. If it has a `main` function, it can be
compiled to an executable. Rust does not allow code that's not a
2012-10-10 21:05:13 -05:00
declaration to appear at the top level of the file: all statements must
2012-09-22 20:59:34 -05:00
live inside a function. Rust programs can also be compiled as
libraries, and included in other programs.
## Using the rust tool
While using `rustc` directly to generate your executables, and then
running them manually is a perfectly valid way to test your code,
for smaller projects, prototypes, or if you're a beginner, it might be
more convenient to use the `rust` tool.
2013-02-19 15:19:19 -06:00
The `rust` tool provides central access to the other rust tools,
as well as handy shortcuts for directly running source files.
For example, if you have a file `foo.rs` in your current directory,
`rust run foo.rs` would attempt to compile it and, if successful,
directly run the resulting binary.
To get a list of all available commands, simply call `rust` without any
argument.
## Editing Rust code
2012-09-22 20:59:34 -05:00
There are vim highlighting and indentation scripts in the Rust source
distribution under `src/etc/vim/`. There is an emacs mode under
`src/etc/emacs/` called `rust-mode`, but do read the instructions
included in that directory. In particular, if you are running emacs
24, then using emacs's internal package manager to install `rust-mode`
is the easiest way to keep it up to date. There is also a package for
Sublime Text 2, available both [standalone][sublime] and through
[Sublime Package Control][sublime-pkg], and support for Kate
under `src/etc/kate`.
There is ctags support via `src/etc/ctags.rust`, but many other
2012-10-10 21:05:13 -05:00
tools and editors are not yet supported. If you end up writing a Rust
mode for your favorite editor, let us know so that we can link to it.
2012-09-22 20:59:34 -05:00
[sublime]: http://github.com/dbp/sublime-rust
[sublime-pkg]: http://wbond.net/sublime_packages/package_control
# Syntax basics
Assuming you've programmed in any C-family language (C++, Java,
2012-09-22 20:59:34 -05:00
JavaScript, C#, or PHP), Rust will feel familiar. Code is arranged
in blocks delineated by curly braces; there are control structures
for branching and looping, like the familiar `if` and `while`; function
2012-09-22 20:59:34 -05:00
calls are written `myfunc(arg1, arg2)`; operators are written the same
and mostly have the same precedence as in C; comments are again like C;
module names are separated with double-colon (`::`) as with C++.
2012-09-22 20:59:34 -05:00
The main surface difference to be aware of is that the condition at
the head of control structures like `if` and `while` does not require
2012-10-10 21:32:11 -05:00
parentheses, while their bodies *must* be wrapped in
braces. Single-statement, unbraced bodies are not allowed.
~~~~
2012-12-20 18:32:28 -06:00
# mod universe { pub fn recalibrate() -> bool { true } }
fn main() {
/* A simple loop */
loop {
// A tricky calculation
if universe::recalibrate() {
return;
2012-08-31 18:57:37 -05:00
}
}
}
~~~~
2012-10-10 21:32:11 -05:00
The `let` keyword introduces a local variable. Variables are immutable by
default. To introduce a local variable that you can re-assign later, use `let
mut` instead.
2012-09-22 20:59:34 -05:00
~~~~
let hi = "hi";
let mut count = 0;
while count < 10 {
println(fmt!("count: %?", count));
2012-09-22 20:59:34 -05:00
count += 1;
}
~~~~
Although Rust can almost always infer the types of local variables, you
can specify a variable's type by following it with a colon, then the type
name. Static items, on the other hand, always require a type annotation.
2012-09-22 20:59:34 -05:00
~~~~
2013-03-22 19:24:26 -05:00
static monster_factor: float = 57.8;
let monster_size = monster_factor * 10.0;
let monster_size: int = 50;
2012-09-22 20:59:34 -05:00
~~~~
2012-10-10 21:32:11 -05:00
Local variables may shadow earlier declarations, as in the previous example:
`monster_size` was first declared as a `float`, and then a second
`monster_size` was declared as an `int`. If you were to actually compile this
example, though, the compiler would determine that the first `monster_size` is
2012-10-10 21:32:11 -05:00
unused and issue a warning (because this situation is likely to indicate a
programmer error). For occasions where unused variables are intentional, their
names may be prefixed with an underscore to silence the warning, like `let
2012-10-10 21:32:11 -05:00
_monster_size = 50;`.
2012-10-02 22:28:53 -05:00
Rust identifiers start with an alphabetic
2012-09-22 20:59:34 -05:00
character or an underscore, and after that may contain any sequence of
alphabetic characters, numbers, or underscores. The preferred style is to
2012-12-20 15:20:02 -06:00
write function, variable, and module names with lowercase letters, using
2012-09-22 20:59:34 -05:00
underscores where they help readability, while writing types in camel case.
~~~
let my_variable = 100;
2012-12-20 15:20:02 -06:00
type MyType = int; // primitive types are _not_ camel case
2012-09-22 20:59:34 -05:00
~~~
## Expressions and semicolons
Though it isn't apparent in all code, there is a fundamental
difference between Rust's syntax and predecessors like C.
Many constructs that are statements in C are expressions
2012-09-22 20:59:34 -05:00
in Rust, allowing code to be more concise. For example, you might
2012-08-31 18:57:37 -05:00
write a piece of code like this:
~~~~
# let item = "salad";
let price;
if item == "salad" {
price = 3.50;
} else if item == "muffin" {
price = 2.25;
} else {
price = 2.00;
}
~~~~
2012-08-31 18:57:37 -05:00
But, in Rust, you don't have to repeat the name `price`:
~~~~
2012-08-31 18:57:37 -05:00
# let item = "salad";
let price =
if item == "salad" {
3.50
} else if item == "muffin" {
2.25
} else {
2.00
};
~~~~
2012-10-10 21:32:11 -05:00
Both pieces of code are exactly equivalent: they assign a value to
`price` depending on the condition that holds. Note that there
2012-10-10 21:32:11 -05:00
are no semicolons in the blocks of the second snippet. This is
important: the lack of a semicolon after the last statement in a
2012-09-22 20:59:34 -05:00
braced block gives the whole block the value of that last expression.
2012-08-31 18:57:37 -05:00
Put another way, the semicolon in Rust *ignores the value of an expression*.
Thus, if the branches of the `if` had looked like `{ 4; }`, the above example
would simply assign `()` (nil or void) to `price`. But without the semicolon, each
branch has a different value, and `price` gets the value of the branch that
was taken.
2012-10-10 21:32:11 -05:00
In short, everything that's not a declaration (declarations are `let` for
variables; `fn` for functions; and any top-level named items such as
2012-10-10 21:32:11 -05:00
[traits](#traits), [enum types](#enums), and [constants](#constants)) is an
expression, including function bodies.
~~~~
2012-09-22 20:59:34 -05:00
fn is_four(x: int) -> bool {
// No need for a return statement. The result of the expression
// is used as the return value.
x == 4
}
~~~~
## Primitive types and literals
There are general signed and unsigned integer types, `int` and `uint`,
as well as 8-, 16-, 32-, and 64-bit variants, `i8`, `u16`, etc.
2012-10-10 21:32:11 -05:00
Integers can be written in decimal (`144`), hexadecimal (`0x90`), or
2012-09-23 00:22:49 -05:00
binary (`0b10010000`) base. Each integral type has a corresponding literal
suffix that can be used to indicate the type of a literal: `i` for `int`,
`u` for `uint`, `i8` for the `i8` type.
2012-10-10 21:32:11 -05:00
In the absence of an integer literal suffix, Rust will infer the
2012-09-23 00:22:49 -05:00
integer type based on type annotations and function signatures in the
surrounding program. In the absence of any type information at all,
Rust will assume that an unsuffixed integer literal has type
`int`.
~~~~
2012-09-23 00:22:49 -05:00
let a = 1; // a is an int
let b = 10i; // b is an int, due to the 'i' suffix
2012-09-26 18:19:07 -05:00
let c = 100u; // c is a uint
2012-09-23 00:22:49 -05:00
let d = 1000i32; // d is an i32
~~~~
There are three floating-point types: `float`, `f32`, and `f64`.
Floating-point numbers are written `0.0`, `1e6`, or `2.1e-4`.
Like integers, floating-point literals are inferred to the correct type.
Suffixes `f`, `f32`, and `f64` can be used to create literals of a specific type.
The keywords `true` and `false` produce literals of type `bool`.
Characters, the `char` type, are four-byte Unicode codepoints,
whose literals are written between single quotes, as in `'x'`.
Just like C, Rust understands a number of character escapes, using the backslash
character, such as `\n`, `\r`, and `\t`. String literals,
written between double quotes, allow the same escape sequences.
More on strings [later](#vectors-and-strings).
The nil type, written `()`, has a single value, also written `()`.
## Operators
Rust's set of operators contains very few surprises. Arithmetic is done with
`*`, `/`, `%`, `+`, and `-` (multiply, quotient, remainder, add, and subtract). `-` is
also a unary prefix operator that negates numbers. As in C, the bitwise operators
`>>`, `<<`, `&`, `|`, and `^` are also supported.
Note that, if applied to an integer value, `!` flips all the bits (like `~` in
C).
The comparison operators are the traditional `==`, `!=`, `<`, `>`,
`<=`, and `>=`. Short-circuiting (lazy) boolean operators are written
`&&` (and) and `||` (or).
For type casting, Rust uses the binary `as` operator. It takes an
expression on the left side and a type on the right side and will,
2012-05-16 22:22:32 -05:00
if a meaningful conversion exists, convert the result of the
expression to the given type.
~~~~
let x: float = 4.0;
let y: uint = x as uint;
2013-03-28 20:39:09 -05:00
assert!(y == 4u);
~~~~
## Syntax extensions
*Syntax extensions* are special forms that are not built into the language,
but are instead provided by the libraries. To make it clear to the reader when
2012-10-10 21:32:11 -05:00
a name refers to a syntax extension, the names of all syntax extensions end
with `!`. The standard library defines a few syntax extensions, the most
useful of which is `fmt!`, a `sprintf`-style text formatter that you will
often see in examples.
2012-10-10 21:32:11 -05:00
`fmt!` supports most of the directives that [printf][pf] supports, but unlike
printf, will give you a compile-time error when the types of the directives
don't match the types of the arguments.
~~~~
# let mystery_object = ();
println(fmt!("%s is %d", "the answer", 43));
// %? will conveniently print any type
println(fmt!("what is this thing: %?", mystery_object));
~~~~
[pf]: http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/io/c/fprintf
2012-10-10 21:32:11 -05:00
You can define your own syntax extensions with the macro system. For details, see the [macro tutorial][macros].
[macros]: tutorial-macros.html
# Control structures
## Conditionals
2012-10-10 22:08:08 -05:00
We've seen `if` expressions a few times already. To recap, braces are
compulsory, an `if` can have an optional `else` clause, and multiple
`if`/`else` constructs can be chained together:
~~~~
if false {
println("that's odd");
} else if true {
println("right");
} else {
println("neither true nor false");
}
~~~~
2012-10-10 22:08:08 -05:00
The condition given to an `if` construct *must* be of type `bool` (no
implicit conversion happens). If the arms are blocks that have a
value, this value must be of the same type for every arm in which
control reaches the end of the block:
~~~~
fn signum(x: int) -> int {
if x < 0 { -1 }
else if x > 0 { 1 }
2012-08-31 18:57:37 -05:00
else { return 0 }
}
~~~~
## Pattern matching
2012-08-06 14:34:08 -05:00
Rust's `match` construct is a generalized, cleaned-up version of C's
2012-10-10 22:08:08 -05:00
`switch` construct. You provide it with a value and a number of
*arms*, each labelled with a pattern, and the code compares the value
against each pattern in order until one matches. The matching pattern
executes its corresponding arm.
~~~~
# let my_number = 1;
2012-08-06 14:34:08 -05:00
match my_number {
0 => println("zero"),
1 | 2 => println("one or two"),
3..10 => println("three to ten"),
_ => println("something else")
}
~~~~
Unlike in C, there is no "falling through" between arms: only one arm
2012-10-10 22:08:08 -05:00
executes, and it doesn't have to explicitly `break` out of the
construct when it is finished.
2012-10-10 22:08:08 -05:00
A `match` arm consists of a *pattern*, then an arrow `=>`, followed by
an *action* (expression). Literals are valid patterns and match only
their own value. A single arm may match multiple different patterns by
combining them with the pipe operator (`|`), so long as every pattern
binds the same set of variables. Ranges of numeric literal patterns
can be expressed with two dots, as in `M..N`. The underscore (`_`) is
a wildcard pattern that matches any single value. The asterisk (`*`)
is a different wildcard that can match one or more fields in an `enum`
variant.
The patterns in a match arm are followed by a fat arrow, `=>`, then an
2012-08-06 00:07:22 -05:00
expression to evaluate. Each case is separated by commas. It's often
convenient to use a block expression for each case, in which case the
2012-08-06 00:07:22 -05:00
commas are optional.
~~~
# let my_number = 1;
2012-08-06 14:34:08 -05:00
match my_number {
0 => { println("zero") }
_ => { println("something else") }
2012-08-06 00:07:22 -05:00
}
~~~
2012-10-10 22:08:08 -05:00
`match` constructs must be *exhaustive*: they must have an arm
covering every possible case. For example, the typechecker would
reject the previous example if the arm with the wildcard pattern was
omitted.
2012-10-10 22:08:08 -05:00
A powerful application of pattern matching is *destructuring*:
matching in order to bind names to the contents of data
types.
> ***Note:*** The following code makes use of tuples (`(float, float)`) which
> are explained in section 5.3. For now you can think of tuples as a list of
> items.
~~~~
# use std::float;
2012-08-31 18:57:37 -05:00
fn angle(vector: (float, float)) -> float {
let pi = float::consts::pi;
2012-08-31 18:57:37 -05:00
match vector {
(0f, y) if y < 0f => 1.5 * pi,
(0f, y) => 0.5 * pi,
2012-08-06 00:07:22 -05:00
(x, y) => float::atan(y / x)
}
}
~~~~
2012-10-10 22:08:08 -05:00
A variable name in a pattern matches any value, *and* binds that name
to the value of the matched value inside of the arm's action. Thus, `(0f,
y)` matches any tuple whose first element is zero, and binds `y` to
the second element. `(x, y)` matches any two-element tuple, and binds both
2012-10-10 22:08:08 -05:00
elements to variables.
2012-10-10 22:08:08 -05:00
Any `match` arm can have a guard clause (written `if EXPR`), called a
*pattern guard*, which is an expression of type `bool` that
determines, after the pattern is found to match, whether the arm is
taken or not. The variables bound by the pattern are in scope in this
guard expression. The first arm in the `angle` example shows an
example of a pattern guard.
You've already seen simple `let` bindings, but `let` is a little
2012-10-10 22:08:08 -05:00
fancier than you've been led to believe. It, too, supports destructuring
patterns. For example, you can write this to extract the fields from a
tuple, introducing two variables at once: `a` and `b`.
~~~~
# fn get_tuple_of_two_ints() -> (int, int) { (1, 1) }
let (a, b) = get_tuple_of_two_ints();
~~~~
2012-10-10 22:08:08 -05:00
Let bindings only work with _irrefutable_ patterns: that is, patterns
that can never fail to match. This excludes `let` from matching
2012-10-10 22:08:08 -05:00
literals and most `enum` variants.
## Loops
2012-10-10 22:08:08 -05:00
`while` denotes a loop that iterates as long as its given condition
(which must have type `bool`) evaluates to `true`. Inside a loop, the
keyword `break` aborts the loop, and `loop` aborts the current
iteration and continues with the next.
~~~~
let mut cake_amount = 8;
while cake_amount > 0 {
cake_amount -= 1;
}
~~~~
2012-10-10 22:08:08 -05:00
`loop` denotes an infinite loop, and is the preferred way of writing `while true`:
~~~~
# use std::int;
let mut x = 5;
2012-07-01 21:20:43 -05:00
loop {
x += x - 3;
if x % 5 == 0 { break; }
println(int::to_str(x));
}
~~~~
This code prints out a weird sequence of numbers and stops as soon as
it finds one that can be divided by five.
Rust also has a `for` construct. It's different from C's `for` and it works
best when iterating over collections. See the section on [closures](#closures)
to find out how to use `for` and higher-order functions for enumerating
elements of a collection.
# Data structures
2012-08-31 18:57:37 -05:00
## Structs
2012-08-31 18:57:37 -05:00
Rust struct types must be declared before they are used using the `struct`
syntax: `struct Name { field1: T1, field2: T2 [, ...] }`, where `T1`, `T2`,
... denote types. To construct a struct, use the same syntax, but leave off
the `struct`: for example: `Point { x: 1.0, y: 2.0 }`.
2012-08-31 18:57:37 -05:00
Structs are quite similar to C structs and are even laid out the same way in
memory (so you can read from a Rust struct in C, and vice-versa). Use the dot
operator to access struct fields, as in `mypoint.x`.
~~~~
struct Point {
x: float,
y: float
2012-08-31 18:57:37 -05:00
}
~~~~
Inherited mutability means that any field of a struct may be mutable, if the
struct is in a mutable slot (or a field of a struct in a mutable slot, and
so forth).
With a value (say, `mypoint`) of such a type in a mutable location, you can do
`mypoint.y += 1.0`. But in an immutable location, such an assignment to a
struct without inherited mutability would result in a type error.
~~~~ {.xfail-test}
# struct Point { x: float, y: float }
let mut mypoint = Point { x: 1.0, y: 1.0 };
let origin = Point { x: 0.0, y: 0.0 };
mypoint.y += 1.0; // mypoint is mutable, and its fields as well
origin.y += 1.0; // ERROR: assigning to immutable field
~~~~
`match` patterns destructure structs. The basic syntax is
`Name { fieldname: pattern, ... }`:
2012-10-04 22:03:40 -05:00
~~~~
2012-08-31 18:57:37 -05:00
# struct Point { x: float, y: float }
# let mypoint = Point { x: 0.0, y: 0.0 };
2012-08-06 14:34:08 -05:00
match mypoint {
Point { x: 0.0, y: yy } => { println(yy.to_str()); }
Point { x: xx, y: yy } => { println(xx.to_str() + " " + yy.to_str()); }
}
~~~~
2012-08-31 18:57:37 -05:00
In general, the field names of a struct do not have to appear in the same
order they appear in the type. When you are not interested in all
the fields of a struct, a struct pattern may end with `, _` (as in
`Name { field1, _ }`) to indicate that you're ignoring all other fields.
2012-10-04 22:03:40 -05:00
Additionally, struct fields have a shorthand matching form that simply
reuses the field name as the binding name.
~~~
# struct Point { x: float, y: float }
# let mypoint = Point { x: 0.0, y: 0.0 };
match mypoint {
Point { x, _ } => { println(x.to_str()) }
2012-10-04 22:03:40 -05:00
}
~~~
## Enums
Enums are datatypes that have several alternate representations. For
example, consider the type shown earlier:
~~~~
2012-08-31 18:57:37 -05:00
# struct Point { x: float, y: float }
enum Shape {
Circle(Point, float),
Rectangle(Point, Point)
}
~~~~
A value of this type is either a `Circle`, in which case it contains a
`Point` struct and a float, or a `Rectangle`, in which case it contains
two `Point` structs. The run-time representation of such a value
includes an identifier of the actual form that it holds, much like the
"tagged union" pattern in C, but with better static guarantees.
The above declaration will define a type `Shape` that can refer to
such shapes, and two functions, `Circle` and `Rectangle`, which can be
used to construct values of the type (taking arguments of the
specified types). So `Circle(Point { x: 0f, y: 0f }, 10f)` is the way to
create a new circle.
Enum variants need not have parameters. This `enum` declaration,
for example, is equivalent to a C enum:
~~~~
2012-09-15 20:44:44 -05:00
enum Direction {
North,
East,
South,
West
}
~~~~
This declaration defines `North`, `East`, `South`, and `West` as constants,
2012-09-15 20:44:44 -05:00
all of which have type `Direction`.
When an enum is C-like (that is, when none of the variants have
parameters), it is possible to explicitly set the discriminator values
to a constant value:
~~~~
2012-09-15 20:44:44 -05:00
enum Color {
Red = 0xff0000,
Green = 0x00ff00,
Blue = 0x0000ff
}
~~~~
If an explicit discriminator is not specified for a variant, the value
defaults to the value of the previous variant plus one. If the first
variant does not have a discriminator, it defaults to 0. For example,
the value of `North` is 0, `East` is 1, `South` is 2, and `West` is 3.
When an enum is C-like, you can apply the `as` cast operator to
convert it to its discriminator value as an `int`.
For enum types with multiple variants, destructuring is the only way to
get at their contents. All variant constructors can be used as
patterns, as in this definition of `area`:
~~~~
# use std::float;
2012-10-07 00:35:08 -05:00
# struct Point {x: float, y: float}
2012-09-15 20:44:44 -05:00
# enum Shape { Circle(Point, float), Rectangle(Point, Point) }
fn area(sh: Shape) -> float {
2012-08-06 14:34:08 -05:00
match sh {
2012-09-15 20:44:44 -05:00
Circle(_, size) => float::consts::pi * size * size,
Rectangle(Point { x, y }, Point { x: x2, y: y2 }) => (x2 - x) * (y2 - y)
}
}
~~~~
You can write a lone `_` to ignore an individual field, and can
ignore all fields of a variant like: `Circle(*)`. As in their
introduction form, nullary enum patterns are written without
parentheses.
~~~~
# struct Point { x: float, y: float }
2012-09-15 20:44:44 -05:00
# enum Direction { North, East, South, West }
fn point_from_direction(dir: Direction) -> Point {
2012-08-06 14:34:08 -05:00
match dir {
North => Point { x: 0f, y: 1f },
East => Point { x: 1f, y: 0f },
South => Point { x: 0f, y: -1f },
West => Point { x: -1f, y: 0f }
}
}
~~~~
Enum variants may also be structs. For example:
~~~~
# use std::float;
# struct Point { x: float, y: float }
# fn square(x: float) -> float { x * x }
enum Shape {
Circle { center: Point, radius: float },
Rectangle { top_left: Point, bottom_right: Point }
}
fn area(sh: Shape) -> float {
match sh {
Circle { radius: radius, _ } => float::consts::pi * square(radius),
Rectangle { top_left: top_left, bottom_right: bottom_right } => {
(bottom_right.x - top_left.x) * (bottom_right.y - top_left.y)
}
}
}
~~~~
## Tuples
Tuples in Rust behave exactly like structs, except that their fields
do not have names. Thus, you cannot access their fields with dot notation.
2013-04-07 16:08:23 -05:00
Tuples can have any arity except for 0 (though you may consider
unit, `()`, as the empty tuple if you like).
~~~~
let mytup: (int, int, float) = (10, 20, 30.0);
2012-08-06 14:34:08 -05:00
match mytup {
2013-03-08 14:39:42 -06:00
(a, b, c) => info!(a + b + (c as int))
}
~~~~
2012-12-19 22:52:03 -06:00
## Tuple structs
Rust also has _tuple structs_, which behave like both structs and tuples,
except that, unlike tuples, tuple structs have names (so `Foo(1, 2)` has a
different type from `Bar(1, 2)`), and tuple structs' _fields_ do not have
names.
2012-12-19 22:52:03 -06:00
For example:
~~~~
struct MyTup(int, int, float);
let mytup: MyTup = MyTup(10, 20, 30.0);
match mytup {
2013-03-08 14:39:42 -06:00
MyTup(a, b, c) => info!(a + b + (c as int))
2012-12-19 22:52:03 -06:00
}
~~~~
<a name="newtype"></a>
There is a special case for tuple structs with a single field, which are
sometimes called "newtypes" (after Haskell's "newtype" feature). These are
used to define new types in such a way that the new name is not just a
synonym for an existing type but is rather its own distinct type.
~~~~
struct GizmoId(int);
~~~~
For convenience, you can extract the contents of such a struct with the
dereference (`*`) unary operator:
~~~~
# struct GizmoId(int);
let my_gizmo_id: GizmoId = GizmoId(10);
let id_int: int = *my_gizmo_id;
~~~~
Types like this can be useful to differentiate between data that have
the same type but must be used in different ways.
~~~~
struct Inches(int);
struct Centimeters(int);
~~~~
The above definitions allow for a simple way for programs to avoid
confusing numbers that correspond to different units.
# Functions
We've already seen several function definitions. Like all other static
declarations, such as `type`, functions can be declared both at the
top level and inside other functions (or in modules, which we'll come
back to [later](#modules-and-crates)). The `fn` keyword introduces a
function. A function has an argument list, which is a parenthesized
list of `expr: type` pairs separated by commas. An arrow `->`
separates the argument list and the function's return type.
~~~~
fn line(a: int, b: int, x: int) -> int {
2012-10-04 19:33:06 -05:00
return a * x + b;
}
~~~~
The `return` keyword immediately returns from the body of a function. It
is optionally followed by an expression to return. A function can
also return a value by having its top-level block produce an
expression.
~~~~
fn line(a: int, b: int, x: int) -> int {
2012-10-04 19:33:06 -05:00
a * x + b
}
~~~~
It's better Rust style to write a return value this way instead of
writing an explicit `return`. The utility of `return` comes in when
returning early from a function. Functions that do not return a value
are said to return nil, `()`, and both the return type and the return
value may be omitted from the definition. The following two functions
are equivalent.
~~~~
fn do_nothing_the_hard_way() -> () { return (); }
fn do_nothing_the_easy_way() { }
~~~~
Ending the function with a semicolon like so is equivalent to returning `()`.
~~~~
2012-10-04 19:33:06 -05:00
fn line(a: int, b: int, x: int) -> int { a * x + b }
fn oops(a: int, b: int, x: int) -> () { a * x + b; }
2013-03-28 20:39:09 -05:00
assert!(8 == line(5, 3, 1));
assert!(() == oops(5, 3, 1));
~~~~
2012-12-20 18:51:37 -06:00
As with `match` expressions and `let` bindings, function arguments support
pattern destructuring. Like `let`, argument patterns must be irrefutable,
as in this example that unpacks the first value from a tuple and returns it.
2012-12-20 18:51:37 -06:00
~~~
fn first((value, _): (int, float)) -> int { value }
~~~
2013-03-18 18:24:48 -05:00
# Destructors
2012-07-01 21:20:43 -05:00
A *destructor* is a function responsible for cleaning up the resources used by
an object when it is no longer accessible. Destructors can be defined to handle
the release of resources like files, sockets and heap memory.
Objects are never accessible after their destructor has been called, so there
are no dynamic failures from accessing freed resources. When a task fails, the
destructors of all objects in the task are called.
2012-07-01 21:20:43 -05:00
The `~` sigil represents a unique handle for a memory allocation on the heap:
2013-03-18 18:24:48 -05:00
~~~~
{
// an integer allocated on the heap
let y = ~10;
2013-03-18 18:24:48 -05:00
}
// the destructor frees the heap memory as soon as `y` goes out of scope
~~~~
2013-03-18 18:24:48 -05:00
Rust includes syntax for heap memory allocation in the language since it's
commonly used, but the same semantics can be implemented by a type with a
custom destructor.
2013-03-18 18:24:48 -05:00
# Ownership
Rust formalizes the concept of object ownership to delegate management of an
object's lifetime to either a variable or a task-local garbage collector. An
object's owner is responsible for managing the lifetime of the object by
calling the destructor, and the owner determines whether the object is mutable.
Ownership is recursive, so mutability is inherited recursively and a destructor
destroys the contained tree of owned objects. Variables are top-level owners
and destroy the contained object when they go out of scope. A box managed by
the garbage collector starts a new ownership tree, and the destructor is called
when it is collected.
~~~~
// the struct owns the objects contained in the `x` and `y` fields
struct Foo { x: int, y: ~int }
{
// `a` is the owner of the struct, and thus the owner of the struct's fields
let a = Foo { x: 5, y: ~10 };
}
// when `a` goes out of scope, the destructor for the `~int` in the struct's
// field is called
// `b` is mutable, and the mutability is inherited by the objects it owns
let mut b = Foo { x: 5, y: ~10 };
b.x = 10;
~~~~
2013-03-18 18:24:48 -05:00
If an object doesn't contain garbage-collected boxes, it consists of a single
ownership tree and is given the `Owned` trait which allows it to be sent
between tasks. Custom destructors can only be implemented directly on types
that are `Owned`, but garbage-collected boxes can still *contain* types with
custom destructors.
2013-03-18 18:24:48 -05:00
# Boxes
2013-04-03 19:10:09 -05:00
Many modern languages represent values as pointers to heap memory by
2013-03-18 18:24:48 -05:00
default. In contrast, Rust, like C and C++, represents such types directly.
Another way to say this is that aggregate data in Rust are *unboxed*. This
means that if you `let x = Point { x: 1f, y: 1f };`, you are creating a struct
on the stack. If you then copy it into a data structure, you copy the entire
struct, not just a pointer.
For small structs like `Point`, this is usually more efficient than allocating
memory and indirecting through a pointer. But for big structs, or mutable
state, it can be useful to have a single copy on the stack or on the heap, and
refer to that through a pointer.
## Owned boxes
An owned box (`~`) is a uniquely owned allocation on the heap. It inherits the
mutability and lifetime of the owner as it would if there was no box:
~~~~
let x = 5; // immutable
let mut y = 5; // mutable
y += 2;
let x = ~5; // immutable
let mut y = ~5; // mutable
*y += 2; // the * operator is needed to access the contained value
~~~~
The purpose of an owned box is to add a layer of indirection in order to create
recursive data structures or cheaply pass around an object larger than a
pointer. Since an owned box has a unique owner, it can only be used to
represent a tree data structure.
The following struct won't compile, because the lack of indirection would mean
it has an infinite size:
~~~~ {.xfail-test}
struct Foo {
child: Option<Foo>
}
~~~~
> ***Note:*** The `Option` type is an enum that represents an *optional* value.
> It's comparable to a nullable pointer in many other languages, but stores the
> contained value unboxed.
Adding indirection with an owned pointer allocates the child outside of the
struct on the heap, which makes it a finite size and won't result in a
compile-time error:
~~~~
struct Foo {
child: Option<~Foo>
}
~~~~
2013-03-18 18:24:48 -05:00
## Managed boxes
2013-03-18 18:24:48 -05:00
A managed box (`@`) is a heap allocation with the lifetime managed by a
task-local garbage collector. It will be destroyed at some point after there
are no references left to the box, no later than the end of the task. Managed
boxes lack an owner, so they start a new ownership tree and don't inherit
mutability. They do own the contained object, and mutability is defined by the
type of the shared box (`@` or `@mut`). An object containing a managed box is
not `Owned`, and can't be sent between tasks.
~~~~
let a = @5; // immutable
let mut b = @5; // mutable variable, immutable box
b = @10;
let c = @mut 5; // immutable variable, mutable box
*c = 10;
let mut d = @mut 5; // mutable variable, mutable box
*d += 5;
d = @mut 15;
~~~~
A mutable variable and an immutable variable can refer to the same box, given
that their types are compatible. Mutability of a box is a property of its type,
however, so for example a mutable handle to an immutable box cannot be
2013-04-04 15:35:23 -05:00
assigned a reference to a mutable box.
~~~~
let a = @1; // immutable box
let b = @mut 2; // mutable box
let mut c : @int; // declare a variable with type managed immutable int
let mut d : @mut int; // and one of type managed mutable int
2013-04-04 15:35:23 -05:00
c = a; // box type is the same, okay
d = b; // box type is the same, okay
~~~~
~~~~ {.xfail-test}
// but b cannot be assigned to c, or a to d
c = b; // error
~~~~
2013-03-18 18:24:48 -05:00
# Move semantics
2013-03-18 18:24:48 -05:00
Rust uses a shallow copy for parameter passing, assignment and returning values
from functions. A shallow copy is considered a move of ownership if the
ownership tree of the copied value includes an owned box or a type with a
custom destructor. After a value has been moved, it can no longer be used from
the source location and will not be destroyed there.
~~~~
let x = ~5;
let y = x.clone(); // y is a newly allocated box
let z = x; // no new memory allocated, x can no longer be used
~~~~
Since in owned boxes mutability is a property of the owner, not the
box, mutable boxes may become immutable when they are moved, and vice-versa.
~~~~
let r = ~13;
let mut s = r; // box becomes mutable
*s += 1;
let t = s; // box becomes immutable
~~~~
2013-03-18 18:24:48 -05:00
# Borrowed pointers
Rust's borrowed pointers are a general purpose reference type. In contrast with
2013-03-29 13:16:52 -05:00
owned boxes, where the holder of an owned box is the owner of the pointed-to
memory, borrowed pointers never imply ownership. A pointer can be borrowed to
any object, and the compiler verifies that it cannot outlive the lifetime of
the object.
As an example, consider a simple struct type, `Point`:
~~~
struct Point {
x: float,
y: float
}
~~~~
We can use this simple definition to allocate points in many different
ways. For example, in this code, each of these three local variables
contains a point, but allocated in a different location:
~~~
# struct Point { x: float, y: float }
let on_the_stack : Point = Point { x: 3.0, y: 4.0 };
let managed_box : @Point = @Point { x: 5.0, y: 1.0 };
let owned_box : ~Point = ~Point { x: 7.0, y: 9.0 };
~~~
2013-06-19 14:58:08 -05:00
Suppose we want to write a procedure that computes the distance
between any two points, no matter where they are stored. For example,
we might like to compute the distance between `on_the_stack` and
`managed_box`, or between `managed_box` and `owned_box`. One option is
to define a function that takes two arguments of type point—that is,
it takes the points by value. But this will cause the points to be
copied when we call the function. For points, this is probably not so
bad, but often copies are expensive or, worse, if there are mutable
fields, they can change the semantics of your program. So wed like to
define a function that takes the points by pointer. We can use
borrowed pointers to do this:
~~~
# struct Point { x: float, y: float }
# fn sqrt(f: float) -> float { 0f }
fn compute_distance(p1: &Point, p2: &Point) -> float {
let x_d = p1.x - p2.x;
let y_d = p1.y - p2.y;
sqrt(x_d * x_d + y_d * y_d)
}
~~~
Now we can call `compute_distance()` in various ways:
~~~
# struct Point{ x: float, y: float };
# let on_the_stack : Point = Point { x: 3.0, y: 4.0 };
# let managed_box : @Point = @Point { x: 5.0, y: 1.0 };
# let owned_box : ~Point = ~Point { x: 7.0, y: 9.0 };
# fn compute_distance(p1: &Point, p2: &Point) -> float { 0f }
compute_distance(&on_the_stack, managed_box);
compute_distance(managed_box, owned_box);
~~~
Here the `&` operator is used to take the address of the variable
`on_the_stack`; this is because `on_the_stack` has the type `Point`
(that is, a struct value) and we have to take its address to get a
value. We also call this _borrowing_ the local variable
`on_the_stack`, because we are creating an alias: that is, another
route to the same data.
In the case of the boxes `managed_box` and `owned_box`, however, no
explicit action is necessary. The compiler will automatically convert
a box like `@point` or `~point` to a borrowed pointer like
`&point`. This is another form of borrowing; in this case, the
contents of the managed/owned box are being lent out.
Whenever a value is borrowed, there are some limitations on what you
can do with the original. For example, if the contents of a variable
have been lent out, you cannot send that variable to another task, nor
will you be permitted to take actions that might cause the borrowed
value to be freed or to change its type. This rule should make
intuitive sense: you must wait for a borrowed value to be returned
(that is, for the borrowed pointer to go out of scope) before you can
make full use of it again.
For a more in-depth explanation of borrowed pointers, read the
[borrowed pointer tutorial][borrowtut].
[borrowtut]: tutorial-borrowed-ptr.html
2013-03-18 18:24:48 -05:00
## Freezing
Borrowing an immutable pointer to an object freezes it and prevents mutation.
`Owned` objects have freezing enforced statically at compile-time.
2013-03-18 18:24:48 -05:00
~~~~
let mut x = 5;
{
let y = &x; // x is now frozen, it cannot be modified
}
// x is now unfrozen again
~~~~
Mutable managed boxes handle freezing dynamically when any of their contents
are borrowed, and the task will fail if an attempt to modify them is made while
they are frozen:
~~~~
let x = @mut 5;
let y = x;
{
let z = &*y; // the managed box is now frozen
// modifying it through x or y will cause a task failure
}
// the box is now unfrozen again
~~~~
2013-03-18 18:24:48 -05:00
# Dereferencing pointers
Rust uses the unary star operator (`*`) to access the contents of a
box or pointer, similarly to C.
~~~
let managed = @10;
let owned = ~20;
let borrowed = &30;
let sum = *managed + *owned + *borrowed;
~~~
Dereferenced mutable pointers may appear on the left hand side of
assignments. Such an assignment modifies the value that the pointer
points to.
~~~
let managed = @mut 10;
let mut owned = ~20;
let mut value = 30;
let borrowed = &mut value;
*managed = *owned + 10;
*owned = *borrowed + 100;
*borrowed = *managed + 1000;
~~~
Pointers have high operator precedence, but lower precedence than the
dot operator used for field and method access. This precedence order
can sometimes make code awkward and parenthesis-filled.
~~~
# struct Point { x: float, y: float }
# enum Shape { Rectangle(Point, Point) }
# impl Shape { fn area(&self) -> int { 0 } }
let start = @Point { x: 10f, y: 20f };
let end = ~Point { x: (*start).x + 100f, y: (*start).y + 100f };
let rect = &Rectangle(*start, *end);
let area = (*rect).area();
~~~
To combat this ugliness the dot operator applies _automatic pointer
dereferencing_ to the receiver (the value on the left-hand side of the
dot), so in most cases, explicitly dereferencing the receiver is not necessary.
~~~
# struct Point { x: float, y: float }
# enum Shape { Rectangle(Point, Point) }
# impl Shape { fn area(&self) -> int { 0 } }
let start = @Point { x: 10f, y: 20f };
let end = ~Point { x: start.x + 100f, y: start.y + 100f };
let rect = &Rectangle(*start, *end);
let area = rect.area();
~~~
You can write an expression that dereferences any number of pointers
2013-06-19 14:58:08 -05:00
automatically. For example, if you feel inclined, you could write
something silly like
~~~
# struct Point { x: float, y: float }
let point = &@~Point { x: 10f, y: 20f };
println(fmt!("%f", point.x));
~~~
The indexing operator (`[]`) also auto-dereferences.
# Vectors and strings
A vector is a contiguous section of memory containing zero or more
values of the same type. Like other types in Rust, vectors can be
stored on the stack, the local heap, or the exchange heap. Borrowed
pointers to vectors are also called 'slices'.
~~~
2012-10-07 03:06:07 -05:00
# enum Crayon {
# Almond, AntiqueBrass, Apricot,
# Aquamarine, Asparagus, AtomicTangerine,
# BananaMania, Beaver, Bittersweet,
# Black, BlizzardBlue, Blue
# }
// A fixed-size stack vector
2013-03-22 19:24:26 -05:00
let stack_crayons: [Crayon, ..3] = [Almond, AntiqueBrass, Apricot];
// A borrowed pointer to stack-allocated vector
let stack_crayons: &[Crayon] = &[Aquamarine, Asparagus, AtomicTangerine];
// A local heap (managed) vector of crayons
let local_crayons: @[Crayon] = @[BananaMania, Beaver, Bittersweet];
// An exchange heap (owned) vector of crayons
let exchange_crayons: ~[Crayon] = ~[Black, BlizzardBlue, Blue];
~~~
The `+` operator means concatenation when applied to vector types.
~~~~
2012-09-15 20:44:44 -05:00
# enum Crayon { Almond, AntiqueBrass, Apricot,
# Aquamarine, Asparagus, AtomicTangerine,
# BananaMania, Beaver, Bittersweet };
let my_crayons = ~[Almond, AntiqueBrass, Apricot];
let your_crayons = ~[BananaMania, Beaver, Bittersweet];
// Add two vectors to create a new one
let our_crayons = my_crayons + your_crayons;
2012-10-07 03:06:07 -05:00
// += will append to a vector, provided it lives in a mutable slot
let mut my_crayons = my_crayons;
my_crayons += your_crayons;
~~~~
> ***Note:*** The above examples of vector addition use owned
> vectors. Some operations on slices and stack vectors are
> not yet well-supported. Owned vectors are often the most
> usable.
Square brackets denote indexing into a vector:
~~~~
2012-09-15 20:44:44 -05:00
# enum Crayon { Almond, AntiqueBrass, Apricot,
# Aquamarine, Asparagus, AtomicTangerine,
# BananaMania, Beaver, Bittersweet };
# fn draw_scene(c: Crayon) { }
2013-03-22 19:24:26 -05:00
let crayons: [Crayon, ..3] = [BananaMania, Beaver, Bittersweet];
match crayons[0] {
Bittersweet => draw_scene(crayons[0]),
_ => ()
}
~~~~
A vector can be destructured using pattern matching:
~~~~
2013-03-22 19:24:26 -05:00
let numbers: [int, ..3] = [1, 2, 3];
let score = match numbers {
[] => 0,
[a] => a * 10,
[a, b] => a * 6 + b * 4,
[a, b, c, ..rest] => a * 5 + b * 3 + c * 2 + rest.len() as int
};
~~~~
The elements of a vector _inherit the mutability of the vector_,
and as such, individual elements may not be reassigned when the
vector lives in an immutable slot.
~~~ {.xfail-test}
2012-09-15 20:44:44 -05:00
# enum Crayon { Almond, AntiqueBrass, Apricot,
# Aquamarine, Asparagus, AtomicTangerine,
# BananaMania, Beaver, Bittersweet };
let crayons: ~[Crayon] = ~[BananaMania, Beaver, Bittersweet];
crayons[0] = Apricot; // ERROR: Can't assign to immutable vector
~~~
Moving it into a mutable slot makes the elements assignable.
~~~
2012-09-15 20:44:44 -05:00
# enum Crayon { Almond, AntiqueBrass, Apricot,
# Aquamarine, Asparagus, AtomicTangerine,
# BananaMania, Beaver, Bittersweet };
let crayons: ~[Crayon] = ~[BananaMania, Beaver, Bittersweet];
// Put the vector into a mutable slot
2013-02-15 04:44:18 -06:00
let mut mutable_crayons = crayons;
// Now it's mutable to the bone
mutable_crayons[0] = Apricot;
~~~
This is a simple example of Rust's _dual-mode data structures_, also
referred to as _freezing and thawing_.
Strings are implemented with vectors of `u8`, though they have a
distinct type. They support most of the same allocation options as
vectors, though the string literal without a storage sigil (for
example, `"foo"`) is treated differently than a comparable vector
(`[foo]`). Whereas plain vectors are stack-allocated fixed-length
vectors, plain strings are borrowed pointers to read-only (static)
memory. All strings are immutable.
~~~
// A plain string is a slice to read-only (static) memory
let stack_crayons: &str = "Almond, AntiqueBrass, Apricot";
// The same thing, but with the `&`
let stack_crayons: &str = &"Aquamarine, Asparagus, AtomicTangerine";
// A local heap (managed) string
2012-12-10 14:58:18 -06:00
let local_crayons: @str = @"BananaMania, Beaver, Bittersweet";
// An exchange heap (owned) string
let exchange_crayons: ~str = ~"Black, BlizzardBlue, Blue";
~~~
Both vectors and strings support a number of useful
[methods](#functions-and-methods), defined in [`std::vec`]
and [`std::str`]. Here are some examples.
[`std::vec`]: std/vec.html
[`std::str`]: std/str.html
~~~
2012-09-15 20:44:44 -05:00
# enum Crayon {
# Almond, AntiqueBrass, Apricot,
# Aquamarine, Asparagus, AtomicTangerine,
# BananaMania, Beaver, Bittersweet
# }
2012-09-15 20:44:44 -05:00
# fn unwrap_crayon(c: Crayon) -> int { 0 }
# fn eat_crayon_wax(i: int) { }
2012-09-15 20:44:44 -05:00
# fn store_crayon_in_nasal_cavity(i: uint, c: Crayon) { }
# fn crayon_to_str(c: Crayon) -> &str { "" }
let crayons = [Almond, AntiqueBrass, Apricot];
// Check the length of the vector
2013-03-28 20:39:09 -05:00
assert!(crayons.len() == 3);
assert!(!crayons.is_empty());
// Iterate over a vector, obtaining a pointer to each element
// (`for` is explained in the next section)
for crayons.iter().advance |crayon| {
2012-09-19 20:59:48 -05:00
let delicious_crayon_wax = unwrap_crayon(*crayon);
eat_crayon_wax(delicious_crayon_wax);
}
// Map vector elements
let crayon_names = crayons.map(|v| crayon_to_str(*v));
let favorite_crayon_name = crayon_names[0];
// Remove whitespace from before and after the string
let new_favorite_crayon_name = favorite_crayon_name.trim();
if favorite_crayon_name.len() > 5 {
// Create a substring
println(favorite_crayon_name.slice_chars(0, 5));
}
~~~
# Closures
2012-07-07 20:15:59 -05:00
Named functions, like those we've seen so far, may not refer to local
variables declared outside the function: they do not close over their
environment (sometimes referred to as "capturing" variables in their
environment). For example, you couldn't write the following:
~~~~ {.ignore}
let foo = 10;
fn bar() -> int {
2012-08-01 19:30:05 -05:00
return foo; // `bar` cannot refer to `foo`
}
~~~~
Rust also supports _closures_, functions that can access variables in
the enclosing scope.
~~~~
fn call_closure_with_ten(b: &fn(int)) { b(10); }
let captured_var = 20;
let closure = |arg| println(fmt!("captured_var=%d, arg=%d", captured_var, arg));
call_closure_with_ten(closure);
~~~~
Closures begin with the argument list between vertical bars and are followed by
a single expression. Remember that a block, `{ <expr1>; <expr2>; ... }`, is
considered a single expression: it evaluates to the result of the last
expression it contains if that expression is not followed by a semicolon,
otherwise the block evaluates to `()`.
The types of the arguments are generally omitted, as is the return type,
because the compiler can almost always infer them. In the rare case where the
compiler needs assistance, though, the arguments and return types may be
annotated.
~~~~
let square = |x: int| -> uint { x * x as uint };
2012-07-01 21:20:43 -05:00
~~~~
There are several forms of closure, each with its own role. The most
common, called a _stack closure_, has type `&fn` and can directly
2012-07-02 18:27:53 -05:00
access local variables in the enclosing scope.
2012-07-01 21:20:43 -05:00
~~~~
let mut max = 0;
2012-10-05 21:10:41 -05:00
[1, 2, 3].map(|x| if *x > max { max = *x });
~~~~
2012-07-01 21:20:43 -05:00
Stack closures are very efficient because their environment is
allocated on the call stack and refers by pointer to captured
locals. To ensure that stack closures never outlive the local
variables to which they refer, stack closures are not
first-class. That is, they can only be used in argument position; they
cannot be stored in data structures or returned from
functions. Despite these limitations, stack closures are used
2012-07-01 21:20:43 -05:00
pervasively in Rust code.
## Managed closures
When you need to store a closure in a data structure, a stack closure
will not do, since the compiler will refuse to let you store it. For
this purpose, Rust provides a type of closure that has an arbitrary
lifetime, written `@fn` (boxed closure, analogous to the `@` pointer
type described earlier). This type of closure *is* first-class.
A managed closure does not directly access its environment, but merely
copies out the values that it closes over into a private data
structure. This means that it can not assign to these variables, and
cannot observe updates to them.
This code creates a closure that adds a given string to its argument,
returns it from a function, and then calls it:
~~~~
fn mk_appender(suffix: ~str) -> @fn(~str) -> ~str {
// The compiler knows that we intend this closure to be of type @fn
return |s| s + suffix;
}
fn main() {
let shout = mk_appender(~"!");
println(shout(~"hey ho, let's go"));
}
~~~~
## Owned closures
Owned closures, written `~fn` in analogy to the `~` pointer type,
2012-07-10 02:35:14 -05:00
hold on to things that can safely be sent between
processes. They copy the values they close over, much like managed
closures, but they also own them: that is, no other code can access
them. Owned closures are used in concurrent code, particularly
for spawning [tasks][tasks].
[tasks]: tutorial-tasks.html
## Closure compatibility
Rust closures have a convenient subtyping property: you can pass any kind of
closure (as long as the arguments and return types match) to functions
that expect a `&fn()`. Thus, when writing a higher-order function that
only calls its function argument, and does nothing else with it, you
should almost always declare the type of that argument as `&fn()`. That way,
callers may pass any kind of closure.
~~~~
fn call_twice(f: &fn()) { f(); f(); }
let closure = || { "I'm a closure, and it doesn't matter what type I am"; };
fn function() { "I'm a normal function"; }
call_twice(closure);
call_twice(function);
~~~~
> ***Note:*** Both the syntax and the semantics will be changing
> in small ways. At the moment they can be unsound in some
> scenarios, particularly with non-copyable types.
## Do syntax
2012-10-07 03:52:06 -05:00
The `do` expression provides a way to treat higher-order functions
(functions that take closures as arguments) as control structures.
Consider this function that iterates over a vector of
integers, passing in a pointer to each integer in the vector:
~~~~
fn each(v: &[int], op: &fn(v: &int)) {
let mut n = 0;
while n < v.len() {
op(&v[n]);
n += 1;
}
}
~~~~
2012-10-07 03:52:06 -05:00
As an aside, the reason we pass in a *pointer* to an integer rather
than the integer itself is that this is how the actual `each()`
function for vectors works. `vec::each` though is a
[generic](#generics) function, so must be efficient to use for all
types. Passing the elements by pointer avoids copying potentially
large objects.
As a caller, if we use a closure to provide the final operator
argument, we can write it in a way that has a pleasant, block-like
structure.
~~~~
# fn each(v: &[int], op: &fn(v: &int)) { }
2012-10-07 03:52:06 -05:00
# fn do_some_work(i: &int) { }
each([1, 2, 3], |n| {
2012-10-07 03:52:06 -05:00
do_some_work(n);
});
~~~~
This is such a useful pattern that Rust has a special form of function
call that can be written more like a built-in control structure:
~~~~
# fn each(v: &[int], op: &fn(v: &int)) { }
2012-10-07 03:52:06 -05:00
# fn do_some_work(i: &int) { }
do each([1, 2, 3]) |n| {
2012-10-07 03:52:06 -05:00
do_some_work(n);
}
~~~~
The call is prefixed with the keyword `do` and, instead of writing the
final closure inside the argument list, it appears outside of the
parentheses, where it looks more like a typical block of
code.
`do` is a convenient way to create tasks with the `task::spawn`
function. `spawn` has the signature `spawn(fn: ~fn())`. In other
words, it is a function that takes an owned closure that takes no
arguments.
~~~~
use std::task::spawn;
do spawn() || {
debug!("I'm a task, whatever");
}
~~~~
Look at all those bars and parentheses -- that's two empty argument
2012-10-07 03:52:06 -05:00
lists back to back. Since that is so unsightly, empty argument lists
may be omitted from `do` expressions.
~~~~
# use std::task::spawn;
do spawn {
debug!("Kablam!");
}
~~~~
2013-04-17 10:51:43 -05:00
If you want to see the output of `debug!` statements, you will need to turn on `debug!` logging.
2013-04-19 18:17:34 -05:00
To enable `debug!` logging, set the RUST_LOG environment variable to the name of your crate, which, for a file named `foo.rs`, will be `foo` (e.g., with bash, `export RUST_LOG=foo`).
2013-04-17 10:51:43 -05:00
## For loops
The most common way to express iteration in Rust is with a `for`
loop. Like `do`, `for` is a nice syntax for describing control flow
with closures. Additionally, within a `for` loop, `break`, `loop`,
and `return` work just as they do with `while` and `loop`.
Consider again our `each` function, this time improved to return
immediately when the iteratee returns `false`:
2012-07-02 18:27:53 -05:00
~~~~
fn each(v: &[int], op: &fn(v: &int) -> bool) -> bool {
2012-07-02 18:27:53 -05:00
let mut n = 0;
while n < v.len() {
if !op(&v[n]) {
return false;
2012-07-02 18:27:53 -05:00
}
n += 1;
}
return true;
2012-07-02 18:27:53 -05:00
}
~~~~
2012-07-02 18:27:53 -05:00
And using this function to iterate over a vector:
~~~~
# use each = std::vec::each;
each([2, 4, 8, 5, 16], |n| {
if *n % 2 != 0 {
println("found odd number!");
false
} else { true }
});
~~~~
With `for`, functions like `each` can be treated more
like built-in looping structures. When calling `each`
in a `for` loop, instead of returning `false` to break
out of the loop, you just write `break`. To skip ahead
2012-09-26 22:28:39 -05:00
to the next iteration, write `loop`.
~~~~
# use each = std::vec::each;
for each([2, 4, 8, 5, 16]) |n| {
if *n % 2 != 0 {
println("found odd number!");
break;
}
}
~~~~
2012-08-01 19:30:05 -05:00
As an added bonus, you can use the `return` keyword, which is not
normally allowed in closures, in a block that appears as the body of a
`for` loop: the meaning of `return` in such a block is to return from
the enclosing function, not just the loop body.
~~~~
# use each = std::vec::each;
fn contains(v: &[int], elt: int) -> bool {
2012-07-02 18:27:53 -05:00
for each(v) |x| {
if (*x == elt) { return true; }
}
false
}
~~~~
2012-12-20 18:51:37 -06:00
Notice that, because `each` passes each value by borrowed pointer,
the iteratee needs to dereference it before using it.
2012-12-20 18:51:37 -06:00
In these situations it can be convenient to lean on Rust's
argument patterns to bind `x` to the actual value, not the pointer.
~~~~
# use each = std::vec::each;
2012-12-20 18:51:37 -06:00
# fn contains(v: &[int], elt: int) -> bool {
for each(v) |&x| {
if (x == elt) { return true; }
}
# false
# }
~~~~
`for` syntax only works with stack closures.
> ***Note:*** This is, essentially, a special loop protocol:
> the keywords `break`, `loop`, and `return` work, in varying degree,
> with `while`, `loop`, `do`, and `for` constructs.
# Methods
Methods are like functions except that they always begin with a special argument,
called `self`,
which has the type of the method's receiver. The
`self` argument is like `this` in C++ and many other languages.
Methods are called with dot notation, as in `my_vec.len()`.
_Implementations_, written with the `impl` keyword, can define
methods on most Rust types, including structs and enums.
As an example, let's define a `draw` method on our `Shape` enum.
~~~
# fn draw_circle(p: Point, f: float) { }
# fn draw_rectangle(p: Point, p: Point) { }
struct Point {
x: float,
y: float
}
enum Shape {
Circle(Point, float),
Rectangle(Point, Point)
}
impl Shape {
fn draw(&self) {
match *self {
Circle(p, f) => draw_circle(p, f),
Rectangle(p1, p2) => draw_rectangle(p1, p2)
}
}
}
let s = Circle(Point { x: 1f, y: 2f }, 3f);
s.draw();
~~~
This defines an _implementation_ for `Shape` containing a single
method, `draw`. In most respects the `draw` method is defined
like any other function, except for the name `self`.
The type of `self` is the type on which the method is implemented,
or a pointer thereof. As an argument it is written either `self`,
`&self`, `@self`, or `~self`.
A caller must in turn have a compatible pointer type to call the method.
~~~
# fn draw_circle(p: Point, f: float) { }
# fn draw_rectangle(p: Point, p: Point) { }
# struct Point { x: float, y: float }
# enum Shape {
# Circle(Point, float),
# Rectangle(Point, Point)
# }
impl Shape {
fn draw_borrowed(&self) { ... }
fn draw_managed(@self) { ... }
fn draw_owned(~self) { ... }
fn draw_value(self) { ... }
}
let s = Circle(Point { x: 1f, y: 2f }, 3f);
(@s).draw_managed();
(~s).draw_owned();
(&s).draw_borrowed();
s.draw_value();
~~~
Methods typically take a borrowed pointer self type,
so the compiler will go to great lengths to convert a callee
to a borrowed pointer.
~~~
# fn draw_circle(p: Point, f: float) { }
# fn draw_rectangle(p: Point, p: Point) { }
# struct Point { x: float, y: float }
# enum Shape {
# Circle(Point, float),
# Rectangle(Point, Point)
# }
# impl Shape {
# fn draw_borrowed(&self) { ... }
# fn draw_managed(@self) { ... }
# fn draw_owned(~self) { ... }
# fn draw_value(self) { ... }
# }
# let s = Circle(Point { x: 1f, y: 2f }, 3f);
// As with typical function arguments, managed and owned pointers
// are automatically converted to borrowed pointers
(@s).draw_borrowed();
(~s).draw_borrowed();
// Unlike typical function arguments, the self value will
// automatically be referenced ...
s.draw_borrowed();
// ... and dereferenced
(& &s).draw_borrowed();
// ... and dereferenced and borrowed
(&@~s).draw_borrowed();
~~~
2013-03-22 19:24:26 -05:00
Implementations may also define standalone (sometimes called "static")
2013-06-19 14:58:08 -05:00
methods. The absence of a `self` parameter distinguishes such methods.
2013-03-22 19:24:26 -05:00
These methods are the preferred way to define constructor functions.
~~~~ {.xfail-test}
impl Circle {
fn area(&self) -> float { ... }
2013-03-22 19:24:26 -05:00
fn new(area: float) -> Circle { ... }
}
~~~~
2013-03-22 19:24:26 -05:00
To call such a method, just prefix it with the type name and a double colon:
~~~~
# use std::float::consts::pi;
# use std::float::sqrt;
struct Circle { radius: float }
impl Circle {
2013-03-22 19:24:26 -05:00
fn new(area: float) -> Circle { Circle { radius: sqrt(area / pi) } }
}
let c = Circle::new(42.5);
~~~~
# Generics
Throughout this tutorial, we've been defining functions that act only
on specific data types. With type parameters we can also define
functions whose arguments have generic types, and which can be invoked
with a variety of types. Consider a generic `map` function, which
takes a function `function` and a vector `vector` and returns a new
vector consisting of the result of applying `function` to each element
of `vector`:
~~~~
# use std::vec;
fn map<T, U>(vector: &[T], function: &fn(v: &T) -> U) -> ~[U] {
let mut accumulator = ~[];
for vec::each(vector) |element| {
accumulator.push(function(element));
2012-07-09 17:28:08 -05:00
}
return accumulator;
}
~~~~
When defined with type parameters, as denoted by `<T, U>`, this
function can be applied to any type of vector, as long as the type of
`function`'s argument and the type of the vector's contents agree with
each other.
2012-07-09 17:28:08 -05:00
Inside a generic function, the names of the type parameters
(capitalized by convention) stand for opaque types. All you can do
with instances of these types is pass them around: you can't apply any
operations to them or pattern-match on them. Note that instances of
generic types are often passed by pointer. For example, the parameter
`function()` is supplied with a pointer to a value of type `T` and not
a value of type `T` itself. This ensures that the function works with
the broadest set of types possible, since some types are expensive or
illegal to copy and pass by value.
Generic `type`, `struct`, and `enum` declarations follow the same pattern:
~~~~
# use std::hashmap::HashMap;
type Set<T> = HashMap<T, ()>;
struct Stack<T> {
elements: ~[T]
}
enum Option<T> {
Some(T),
None
}
~~~~
These declarations can be instantiated to valid types like `Set<int>`,
`Stack<int>`, and `Option<int>`.
The last type in that example, `Option`, appears frequently in Rust code.
Because Rust does not have null pointers (except in unsafe code), we need
another way to write a function whose result isn't defined on every possible
combination of arguments of the appropriate types. The usual way is to write
a function that returns `Option<T>` instead of `T`.
~~~~
# struct Point { x: float, y: float }
# enum Shape { Circle(Point, float), Rectangle(Point, Point) }
fn radius(shape: Shape) -> Option<float> {
match shape {
Circle(_, radius) => Some(radius),
Rectangle(*) => None
}
}
~~~~
The Rust compiler compiles generic functions very efficiently by
*monomorphizing* them. *Monomorphization* is a fancy name for a simple
2012-12-20 04:22:56 -06:00
idea: generate a separate copy of each generic function at each call site,
a copy that is specialized to the argument
types and can thus be optimized specifically for them. In this
respect, Rust's generics have similar performance characteristics to
C++ templates.
## Traits
Within a generic function the operations available on generic types
are very limited. After all, since the function doesn't know what
types it is operating on, it can't safely modify or query their
values. This is where _traits_ come into play. Traits are Rust's most
powerful tool for writing polymorphic code. Java developers will see
them as similar to Java interfaces, and Haskellers will notice their
similarities to type classes. Rust's traits are a form of *bounded
polymorphism*: a trait is a way of limiting the set of possible types
that a type parameter could refer to.
As motivation, let us consider copying in Rust. The `copy` operation
is not defined for all Rust types. One reason is user-defined
destructors: copying a type that has a destructor could result in the
destructor running multiple times. Therefore, types with user-defined
destructors cannot be copied, either implicitly or explicitly, and
2012-12-18 18:27:26 -06:00
neither can types that own other types containing destructors.
This complicates handling of generic functions. If you have a type
parameter `T`, can you copy values of that type? In Rust, you can't,
and if you try to run the following code the compiler will complain.
~~~~ {.xfail-test}
// This does not compile
fn head_bad<T>(v: &[T]) -> T {
v[0] // error: copying a non-copyable value
}
~~~~
However, we can tell the compiler that the `head` function is only for
2013-06-15 20:36:55 -05:00
copyable types: that is, those that have the `Copy` trait. In that
case, we can explicitly create a second copy of the value we are
returning using the `copy` keyword:
~~~~
// This does
fn head<T: Copy>(v: &[T]) -> T {
2013-06-15 20:36:55 -05:00
copy v[0]
}
~~~~
This says that we can call `head` on any type `T` as long as that type
implements the `Copy` trait. When instantiating a generic function,
you can only instantiate it with types that implement the correct
trait, so you could not apply `head` to a type with a
destructor. (`Copy` is a special trait that is built in to the
compiler, making it possible for the compiler to enforce this
restriction.)
While most traits can be defined and implemented by user code, three
traits are automatically derived and implemented for all applicable
types by the compiler, and may not be overridden:
* `Copy` - Types that can be copied, either implicitly, or explicitly with the
`copy` operator. All types are copyable unless they have destructors or
contain types with destructors.
2012-12-11 18:51:37 -06:00
* `Owned` - Owned types. Types are owned unless they contain managed
boxes, managed closures, or borrowed pointers. Owned types may or
2012-12-11 18:51:37 -06:00
may not be copyable.
* `Const` - Constant (immutable) types. These are types that do not contain
mutable fields.
> ***Note:*** These three traits were referred to as 'kinds' in earlier
> iterations of the language, and often still are.
2012-12-18 18:27:26 -06:00
Additionally, the `Drop` trait is used to define destructors. This
2013-06-20 20:06:13 -05:00
trait defines one method called `drop`, which is automatically
2012-12-19 12:46:24 -06:00
called when a value of the type that implements this trait is
2012-12-18 18:27:26 -06:00
destroyed, either because the value went out of scope or because the
garbage collector reclaimed it.
~~~
struct TimeBomb {
explosivity: uint
}
impl Drop for TimeBomb {
2013-06-20 20:06:13 -05:00
fn drop(&self) {
for self.explosivity.times {
println("blam!");
}
}
}
~~~
2013-06-20 20:06:13 -05:00
It is illegal to call `drop` directly. Only code inserted by the compiler
may call it.
## Declaring and implementing traits
2012-10-02 22:28:53 -05:00
A trait consists of a set of methods, without bodies, or may be empty,
2012-12-11 18:51:37 -06:00
as is the case with `Copy`, `Owned`, and `Const`. For example, we could
2012-10-02 22:28:53 -05:00
declare the trait `Printable` for things that can be printed to the
console, with a single method:
~~~~
trait Printable {
fn print(&self);
}
~~~~
2012-10-02 22:28:53 -05:00
Traits may be implemented for specific types with [impls]. An impl
that implements a trait includes the name of the trait at the start of
2012-10-02 22:28:53 -05:00
the definition, as in the following impls of `Printable` for `int`
and `~str`.
2012-10-02 22:28:53 -05:00
[impls]: #functions-and-methods
~~~~
# trait Printable { fn print(&self); }
impl Printable for int {
fn print(&self) { println(fmt!("%d", *self)) }
}
impl Printable for ~str {
fn print(&self) { println(*self) }
}
# 1.print();
# (~"foo").print();
~~~~
Methods defined in an implementation of a trait may be called just like
2012-10-02 22:28:53 -05:00
any other method, using dot notation, as in `1.print()`. Traits may
themselves contain type parameters. A trait for generalized sequence
types might look like the following:
~~~~
2012-09-15 20:44:44 -05:00
trait Seq<T> {
2013-06-15 19:53:30 -05:00
fn length(&self) -> uint;
}
impl<T> Seq<T> for ~[T] {
2013-06-15 19:53:30 -05:00
fn length(&self) -> uint { self.len() }
}
~~~~
The implementation has to explicitly declare the type parameter that
it binds, `T`, before using it to specify its trait type. Rust
requires this declaration because the `impl` could also, for example,
specify an implementation of `Seq<int>`. The trait type (appearing
between `impl` and `for`) *refers* to a type, rather than
defining one.
The type parameters bound by a trait are in scope in each of the
method declarations. So, re-declaring the type parameter
`T` as an explicit type parameter for `len`, in either the trait or
the impl, would be a compile-time error.
2013-04-29 03:59:25 -05:00
Within a trait definition, `Self` is a special type that you can think
2012-09-24 19:49:04 -05:00
of as a type parameter. An implementation of the trait for any given
2013-04-29 03:59:25 -05:00
type `T` replaces the `Self` type parameter with `T`. The following
trait describes types that support an equality operation:
2012-09-24 19:49:04 -05:00
~~~~
// In a trait, `self` refers to the self argument.
// `Self` refers to the type implementing the trait.
2012-09-24 19:49:04 -05:00
trait Eq {
fn equals(&self, other: &Self) -> bool;
2012-09-24 19:49:04 -05:00
}
// In an impl, `self` refers just to the value of the receiver
impl Eq for int {
fn equals(&self, other: &int) -> bool { *other == *self }
2012-09-24 19:49:04 -05:00
}
~~~~
Notice that in the trait definition, `equals` takes a
2013-04-29 03:59:25 -05:00
second parameter of type `Self`.
In contrast, in the `impl`, `equals` takes a second parameter of
type `int`, only using `self` as the name of the receiver.
2012-09-24 19:49:04 -05:00
2013-03-22 19:24:26 -05:00
Just as in type implementations, traits can define standalone (static)
methods. These methods are called by prefixing the method name with the trait
name and a double colon. The compiler uses type inference to decide which
implementation to use.
~~~~
# use std::float::consts::pi;
# use std::float::sqrt;
2013-03-26 23:17:29 -05:00
trait Shape { fn new(area: float) -> Self; }
struct Circle { radius: float }
struct Square { length: float }
impl Shape for Circle {
2013-03-22 19:24:26 -05:00
fn new(area: float) -> Circle { Circle { radius: sqrt(area / pi) } }
}
impl Shape for Square {
2013-03-22 19:24:26 -05:00
fn new(area: float) -> Square { Square { length: sqrt(area) } }
}
let area = 42.5;
let c: Circle = Shape::new(area);
let s: Square = Shape::new(area);
~~~~
## Bounded type parameters and static method dispatch
Traits give us a language for defining predicates on types, or
abstract properties that types can have. We can use this language to
define _bounds_ on type parameters, so that we can then operate on
generic types.
~~~~
# trait Printable { fn print(&self); }
fn print_all<T: Printable>(printable_things: ~[T]) {
for printable_things.iter().advance |thing| {
thing.print();
}
}
~~~~
Declaring `T` as conforming to the `Printable` trait (as we earlier
did with `Copy`) makes it possible to call methods from that trait
on values of type `T` inside the function. It will also cause a
compile-time error when anyone tries to call `print_all` on an array
whose element type does not have a `Printable` implementation.
Type parameters can have multiple bounds by separating them with `+`,
as in this version of `print_all` that copies elements.
~~~
# trait Printable { fn print(&self); }
fn print_all<T: Printable + Copy>(printable_things: ~[T]) {
let mut i = 0;
while i < printable_things.len() {
2013-06-15 20:36:55 -05:00
let copy_of_thing = copy printable_things[i];
copy_of_thing.print();
2012-11-26 12:28:17 -06:00
i += 1;
}
}
~~~
Method calls to bounded type parameters are _statically dispatched_,
imposing no more overhead than normal function invocation, so are
the preferred way to use traits polymorphically.
This usage of traits is similar to Haskell type classes.
## Trait objects and dynamic method dispatch
The above allows us to define functions that polymorphically act on
values of a single unknown type that conforms to a given trait.
However, consider this function:
~~~~
# type Circle = int; type Rectangle = int;
# impl Drawable for int { fn draw(&self) {} }
# fn new_circle() -> int { 1 }
trait Drawable { fn draw(&self); }
fn draw_all<T: Drawable>(shapes: ~[T]) {
for shapes.iter().advance |shape| { shape.draw(); }
}
# let c: Circle = new_circle();
# draw_all(~[c]);
~~~~
You can call that on an array of circles, or an array of rectangles
(assuming those have suitable `Drawable` traits defined), but not on
an array containing both circles and rectangles. When such behavior is
needed, a trait name can alternately be used as a type, called
an _object_.
~~~~
# trait Drawable { fn draw(&self); }
fn draw_all(shapes: &[@Drawable]) {
for shapes.iter().advance |shape| { shape.draw(); }
}
~~~~
In this example, there is no type parameter. Instead, the `@Drawable`
type denotes any managed box value that implements the `Drawable`
trait. To construct such a value, you use the `as` operator to cast a
value to an object:
~~~~
# type Circle = int; type Rectangle = bool;
# trait Drawable { fn draw(&self); }
# fn new_circle() -> Circle { 1 }
# fn new_rectangle() -> Rectangle { true }
# fn draw_all(shapes: &[@Drawable]) {}
impl Drawable for Circle { fn draw(&self) { ... } }
impl Drawable for Rectangle { fn draw(&self) { ... } }
let c: @Circle = @new_circle();
let r: @Rectangle = @new_rectangle();
draw_all([c as @Drawable, r as @Drawable]);
~~~~
We omit the code for `new_circle` and `new_rectangle`; imagine that
these just return `Circle`s and `Rectangle`s with a default size. Note
that, like strings and vectors, objects have dynamic size and may
only be referred to via one of the pointer types.
Other pointer types work as well.
Casts to traits may only be done with compatible pointers so,
for example, an `@Circle` may not be cast to an `~Drawable`.
~~~
# type Circle = int; type Rectangle = int;
# trait Drawable { fn draw(&self); }
# impl Drawable for int { fn draw(&self) {} }
# fn new_circle() -> int { 1 }
# fn new_rectangle() -> int { 2 }
// A managed object
let boxy: @Drawable = @new_circle() as @Drawable;
// An owned object
let owny: ~Drawable = ~new_circle() as ~Drawable;
// A borrowed object
let stacky: &Drawable = &new_circle() as &Drawable;
~~~
Method calls to trait types are _dynamically dispatched_. Since the
compiler doesn't know specifically which functions to call at compile
time, it uses a lookup table (also known as a vtable or dictionary) to
select the method to call at runtime.
This usage of traits is similar to Java interfaces.
## Trait inheritance
We can write a trait declaration that _inherits_ from other traits, called _supertraits_.
Types that implement a trait must also implement its supertraits.
For example,
we can define a `Circle` trait that inherits from `Shape`.
~~~~
trait Shape { fn area(&self) -> float; }
trait Circle : Shape { fn radius(&self) -> float; }
~~~~
Now, we can implement `Circle` on a type only if we also implement `Shape`.
~~~~
# use std::float::consts::pi;
# use std::float::sqrt;
# trait Shape { fn area(&self) -> float; }
# trait Circle : Shape { fn radius(&self) -> float; }
# struct Point { x: float, y: float }
# fn square(x: float) -> float { x * x }
struct CircleStruct { center: Point, radius: float }
impl Circle for CircleStruct {
fn radius(&self) -> float { sqrt(self.area() / pi) }
}
impl Shape for CircleStruct {
fn area(&self) -> float { pi * square(self.radius) }
2013-02-19 11:10:31 -06:00
}
~~~~
Notice that methods of `Circle` can call methods on `Shape`, as our
`radius` implementation calls the `area` method.
This is a silly way to compute the radius of a circle
(since we could just return the `radius` field), but you get the idea.
In type-parameterized functions,
methods of the supertrait may be called on values of subtrait-bound type parameters.
Refering to the previous example of `trait Circle : Shape`:
~~~
# trait Shape { fn area(&self) -> float; }
# trait Circle : Shape { fn radius(&self) -> float; }
fn radius_times_area<T: Circle>(c: T) -> float {
// `c` is both a Circle and a Shape
c.radius() * c.area()
}
~~~
Likewise, supertrait methods may also be called on trait objects.
~~~ {.xfail-test}
# use std::float::consts::pi;
# use std::float::sqrt;
2013-03-26 23:17:29 -05:00
# trait Shape { fn area(&self) -> float; }
# trait Circle : Shape { fn radius(&self) -> float; }
# struct Point { x: float, y: float }
# struct CircleStruct { center: Point, radius: float }
# impl Circle for CircleStruct { fn radius(&self) -> float { sqrt(self.area() / pi) } }
# impl Shape for CircleStruct { fn area(&self) -> float { pi * square(self.radius) } }
let concrete = @CircleStruct{center:Point{x:3f,y:4f},radius:5f};
let mycircle: Circle = concrete as @Circle;
let nonsense = mycircle.radius() * mycircle.area();
~~~
> ***Note:*** Trait inheritance does not actually work with objects yet
## Deriving implementations for traits
A small number of traits in `std` and `extra` can have implementations
that can be automatically derived. These instances are specified by
placing the `deriving` attribute on a data type declaration. For
example, the following will mean that `Circle` has an implementation
for `Eq` and can be used with the equality operators, and that a value
of type `ABC` can be randomly generated and converted to a string:
~~~
#[deriving(Eq)]
struct Circle { radius: float }
#[deriving(Rand, ToStr)]
enum ABC { A, B, C }
~~~
The full list of derivable traits is `Eq`, `TotalEq`, `Ord`,
`TotalOrd`, `Encodable` `Decodable`, `Clone`, `DeepClone`,
`IterBytes`, `Rand`, `Zero`, and `ToStr`.
# Modules and crates
The Rust namespace is arranged in a hierarchy of modules. Each source
(.rs) file represents a single module and may in turn contain
additional modules.
~~~~
mod farm {
pub fn chicken() -> &str { "cluck cluck" }
pub fn cow() -> &str { "mooo" }
}
fn main() {
println(farm::chicken());
}
~~~~
The contents of modules can be imported into the current scope
with the `use` keyword, optionally giving it an alias. `use`
may appear at the beginning of crates, `mod`s, `fn`s, and other
blocks.
~~~
# mod farm { pub fn chicken() { } }
# fn main() {
// Bring `chicken` into scope
use farm::chicken;
fn chicken_farmer() {
// The same, but name it `my_chicken`
use my_chicken = farm::chicken;
...
2013-02-26 00:23:36 -06:00
# my_chicken();
}
2013-02-26 00:23:36 -06:00
# chicken();
# }
~~~
These farm animal functions have a new keyword, `pub`, attached to
them. The `pub` keyword modifies an item's visibility, making it
visible outside its containing module. An expression with `::`, like
`farm::chicken`, can name an item outside of its containing
module. Items, such as those declared with `fn`, `struct`, `enum`,
2013-03-22 19:24:26 -05:00
`type`, or `static`, are module-private by default.
Visibility restrictions in Rust exist only at module boundaries. This
is quite different from most object-oriented languages that also
enforce restrictions on objects themselves. That's not to say that
Rust doesn't support encapsulation: both struct fields and methods can
be private. But this encapsulation is at the module level, not the
struct level. Note that fields and methods are _public_ by default.
~~~
pub mod farm {
# pub type Chicken = int;
# type Cow = int;
# struct Human(int);
# impl Human { fn rest(&self) { } }
# pub fn make_me_a_farm() -> Farm { Farm { chickens: ~[], cows: ~[], farmer: Human(0) } }
pub struct Farm {
priv chickens: ~[Chicken],
priv cows: ~[Cow],
farmer: Human
}
impl Farm {
priv fn feed_chickens(&self) { ... }
priv fn feed_cows(&self) { ... }
pub fn add_chicken(&self, c: Chicken) { ... }
}
pub fn feed_animals(farm: &Farm) {
farm.feed_chickens();
farm.feed_cows();
}
}
fn main() {
let f = make_me_a_farm();
f.add_chicken(make_me_a_chicken());
farm::feed_animals(&f);
f.farmer.rest();
}
# fn make_me_a_farm() -> farm::Farm { farm::make_me_a_farm() }
# fn make_me_a_chicken() -> farm::Chicken { 0 }
~~~
## Crates
The unit of independent compilation in Rust is the crate: rustc
compiles a single crate at a time, from which it produces either a
library or an executable.
2012-12-14 21:12:51 -06:00
When compiling a single `.rs` source file, the file acts as the whole crate.
You can compile it with the `--lib` compiler switch to create a shared
library, or without, provided that your file contains a `fn main`
somewhere, to create an executable.
2012-12-14 21:12:51 -06:00
Larger crates typically span multiple files and are, by convention,
compiled from a source file with the `.rc` extension, called a *crate file*.
The crate file extension distinguishes source files that represent
crates from those that do not, but otherwise source files and crate files are identical.
A typical crate file declares attributes associated with the crate that
may affect how the compiler processes the source.
Crate attributes specify metadata used for locating and linking crates,
the type of crate (library or executable),
and control warning and error behavior,
among other things.
Crate files additionally declare the external crates they depend on
as well as any modules loaded from other files.
~~~~ { .xfail-test }
2012-12-14 21:12:51 -06:00
// Crate linkage metadata
#[link(name = "farm", vers = "2.5", author = "mjh")];
2012-12-14 21:12:51 -06:00
// Make a library ("bin" is the default)
#[crate_type = "lib"];
2012-12-14 21:12:51 -06:00
// Turn on a warning
#[warn(non_camel_case_types)]
// Link to the standard library
extern mod std;
// Load some modules from other files
mod cow;
mod chicken;
mod horse;
2012-12-14 21:12:51 -06:00
fn main() {
...
}
~~~~
Compiling this file will cause `rustc` to look for files named
`cow.rs`, `chicken.rs`, and `horse.rs` in the same directory as the
`.rc` file, compile them all together, and, based on the presence of
the `crate_type = "lib"` attribute, output a shared library or an
executable. (If the line `#[crate_type = "lib"];` was omitted,
`rustc` would create an executable.)
The `#[link(...)]` attribute provides meta information about the
module, which other crates can use to load the right module. More
about that later.
To have a nested directory structure for your source files, you can
2012-12-14 21:12:51 -06:00
nest mods:
~~~~ {.ignore}
mod poultry {
mod chicken;
mod turkey;
}
~~~~
The compiler will now look for `poultry/chicken.rs` and
`poultry/turkey.rs`, and export their content in `poultry::chicken`
and `poultry::turkey`. You can also provide a `poultry.rs` to add
content to the `poultry` module itself.
## Using other crates
The `extern mod` directive lets you use a crate (once it's been
compiled into a library) from inside another crate. `extern mod` can
appear at the top of a crate file or at the top of modules. It will
cause the compiler to look in the library search path (which you can
extend with the `-L` switch) for a compiled Rust library with the
right name, then add a module with that crate's name into the local
scope.
For example, `extern mod std` links the [standard library].
[standard library]: std/index.html
When a comma-separated list of name/value pairs appears after `extern
mod`, the compiler front-end matches these pairs against the
attributes provided in the `link` attribute of the crate file. The
front-end will only select this crate for use if the actual pairs
match the declared attributes. You can provide a `name` value to
override the name used to search for the crate.
Our example crate declared this set of `link` attributes:
~~~~
#[link(name = "farm", vers = "2.5", author = "mjh")];
~~~~
Which you can then link with any (or all) of the following:
~~~~ {.xfail-test}
extern mod farm;
extern mod my_farm (name = "farm", vers = "2.5");
extern mod my_auxiliary_farm (name = "farm", author = "mjh");
~~~~
If any of the requested metadata do not match, then the crate
will not be compiled successfully.
## A minimal example
2013-06-19 14:58:08 -05:00
Now for something that you can actually compile yourself, we have
these two files:
~~~~
// world.rs
#[link(name = "world", vers = "1.0")];
pub fn explore() -> &str { "world" }
~~~~
~~~~ {.xfail-test}
// main.rs
extern mod world;
fn main() { println(~"hello " + world::explore()); }
~~~~
Now compile and run like this (adjust to your platform if necessary):
~~~~ {.notrust}
> rustc --lib world.rs # compiles libworld-94839cbfe144198-1.0.so
> rustc main.rs -L . # compiles main
> ./main
"hello world"
~~~~
Notice that the library produced contains the version in the filename
as well as an inscrutable string of alphanumerics. These are both
part of Rust's library versioning scheme. The alphanumerics are
a hash representing the crate metadata.
## The standard library
The Rust standard library provides runtime features required by the language,
including the task scheduler and memory allocators, as well as library
support for Rust built-in types, platform abstractions, and other commonly
used features.
[`std`] includes modules corresponding to each of the integer types, each of
the floating point types, the [`bool`] type, [tuples], [characters], [strings],
[vectors], [managed boxes], [owned boxes],
and unsafe and borrowed [pointers]. Additionally, `std` provides
some pervasive types ([`option`] and [`result`]),
[task] creation and [communication] primitives,
platform abstractions ([`os`] and [`path`]), basic
I/O abstractions ([`io`]), [containers] like [`hashmap`],
common traits ([`kinds`], [`ops`], [`cmp`], [`num`],
[`to_str`], [`clone`]), and complete bindings to the C standard library ([`libc`]).
### Standard Library injection and the Rust prelude
`std` is imported at the topmost level of every crate by default, as
if the first line of each crate was
extern mod std;
This means that the contents of std can be accessed from from any context
with the `std::` path prefix, as in `use std::vec`, `use std::task::spawn`,
etc.
Additionally, `std` contains a `prelude` module that reexports many of the
most common standard modules, types and traits. The contents of the prelude are
imported into every *module* by default. Implicitly, all modules behave as if
they contained the following prologue:
use std::prelude::*;
[`std`]: std/index.html
[`bool`]: std/bool.html
[tuples]: std/tuple.html
[characters]: std/char.html
[strings]: std/str.html
[vectors]: std/vec.html
[managed boxes]: std/managed.html
[owned boxes]: std/owned.html
[pointers]: std/ptr.html
[`option`]: std/option.html
[`result`]: std/result.html
[task]: std/task.html
[communication]: std/comm.html
[`os`]: std/os.html
[`path`]: std/path.html
[`io`]: std/io.html
[containers]: std/container.html
[`hashmap`]: std/hashmap.html
[`kinds`]: std/kinds.html
[`ops`]: std/ops.html
[`cmp`]: std/cmp.html
[`num`]: std/num.html
[`to_str`]: std/to_str.html
[`clone`]: std/clone.html
[`libc`]: std/libc.html
# What next?
Now that you know the essentials, check out any of the additional
tutorials on individual topics.
* [Borrowed pointers][borrow]
* [Tasks and communication][tasks]
* [Macros][macros]
* [The foreign function interface][ffi]
There is further documentation on the [wiki].
[borrow]: tutorial-borrowed-ptr.html
[tasks]: tutorial-tasks.html
[macros]: tutorial-macros.html
[ffi]: tutorial-ffi.html
[wiki]: https://github.com/mozilla/rust/wiki/Docs
[unit testing]: https://github.com/mozilla/rust/wiki/Doc-unit-testing
[rustdoc]: https://github.com/mozilla/rust/wiki/Doc-using-rustdoc
[cargo]: https://github.com/mozilla/rust/wiki/Doc-using-cargo-to-manage-packages
[attributes]: https://github.com/mozilla/rust/wiki/Doc-attributes
[pound-rust]: http://chat.mibbit.com/?server=irc.mozilla.org&channel=%23rust